Friday 9 October 2015

The PSLE maths question that got Singaporeans in a pickle

Have you heard about the PSLE maths question that got many Singaporeans in a pickle? My first impression was that it was a pretty good question that challenged students to think outside the box for a change. I did have a chance to have a look at what primary six students were facing this year as I was in Singapore earlier this year and helped my nephew with some of the trickier questions he had in his maths homework - they weren't exactly straightforward but I had expected nothing less. After all, if the exam was too easy, that every student would be scoring nearly full marks, then how are you going to differentiate the very smart students from the ones who are just above average? Hence there has to be a few questions that require a fair amount of mental gymnastics to separate the wheat from chaff.
Like many, I arrived at the right answer through the process of elimination. 6 kg is way too heavy, as is 600 grams (I cook a lot and know how much my ingredients weigh _ so I know how much 600 grams of butter or flour would weigh). So I was left with 6 grams and 60 grams and between the two options, 60 grams was a lot more plausible as 6 grams is way too little. So without actually doing any calculations at all, simply through the process of elimination and a bit of common sense from the real world, I arrived at the right answer quite easily. Now I actually tested a number of my British friends (granted they have not heard about this question yet) and you'll be amazed how many of them got it wrong - many actually underestimated the weight of the eight coins and went for 6 grams, on the assumption that coins are light and don't weigh that much. So, the question is not that easy even for seemingly well educated adults.

But why are so many parents upset about this question? Why did so many of them take to social media and protest? They probably got the question wrong themselves and thought, "if I can't even get this right, how do you expect my 12 year old kid to get this right?" It is really time for them to put their ego aside and realize that the PSLE syllabus has evolved quite a bit since they took the same exam years ago! Secondly, some of them felt like it wasn't really a maths question, given that it involved estimation rather than calculation to arrive at the right answer. Let me deal with one particularly irate Singaporean by the name of Lee Xun Yi who took to the Singapore Ministry of Education's Facebook page to protest (in broken English - sheesh, how did she pass her PSLE English in the first place)? She wrote:
Singaporeans are supposedly good at maths... no?

"I can't understand why PSLE came out with a Maths question asking how heavy is 8 $1 coins when they do not even tell students its 6g each. Are we having IQ exams or Maths exam? Misleading! Because coin can be gold coin, plastic coin or even based on ur paper, paper coin. So is 6g the answer? Please, this question has so many doubts. I hope MOE can clarify my IQ question. Am I 40kg, 70kg, 100kg or 200kg if my mother is 75kg? Thank you."

Now why does Ms Lee wind me up this much (apart from the fact that she would have struggled to pass her PSLE English, given how awful her English is)? Firstly, as we now know, the right answer is 60 grams; well, actually eight S$1 coins weigh about 61 grams. So 8 x 6 is actually 48 and not 60. Secondly, even if you did tell the students that each coin weighs about 7.6 grams, then all you are doing is getting the students to multiply 7.6 x 8 = 60.8, that is hardly a question worthy of a PSLE exam. Maybe that would be right for primary 3 exam (or a very easy one for a primary 4 exam) but certainly not for PSLE standard. The question is not a conventional maths question, but it tests the ability of the student to apply basic mathematical concepts in the real world. It certainly is not misleading at all.
Are you good with numbers in the real world?

In any case, the question is fairly obvious - we are talking about a Singaporean $1 coin, we're not talking about a Canadian, American or Australian dollar coin. There are no currencies in the world which use a plastic coin - some casinos do issue chips made of plastic, but these are not coins per se and as for paper: it seems that Ms Lee doesn't know the difference between a coin and a note. When currency is issued on paper, it is a note, not a coin. And as for her desperate attempt to be clever at the end, her question doesn't make any sense at all because there is clearly no correlation between her weight and her mother's weight: but one can quite accurately arrive at the right answer to the question given that it is a simple multiple choice question. How do I put it delicately... Ms Lee is plain stupid. Her very poor command of English should tell you that she would have probably struggled to pass her PSLE English exam and the fact that she doesn't understand this maths questions means that she is not particularly clever. Duh.

Despite the fact that we all know the right answer now (60 grams), many idiots (I'm going to call a spade a spade) have posted comments like "I think the answer is 6g" or "is the answer 600g?" - this is a real #facepalm moment. Great, these people have no shame and will gladly announce to the world that they are too dumb to work out a simple maths question designed for 12 year old kids. Come on people. If you don't know the answer, at least have the discretion to keep your big mouth shut and not announce to the world just what a total idiot you are, please. Duh. This is when I question the quality of journalism n Singapore.Why did the ST article choose to feature that comment by Ms Lee - should she have been spared the indignity of being publicly embarrassed like that? She made a dumb remark and many (like myself) have mocked her for it, I bet she is regretting having posted that comment in the first place.
How much do these coins weigh?

Is it a straight forward maths question? No it isn't - but it does test the student's ability to apply mathematical principles to solve problems. One British friend said that this could be a physics question as it deals with concepts of weight, mass and estimation; so perhaps it could have been a question that could have been in the science rather than the maths exam. Regardless of whether this is a maths or a science question, it is a good question as it challenges students to think out of the box. I don't believe for a moment that all students can be coached to straight As at the PSLE, that is just not the way nature works; instead there is a bell curve when it comes to the distribution of intelligence and you need questions like that to find out who the really intelligent kids are. By that token, the maths exam has got to contain some questions that most kids will struggle to answer, such is the nature of such exams.

But regardless of whether such questions end up in the PSLE maths, science or even English exam, I am glad that such questions are indeed a part of the PSLE (and ultimately count towards their total aggregate score) because they will make the young students think about how they can apply their knowledge when it comes to solving problems they will encounter in the real world. Students should not be bludgeoned through years of hard work, revision and tuition just to score well in an important exam, education should have a higher purpose than that because it should ultimately prepare students for the working world. Studying for exams couldn't be more different from the stuff us working adults do on a daily basis to earn a living so I would like to see a lot more questions like that in the PSLE maths syllabus.

I have worked years in finance and media but I have never ever used mathematics at work - in fact, it is probably the most useless thing I have studied at school but once in a while, life does present an opportunity for you to use mathematics. Let me give you an example. At the supermarket, there are two sizes for the apricot jam: the small jar (400 grams) costs £2.25 and the bigger jar (650 grams) costs £3.50. Obviously, the bigger jar of jam is slightly cheaper per gram as the supermarket wants to encourage shoppers to buy the bigger jar. So let's say, there's a special offer on and the price of the smaller jar of apricot jam is reduced to £2.15 but the price of the bigger jar is unchanged during this sale - can you work out in your head (without a calculator) which size offers better value for money? Leave your answers in the comments section below but please, no cheating.

So what would you do in this case, in the supermarket, in the real world? Chances are, you would not be able to do all the calculations in your head, you would whip out your phone, fire up the calculator app and work it out that way. Such is the real world - nobody expects you to do any real mathematics anymore, not without the help of a calculator or computer anyway. I had to write an invoice earlier today for some work that I had done recently, there were some calculations which I could have done the old fashioned way but I used Excel to do the calculations as I didn't want to risk making any mistakes.  This is why I wonder when the PSLE syllabus is finally going to catch up with the modern world and set questions like that for students to solve, allowing them to use a calculator to arrive at the right answer. Trying to use mathematics to somehow gauge the intelligence or ability of a student is such an old fashioned concept.
Can you make the leap from the textbook to the real world?

I have blogged a lot about how misguided Singaporean parents are - too many simply bludgeon their children through hours and hours of tuition and classes, but never allow them to do simple tasks like cook a meal, go to the shops on their own or even take a bus on their own. The worst part is that the children involved are oblivious to how awful their parents' parenting skills are and they think that they are being good children by doing as they are told. The result is that these children are unable to use any kind of initiative of their own when faced with a somewhat unusual question like this maths question and their inability to solve such a problem is more a reflection on the terrible parenting skills of your average Singaporean parent today. Certainly, if you have done any kind of grocery shopping in any supermarket, you would have some idea of how much 60 grams is - come on people, it isn't rocket science.

The whole situation is best summarized by the article from TNP, "There will be numerous occasions in life where you don't have all the information to make an informed decision. So you will just have to make a choice based on your most logical guess." However, I do think this sets a good precedent for future PSLE students. I can imagine maths teachers, tuition teachers and parents will come up with all kind of interesting experiments to prepare students for the PSLE in the future - this will undoubtedly open up a new dimension of mathematics for future students and hopefully, it will make mathematics more interesting and relevant to the real world. So if you can get over the idiotic reactions by the stupid Singaporean parents, this is actually a step in the right direction for the Singaporean education system.
Why are so many people bothered by this simple question?

So that's it from me on this issue. Over to you: what do you make of this PSLE maths question? Did you find it easy to arrive at the right answer? Do you think it is an appropriate question for a 12 year old student? Why are Singaporean parents reacting like that over this question? Let me know your thoughts please, as well as your answers on the apricot jam sale question above (do state your reasoning, but no calculation allowed). Many thanks for reading!

17 comments:

  1. I don't know what all the fuss is about. I remember doing questions of a similar nature for my psle. I believe it was a question asking us to estimate the mass of a football. The possible answers were similar as well, ranging from 40g to 40kg.

    I dont know why these people are complaining. Surely even a child with average intelligence would be able to perform such rudimentary estimations.

    And you are correct. It reflects the absurd and damaging mentality of Singaporean parents who think that their kids have to be nothing short of the best when in reality we all have varying abilities. Only now in my twenties have I realised that confidence in ones own abilities is what usually brings one success, and not trying your utmost to be someone you are not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ivan,

      You simply cannot set a PSLE exam (in any subject) that is so easy that everyone can get full marks. The whole point of the PSLE is to gauge the students' ability, in order for them to gain admission to secondary school. So even if a subject like English, there are going to be areas like composition where only the top marks are offered to those who do exceptionally well and more average scores offered to those who do just okay. The exam isn't fit for purpose if it is too easy - thus the need for difficult questions that will inevitably make some students scratch their heads and say, "I have no idea what the answer is."

      Delete
    2. Haha to quote my professor who coincidentally just said this a couple of days ago in response to a question about the bell curve, "well we obviously can't have everyone getting an A. Then the A would be worth absolutely nothing!"

      I think that message needs to hit home for more parents. Oh well. The approach to exams in this country is just so wrong. #Asians.

      Delete
    3. Well but that's the thing - Asians don't know how to deal with that. For them, if you got a B for maths, that means you're lazy and didn't study hard enough. If a student gets a B for maths, then that means okay, they are good at something else and that's a sign for them to pursue a career which doesn't require maths - which is what I did. I hardly ever used any maths in my working life and what little I did, I processed with computers. So surely the focus should be on utilizing technology (computer programmes, smart phone apps) to solve our maths problems, rather than hardcore academics of maths?

      BTW, Have you worked out which jar of jam is cheaper?

      Delete
  2. Having no concept of the coins,I would say 6 g or 60 g would be reasonable. 60 g more likely. So process of elimination as you said. Not that hard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's the point - it's logic & reasoning that leads one to the right answer, there is no calculation necessary, one uses the process of elimination.

      That's when many Singaporean parents freak out .... because they have raised kids unable to think outside the box!

      Delete
    2. i think parents have figured out that the system can be gamed and exploited based on the precedence the government has set based on meritocracy.

      Delete
    3. The parents want questions they can prep for. They don't want surprises. They want to be able to practise and memorize formulae. Children become highly educated robots.

      Delete
  3. I'm more intrigue on why the big reaction than the specific question itself. Goes to show how much importance exams are placed by parents

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agreed. A great question. As Singapore move away from a manufacturing society to a high value add one, it starts with education. In a manufacturing economy, it is all black and white and everything is a linear relationship. You work more you get more. In a developed economy, innovation is key and there is no right answer or textbook to teach you that. However, in that type of economy, you will have winners and losers. Some people are just more innovative than others. I can start to see the need for foreign talent in Singapore, but this question is a good first step to bring the local talent up to par with the foreigners. Maybe slowly, parents will start to see the value of play and exploration versus tuiton all day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OMG! Your jam question! Judging on the context you are blogging, definitely the 400g jar would be cheaper with the 0.10 discount. To see whether I'm deducing correctly, I took my calculator to check! Haha! I cheated somehow but I admit it! Seriously, the savings is really marginal. Unless I'm buying in bulk then the savings will be significant. However, I don't think a everyday consumer will do that. I would take the 400g jar whether there's a discount or not factoring on consumption rate and the possibility of food wastage. A 400g of jam can take me months to finish. But if it were Prego pasta sauce, I would probably get a few 400g of sauces and my one week's dinner would be solved. I don't mind having pasta everyday.

    Yeah I know it's not about supermarketing here... I digressed... I didn't know this has been a hoo-ha. As I read it... ~sign~ And I'm really speechless. I'd guess parents are just overly concerned and doubting their children's common senses and ability to think. We are never taught to become creative thinkers and this aspect of learning is largely neglected. Just as what Sir Ken Robinson said, "As children grow up, we start to educate them progressively from the waist up. And then we focus on their heads. And slightly to one side." Singapore is no different just that we have an additional strong touch of kiasuism...

    I wonder are you aware of this scratch head debate: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156195255530397&set=a.10150651200310397.694502.702850396&type=3&theater ? Seems controversial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Katie. I am one of those people who will buy jars of jam at the supermarket just because they are on sale and then 2 years later realize, oh damn I barely ate half of it? But yeah, I'm always tempted by special offers and discounts when shopping :)

      As for the Nadine Yap case, good grief.

      Delete
    2. I am learning my lesson finally. No point buying the cheaper item only to end up throwing it away as my cash output is higher. Toilet paper and most toiletries lasts a long time so not a problem. Perishables --- no.

      Delete
  6. Hi! I just chanced upon your blog (now where did I start from... Ah yes from the post about too many universities in Sg) and I've been jumping across posts of interests. Great work writing these posts!

    Just wanted to say that I'm not good in Mathematics (just got back promos results and got U for H1 Maths, atrocious I know right..) but I was able to work out in my head that the value of the jams would almost be equivalent! On using the calculator, the 400g jar is ever so slightly cheaper. Now that certainly restored some faith in my ability :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Actually I realised, of course they should be almost equivalent given differences in price sales are usually not too big with 10% discount thus making the 400g jar cheaper and it's value closer to the 650g jar, so what I said was quite redundant.

    Anyway, how I worked out was.. (not sure if this is legit) I try to get the price value closer to the jar weight for easier comparison i.e. by multiplying 2

    215 x 2 = 430
    Compared to 400g is a difference of 30 units.

    350 x 2 = 700
    Compared to 650g is a difference of 50 units.

    The smaller the unit difference, the lesser you pay. So the 400g jar now is better value for money. Not sure if this makes sense haha

    ReplyDelete