Saturday 25 February 2017

Time for a geography lesson with Limpeh

For today's lesson, I mean today's post, well it's going to come across as a bit of a geography lesson. You see, one of the things that my parents always did when I was a kid was claim that Singapore was the best country in the world to live in (I kid you not) because Singapore was spared natural disasters like earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes and tornadoes. Every time they saw a report on the news featuring a flood, a volcano eruption, wild fire or a blizzard, they would say something like, "wah, you see? Singaporeans so lucky, we are spared all this tragedy." I suppose the images that make a TV news report would be the most dramatic - nobody wants to see a bunch of residents calmly evacuating and saying, "nobody is panicking, we'll be back in two days and we shall deal with it." I'm afraid my parents would have failed any secondary school geography exam, they have no understanding whatsoever of how weather works and when you are ignorant, any weather-related phenomena becomes pretty scary. I remember my mother once saying, "the weather has gone crazy" and I told her, "no you're wrong - a cold front has merely overtaken a warm front, creating an occluded front: that's science, not insanity on the part of the weather gods you've just made up."
Time for a lesson on physical geography everyone.

Once upon a time, when people didn't have the benefit of modern education, they didn't understand how weather works. So if there is say a storm or a drought, they found their own crazy ways (often through religion) to make sense of it - this had horrific consequences, such as human sacrifices in the Aztec culture to appease the gods when they had bad weather. People like my parents aren't that different from the Aztecs in that they didn't have the education to teach them anything useful about geography or weather but because they are not internet-literate, they don't know how to do a simple Google search on any topic. Heck, I'm not an expert on weather, I just know how to use Google. I am educated enough to know that there's always a scientific answer and all you have to do is look it up if you don't already have the knowledge - that's how enlightened, educated, rational people behave. It is not that hard to do a Google search, really. I do really hate it when stupid people use religion instead of science to justify weather so let's deal with some of these weather events today and put things in perspective as I put on my geography teacher hat.

Earthquakes

Even if you lived in a country like Japan or New Zealand which is very prone to earthquakes, your life is no in peril. Firstly, there are strict building regulations in these countries to ensure that it will not crumble even if a strong earthquake strikes - so even if it does happen, such buildings will only experience minor damage. Furthermore, from a young age, school children are trained exactly what to do if an earthquake strikes, so everyone responds in a very calm manner. The emergency services in these countries know exactly how to leap into action and respond promptly the moment an earthquake strikes. To put things in perspective, 50 people died in earthquakes in Japan in 2016, that may seem like a lot but when you compare that to the number of people who died in road accidents in Japan in the same year - 3904 deaths, it goes to show that you're far more likely to be killed on the road in Japan than during an earthquake. Are my parents paranoid about earthquakes? You bet they are - yet are they worried about crossing the road, driving or using public transport? Strangely enough, they are not at all worried: why the blind spot then? This is because my parents understand how traffic lights work, they understand road safety rules, they know how to stay safe when driving or crossing a busy road. The statistics speak for themselves: don't be paranoid about earthquakes.
Personally, I have experienced a number of minor earthquakes before, nothing major - yes, we actually do get earthquakes in the UK, not particularly strong ones that cause serious damage but significant enough for us to feel the effects. Likewise, I have also experienced earthquakes on my travels as well, again, nothing major enough to cause devastation but enough for everyone to stop what they are doing and look at each other with that realization that we're experiencing an earthquake. Oh yes, that was definitely an earthquake. The fact is, most minor quakes are barely felt and cause little damage and the chances of you being caught in a major earthquake is so low that it is hardly worth worrying about. If it happens, well, it happens - in the meantime, you should focus your energies on more credible threats to your well-being, such as crossing the road or driving very carefully.  Perhaps it is because I am an Asian maths geek obsessed with statistics, so I do spend time and effort studying the numbers and I take comfort in those odds - for people like my mother who can't handle numbers at all, that's when the paranoia takes over.

Hurricanes/cyclones/typhoons

These three are essentially the same thing depending in where in the world you are: in the Asian-Pacific area they are known as typhoons, in the southern hemisphere and Indian Ocean they are known as cyclones and in North America, it is known as a hurricane. During the worst of such storms, the devastation can be horrific, such as was in the case of hurricane Katrina and typhoon Haiyan. Let's put things in perspective though - Katrina and Haiyan are rare events, Katrina battered New Orleans in August 2005 and it was the third biggest tropical storm to have struck the US. The last two times a storm on that scale hit the US were in 1935 and 1969. Storms like that are extremely rare and it is not like New Orleans is hit by a storm like that every time it is hurricane season - no, instead they have a number of smaller, less violent storms that may bring some flooding once in a while but never the kind of devastation that Katrina wrought.
Here's a dose of common sense: humans have been quite sensible as to where they build their settlements. Why do you think there are no big cities in the middle of the Sahara desert or in northern Siberia? No, those places have very harsh physical conditions that do not make it conducive to human habitation - New Orleans on the other hand, enjoys a warm sub-tropical climate: not too hot, not too cold, conveniently located at the mouth of the Mississippi river. No location is perfect but clearly the pros outweigh the cons, hence that is why New Orleans has boomed into one of the biggest cities in that part of the US. Clearly, there are enough pros to keep people in New Orleans and they are willing to deal with the hurricanes when they do happen. In any case, people living in that part of the world have become incredibly resilient when it comes to dealing with hurricanes: when a storm is being predicted, evacuations are mandatory and they keep people out of harm's way. The vast majority of residents will have some kind of insurance to cover storm damage, so even if their homes are destroyed in a storm, they can make an insurance claim.

Now here's the thing: people like my parents seem to think that people living in such areas are often caught unaware, like a storm can strike out of the blue with no warning. Now I'm not saying that weather forecasters never make a mistake (yes, sure they have in the past) but with modern technology in 2017, forecasters don't make that kind of mistakes anymore and people living in storm-prone areas are usually very well prepared. The local services (police, local politicians, even teachers) all pitch in to ensure that the community knows how to deal with major storm when it hits. By and large, communities know exactly how to deal with the inconvenience when it happens and they do it without too much panic or fuss. The UK has been hit by a number of quite violent storms in recent years. most notably storm Doris on the 23rd February 2017 which brought gusts of wind exceeding 150 km/hr along with heavy rain and snow. It is an inconvenience we live with - it's not something we enjoy but we merely accept that yeah storms like that will hit once in a while and we just deal with it when we have to. It is not the end of the world, we just deal with it.
Snow storms/blizzards

People who live in cold countries are usually very well prepared for winter - in 2017, the weather forecast can usually tell you with great certainty when you can expect snow and how much. So if you know you have heavy snow on the way, you will make the necessary preparations so you will be ready for those conditions. I'm always prepared for whatever weather I may encounter and more to the point, I've got plenty of common sense. If it is -10 degrees out there, would I go jogging in just shorts & T-shirt? Clearly not. I would make sure I was appropriately dressed before leaving the house. Cold weather is just a part of life for a few months a year for millions of people in the world, living in places where they experience seasons. A heavy snow storm or blizzard may cause some minor disruptions, but life still goes on regardless. The only time when a cold snap or snow could potentially bring some major disruption is when it hits an area that doesn't usually experience winter weather because the locals just aren't prepared for it - such as in 2013 when it snowed in Cairo, Egypt for the first time in 100 years. It is literally a one in a hundred years phenomena and actually many Egyptians were delighted at their first encounter with snow and in any case, the snow melted within a few days as such cold snaps do not last long. Note that nobody died as a result in Cairo during that cold snap.

Volcanoes

Volcano eruptions can be potentially dangerous if local residents do not heed the warning of the authorities to evacuate when an eruption is predicted - what people like my parents do not realize is that in countries with active volcanoes, a group of geologists and seismologists are constantly monitoring the activities of the volcano and even in third world countries, there are government regulations about how close people are allowed to live/farm within proximity to an active volcano. There are plenty of advantages to live close to a volcano: the presence of precious minerals, hot springs, geothermal energy, fertile soils and the opportunities to develop tourism. The common theme however is that resident in volcanic areas usually have a very good understanding of the risks associated with the volcano and their decision to live/work there is a decision taken after a careful risk evaluation. Quite frankly, nobody would be dumb enough to buy a house right next to a volcano without realizing that this lovely 'mountain' nearby is actually a volcano - knowledge is power and most people choose to take a calculated risk, knowing that you may get that phone call in the middle of the night telling you to evacuate if the volcano starts to show signs of unusual activity.
Tsunami 

Most of us can remember the world's deadliest tsunami of 2004 was triggered off by a major earthquake in the Sumatra region and that killed well over 250,000 people. However, you needn't worry too much about another deadly tsunami like that hitting you just because you live near a coast. Firstly, the 2004 boxing day tsunami caught everyone by surprise because a tsunami on that scale is extremely rare and the chances of something like that happening again is very rare. Secondly, important lessons were learnt from that tsunami and many countries now have established a warning system in coastal areas to evacuate residents the moment they get a tsunami. A tsunami is only triggered after an earthquake and local residents will usually have some time to escape to higher ground - people living in tsunami prone areas know how to evacuate swiftly and safely without panic as drills are held regularly to ensure that when a real tsunami hits, everyone can be evacuated before the tsunami hits. Once again, knowledge is power - your chances of survival are infinitely higher if you know exactly what to do when you hear the warning to evacuate. Then again, not all earthquakes result in tsunamis and you are highly unlikely to see another tsunami on the scale of the 2004 boxing day one in your lifetime. You need to look at the statistics and the odds to evaluate the risks.

Singapore: Death by a thousand paper cuts

Is the weather in Singapore really that perfect? Well, that depends if you like the tropical heat and humidity but most Singaporeans actually don't and spend a lot of time hiding away in air-conditioned homes, malls and offices, only emerging when it is cooler earlier in the day or at night. Most jobs that require working outdoors in the midday heat are taken by foreign workers because Singaporeans simply refuse to work outdoors when it is 33 degrees and 95% humidity. Any kind of physical activity carried out outdoors between 9 am to about 6 pm will make you sweat - so even if it is a simple act of walking from your home to the nearest MRT station, you end up sweating profusely and do you really want to show up to say a job interview or a business meeting with an important client drenched in sweat? Of course not, it is very uncomfortable and looks extremely undignified. What you end up doing is spending more money on getting a taxi or Uber, whereas in a cooler climate, walking that same distance isn't such an uncomfortable activity.
Do you have romantic visions of tropical weather?

Either you put up with the heat and discomfort associated with a tropical climate, or you pay to avoid it. You can probably get a dish of chicken rice for about S$3 in a hawker center - cheap and delicious, but if you want air-con with that chicken rice, be prepared to pay over S$6 if you buy it in a food court. Heck, the food court in Vivo City well and truly take the piss when it comes to charging more for their location. When you add it all up, Singaporeans spend a great deal of money on air-conditioning, just to avoid the stifling tropical heat on a daily basis. Contrast that to countries which are in cooler climates, they don't spend thousands of dollars installing air-conditioning everywhere form homes to schools to public transport to malls to offices. The very fact that Singaporeans do spend that much on air-conditioning instead of embracing the heat (like the way they did back in the period before the 1980s when air-conditioning wasn't widely available) shows you that most Singaporeans do genuinely dislike the stifling tropical heat.

But it goes beyond the heat: did I mention the creepie-crawlies? Gosh, if I left something sweet like a slice of fruit or a piece of cake on the table for just a few minutes in Singapore, it would start attracting flies or ants instantly. This just doesn't happen in colder climates! In the tropics, people are more prone to food poisoning as meat, eggs and dairy products go off a lot more quickly in the heat. Everything from the cockroaches to the moths to the mosquitoes are bigger, badder and more aggressive in the tropics. In the UK, the cool weather means that there are far fewer insects, especially in the winter months as the cold weather either kills off a lot of them or they go dormant. In the tropics, the warmer temperatures and abundance of food, constant growing seasons allows insects to thrive and breed so much more rapidly. Singapore has always had a problem with insects like the aedes mosquito spreading dengue fever - this is a serious problem that does result in the death of some patients. In contrast, I barely get any insect bites in the UK even in the summer - I can go spend an afternoon in the park and not even have to worry about covering my arms.
Another major problem that affects Singapore for 4 to 5 months a year is the haze. During that nasty haze season, Singaporeans nervously check the PSI every few hours on their phone whilst choking on the heavily polluted air. Whilst this may not be as devastating as a major earthquake or hurricane striking your city, but whilst you never know when an earthquake or hurricane may strike, you know that the haze season will hit Singapore every year and everyone will suffer as a result. You know it is going to be hot and sticky every day and people will have to pay more to avoid suffering in the sweltering heat. This is what I mean by the Singaporean "death by a thousand paper cuts" - each individual paper cut may not look like a fatal wound, but the physical geography of Singapore will inflict such paper cuts on you every single day you live there and even if you don't bleed to death as a result, you are walking wounded everyday, bearing the scars of these thousands of paper cuts. But consider the statistics for a moment: the chances of getting killed or injured in a major earthquake in somewhere like Japan is actually really low, but you have 100% certainty when it comes to suffering the unforgiving physical elements every single day you are in Singapore. 

Imagine if you had the choice between two jobs offers: one is with a new company where the pay is excellent, the managers are extremely nice and laid-back and you're totally passionate about the work there. But there's a small catch - being a very new company, there is a small risk that the company may not make it and you could be out of a job if the company folds or if they are no longer able to hire you if they do not get the business off the ground. It looks unlikely but they are flagging it up as a possibility, as in a worst case scenario. Then there's the another job offer with a much older, bigger company - they have been there for centuries so there's no question of them going bust, but the pay offer is terrible, you have heard horror stories about the kind of management there and you are far less interested in the kind of work they want you to do. Between the two, which would you choose? The much more attractive option with a small possibility of things going wrong, or the other option where you know you will have a job for the foreseeable future, but you will suffer the death of a thousand paper cuts scenario? I know which I would choose.
But then again, for people like my parents - there is absolutely no choice to be made at all! They simply never ever had the kind of skills required to work in the West because you need to be a skilled migrant to obtain that elusive work permit in the first place. It's one thing to recognize that you can't get a work permit to say work in the USA, it's another thing to imagine that the geography of the USA is 'crazy' and that you never know if you're going to be hit by an earthquake, hurricane or blizzard from one moment to the next. I'm afraid such people give in to the 'sour grapes' mentality - they can't have something, so they start condemning that entity without actually knowing how good it actually is by making up lies about it. It is rather puzzling why they feel the need to do so, perhaps they need to convince themselves that the rest of the world is a horrible place, just to make themselves feel less dissatisfied with the aspects of life in Singapore they are not fond of, such as the horrible weather. Or maybe they need to convince themselves that they have somehow landed up with the best option available in life, despite their limited resources and abilities. They don't have a second choice, so they may as well try to feel good about their one and only option.

I like in the weather and physical environment in London - I may be struck by another earthquake like the one in 2008, I may be struck by a hurricane (we had a major storm just this week), we have even had a few major snow storms that have paralyzed the city over the years, but so what? The earthquake in 2008 caused a small number of injuries and a little damage to old buildings, a few pots in my garden were blown over in the storm and I go to the park to play with my snow blades when it snows heavily. Compare that to the 'death by a thousand paper cuts' environment in Singapore, strictly from a physical geography point of view (I'm leaving out the human geography for now), I'd take London over Singapore any time. Look I'm not trying to make it sound like Singapore's weather is that awful but even a simple activity like taking a walk in the park is unpleasant on most days with the heat and the insects and downright impossible during the haze season. So if you're the kind of person who likes to stay in and watch TV or play computer games (with the air-con on of course), then Singapore's hot, tropical weather probably doesn't bother you at all.
So there you go, that's it from me on this issue. I hope you have found my short geography lesson useful - what do you think about the physical geography of Singapore? How do you feel about the environment there when compared to say California, Japan, the UK or New Zealand? Have you perhaps experienced an earthquake, blizzard or a hurricane before? Do let me know your thoughts and experiences, leave a comment below. Many thanks for reading.

27 comments:

  1. Being a grad student in Tokyo and staying in a suburb outside Tokyo prefecture currently, there are certain things I like and dislike about Kanto's winter weather compared to Singapore's weather.

    To start off with my dislikes, I am not a fan of near-freezing or subzero outdoor nighttime winter temperatures. During daytime, the city and suburbs tend to experience similar temperatures, but when night approaches, the suburbs are usually significantly colder. That said, by dressing appropriately, one can still keep warm. I didn't like the idea of wrapping myself up under multiple thick layers when I am outdoor, unlike in SG when a T-shirt and short will usually do. Also, another problem will be the extremely, dry winter air. The northwesterlies usually prevail over Japan during winter. Although the winds originate from the Sea of Japan, most of the moisture will have condensed and be dumped as snow in the northern coast before passing over the central mountainous region, leaving the winds over Kanto to be really dry. Those with sensitive skin and breathing problems will have a difficult time dealing with the dry weather. Not to mention the periodic strong winter winds whose strength is comparable to SG Sumatra squalls whenever there are monsoonal surges.

    About my likes, because the weather is dry most of the time, I need not worry about being drenched by rain showers when outdoor (and I absolutely hate dealing with afternoon thunderstorms back in SG). In fact, I only used an umbrella once or twice over the last few months. And yes, no haze to deal with, partly because of the strong winds, although the air quality might turn bad (but not as bad as the annual SG haze) during spring due to the pollutants from neighbouring China.

    I have not discussed about spring and autumn, but basically I liked autumn the most, neither too cold nor hot, best weather for strolling outdoor without sweating. Summer is like SG weather, extremely humid and rainy, and all the pests, including mosquitoes, start swarming outdoor.

    Some people in SG appear to be extremely concerned about earthquakes in Japan. Surprisingly, during my last six months in Tokyo, there is only 1-2 instances when the tremors are perceptible (I would say similar to those felt in high-rise HDB flats whenever there is a strong earthquake at Sumatra). Definitely not strong enough to topple down shelves or cause the whole world to crash upon you as some people like to believe. That said, there is a chance that a devastating earthquake can hit Kanto in future, but it is not like every week or month some part of Japan is hit by magnitude of >6 earthquakes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Marvin, you see, with cold weather, as long as you dress appropriately (as you've described) you can still venture out and function. But with hot weather, there's no low-cost, low-tech solution. Wearing a sweater or a coat is fairly straight forward, imagine you had to get from A to B in Singapore, how do you guarantee that you're in air-con comfort every step of the way without forking out for an Uber? Sure putting up with freezing temperatures may not be fun, but putting up with Singapore-style 33 degrees midday heat is pretty intense as well. As for the dry air/weather, a little moisturizer and lip balm goes a long way - again, it's a low-cost simple solution. I have a pound shop near my home (kinda like Daiso, everything for £1) and I can get you a big bottle of moisturizer for £1 - boom, problem solved, easy. Appreciate your insight into earthquakes.

      Delete
    2. Fellow Tokyo-dweller, I kind of love the dry weather, as it helps me with my laundry.
      As for the cold temperatures, I am a fan of winter, I even sleep naked during winter. Keep going on winter escapades into the mountains for the snow and hot springs.

      As for earthquakes, on the contrary to what you think, tectonic movement effects are actual quite frequent. But most of it is not severe enough to be considered for earthquake alert in Tokyo. Any quake below the Richter scale of 3, you probably would not be able to feel its effects, as the public infrastructure was designed to mitigate it away.

      Delete
    3. High five fellow winter weather fan!

      My mother made such a big fuss about dry lips when she came to London. I dab on a little lip balm at the start and the end of the day. It takes me like 5 seconds or so to do that and I have got a big tub which once again, thanks to my local pound shop, is a cheap and simple solution. I'm amazed how some Singaporeans make mountains out of molehills when it comes to such adaptations.

      Delete
    4. High five back!

      My mood and motivation at work is declining due to the ending winter season... No more thick snow play up in the northern regions soon. Sighz... Oh well, at least there is the flower blooming season ahead.

      Delete
    5. The best part i like about winter is getting warm when you go indoors and soaking in the hotsprings. If only there were coldsprings in SG to cool down so fast.

      Delete
  2. But what about crime rate and gangster. Singaporean claim that they live in the lowest crime rate country in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neon - by 'Singaporean' you mean your mother or possibly your father too. There is a wide range of opinions in Singapore and you're most probably quoting your mother since you have told me about her before. OK let's deal with crime rate - that's human geography instead of physical geography but I'll indulge you like any good teacher.

      Your mother doesn't look stuff up on Google - she just believes what she wants to believe in and she'll make shit up, I know cos my mother does the same thing. Crime is measured and recorded differently in different countries because of different administrative systems, but let's look at the average results over a few different studies.

      World Atlas: 20th http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/safest-countries-in-the-world.html
      Elist: 2nd http://www.elist10.com/top-10-countries-lowest-recorded-crime-rate/
      Numbeo: 2nd https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp
      GPI: 20th https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Peace_Index
      And you may be thinking, hang on if two studies rank Singapore as the 2nd safest country in the world, then it must be true right? Not necessarily. Numbeo puts Qatar at number one on the list whilst the other one puts Switzerland at number one on the list. Switzerland is ranked 11th on the Numbeo list whilst Qatar is not in the top 10 in the elist (which only shows the top 10).

      Here's the difficulty in looking at these different lists - each list picks a different country as the 'safest country' or the one with the lowest crime rate: Switzerland, Qatar, South Korea, New Zealand etc. I'm sure if you look hard enough, you may be able to find a list with Singapore as number 1, but I've yet to see that.

      Singapore is definitely in the top 20 - yes crime rates are definitely low, but your mother is talking bullshit out of her backside because she doesn't have the slightest clue how these statistics are compiled or how they are compared in such studies. I've spent about 15 minutes looking up the statistics on Google and I did do a module on statistics at university, I also need a very good understanding on how statistics work in my current job.

      In short, your mother is wrong - Singapore's crime rate may be low but:

      1. Singapore is not the safest country in the world, there are others with lower crime rates.
      2. There are also plenty of other countries in the world which are just as safe as Singapore. Any country in the top 50 in any of those lists have pretty low crime rates and are very safe. I have also traveled through countries with relatively high crime rates and guess what? Nothing happened. It is only the countries with the extremely high crime rates that you need to avoid and those are usually war zones.

      Delete
    2. 3. Look I don't want to insult your mother so I'll talk about my mother instead okay? But I'll make the same point as our mothers are so similar. My mother is so stupid. She is afraid to take the MRT because she thinks she'll get on the wrong train and get lost or she'll drop her EZ link card (yes she's done that before). She is afraid of even going on a day trip to Malaysia mostly because she doesn't trust herself - she is afraid she will get confused with a different currency, she is afraid she'll drop her passport, she is afraid of the language barrier, she is afraid she will get lost, she is nervous about everything. OK to be downright cruel, she probably knows she is very stupid and hence her nervousness about going to Malaysia reflects that - she is not a confident traveler. Thus she feels safe in Singapore compared to Malaysia, not because Malaysia is so much more dangerous than Singapore, but because she is too stupid to function independently once you take her out of the vicinity where she lives. Her perception of crime, "gang violence" and safety is shaped by her stupidity and inability to function outside Singapore, rather than statistics and science.

      In short, your mother doesn't know shit. Your mother is stupid. I ignore my mother when she talks shit because I know she is stupid and uneducated, ok? It is not her fault that she is so stupid but you've got to learn to accept that your mother is always wrong because she's not educated. I'm sorry but I cannot put this any more tactfully. Your mother is uneducated and wrong, just like mine.

      Delete
    3. WTF. Seriously Your mom is afraid of taking a MRT. Sure my mom is not so intelligence and thinking other countries are more dangerous but as least she is not afraid of everything except for traveling other countries. what happen if your mom want to buy stuff?

      Delete
    4. Oh she's not so bad now, given that the MRT has been around for years but she didn't dare take it for the first few years I swear. For most things, my mother just turns to my father and expects him to do it for her. My father is very, very old fashioned and traditional in a very Chinese way - I think he deliberately chose a wife who would listen to him and be quite passive, do as she is told and be obedient. So by that token, he doesn't mind doing many things for my mother because in return, he has her "obedience". It may seem like something from another era, but it works for them and they are still together after so many years. Later this year, they will celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary, so it clearly works for them I suppose.

      Delete
    5. Oh and if I may add, if it's "woman"'s stuff, like buying clothes, cosmetics etc I have two sisters who will take my mum shopping. My mum doesn't do anything on her own - she is either dependent on her daughters or her husband. My 2 sisters are extremely patient with my mum.

      Delete
    6. Obviously, all cities will have a "dark" alley or two. For example, in Tokyo, there is the Kabuki-cho, which is like the nest of vices. If you reside in or visit Tokyo, it is common sense to stay away from such areas. If I remember correctly, Geylang is the equivalent of Kabuki-cho in Singapore.

      Delete
    7. I don't get why Asian mothers who were once capable of raising kids and even making a living suddenly become dependent on their children when the latter are adults. They become even more incapable when their husbands die. They take pride that their children are "taking care" of them. However, they render themselves helpless even though they may be in good health. Even when going to the doctor's office, they want their children to take them. Baffling.

      Delete
    8. LOL - Di, I know exactly whom you're talking about.

      Delete
    9. I used to stay in Geylang for a few years so it is not as bad as most people think. Just be smart in sticking to safer streets after 9pm or just stay home. In fact i used to wander around Shinjuku 2 and 3 chome at night and the most annoying thing to happen to me are those African touts who keep approaching you. Granted there are lots of yakuza around but they usually don't do bad stuff to tourist. Bad for business.

      Delete
    10. @choaniki
      That is true. But there are those occasions where some drunks get into fight and the presence of yakuza failed to de-escalate the situation. My previous workplace was near Shinjuku and I had to cross the entire kabuki-cho area to get to the building. So when I get off from work, I would always avoid the known streets with tons of pubs.

      Delete
  3. Hi Alex - yep, every Country has its own struggles: if Italians shared your parents' views, they would have to emigrate en masse, since most of Italy is prone to earthquakes (parts of Lombardy and the whole of Sardinia aside).

    Granted, some areas are more dangerous than others, but... we had our (un)fair share of tragedy last year.

    However, we can just stay here and try to strengthen our defenses - we're still lagging far behind Japan, unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is usually the poor that are uninformed about upcoming natural disasters. :( https://www.google.com.sg/amp/s/psmag.com/amp/p/db67eba6c084

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sidetracking here, but further to this discussion - anyone interested should watch the BBC documentary Human Planet for a wonderful presentation on the human condition under vastly differing environmental and geological conditions; and the ingenious means devised to adapt,thrive and solve basic survival problems presented by each different environment; from the wet of the Mekong jungle to the bone-dry Sahara.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi LIFT, have u smoked weed before? or any other drugs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Easy question. No. Never. I have been around people who have smoked weed before - I first encountered that at university and it is fairly common in the UK since it is not illegal. However, I think it has been bludgeoned into my head that drugs are bad and we don't need drugs. Like I don't even drink alcohol - I think people who get drunk to have fun need to question why they are using alcohol as a means of escape and address the fundamental issue of why they feel the need to get drunk in the first place. So it goes beyond a matter of clean living, health or morals, but a more... philosophical approach to the matter.

      For example, in the gay community, there is this 'chem sex' thing whereby people take drugs and have sex whilst high on drugs and I find that so disturbing. Like if why are you doing that? If you are truly attracted to the person you have sex with, then the sex should be fun - why the need for drugs? If you are not attracted to the person, then you shouldn't be having sex with them in the first place with or without drugs.

      Anyway, you get the idea. I don't touch any kind of drugs, tobacco, alcohol. The closest I get to a stimulant is my cups of coffee in the morning.

      Delete
    2. I find the idea of even just weed disgusting. I have been around people who were passing weed amongst themselves, and my only thought was, "Eewww! Germs!" I smell weed on the streets once in a while, and I hate the smell. When my son asked me recently if I had ever done any drugs, it was nice to not have to lie.

      Delete
    3. I can't stand the smell of weed. It's disgusting.

      Delete
  7. I think there are two separate issues; one is her conduct and the second is the UK government response. They're partially linked but not entirely. I think you have been very uncharitable and mean-spirited in your writing and implicitly sided with the Immigration service. For example, I don't think it's fair to make a judgement about her feelings/commitments to her children relative to her parents. Given the lack of social care provision in Singapore, I find it entirely believable that she felt compelled to take care of them if they were in poor health. Depending on their income/financial circumstances, private residential care may not have been a plausible option.

    Irene's conduct - as you point out - has not been exemplary and is open for criticism. However, I can understand the conflict she may have felt regarding taking up British citizenship. If she would have lost her HDB due to her citizenship change, that represents a significant financial loss. If she felt uncertainty about the future because of her caring responsibilities for her parents, I can understand why she may have wanted to keep her rights to her HDB. Also, you are completely wrong that any one who renounces Singapore citizenship can later be welcomed as an expat. I loved as in expat in Singapore for many years, and know several people (including family members) with dual nationality who later chose to renounce their Singapore citizenship. When these folks have later tried to gain entry to SG via work visa programmes, they have all been unsuccessful, because the government keeps a blacklist of former nationals who renounce their citizenship. They have sometimes been challenged at passport control when coming to SG for holiday or on a social visit.

    It's also a red herring to cast blame on Irene for the actions of her sister in law. You cleverly frame the discussion in such a way that one feels that Irene is responsible for her sister in law's white lies, "guilt by association" if you will, but this is a rhetorical device and should not been considered as fact.

    The more important issue for me is the UK government's conduct. They have rejected her case and deported her on procedural grounds. This is very different from establishing intent and underlying motivation. The underlying motivation or basis of her application for indefinite leave to remain is that she wants to have the basic right to live with her family and also to provide care for her husband. Regardless of whether or not she met the procedural benchmarks, deportation (and a 10 year ban) is denying her the basic right of being with her family, which seems to contravene the right to family reunion - a basic human right which Is guaranteed under EU law. Until the UK actually leaves the UK, they are required to up hold this right.

    Lastly, for those of you unfamiliar with the UK immigration systems, Indefinite Leave to Remain does not grant you access to benefits. The only privileges you get are access to medical care, the right to vote (if you're a commonwealth national), and right to stay in the U.K. Also, those of you haven't lived in the U.K., the amoint you receive in benefits is really not great. Even if she were the recipient of benefits (which she wouldn't be entitled to as a non-citizen), it pretty much only guarantees a subsistence level of income, certainly nothing lavish. It would still be a life of poverty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A bit bizarre that you chose to post this here rather than the actual article, but I'll entertain you nonetheless.

      1. You can't say, "I have to care for my parents in Singapore, so let me break the rules that everyone else abides by." No, at least speak to an immigration expert and get some advice before you willfully believe that the rules somehow don't apply to you. She could have given any good reason - say she went to Africa to work for a charity helping orphans (oooh let's tug at those heart strings there) and you could plead your case all you want based on those poor African orphans who need saving - but rules are not dependent on how 'charitable' or 'kind/nice' you are and there are ways around it, to ensure that you do not break them. Many in that position take steps to ensure that they do not lose their ILTR if it matters to them. Irene was stubborn, ignorant and plain silly to imagine that they rules didn't apply to her. So her family situation in Singapore is quite frankly, irrelevant to this case. In any case, Irene also has siblings in Singapore - why didn't they pitch in to help care for her parents? Why did Irene have to effectively abandon her kids for that many years?

      2. Irene could have sold her HDB flat and used the money to hire professional help to help care for her parents - her desires to do things her way regardless of the rules has been a recurring theme here. It's her way or the high way, screw the rules. She has failed to take into anyone else's point of view and in her case, she should have considered where the law in the UK stands with regards to her HDB flat. Again, a case of very poor judgement.

      3. For crying out aloud, I worked in Singapore in 2011 as a BRITISH EXPAT - that's why my whole blog started in the first place. It was so weird returning to Singapore in 2011 for that contract, walking down Orchard Road, going to the food courts where I used to go when I was in JC and NS, going to ECP. That's why I started blogging because of that experience. A small number of Singaporeans have managed to do that - there are complicated arrangements that can be made and if you are a highly paid, highly skilled professional, highly valued by your company, then yeah your company will do that for you. I'm not saying that every single ex-Singaporean has that route open for them and perhaps in Irene's case, it probably won't be possible as I doubt she's all that highly educated/skilled. I've visited Singapore so many times on my UK passport and have never been challenged once despite my 'place of birth' on my UK passport clearly stating that I was born in Singapore. Usually they don't give a shit about that - some ask questions like,"wah in the UK you got good job? Big house? So lucky." Usually when it is crowded, they just can't wait to stamp my passport and wave me through.
      Part 2 coming up.

      Delete
    2. 4. Confirmation bias much? Her sister in law is crook who told blatant lies (oh you call those "white lies") to obtain vast sums of money (over £52,000 that's more money that most Brits and Singaporeans will earn in a year) - if Angela Clennell had been truthful with the facts of the case, hardly anyone would have donated any money. But what's more interesting is the way the British public are searching for stories of confirmation bias - they don't mind they are being duped and scammed by Ms Clennell. I told someone who donated the truth and he didn't seem to care, in fact he was rather upset that I had broken the illusion that the government is nasty, evil, heartless etc. He would have rather lived with the illusion that the government did deport a kind, old grandmother who had been in the country for 30 years than someone who had not been in the UK for that long and had violated her visa rules time and again. That friend is not stupid, just woefully emotional and irrational when it comes to his hatred for the Tory government. Confirmation bias can affect even educated people.

      5. Oh and let me use your words, you're completely wrong (your words) about the government's conduct - you don't know what the hell you're talking about (that's my words, not yours). The Home Office cannot comment on an ongoing case, they do not need to defend their actions to the press, they issued a short statement that was generic and didn't release any details. That's standard operating procedure. So all you have is Irene's side of the story - she has already lied about everything from the amount of time she has spent in the UK, to her financial situation, to her family in Singapore (she claimed she had nothing and no one in Singapore - yeah right) and even her accent (LOL, she is worse than Ris Low, she claimed she sounded so British, yeah right auntie). So you're gullible and dumb enough to believe her side of the story? She's already lied non-stop so far, what makes you think that she's not lying as well when she talked about the way she was treated from a procedure POV? There are so many provisions for family reunion (I've talked about the Surinder Singh route in my part 2 of this case) - why didn't she use that route that so many other families have used? Oh because it's her way or the high way, she thinks she is so special the normal rules that the rest of us do not apply to her. Duh. You know the story of the boy who cried wolf? She is an unreliable witness - because she has lied so much already, we don't know when she is telling the truth and when she is not; so even if she is telling the truth about some aspects of her case, I don't even know if I can believe her.

      6. Oh if you wanna talk about money - she's wasted my tax money on her deportation when she could have followed the rules and stayed in this country legally. Well she is now sitting on a goldmine of £52k in donations - that's more money than she can possibly dream of, whoopee. I bet you she's drinks champagne and eating lobster in MBS now with her ill-gotten gains. And the rest of the Singaporean diaspora in the UK are either university students (usually in pretty good universities) or those who are highly skilled professionals on a work permit - that's why there's a sense of disdain towards someone like Irene Clennell who is clearly working class and poor. The rest of us follow the rules and are fine, what's your problem Irene? You think you're better than the rest of us so the rules don't apply to you? Yeah right.

      Delete