It is astonishing that they can try to present this kind of defence in a court of law - look, you can tell yourself whatever you want in private, you can justify it in any way you want to yourself in private. But when trying to convince a judge in the court of law, under intense public scrutiny, they are still sticking to their story that China Wine was "deemed a success" in spite of the total absence of any form of commercial success. Now it is so easy to pour scorn on Sun Ho short lived foray into the American market - but I have been issued a challenge. Zhao asked me on Facebook, "If Sun Ho were to employ you as her PR consultant, how would you try to spin this to make Sun Ho look good or limit the damage? Maybe their current approach may seem rather self-delusional, but what is the alternative? What kind of statement would you issue if you were Sun Ho's new PR manager?"
Is it possible to put a positive spin on the Sun Ho story thus far? |
Alright challenge accepted Zhao. May I state a disclaimer please - whilst I have worked in marketing and PR for many years, I am not approaching the issue from a legal point of view. I have no legal background or training. What I am proposing is no more than an alternative way to present Sun Ho's career in the last few years to try to make her look a bit better in the public eye, this in no way constitutes any kind of legal defence that can be used in court. Furthermore, from the amount of scorn I have poured on Sun Ho's career, you do know how I think her music is one big joke - however, as I do like a challenge and I shall attempt to justify Sun Ho's career. It is too easy to kick a man (or a woman, in this case) who is already down. So please bear this in mind - I am treating this as an academic exercise, I am no fan of Sun Ho, okay? In the next few paragraphs, I shall pretend I am Sun Ho's new PR spokesman and how I would respond to current criticisms about her music in light of the ongoing court case. There will be some geni.us links in this article - they will take you to your local iTunes store where you can preview and purchase the tracks mentioned in the article.
*****************************************************************************
"Firstly, thank you very much for your interest in Sun Ho and her music. With regards to all the criticism about her single China Wine, please let me be clear: we are not pretending for a moment that China Wine and Kill Bill were successful - the lack of commercial success was disappointing to say the least. Sun Ho worked extremely hard in America with Wyclef and his team on this project and no one is more disappointed than her, because she didn't want to let anyone down. However, we are not sorry that we took a chance to work with Wyclef Jean - he had just been working with Shakira on the global hit Hips Don't Lie and if China Wine had been half as successful as Hips Don't Lie, then all the hard work would have been worth it. Sun Ho did learn from her mistakes and her follow up single Fancy Free demonstrated just how versatile she was and she was able to reinvent her music, image and style altogether.
Many singers do try to reinvent themselves during their long careers - it is necessary to refresh their image, try new musical styles, collaborate with different people in order to reach out to new audiences, win new fans and surprise old fans. Madonna had experimented with fusing Indian music in her album Ray Of Light - the result was the haunting yet beautiful album track Shanti Ashtangi. The song wasn't a commercial success as it was never released as a single but it does prove how versatile Madonna is as an artist taking on a completely different and unfamiliar genre of music and creating a fusion track like that. Kylie Minogue is another artiste who has experimented with various genres of music - from pop to indie to rock to dance. Not every one of Kylie's reinventions have been huge successes - she has had singles which have flopped. None of her singles from her indie album Impossible Princess (1997) made top ten in the UK or even back in her native Australia. I still think that is one of Kyle's best albums despite the lack of commercial success - the music on that album just wasn't quite what the public had an appetite for at that time.
Does the lack of commercial success mean that this song was a complete failure? I challenge you, watch the music video below and you be the judge. Why does everything have to be judged by commercial success? Justin Bieber has achieved a huge amount of commercial success, but many people simply can't stand his music (I swear I literally ran for cover the last time I heard the song Baby when it was played in a shop!) - I prefer music like While The Earth Sleeps by Peter Gabriel and Deep Forest which has far more depth and character despite lacking commercial success.
And perhaps the strangest, most recent such collaboration was on Psy's 2014 single Hangover where he teamed up with Snoop Dogg and G-Dragon in a K-pop meets black American hip hop fusion. As interesting an experiment as it was, the single Hangover's performance in the charts was disappointing - reaching 26 in the US and it didn't chart at all in the UK but more significantly, it failed to chart in Psy's native South Korea as well. Compared to Gangnam Style and Gentleman, these results were very disappointing given how Snoop Dogg has had five top ten hits in the US including a huge number one Drop It Like Its Hot (2004). So as you can see, such collaborations can yield poor results for a global superstar like Psy. Such is the nature of such experimental collaborations - there are no guarantees of success.
We are not trying to pretend for a moment that Sun Ho's China Wine was a qualified success - we are only too aware of the public's reaction to it and yes, we have read the comments left on her Youtube page. All I am saying is that singers like Sun Ho have to reinvent themselves and try new things - she could have been quite happy singing Mandarin ballads for the rest of her career but that would have meant never expanding beyond the East Asian Chinese market. In hindsight, we do realize that working with Wyclef Jean was probably a mistake and if we had the chance to do it all over again, we would have chosen a different producer and avoided reggae altogether, but hindsight is always 2020. Sun Ho had the ambition and the talent to try to break into the American market, but unfortunately her career suffered because of some poor decisions that were made. Should she be crucified for trying? That seems rather harsh.
So, what can we learn from the case study of Whitney Houston? The key lesson is that singers have to take risks, innovate, reinvent themselves, keep themselves interesting to a new, younger audience in order to remain relevant in this industry or risk slipping into oblivion. Whitney Houston may have had a string of number ones back in the 1980s and 1990s, but she was unable to sustain herself in the 2000s and in spite of her earlier fame and success, did just that - she slipped into oblivion later in her career. It was only with her untimely, unfortunate death at the age of 48 (in 2012 when she drowned in her hotel room bathtub) that rekindled a fresh interest in her music, but once again, the interest was in her earlier hits from the 1980s and 1990s, rather than her later work. If even someone like the great Whitney Houston can slip into oblivion, then that shows how important it is for singers to try to reinvent themselves and create fresh material to continually woo new audiences in what is an extremely competitive industry.
As for the ongoing trial involving Kong Hee and another members of CHC, we cannot comment on it as it is an ongoing case - we just want to clarify that Sun Ho has not been charged with any crime and thus is not directly involved in this case. She is an artiste, a singer, a musician and for the last few years has been very much focused on working on her music rather than all the paperwork that goes on behind the scenes - that does not concern her at all.
Yours faithfully,
Sun Ho's imaginary new PR manager who doesn't exist.
*******************************************************************************
Please note that I have treated this blog post as an academic exercise in marketing & PR - the piece above does not represent my personal opinion even if I did use my knowledge of the media & music industry to craft the statement above. I am not a fan of Sun Ho and I can't wait for Kong Hee & gang to be sent to jail for a very, very long time. So you see, that is how I would defend Sun Ho's career - I acknowledged the mistakes she has made, explained the context of the industry and celebrated the things she did right. Her current approach of complete denial to the point of being self-delusional is laughable at best and that is why she has been mocked to no end by Singaporeans on social media. A slice of humble pie and a far more PR-savvy marketing manager would be exactly what I would prescribe Sun Ho now.
As usual, please feel to leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Many thanks for reading.
Hey I've written an article based on your latest take.
ReplyDeletehttp://anyhowhantam.blogspot.com/2014/08/city-harvest-trial-lots-for-defense-to.html
Hope it explains the length of the trial and part of his defense strategy.
Interesting article indeed, I've just read it :) Thanks for the heads up. Yeah this whole case fascinates me no end and has given me plenty to talk about on my blog.
DeleteI would correct you though, you were not clear about how songs chart on the billboard hot 100 - it isn't merit per se, but a combination of airplay, download, sales + other sources like Spotify (and other similar sites). Hence that's how a godawful song like Justin Bieber's Baby can get to number one on that chart because it is popular enough (but sounds bloody awful). There's no redeeming merit to any of Justin Bieber's awful songs, but he keeps enjoying a huge amount of commercial success in the US market because he remains popular with some people (who have very bad taste in music).
It goes to show you need commercial appeal to get into the charts. Something Sun Ho just didn't quite get.
Yeah sorry, I knew I wasn't doing you justice in explaining the bit where you shared 2 years ago about how a song can top the 1 chart that matters - Billboard Hot 100. But I do think ppl who read your blog will know exactly what's needed following your many explanations.
DeleteAnyway thanks to you I'm blogging. :) Your commercial explanations are very good much better than anything I could ever muster, but perhaps my reading of how the Law here works is better.
Btw I am a Belieber! But yeah although I won't go round listening to Justin all day or buy his every record, he's had some awful songs that make it in part because of who he is and the following he has. As you said Ms Ho had neither and the US project was always going to be a failure unless Kong Hee had thought and approached it in the correct way. Even then it could still fail, just look at how many people send some really good songs to our Youtube accounts, but they all cannot find the breakthrough.
Money plays a huge part or can play a huge part. Problem was in her case, Kong Hee was using money that wasn't really his or hers for it. And with the imminent failure looming, it all unravelled. Only if it succeeded, and she became a famous star, then the money could be recouped. Still wrong though in the eyes of the Law to use the money in the way it was used, but if she succeeded and repaid the amount, it might not be discovered or if discovered, the penalties might not be as serious as the ones he's now facing.
Aiyoh, you like Justin Beiber? Eeeks. Noooooo.
DeleteNice piece you wrote BTW, but you should be careful about this 'wall of text' syndrome which can put off some readers - always break up your long post with loads of photos, diagrams and youtube videos, it makes it less daunting to reader a longer piece. Think about giving it a magazine feel rather than a textbook feel.
And had Sun Ho been commercially successful, who knows - Kong Hee would have had enough money to cover his tracks, there wouldn't be a big hole in CHC's finances and yes, that means he probably would have gotten away with it.
Hi Alex, I recently stumbled onto your blog and have enjoyed most of the posts I chose to read. I like your genuine style and incisive comments on many issues, especially those on the CHC and NLB episodes. Your PR spin using 'reinvention' for Sun Ho certainly does some damage control for her (in my opinion), although we all know it was never for this purpose that they embarked on the US campaign. In any case, I certainly hope they don't use anything you said for their defence (which may turn out to be useful)! I was wondering if you came across this FB page called CHC Confessions? Somebody actually attends the court session and provides as much details during the cross examinations as possible. This is partly because CHC apparently sends students to start queuing for admission at the break of dawn to prevent members of the public from attending the sessions (although most seats will eventually be left empty). Assuming nothing has been faked nor omitted (of course the page has it's own agenda), it is clear that Kong Hee is playing a blame game. Someone said that Sharon Tan (one of the accused) looked 'visibly shocked' when Kong conveniently laid the blame of some issue on her. I feel a bit sad for people who continue to support him. And I have been following this because a few good friends of mine (and some family members) have been going to another megachurch (claiming to be 'non-denominational') and they frequently refer to their deity as 'Daddy God'. I am getting increasingly disturbed by their blindness and their FB postings just make my eyes roll so much they are ready to pop out soon. While this 'church' does not seem to have any leaders with the ambition of becoming an international pop star, everything else is largely the same - reaping outlandish profits from the fears and faith of the weak. I've been reading up on Leon Festinger's cognitive dissonance theory and it does illuminate the behaviour of the 'flock'. How can people be so blind? Why do people not learn? My friends asked people who are not believers to not comment on their posts - there is no debate in religion I guess. Do you have good friends who are like that? What would you do? I am staunchly atheist, by the way.
ReplyDeleteHiya and thanks for your comment. Of course lah, you and I both know that it was never her intention to reinvent herself and experiment with new styles of music - in any case, it was a bloody expensive experiment with a price tag of S$24 million - aiyoh. We live in the age of the internet, where teenagers can experiment and create their own music and put them up on their music on their Myspace page, you can experiment with different genres of music in your own living room, on your laptop on a budget of $24. What I have done in this 'defense' is clearly ignore the fact that she spent an obscene amount of money on a very unsuccessful reinvention that has led to zero results and a huge lawsuit that will probably land Kong Hee & gang in jail - it's called defending the indefensible, something lawyers and PR pros do all the time actually.
DeleteBut nonetheless, I thought that as a PR challenge, that would be the route I would take to try to justify the godawful China Wine and Kill Bill - as no more than a reinvention exercise, experimenting with a different genre of music. If they wanna use my approach as a defence they are free to - but so far, they have shown complete ignorance as to the way PR works in the music industry from the very beginning, their defence has been implausible at best, totally ridiculous at worst.
I share your concern about your family members going to such a megachurch - my mother goes to church as well and is the kind of old woman who is incapable of thinking for herself, she's not street smart, she's not highly educated and she is very vulnerable and gullible. But I am assured that my sister who is super smart goes to church with her, so at least I know my sister will take care of my mother when it comes to church affairs. Phew. What would I do without my super smart and wonderful da jie.
Like you, I am a militant atheist. All I can say is that you need to reach a compromise with your family members and come to a mutual, respectful understanding on the issue of religion. I can't overprescribe a solution as I don't know your family, but you need to speak with them and extend your understanding and love in a way which does not infringe on their right to religion.
Nice try at the damage control...there's just only one very small problem. She wasn't exactly a success in the mandopop scene too. They had to set aside money to buy back surplus albums and/or buy the charts. So now what? Can you the imaginary PR manager still salvage the situation?
ReplyDeleteSomething I really can't understand about whole thing is, why didn't kong hee just go ahead and ask for the church to fund her career. He's always been so blatant about asking enormous amounts for their OTT churches so why not just do the same thing? Why deviate from the norm when even now with each new revelation in court, educated church members are still willing to blind themselves. Or maybe right from the start both Kong Hee & Ho Yeow Sun knew they were doing something illegal but decided to go ahead anyway. Recklessness, the thing that falls the mighty. Lol!
Twenty-tree
Hiya Muchopunk. Yeah I am more than aware of the way money was set aside from CHC's coffers to boost her Mandopop sales - the imaginary PR manager cannot deny that fact, he can only use a tactic called "compartmentalizing the problem" as a diversion tactic when that tricky question is raised. How does this tactic work? You talk about her English-language career in isolation without referring too much to her Mandopop career, as if the two weren't that closely related, you do not use a dodgy, questionable piece of evidence as a piece of defence. The court case and media focus here has been on China Wine, Kill Bill and the way she spent a lot of money in America, rather than her Mandopop career.
DeleteAs for Kong Hee's tactics, who knows? More on his motivation here: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/kong-hees-motivation-explained-thanks.html
I am surprised that given her notoriety at the moment, her music sales are not moving.
ReplyDeleteHi Kelvin! You do realize we've known each other for 19 years, since 1995 (army days)... Funny I never told you to look at my blog via FB but you've found me nonetheless! :)
Delete