Thursday 17 July 2014

MDA bans Archie Comic book with gay marriage storyline

This story got me furious but it does demonstrate just how the MDA in Singapore make no sense whatsoever and don't have a clue what the hell they are doing. The Media Development Authority (MDA) confirms that a comic "Archie: The Married Life" Book Three was pulled from bookstore shelves because its content breached guidelines by depicting same-sex marriage of two characters. Cue facepalm - where do I even begin to deal with the sheer stupidity of the MDA in banning this comic book? Here is their explanation (which I shall tear apart with great relish):

MDA says the Publications Consultative Panel, "which comprises a cross-section of Singapore society" was consulted before its decision, and its members advised them that the theme of the comic was "not in line with social norms" and in breach of existing content guidelines.
I am going to refer you to one of the greatest works of Singaporean literature to demonstrate why the MDA's stance is totally wrong. In my humble opinion, one of the greatest books ever written by a Singaporean writer is Foreign Bodies by Tan Hwee Hwee - if you have not yet read it, I implore you, track it down and read it. It is totally worth it. My sister was so enthralled by it that she stayed up late just to finish the book and I read and then re-read it - the ending is very sad and moved both my sister and I to tears. This complex and gripping story includes the following: murder, incest, rape and injustice (both the rapist and the murderer are not punished for their heinous crimes).

Certainly, none of these themes would be in line with social norms in Singapore, or indeed any country. You wouldn't find a country in the world which would condone murder or incest as portrayed in the story. Then again, is Tan Hwee Hwee telling her readers, "hey readers, go commit murder and incest just like the characters in my book. It's cool, it's fun, it's great and on top of that, you know you can probably get away with it"? Hardly, she is telling a story and we're simply being taken on a journey as we read this book. (Do check out her other book, Mammon Inc.) At the end of the day, it is literature - should the fact that her story contains incest and murder mean that her book should be censored and ban, just because murder and incest is not "in line with social norms"? If we were to ban any kind of fiction and media which is not "in line with social norms", then think of the number of books, films, TV programmes which will be banned in Singapore just because they contain any kind of criminal activity which is not "in line with social norms". 
Tan Hwee Hwee, Singapore's greatest writer

More to the point, did anyone commit murder or incest as a result of having read Tan Hwee Hwee's book? No, clearly not. Would reading a murder mystery cause the reader to become a murderer? Crikey, if it did, then we have to remove the entire crime section from all libraries and bookshops. By that token, would reading a story book or a comic book with gay characters having a gay marriage turn the reader gay? Clearly not. We are not so easily influenced by the books we read, the TV programmes we watch, the websites we surf etc - rather, what the media we consume is shaped by our characters (rather than the other way around).

For instance, I adore French films because I speak French, have lived in France and have many French friends. It is this knowledge of French language and culture that allows me to appreciate, understand and enjoy French films. Give your average Singaporean a French film without any subtitles and they will probably be totally lost and give up trying to watch it. Quite simply, watching French films will not turn you French (or at least into a Francophile like me) - rather would be those with a knowledge of French culture and language who are naturally attracted to French films.
I recognize that gay marriage is a divisive issue and there are strong feelings on both sides of the divide - but you also have to recognize that in many countries around the world, gay marriage is a reality and the list of countries which have gay marriage is growing all the time. Just because it is not (yet) legal in Singapore doesn't mean that you should censor it from all forms of media. That's such a frog in a well attitude - you're pretending as if there isn't a world beyond Singapore's borders and that the only thing that matters is what happens locally. In the age of the internet, Singaporeans need to look at their place in the world, their relationship with other people in other countries and realize that they need to learn about the world out there and learn about the different countries, cultures and societies beyond our shores. Open your eyes people, there is a big world out there just waiting for you.

The Archie comics series is quintessentially American - I read it religiously as a child as my sister was a big fan of it and we truly enjoyed them. It was a big part of my childhood (I remember learning the word "ridiculous" at the age of 6 from Jughead) and I salute them in their pro-gay marriage stance. Singaporeans reading Archie comics know that they are not reading about anything set in Singapore - it is an opportunity for the reader to learn about American culture and in some states in America, they have gay marriage which is a part of their society. This is called "learning about another country" - it makes you a more knowledgeable person.. Why are you so scared about learning that there are countries around the world which do have gay marriage and extend all kinds of equal rights to gays in their legal systems? What good would ignoring it do - that's like an ostrich sticking its head in the sand when it sees an enemy. Great, so that's how the MDA deals with a difficult topic. Why can't you just have a sensible discussion about the issue?
"There's a problem, quick bury your head in the sand!" 

If you oppose gay marriage for personal or religious reasons and prefer not to read a comic book or novel featuring a gay couple getting married, I have a simple solution: go read something else. You have a choice with regards to what you wish to consume personally, but do not impose your choices on others. In any civilized society, there needs to be a respect for the individual to make up his own mind on issues like that, rather than be treated like a child and be told, "no, you cannot even read it as I don't trust you to think about it. You can't handle it." What has happened rather, is a knee-jerk reaction by some stupid idiots who freak out the moment they see the word gay. Newsflash people: you don't become gay just because you read about gay people in the media and hey, there are loads of gay people around.

Today, we mostly access our media through the internet rather than cooks. There's something nostalgic about comic books, I did grow up in the 1980s when I read loads of comics, but seriously, people mostly choose to read on their smartphones, laptops, Kindles and other electronic devices these days. There is even an app for free digital Archie comics. The removal of this particular comic book with the gay marriage storyline is but a token gesture as only hardcore Archie fans would purchase that comic from Kinokuniya bookstore - everyone else is going to read it online instead, the same way they read everything else online. Yes, Singaporeans are going to use the internet and what is the MDA going to do, censor the internet to prevent Singaporeans from seeing anything gay on the internet?
Oh and here's something perhaps we should tell the dozy idiots at MDA. This issue of Archie came out over two years ago. Have a read of this report dated the 1st May 2012 on the Hollywood Reporter.This comic has been around for over two years and the MDA only removed it from sale in March 2014? Tsk tsk, too slow MDA, way too slow. If this was such toxic, dangerous material, why were you sitting on your fat lazy asses and only acting now after this was available for such a long time? How do you account for your inaction for nearly two years? The fact is after this comic has been out for so long, those who wanted to read it would have bought it and read it ages ago - and those who have no interest in Archie would have never touched it anyway. Thus it is another meaningless gesture by the MDA that has archived absolutely nothing, apart from pissing off more Singaporeans who are already fed up with their heavy handed approach to censorship. 

So what do you think? Are the MDA as bloody stupid and useless as I think they are? Or are you willing to give them a bit more credit than that? Please leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Tthanks for reading.


8 comments:

  1. I think MDA is just riding on the hype of the books being banned by the NLB to gain the approval of conservative voters, since conservative voters make up a huge chunk of Singaporeans

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually,you got the chronological order wrong. This Archie comic was quietly removed from the shelves of the bookshops in March 2014 and they kept very quiet about it, hoping that no one will notice - but someone did, 4 months later, in July 2014. So this Archie comic was banned first, then the whole NLB storybook thing came second, in July.

      Besides, this was a decision by the MDA, the NLB has a different decision making body regarding the books in their collections.

      As for the conservative voters of Singapore, think again - they are not that reactionary or stupid: well - I am sure some of them are, but most of them would want more concrete laws around matters such as family life, divorce, the right to religious freedom, etc - we''re talking concrete measures enshrined in laws - the pulping or banning of books they were never going to touch anyway makes no difference to their lives. Only the most petty amongst the conservative voters will be pleased by this episode - the others have a long list of things they still want from the government and believe me, they are not that easily pleased.

      Delete
  2. I think the main thing is the sense of entitlement of parents demanding that the government does the parenting for them. They are afraid that books, films, tv, etc will influence their kids when they do not want to take responsibility for their negligence. Therefore they make these complains and demands the MDA, NLB, Government etc to parent for them. The same way they blame teachers for everything. When they failed as a parent, they do not want to own up and change, instead they seek to blame others for not doing the parenting for them.

    If I were the NLB and the MDA, I would tell these complainers to fuck off and parent the kid themselves, if your kid is reading these books and getting "influenced" then you failed as a parent because you can't even engage and talk with your kid on such things. Nothing to do with the availability of these books, after all if the kid just goes online they can find much much worst stuff to scare them for life.

    TL:DR man up and be a better parent. If you can't do that then fucking don't have a kid.

    more radical views - I believe having a kid is a privilege NOT a right, it is fucking hard to be a good parent, if you can't be a good parent then you shouldn't be one at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with you Ian. I feel like writing a piece about this reflecting on my own experiences - but I fear it may get a bit too personal, as my parents are exactly the kind of parents you talk about.

      Delete
    2. Hi Ian, LIFT, I am afraid there are a lot of self righteous folks in Sg who sees it as totally ok to invoke state regulations in the name of advocating what is supposedly "good" for society. They simply are unwilling to or think people are unable to take personal responsibility as parents.

      A lot of these folks appear to be overly zealous members from the Abrahamic faiths. There are plenty of other sins depicted in the Old Testaments e.g. gluttony, pride etc that are just as frowned upon. Why LGBT issues get picked on when it is only a few lines in the passages, is really a mystery. My theory is that with all the other sins, it is hard for us to deny that we are also guilty of them at one point or another. Gosh, food craving, eyes go bling bling at $$, envy over a colleague's new Hermes limited edition bag, swelling pride cos own kid beat the neighbour's in spelling etc. Yup the list goes on. For the heterosexuals, about the only fault they are likely to be not guilty of is laying with their own same sex folks. So ahuh heres a whipping boy group in which sure will not be guilty of ourselves.

      Looking at some of the responses from the local people, I think it suffice to say that zealots will not be changing their minds despite all the in their face rebuttals. The only problem is why secular organisations like MDA and NLB just seem incapable of reasoning and continually pander to the harsh cries for zealotry. Don't they realise how stupid it makes them look?

      Delete
  3. The way I see it, what Singapore had done is like what Japan did in introducing the Tokyo Youth Ordinance where Tokyo would restrict sexually provocative depictions of fictional characters who appear to be under 18 years of age.

    They fear that the youth will start to become rapist after reading the manga.

    The link is at below:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Metropolitan_Ordinance_Regarding_the_Healthy_Development_of_Youths

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh Kelvin, here's the irony: Japan has Asia's biggest porn industry. The Japanese porn industry is huge compared to say, the British porn industry or the French porn industry and whilst the British porn industry sells to an international market, the Japanese porn industry is mostly for domestic consumption. In comparison to other countries, there's a little bit of porn coming out of Thailand and an emergence of a porn industry in China today (just starting...) but by far the Japanese are the ones who are most sexually liberal in all of Asia. That's hardly the image you get when you look at the average Japanese today: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03fh0bg

      The irony is that in the age of the internet, you can't draw arbitrary lines between a pre and post 18 watershed. Minors do access to adult material on the internet and indeed, we're not even talking about hardcore porn here, we're talking about movies and TV programmes aimed at adults with rather adult storylines and themes that you wouldn't necessarily wanna show a 6 year old but wouldn't bat an eyelid if it is presented to an adult audience. Even as a child, I liked more mainstream movies rather than children's movies as I thought they were more interesting and intriguing in terms of their plots and storylines. .

      Delete
  4. I don't get it. There are so many computer games that have a homosexual theme. In mass effect 3, if you play as a male character, you get to romance one of your male crew, who in turn used to have a husband. Sims 4 also allow you to romance same sex character as well and these games are still allowed here are being played by teenagers as well

    If you go to the manga section in kinokuniya, there are some manga that can see breasts and erotica scenes. In NLB, you can find Mein Kampf and books about fascism. These book are not banned but books about same sex marriage freaks everyone out? I just don't know my country anymore.

    ReplyDelete