Saturday, 9 March 2013

Q&A: How do I see Singapore?

I have to thank my reader Yoda for this question, which he left in response to my article on how the world sees Singapore. He asked, "Limpeh, how do you see Singapore?"

That's a great question - after all, I had merely compiled the views of others without actually adding any value judgement on my part. My perspective is of course going to be very different - after all, I grew up in Singapore. Primary school, secondary school, JC followed my NS - the route I took in the first 21 years of my life is pretty typical of any Singaporean boy from Ang Mo Kio. It was only upon ORD in 1997 that I left Singapore for my studies abroad and chose to continue working abroad, acquiring British citizenship in the process. I did return to Singapore for a short stint to work as a foreign talent in 2011 (hence the name of my blog) and have been blogging about Singapore actively ever since. I am offering a "compare and contrast" perspective with my blog: the Singapore of my childhood vs the Singapore of today and of course life in Singapore vs life in Europe. Given how this is such a big topic, I shall just focus on five key issues which I want to talk about in response to Yoda's question.
Xenophobia and Blaming Foreigners

This irks the hell out of me I swear. I am so angry, frustrated and horrified at the way Singaporeans have turned incredibly xenophobic and racist over the last 10 years - particularly towards Filipinos and Indians. This took me by shock, it was not what I expected at all. You see, when I was a child, I saw how my father struggled to communicate with the Indians - he couldn't speak English and didn't share a language in common with them. It often resulted in a mish-mash of pasar Malay and Singlish and the conversation couldn't progress much further beyond buying something at a shop - trying to create friendships in the absence of a common language proved impossible. When it came to my generation, aha - we were all taught English at school, so I had no problems communicating with all my classmates regardless of their ethnicity and so it was very different indeed making friends when we all had a common language. I believed as a child (oh how naive I was!) that racism in Singapore would be eradicated within my generation and we would be the proud generation to show our parents how we could all get along happily.

I have been proven wrong. The amount of racism and xenophobia in Singapore today is shocking and downright distasteful. This stems from a very big mistake on the part of Singaporeans - let me break it down for you.

1. Singapore is overcrowded already.
2. The government wants to increase the population to 6.9 million despite the overcrowding.
3. Who do you blame? The foreigners or the PAP?
For crying out aloud, you don't need a phD in political science from Oxford to figure this one out, aiyoh. It's so freaking simple - blame the PAP, the PAP are the bad guys, it is the PAP who are at fault. Easy right? Apparently not, because most Singaporeans still cannot bring themselves to blame the PAP and instead choose to blame the foreigners who have come to Singapore to work. Duh. Who let in these foreigners in the first place? If the PAP didn't throw open the doors and rolled out the red carpet, would these people be able to come to Singapore in the first place? What is wrong with you Singaporeans - instead of being so freaking racist and xenophobic, why can't you blame the PAP who created this mess in the first place? Why are you so bloody stupid?

That's right - Singaporeans who are xenophobic are fucking stupid, because the cause of the problem is so obvious. I have been told that there is an element of 当局者迷,旁观者清 in my judgement, after all, I don't live in Singapore - I am not experiencing first hand all these foreigners changing the face of Singapore, I am not competing with them for jobs, I am not taking the MRT with them etc. So whilst it is true that I am not having to personally deal with the consequences of overcrowding in Singapore, being nasty and xenophobic towards foreigners isn't going to solve the problem either. You want to solve the problem? You should've voted for the opposition at the last election - waiting until 2016 is far too late as many more foreigners would've settled in Singapore between now and the 2016 elections. That's right Singaporeans - you don't want overcrowding, yet you voted for this - by that token, that makes 60.14% of you fucking stupid. I refer you to the interview with Ris Low below - she clearly doesn't want any more foreigners in Singapore and feels that Singapore is already overcrowded, yet she still votes PAP who wants to increase the population to 6.9 million. Cue face to palm - how fucking stupid is she? Good grief. Alamak.
As I have worked in many different places - from Dubai to Prague to Istanbul to London to Singapore - I am sad to say that the most racist and xenophobic of all these places is Singapore. Shame on you! I am disappointed, frustrated and saddened by what has happened to the country of my birth because I had expected better of Singapore. I had expected Singaporeans who claim to be intelligent to use their freaking brains and vote out the PAP instead of turning into such xenophobic racists. To be fair, this problem of blaming foreigners for all the problems instead of blaming the government happens here as well in the UK and you can have a look at this video for some insight into the problem here. I find her Romanian accent quite sexy actually and she does make a good point!

Singaporeans lie to themselves, 骗自己

Singaporeans are also an extremely insecure lot of people - it is evident why when you look at what is happening to the country. However, instead of dealing with the problem by engaging the government, they go into this incredible frenzy of denial and tell themselves all kinds of crazy lies to convince themselves that they are fine. None of this can fool me, as I know the Singaporean situation only too well and I actually feel sorry for the Singaporeans who react to this insecurity by telling themselves lie after lie. Like, who are you trying to kid? Yourself? 你想欺骗谁?欺骗自己?
Are all Singaporeans happy with the current situation?

One of the most common lies Singaporeans continually tell themselves is that Asians who move to countries in the West like the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc are being treated as second class citizens by racist white people. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, when so many Singaporeans keep telling themselves and each other the same lie, it soon begins to sound like it may actually be true. Did the government deliberately spread this lie? Allow me to use an old fable (I believe it is a Russian folk tale) to illustrate this point.

Once upon a time, there lived a farmer who reared chickens on his farm. Unfortunately, the folk from the town would sneak into his farm in the middle of his night to steal the chickens and eggs. This poor farmer couldn't afford expensive fences and locks for his chicken coop, the chickens were not that profitable to begin with - so he came up with an ingenious plan. Early one morning, he slaughtered a chicken and smeared the chicken blood all over his body, clothes and face. He then staggered into town shouting, "Help! Help! Somebody help me!"
The farmer had a cunning plan to fool the people in town.

The people saw the farmer covered in blood and were shocked, they asked him what had happened. The farmer told them, "I woke up early this morning to hear a sound in the chicken coop, thinking it was a thief I went out there to catch the thief. Instead, I saw a huge wolf that was bigger than me. It had already eaten two chickens and it was still hungry, when it saw me - it attacked me and I fought hard with it. I am lucky to be alive - that wolf is dangerous! He nearly killed me, it was terrifying!" The story of the farmer who was attacked by the huge wolf spread through the town as the people started exaggerating the story, "I saw the farmer and he was covered with blood!" "The farmer said there were two wolves and they had killed all his chicken!" Ah the way rumours and gossip take on a life of their own. Pretty soon, the word has spread around the town of the wolf's attack and no one dared to steal the farmer's chickens again because they were all afraid of being attacked by the huge wolf.

Has this been a lie that has been spread by the government? Or are they simply falling into the sour grapes trap, to convince themselves that life in the West isn't than in Singapore? It is probably more the latter to be honest, after all, the government may censor the media in Singapore but in this day and age when one is free to look at news sources from all over the world on the internet, there is no excuse for ignorance or this 'sour grapes' mentality about life in the West. When will Singaporeans wake up to the fact that they are second class citizens in their own country? Why do they keep believing in the big fat lie about the racist bogeyman in the West whilst ignoring the fact that they are discriminated in their very own country? How can they be this oblivious (and/or stupid)?
Modern Singlish vs 80s Singlish

I have commented on this a lot in my previous posts and I hate the way Singlish is evolving. You see, I am 36 (turning 37 in April) - I am old, I am from a different generation. I grew up speaking Hokkien and Malay along with Mandarin and English in Singapore - many younger Singaporeans are unable to speak Hokkien and unless they are Malay, they are unlikely to speak any Malay at all. I have been told that my kind of Singlish is very dated - it belongs to the older generation who can't speak English properly and had to resort to using loanwords from Hokkien and Malay when they simply didn't know how to use the appropriate term in English to express themselves. Whilst this has indeed been the origins of Singlish, it meant that younger Singaporeans who can't speak Hokkien and/or Malay struggle to understand the loanwords I use in my Singlish. And are these youngsters more Singaporean than me? Go figure.

It makes me sad that Singlish has become a lot more bland over the last 20 years because it has gone from being an extremely rich patois of local languages to simply bad English when you strip out the Hokkien and Malay loanwords. After all, you're simply left with English words in a sentence arranged according to Chinese grammar and spoken with a strong accent - is that Singlish? Is that Singaporean English? Or is that just bad English? Maybe I am showing my age (so sue me, I am old) but I do miss the kind of Singlish from the 80s that I grew up with - it was far richer, more interesting and colourful. By the same token, it is necessary to differentiate standard English from Singlish.
English is my first language and after having spent half my life in the UK, I speak standard English with my Angmor friends. I think it's hilarious when my nephew calls it "Angmor English" - because English is from England (duh - it does what it says on the tin) so when I am in England, I simply speak English; but when I visit Singapore, I encounter "Singaporean English" and "Singlish" - what Singaporeans speak is a local form of English. And good grief, they are so oblivious to the fact that they are speaking Singlish all the time. Let me explain:

Too many Singaporeans think that Singlish means using words like aiyoh, alamak, lah, meh, malu, tolong, tahan, boleh, bodoh, goondu, paiseh, bagus etc - ie. non-English Asian loanwords. But good grief, so many older Singaporeans (okay, not being ageist here as my nephew does the same thing and he's 10) make English sentences according to Chinese grammar and they speak it with a very strong Chinese/Singaporean accent.

Standard English: "Did you turn off the lights when you left the room?"
Singaporean English: "You got close the light or not when you leave the room?"
Add the accent: "You got close de light or not when you lif de loom?"
"You got close the computer or not?"

You see, it gets to the point where it's so ridiculously far from standard English I simply have to say, "that's Singlish (that's definitely not standard English)" - and Singlish is fine. But oh no, these people insist they are speaking standard English when they come up with sentences like "You got close de light or not when you lif de loom?" For crying out aloud, my only conclusion is that everyone around them speaks like that, so they have no concept whatsoever of what standard English is. When everyone makes the same mistakes, it feels normal to speak like that. Don't get me wrong, I adore Singlish - but I also feel it is necessary to know the difference between Singlish and standard English.

Hot and sweaty

Yes, Singapore will always be a hot and sweaty place - it is a tropical country. Pardon me for stating the obvious but it is so true. I cycled home yesterday in the rain - the temperature was about +8 degrees and I cycled especially quickly because I was getting soaked. By the time I got home, I realized that I was wet from the rain on the outside and wet from my sweat on the inside. Yes, I was sweating profusely even at +8 degrees because I was cycling. Now if I can sweat like that at below 10 degrees, imagine how I would feel when it is +33 degrees in Singapore. I suppose it wouldn't bother me if I was sitting by the pool or the beach relaxing, but if you're trying to do anything that involves work or exercise, then it becomes an incredibly sweaty and sticky experience. Yucks. I don't feel particularly attractive when I am dripping with sweat, desperate for a shower. I really hate the hot weather and am most pleased with the cold winter weather in London at the moment. Did I mention that we're expecting snow on Sunday and Monday?
Yeah but they didn't mention the weather...

A disturbing, unhealthy obsession with food

This is the part that bothers me about Singaporeans both abroad and in Singapore - this unhealthy obsession with food. Don't get me wrong, I love the food in Singapore, I post my recipes on my blog and I do miss an authentic laksa, but food does rank pretty low on Marslow's hierarchy of needs. Food always crops up when discussing the topic of moving away from Singapore or living in another country, all too often you will hear Singaporeans using food as an excuse not to move away from Singapore or as a reason to return to Singapore.

Why is this so? I find it unhealthy - nay, make that downright disturbing that Singaporeans seem to be motivated by their stomachs and their taste buds rather than their brains when it comes to choosing the best place in the world for them to blossom as adults. If indeed Singapore is the best place for you to start a family and bring up children - or indeed, if Singapore is the best place for you to start up your new business and unleash your true potential as an entrepreneur, then by all means, good for you. Or even if it is quite simply where you grew up, where you feel a sense of belonging and where you regard as your home - then that sense of belonging should be based on history, memories, experiences, friends and family, rather than food per se.
What motivates you? What fuels your ambitions? What is your aim in life? 

Why are Singaporeans so obsessed with food? I suppose a simple answer is that they need a distraction from all the other crap that is going wrong with everyday life in Singapore. There is the famous story of former deputy prime minster of the UK (from 1997 - 2007) John Prescott who was a famous binge eater. Now I won't beat around the bush here - Prescott is enormous. He is so huge that calling him 'fat' is like calling the sun a bit hot or the sea a bit wet. In 2008, Prescott admitted publicly that he had an eating disorder brought on by the stress of work. When he was upset, stressed or frustrated - he would go binge eating.

"He also revealed how he would turn to sweet things and Chinese food when things became stressful. "I could sup a whole tin of Carnation condensed milk, just for the taste, stupid things like that. Marks & Spencer trifles, I still love them, one of my favourites. I can eat them for ever. Whenever I go to Mr Chu's in Hull, my favourite Chinese restaurant in the whole world ... I could eat my way through the entire menu."
I think Prescott would love visiting Singapore.

Now I am not suggesting that the entire population of Singapore has some form of eating disorder, but it does seem that like Prescott, they are seeking solace in food because of all the problems they are facing in Singapore. Eating char kway teow, laksa, rojak, satay, mee goreng, hokkien prawn mee, chicken rice, roast duck, yong tau hoo, popiah, wantan mee and ice kachang may not solve anything - but perhaps the sheer pleasure of eating such delicious food would distract you from the bullshit around you just for a while, as you focus on the orgasm happening on your taste buds. Is that why Singaporeans would much rather focus on delicious local food, rather than more distasteful local politics? Dare I say the words, population white paper and 6.9 million? Oooh, is that getting you uncomfortable already? Okay fine, here's my recipe for Ngor Hiang instead if politics is too difficult for you to handle.

So there you go, these are the five issues that come to mind when I think about Singapore. I could go on about other issues - but I think I've given you plenty of food for thought on just these five issues. How do you see Singapore? Or do you have a response to what I have said above? Feel free to leave a comment below, thanks, kum siah!
Care for a desert? Or a chat about politics?



28 comments:

  1. Comment on UK politics? I am dying to hear your view on UK politics!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi David. It's a rather big topic - UK politics. Sure I have my views, but can you narrow it down a bit? Which part of UK politics do you want me to comment on? Like I can write several articles on the current coalition government and then there are previous prime ministers, previous governments ... heck, I can write several essays on David Cameron. So could you perhaps pick ONE topic and I can respond to that please?

      Delete
  2. Hi Limpeh!

    Its quite sad that most of what you have to say is negative, but things have changed since 5-6 years ago and somehow you can feel that the atmosphere here is very different so I can kind of understand where you are coming from.

    I personally thought one of the biggest points you didn't explicitly say was the general arrogance and "i'm better than you so you have to listen to me, A is better than me so i've to listen to him" attitude which is just so damn frustrating. I'll be first to admit that I've got a bit of that in me, and from your rants, you probably have a bit of that in you as well. It is pretty interesting because in Australia, my friends all initially thought I was Malaysian, partly because I know quite a bit about Malaysia having lived there before, but mostly because "you don't behave like a Singaporean". Do you get comments like that, Limpeh?

    I thought it might be interesting to hear about what you thought about why we have this kind of culture!

    My two cents is that living in the UK, you have a detached point of view, which can be good or bad depending on how you look at it - rational and able to compare due to the different cities you've lived in and been to, but there's some truth in what the others say that its probably harder for you to feel the increasing irritation and sense of frustration from living here that could explain some of the increasingly incomprehensible behaviour of Singaporeans who want to lash out but do so in the retarded ways you mention. The funny thing is if one day, you ever decide to return to Singapore for a long term stay, you might actually feel alienated and out of place!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Yoda. Thanks for your comment. I've been away from Singapore since 1997 - then I returned in 2011 for a short stint, so the difference is stark. I do think that I have a streak of "I'm better than you so you have to listen to me," but then again, I also couple that with tact and diplomacy. I'm at a funny age my friend, 36. I'm working with people the same age as me or older, but I often feel that I know so much more than them and I am so much better than them and they should listen to me even though they're in their 40s and I'm in my 30s ... but saying that too explicitly would only offend them, LOL. I have a German colleague who feels the same way - he was born in Germany, then spent his teenage years in Australia and then moved back to Germany for university then moved to the UK for work - so he has had to adapt to life in 3 countries and he speaks 3 languages fluently (German, Polish, English). He is currently 32 but he feels that he has had far more worldly experiences than most people his age and I can totally relate to that. So in life, it's not age per se, it's what you've done with your life. As for Singaporeans, I really feel they oughta get out of their comfort zone and be thrown in the deep end of the pool, halfway around the world in an alien culture and be forced to learn a new language - that's the only way they'll truly grow up.

      I have already had the chance to return to S'pore for a short stint in 2011 - I found that my friends involved two of the following groups: 1) expats 2) old friends from my school days and okay, a third group 3) friends of friends (from either category). But yeah, I naturally became drawn to people whom I felt more comfortable with - such as this Malaysian woman who had grown up in Canada but now works in Singapore for a tax consultancy, she's not typically Malaysian, nor is she typically Canadian - by that token, we share a lot in common. The same way I suppose you and I will have plenty in common, Yoda :)

      Delete
  3. LIFT, maybe I am biased, but I was never really much of a fan of Singaporean cuisine, because I found it EXTREMELY unhealthy(I count my calories and macronutrients, in terms of fat, carbs and protein literally as obsessive as it sounds), and plus, if Singaporean food is the reason to induce a person to stay on, I think that many Singaporeans would never leave the country. In fact, I had a friend who is waiting for his Australian residency visa to be processed, and he jokingly said that he considered his 'char kway teow' as one of the various reasons to stay on, but weighing these pros against the cons(the cons basically outweighed it all), he decided that he had to leave no matter what. On these counts, Singaporean food is really unhealthy EMOTIONALLY and PHYSICALLY(on the nutritional count). On the flipside, if Singaporeans want to even try cooking something Singaporean, they can surely buy something produced in Singapore or Malaysia such as Prima Taste and so on and their packets of condiments. I do not see what there is to stop them from moving out. In all my years in Canada, I got my Singaporean condiments if I ever had a craving from the T&T (Taiwanese) supermarket in Vancouver, or Calgary, and I never had problems cooking healthier versions of these dishes. Singaporeans are just in denial on this front.

    Things are NEVER fine in Singapore, unless people mean the fines imposed for breaking the rules(the numerous ones which are really ridiculous at times and even immature to treat us like small children without any IQ). I have constantly tried to talk to Singaporeans to knock sense into their heads that the real problem is not only just the type of foreigners who come in to begin with(mind you, foreigners need not always be mean or nasty), but the basic system itself set up by the PAP government which brings out the worst in everyone, especially Singaporeans and the opportunistic and exploitative ones among the foreigners. But all that I ever got in response was that I am "biased" and "hate Singapore" (quote and unquote these hard-headed Singaporeans). They constantly say they "make do with what they have", which was the most ridiculous thing, because as I ask, "What freedom do you even have to begin with????!!!" Baffles me but I can only call it a case of trying to whip stones, and I eventually gave up and stopped bothering with them. While it seems easy to really say these people are dumb-asses and stupid from a distance , now that we are all just really out of the country, I think the worst thing happens to those who care and want to change the system. A few friends of mine, including one in the opposition who has been actively campaigning and helping in various stuff for the opposition as a volunteer, himself is trying very hard to convince people, and I really pity the bunch of sarcastic idiots (who criticize the government nonstop, but still will not give the opposition a chance at all) that he has to deal with every time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually like Singaporean food a lot - then again, I like all kinds of good food, whether it's Japanese, Korean, French, Greek, Turkish, Indian, Thai, Italian - there's good food all over the world and you just have to know where to find it. My dad had a funny way of expressing it - he went to Vietnam on holiday with my mother and come on, Vietnamese food is pretty darn close to Singaporean food. It's Asian, south-east Asian at that. Yet he kept saying to me, "我吃不惯" (I am not used to eating it). And I'm like - oh come on, that's the whole point of trying something new! It is the excitement of encountering the exotic - of course it's unfamiliar, it's gonna be 不习惯 for you - but do you really want to spend the rest of your days (even when on holiday) only facing what is utterly and totally familiar? Where is your sense of adventure? Cue palm to forehead.

      Delete
    2. Not all Singaporean food is technically lacking in nutrition or taste for me, at least from a point of view of health and nutrition. For example, no one else can really replicate the chewy and smooth texture of the chicken meat in Hainanese chicken rice the way it is done in Singapore, or the fluffy and yet crisp feel of roti kosong elsewhere.

      Korean food is actually my favorite food(other than the girls and women there...Lol, but that is a totally different topic altogether :) Every time I am there to visit friends, I just end up eating kimchi(the baechu/white Chinese cabbage variety) every meal, and I don't ever get sick of it. The only catch is that when one eats so many other spicy dishes on top of the kimchi, such as ddalk-doori-tang(spicy chicken soup) or haejjang-guk(spicy pork bone soup), you have to take a lot of other stuff such as the rice and side dishes to 'clean out' or 'balance' the palate from that overwhelming spiciness.

      Well, your dad is probably like mine. Every time he goes out of the country, he rarely eats much of what he is not comfortable with. I remember how when he went travelling, it was always to places like China(south China more exactly, nearer the hometown of ancestry where my grandparents are from), Thailand, and Malaysia, and needless to say, he ends up eating the classic Chinese-style food that he eats back in Singapore or something which is more or less 'Sinicized' tasting food. My mum is really not much different, and mostly, I actually have to be the one to cajole them to try my Korean cooking when I do come back to visit them. Now, for Japanese cooking, that is even stranger as an idea to them, because of all the sushi and grilled stuff and they have literally NEVER tasted any.....

      And well, by the way, as an aside about Miss Ris Low, she really "cannot make it" in the departments of intellect(I mean intelligent speaking), beauty or even persuasion......

      Delete
    3. I did at one stage find Ris Low's Singlish cute - but after she contradicted herself on the issue of foreigners & the PAP, I conclude that she is beyond help in the stupidity department.

      Delete
  4. LIFT, by the way, about the other aspect of 'racism' in Singapore, to be fair, I do not think that Singaporeans are the only 'racist' group of Asians around. Having lived in Japan for a while, where it is homogenuous for the most part (unless you want to count in the people from Okinawa who are of a different ethnic substrata as opposed to the Yamato Japanese on the mainland, and the ethnic Koreans who have lived as 'Japanese' zainichis for a long time in Japan), there are various other forms of racial profiling going on. For example, I have heard of stories where Japanese on the mainland refuse to rent rooms out to Okinawans because they believe that people from Okinawa are "noisy" and "lack manners". Other derogatory stereotypes include calling Koreans "kokiburi" (cockroaches) and if not, using the Japanese word for flashlight instant camera to describe them as 'noisy' and 'rowdy' people. I will not say that Singaporeans are better than any counts than the Japanese on this, but about as bad.

    On the flipside though, having experienced discrimination firsthand myself(yes, I got discriminated against as a local-born Singaporean in Singapore whenever I came back from Canada.....), I think that Singaporeans are just suffering from siege mentality. Anything that does not really resemble what they are comfortable with as part of the routine of sameness basically gets labelled as something 'bad'. For example, the statements, "If you are Singaporean, why ARE YOU SO WHITE?"(spoken with a lot of incredulity) and "Why do you speak WITH THAT STRANGE ACCENT OR SLANG?" basically say a lot about them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I recognize what you say about the Japanese - I think the French have the best approach to this issue. Essentially the French are all about assimilation - ie. being French is your nationality, not your skin colour. So you can be white, black or Asian but you're French if you speak French, behave in a French manner and are a part of French society. I have written more about it here: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/les-singapouriens-de-souche-indigenous.html
      Americans at least have a clearer idea of national identity that is based on assimilation - but Singaporeans are still a long way from even figuring out what the hell it means to be Singaporean.

      Delete
    2. I cannot say much in the way of just positive things about Americans, since I have met my fair share of crazy Americans as well as ultra-goodhearted ones. But I definitely agree with you about the clearer sense of national identity based on assimilation in the USA. An Asian-American is still very much an American, as long as he or she 'melts' into that 'melting pot'of cultures via speaking English. Still, there are various problems with race and racial difference which the USA has always been dealing with. Look at the media which constantly hits at Barack Obama for various reasons, using his birthplace, racial origins, religion, and even geographical re-locations throughout his life, and you will know that America is never exactly devoid of blatant racism. Even the multiple stereotypes about Asians in their media are really ridiculous.

      As someone who considers Canada his second home for various reasons, Canada's multicultural model is probably one of the best approaches to assimilating various peoples. Technically, you are not required to give up your native language and culture, and you are allowed to become part of this multi-cultural mosaic of Canadian society, at least in theory as it is. The success of the multicultural 'experiment' that is Canada differs from city to city,and based on my experiences there, I believe that the big cities such as Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto are by far the most successful with this model. In any case where people do not assimilate, I find that sadly, it is not because of the fault of 'white' Canadians, but the immigrants themselves, who tend to characterize whites as 'racist' and 'biased' against them, and then group around with other people of their own ethnicity and national background (and maybe religion). It tends to happen a lot sadly with the immigrants from the 3rd World Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Morocco and Bangladesh, maybe because they have a particular 'siege mentality' of being oppressed or looked down upon, I guess. Such internalized feelings of being discriminated against do tend to be self-fulfilling as I have noted. (In other words, I am referring to this trend of 'negative thinking' , in which what you think becomes true.)

      Delete
    3. I see the Canada vs USA difference you have described above to be very similar to the UK (multi-cultural approach) vs France (assimilation) approach. There is a big difference between the theory and what happens in practice, neither model is perfect - but I would prefer the assimilation approach having lived in both France and the UK. Oh yeah, hands down - France has the solution, the UK has got this wrong.

      Delete
    4. Canada's multicultural approach could be influenced by the UK's, if we take into account the fact that it was a former colony and is still part of the commonwealth countries. Even the Canadian Constitution refers to the Queen of England (LOL...which is the perpetual joke Americans have about Canadians...). That aside, just like what you said, both are not perfect, but they do surely beat the 'Singaporean' approach which is basically 'no-approach' but fumbling and bungling till thy kingdom come(if you know what I mean by that allusion). Some people have claimed that Singapore's approach is basically a proto-Confucian state approach in stressing some form of Chinese superiority over other races, such as Malays and Indians, and I am not surprised even if it is true. I have had an Indian friend in Singapore who told me how, whenever he goes into the elevator and stands next to someone else, that other person(normally a Singaporean Chinese) will give him a look as if he is going to rob them....for crying out loud, racism towards one's own countryman!!!! EPIC FAIL at racial integration!

      Delete
  5. I have really enjoyed reading this nice article. Your view that Singaporeans are insecure, is especially telling. But I find it is hard to discuss this issue with other people. How can we discuss weaknesses with insecure people that would not want to be scrutinised? They would just be defensive and not be rational or just turn a deaf ear to your words.

    I also agree with the lack of recognition of proper English. Have you ever spoken proper English and labelled as trying to be 'ang moh' or 'atas' or elitist? I was when I spoke to a Western friend using proper English in front of some Singaporean friends. I was and still perplexed by the reaction.

    I also think that there is too much focus on food. For example, there are far too many food shows on local tv. I wish they spend the resources on better programming such as financial planning, coping with school, charity work, environmental issues, science education, arts, raising a family etc. I am sure you have your opinions on this topic being in this industry after all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi TAP. Thanks for your comment.

      1. Yup, they are insecure - they are afraid of others looking down on them, this is perplexing and it boils down to having faith in yourself personally. After all, criticisms of one's country does not tantamount to a personal attack. Feel free to discuss anything you want about the UK or Singapore with me, I know it is nothing personal.

      2. Well I have been given a very good explanation about the attitude towards proper English by one of my readers here. She told me that there are many Singaporeans who have struggled with English at school and they feel very insecure with the language - so hearing someone else speak it so well only reminds them of how they have struggled with the language and whilst they cannot improve their English, they would rather everyone else spoke broken English like them so they feel less self-conscious about the quality of their English. Of course, in Singapore, people are being judged by the way they speak English as it is often an indication of whether one went to an elite school (and subsequently to a good university) or one was simply 'bueh-tak-chek' (and consequently speaks can't speak English properly). So hearing you speak English as someone who belongs to the well educated cohort, only reminds them on their 'bueh tak chek' status in Singapore and all the social implications that come with it. It has nothing to do with you - I refer you to the first point we discussed earlier - it has entirely got to do with their insecurity and they express that insecurity as an attack on your lack of authenticity (ie. you're not being S'porean, you're trying to be Angmoh). I find that to be utter total bullshit - after all, I speak English like an Angmoh - but I am also totally fluent in Hokkien and Mandarin, I also speak Malay reasonably well. I find it totally ludicrous that Singaporeans MUST speak English with a ridiculously strong accent. You wanna express your Singaporean identity? Here's my take on this: speak Singaporean-Hokkien. It is a unique blend of Hokkien + Malay that is only understood in Southern Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore and the Riau islands and the number of native speakers number less than 2 million (including yours truly). Now that is a language that is truly local and one that we can proudly call our own - Hokkien in Fujian province and Taiwan is very different. If you wanna express yourself in a truly Singaporean manner, then speak Singaporean Hokkien rather than really bad English with a strong accent.

      3. Like I said, food is a delicious distraction from the rest of the crap in Singapore. It is akin to a eating disorder when you use food as a distraction, when you seek solace in food. It's like... there's so much shit in Singapore to deal with, but hey the food is good - so what do you wanna focus on?

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the interesting perspective and being open about discussion.

      1. I suppose the insecurity complements the 'kiasuism' very well. I think many people associate 'kiasuism' with being competitive which I find is not necessarily a bad trait. However being ultra-competitive to the extent of 'sabo-ing' others is clearly immoral to me but many people I know justify that by saying we live in a 'dog-eat-dog' world. Are people in UK and other places you stayed in this competitive?

      2. I think if I tried to speak Singaporean Hokkien I would be labelled as a wannabe Ah Beng instead. I suppose there is no way of avoiding criticism. People will just look at how you are different than them and use that to criticise you. Comformist mentality perhaps.

      P/s - Please keep writing; like what Mel said in the post below, you have increased the average 'interestingness' and intelligence of Singaporean writings that I read by quite a lot.

      Delete
    3. There are competitive people every where you go, but I think Singaporeans are more worried/anxious/kiasu about facing up to the competition, as you say.

      Delete
  6. Alright, I am going to set the bar very high up for you. Basically, could you compare the political position of each party in UK with SG's political parties. From what I have read, I have this impression that the conservative are like the PAP, not taking into account high-handed manoeurve and tactics used by the PAP of course. Am I right to say so?

    Next, do you see UK politics as dysfunctional and chaotic? I watched the house of commons debate and find it very entertaining given all the rhetoric and battle of wits going on during debates. However, I find that the debates certaintly lack substance and the politicians seem intent on scoring points against one another.(Take PM question time for example) Indeed, I have spoken to a PAP MP before and he express his amazement at how parliaments in other countries seem to get things done. What are your views on this? Does the opposition(Labour) oppose every single government policy for the sake of opposing?

    I have the feeling that you are dead set against the labour government for the mess they have created when they are in government. However, I read an article on the BBC where opinion polls show that Labour will form the next govt if polls were held tomorrow. Is this phenomenon a protest vote or more a desire for change of govt?

    Lastly, what are your views on EU integration? In or out of Europe?

    Thanks for taking the time to reply to my post. Hope that you can enlighten Singaporeans on UK politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am going to do a full article for you - but I can't resist giving you a quick reply for now.

      1. There are a few similarities between the Tories and the PAP (being right wing, for example), but please, they are very different indeed. The Tories may place themselves to the right of the political spectrum in the UK, but put them next to the PAP and they will look like tree-hugging loony lefties. The PAP is so far off the scale of being right wing! This has got to do with the nature of British politics - it's one man one vote and there are voters who will vote for Labour because they feel that a Labour government will protect their rights more (benefits system, welfare state) as opposed to a more right wing Tory government (who are seen to be more pro-business). So within that context, if the Tory government wants to win an election, they cannot be too heavy handed with for example, slashing benefits and reducing the welfare state, or else they will simply lose voters to the left.

      In sharp contrast, the PAP can do what the hell they like because there is little or no threat of them losing an election - that is the key difference! At the last election, they still got away with 60.14% of the vote despite numerous fuck ups along the way - how is that possible?! It just goes to show that 60.14% are so fucking stupid that they'll rather blame foreigners than the PAP for the problems in Singapore. So the PAP have no threat of losing an election whilst for the Tories, this is a very real prospect at every election. That is the key difference in the context within which they operate, hence the way they behave is very different indeed.

      UK politics is anything but dysfunctional and chaotic - it is a healthy, thriving democracy. Yes there are lively debates and sometimes I do feel that the Labour party is merely opposing for the sake of opposing the Tories, even when the Tories come up with a good idea. But I'd rather have this than a system where you have virtually no opposition voice in the parliament to hold the PAP to account - take the 6.9 million population white paper for instance, the PAP were able to steam roll that through parliament despite widespread public opposition to this. In the UK, there is a far greater balance of power between the government and the opposition and this would never ever happen in the UK because the government knows that if they do something like that, they risk losing the next election as the voters will desert them for the opposition.

      The PAP often cite "kungfu fighting" in the Korean and Taiwanese parliaments as a good reason to do away with any kind of opposition presence in the parliament at all - but you are now paying a very dear price for not having a credible opposition in parliament. How do you feel about sharing Singapore with 6.9 million people (including many Pinoys, PRCs and Indian nationals)? Do you support the population white paper? Democracy is messy - but that doesn't make it dysfunctional or chaotic. It is through this messy process that we get a good balance of power and a government that is held to account.

      Delete
    2. PART 2

      3. I don't like the Labour party for various reasons: I am naturally right wing in my thinking (well, I am from Singapore). The Labour party lied on the war in Iraq (Blair lied) and Gordon Brown messed up the economy big time. They lost the last election mostly because of the economy and I just don't see the voters returning them to power this soon after they have gotten us into this mess in the first place. Sure there is a sense of desperation when it comes to the austerity measures biting hard for those at the bottom of the food chain who are dependent on the welfare state, but at the end of the day, these people are in the minority and they will always, always vote Labour anyway and the bulk of the Tories' core support comes from hardworking tax-paying middle class Brits who have nice jobs, live in nice houses and have virtually nothing in common with those at the bottom of the food chain. The Tories can count on this middle class support to see them through the next election - either in its current form as a coalition with the Lib Dems or going through on their own without the Lib Dems.

      What I do see is a lurch to the right - when times are hard, we often see the rise of the far right. So I expect parties like the BNP, UKIP and any other new/niche parties who position themselves to the right of the Tories to gain ground. Basically, these people are controversial, they shout loudly, they get a lot of media attention and they tend to attract the protest vote rather than the Labour party.

      As for EU, I am v pro-EU and I want the UK to be in the EU. More on that another time.

      Delete
  7. Dear Limpeh

    I almost choked (on my burger) when I saw your last point because I've been saying for years that the Singapoean obsession with food borders on unhealthy (physically, mentally and emotionally)! Generally, I try to go back to Singapore once a year though recently, with an ailing relative, my trips back have been a lot more frequent and like you, I've noticed the increasingly aggressive xenphobia that very often crosses the line into outright racism.

    Let me summarize my story a bit to give my opinions some perspective/context. I was born and bred in Singapore, just one generation before you. My dad had a high level position in the government which means we grew up upper middle class in a very comfortable environment. I grew up speaking english at home, and didn't learn a lick of my mother tongue until I had to in primary school; my Chinese dad only spoke English and Malay, and he utterly resented Chinese-grammar-styled English (or Singaporean English, to use your terminology) so it was banned at home. Naturally, I was enrolled into the system of schools in which bad mandarin wasn't going to be a handicap (think your old rugby arch rivals), though I think it went too far - getting a C and below for mandarin exams was actually a bragging right. On hindsight, poor performance in Chinese language class and exams was a proxy for ones socioeconomic class, since only the less educated parents or low income households spoke mandarin to their kids. Therefore, being "unable" to speak mandarin was practically and functionally equivalent to "higher class." This is revolting, and is one of the consequences of the "west is best" attitude that was perhaps emphasized way too much when Singapore was a developing country.

    Anyway, I digress. Unlike your precocious self, I was a late bloomer. I hated school because I found it boring, I was apathetic towards everything, even politics (people who know me now will find that incredibly hard to believe!). I had no intellectual interests, no passions, no curiosities, I just saw school as a way to collect the right stamps on the way to a job, and inevitably, the 5 Cs will come. Oh how shallow that worldview was - thinking back about this makes me chuckle out loud at my old small-minded and naive self. Through sheer luck and a great deal of last-minute studying, I was always somehow able to make the grades. I could've gone to the feeder junior college (you know which one) immediately but I wanted to try something else out for the first 3 months (they did away with this, thankfully) and I also wanted to be with my best friends who got posted to a little known junior college, so I voluntarily chose to experience it with them. This was the first time that I was thrown into the mix with kids for whom mandarin was their first language, who predominantly grew up in the heartlands, who really represented the real Singapore, not the Methodist bubble that I was living and schooled in. I actually remember liking my time there very much, but I do also remember that I got appointed class monitor for no good reason (merit would've been a good one) other than the fact that I was from a private, "independent" school and could speak english very well. Automatically, I was granted a certain "status" without having to do anything - this disturbed me to no end. The 3 months quickly came and went, and overall, people were very genuine and for me personally, the diversity of the school body was an eye-opener.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Back at the junior college that I was to spend the next 2 years, the newly accepted applicants had to choose their intended field of study. My O level results were good enough that I qualified for any combination of study and invariably, I elected to study triple science. It was around this time that I started reading books outside of the school curriculum, and if not for having stumbled upon the Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins, I would've never known that I had an insatiable intellectual craving to study genetics. But there was a problem. I was told by the administrators that unless one did biology at O levels, one was not allowed to take biology at A levels. I was mortified - does hunger and passion not count for anything? Why does the system penalize students for their pasts (i.e. in mathematical terms, what's with all the path dependence)? What then happens to all the late-bloomers? It is such an unforgiving system, the focus is always on past achievements and no one seems to get a chance. Or a clean break. Or a clean slate. Consigned to my fate, I was ready to give up the dream when a shrewd friend sitting next to me said, "just lie lah! Think about it. If they find out, then you won't get to study biology, which is what you have now. If they don't, then you get to! So what's the worse that could happen?!" She was right. They never checked. So I lied, and I got a chance to study something that slowly but surely, I was developing a passion for.

    Couple of months in, I was doing very well in the biology tests and exams, so feeling a little gungho, I approached the department head to see if I could take biology as an "S" paper. I sat for the entrance test just like everybody else, and apparently I not only passed but did very well. Nevertheless, the teacher informed me that he couldn't accept me into the class because S paper classes are reserved for folks in the top-tiered triple science class and he wanted to keep the class small for "optimal learning." Having entered junior college after the first 3 months, I was placed in the next available triple science class slot since the majority of folks were already filtered and assigned to their classes. Basically, because I was in a "lower rank" class, I couldn't join in. My class teacher heard about this and talked to me, telling me he saw my paper and thought it was amazing and not to take the decision to heart.

    But how can you not? After all of this, I was tired of the Singapore education system. I came to the US for university and things were never the same again. I was never the same again. For the first time in my life, I felt free to be who I wanted to be, free to build my own identity, free to say what I think, free to indulge in whatever pursuits interest me (without being judged), free from expectations, free from my past grades and choices. In my second year, I showed so much promise as a science student that I received a national scholarship with no strings attached. Finally: validation, and with that came self-confidence and a belief that I could do anything. By my senior year as an undergraduate, I published a first-authored scientific paper in a Nature journal and went on to do research for two years before starting a PhD. To think, I almost never got a chance to do all this if not for

    a) The advice of a very crafty and astute friend: "just lie lah!"
    b) My father being able to afford a US university education (although I did get a scholarship in my second year, but we didn't know that a priori)

    ReplyDelete
  9. My experiences are similar to yours but with a slight variation. I was a "second class student" in Singapore - average grades, average aptitude, etc., but in the US, I was given the chances that I simply wasn't given in Singapore, and the teaching and social environment in the former was infinitely more nurturing. Here, I was a "first class student," and for that I was rewarded with scholarships and entrusted with lab responsibilities to run and conduct my own research! So, how do I see Singapore? Here are some of my views to add to your list:

    1. Singapore is obsessed with ranking

    To the point that it is really infuriating. Look at the NUS ads and you know what I mean. Ranking everyone puts undue stress on kids and allows those that peaked early to rest on their laurels; it also creates a very unforgiving, judgmental system. Striving for excellence and perfection has got to be a mantra of the PAP - they are always droning on and on about Singapore's ranking on this index and that. Number 1 in GDP/capitaa, Gini coefficient, Unhappiness index, healthcare and education outcomes, etc.. which leads me to the next point

    2. Singapore has a Little Engine That Could Syndrome and is desperate for world attention

    I hate how often things in Singapore have to be advertised or bragged about with the adjective "world-class." It's like the youngest, smallest kid in a family of 12 who feels he needs to keep doing things in order to show his parents (the world) that he exists. The Youth Olympic Games? No one cared seriously. If mentioned at all, it was buried in an abyss somewhere at the back of the NY times. And yet you hear the officials going, "the World is watching, so we must be on our best behavior and show them what Singapore can do..." Wait wait, you mean if the world wasn't watching, you wouldn't give two shits? How about doing things well because of honor and self-respect, and because that's the only way you should be doing anything at all? Occasionally you have big conventions and forums like the World Economic Forum that come to town, with important people coming to little Singapore, and everyone goes into this elaborate showboating (I think locals call it wayang) mode to make an impression. I'm not saying don't present yourself well, I'm saying just BE YOURSELF. It's like an ugly girl putting on too much makeup in order to get noticed. OMG. What do Singapore and Snooki have in common?

    3. Singaporeans mostly talk about other people.

    You know that great quote that's often attributed to Eleanor Roosevelt: Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people. Maybe it's a direct consequence of living in a small town that's overcrowding with people but seriously, I can count on my hands the number of times I talked about things other than other people with Singaporeans (that never left the country). I have many British and American friends who have immigrated to Singapore and many of them tell me that they've never lived in a more "gossipy" place.

    4. Nanny states beget entitled babies

    Recently, after the budget proposals, there were lots of complaints on the web and on social media about how the dream of owning a car is now out of reach, blaming the government for their plight of being car-less. Owning a car is NOT something that you are entitled to. In fact, owning a home in your mid-twenties after graduation is not something you are entitled to either. There's a lot of the "government should do this this this," and "provide this and that." Maybe I'm used to the pull-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps sentiment that's ingrained into the American psyche, but to me, this just smacks of entitlement.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 5. Singaporeans are very good at knowing what to think, but not how to think

    The educational trade-off in emphasizing heavily on math and science whilst neglecting the humanities produce functionally smart students who don't possess critical thinking capabilities. This becomes very clear when they grow up and attempt to formulate arguments and opinions. How do you know what you know? Why do you think what you think? What's the process? How do you navigate a world of nuance in which things are almost always not defined by discreet categories or quantifiable results? Why does increasing education levels not lead to increasing abilities for critical thinking and analysis in Singapore? As a corollary, I've also noticed that in the West, the more education you obtain, the more likely you are to be an atheist. That's pretty obvious. But in Singapore (and probably Korea), somehow that trend is reversed. All my Singaporean university-educated friends (save for one) are staunch Christians, although this may be a case of biased sampling as I did go to Christian schools for 12 years. But given that most of the "top schools" are religiously affiliated, and a good chunk of these students represent the undergraduate populations at NUS, NTU and SMU, I'd say this phenomenon may not be that biased after all. Allowing for cause and effect due to historical precedence, why else do you think that for the population as a whole, educated people are actually less likely to be agnostic/atheist in Singapore? This one continues to stump me but I suspect the answer has its roots in my point #5.

    Limpeh, I have to say, you qualify in my books as the Singaporean version of the dude in the Dos Equis commercial, that is, you are the Most Interesting (Singaporean) Man In the World. You're such a polyglot, I'm sure you can practically speak German in Russian, and you've lived in and traveled to places, and done things that are way out of the ordinary. In the words of Ali G: respek. :)

    -Mel

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi there Mel, thanks for your comments. I read everything you wrote but as it is very late, I am just going to thank you and go to bed. I just wanted to say that yes I do speak German and Russian - though not fluently, but yeah I get by in those languages. I have a lot on my plate at the moment with work - so the blogging will be low vol until at least the weekend ... ciao xx

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hello Mel. Thanks for the life story. It provides further proof that students who don't do well in Singapore schools are not necessarily less intelligent than those who do well. I am counting you as one of the real smart Singaporeans whom I know. I am pretty sure there are many more despite the impression that I get when I read local newspapers...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Limpeh and other commenters, I've reading reading this blog for quite a while and today I just have to log in to comment. Thank you for this blog! I may not always agree with you, but it is refreshing reading a blog written by a (ex) Singaporean that is not about food, makeup, shopping, football, entertainment or a photolog.

    I totally agree with what you and Mel has said here. Singaporeans in general are too obsessed with ranking and money. I am nowhere as smart as either you or Mel and was never a top student in school though I did get above average grades for my O levels. At that time I was passionate about travel so I wanted to take tourism studies in a polytechnic even though I could easily get into a good (though not top) JC. You won't be able to believe the number of people (mostly relatives) telling me that I should get into a JC so that I can go to university eventually (Don't you want to get a degree so that you can get a good high paying job? Why do you want to be in the tourism industry? Don't you know that the pay is very low? Don't you want to work in a bank like your mother did? etc.)

    When I did eventually get to a university (in Australia - I couldn't get into a local university because I'm not in the top 5% of my diploma), the questions did not stop. Why didn't I choose a course that could get me a high-paying job, etc. I couldn't afford to continue my studies after getting my degree because I couldn't afford to and I had to come back to Singapore to work and support my mother ( who is a widow and used her life savings to fund my university studies. I would have loved to further my studies and stay on in Australia but I just couldn't leave her alone in Singapore).And when I commented to my Singaporean friends that I am dreading the end of my university life because I loved studying and school life in general, everyone gave me funny looks. To them, the whole point of studying was to get a job - a high paying one. They couldn't wait to get their degrees so that they can start earning money. When they studied, it was to get a good grade so they can get their degree. There was no love of the subject at all. I was really disappointed. The minute class was out and the assignments handed in, everything was thrown out the window. Conversation topics were stuck on shopping, eating, and entertainment. I wanted to join an eco club in university but my Singaporean friends again couldn't understand why I even wanted to join ANY club - it wasn't a course requirement and does not contribute to getting a high paying job. I love reading about religion ( I am anti-religion), feminism and fiction in general, but again, I had no friends who are interested. And yes, I was mocked for trying to speak proper English too. The amazing thing is that I actually spoke more mandarin in Australia than I did in Singapore! That was the other thing binding the Singaporeans together other than our nationality. That we spoke in a language that most Aussies did not understand. I was a timid and insecure girl back then so I never moved out of the comfort of the Singaporean circle, and instead, I "assimilated" into the Singapore culture (while in Australia! The irony). Looking back, this is something that I really regret.

    That was years ago. Since then, I have lived my life as a typical Singaporean - obsessed with money, food and shopping. I still love to read but my brain has gotten so rusty. So now, thanks to blogs like yours, I am trying to "recalibrate" my rusty brain for things other than MONEY and the banal.

    Please excuse my rambling comment and messy train of thought! I am not a "real smart Singapore", but I love to read thoughts by the real smart ones. :) I really just wanted to thank you and everyone here, keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete