Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Avinology and NS in Singapore: What did you learn?

I am sure some of you must have seen this post: http://alvinology.com/2012/03/28/what-has-ns-done-for-you/ and if you haven't, then you really must. It does give you an insight into the experiences of what us male Singaporeans have to go through when it comes to national service. It would've been hilarious if it wasn't so true. But you know me, I am so long-winded, that's why I don't use Twitter. I can't say what I wanna say in 140 characters. So I am going to respond to Limpeh's usual way. This might have been more funny if my friend Melissa didn't just remind me of this story which could have ended in tragedy. http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/18-old-recruit-attempted-swim-tekong-052017546.html

The kid was very silly to even attempt such a swim which would be challenging for all except very strong swimmers. Pulau Tekong Kechil to Changi is just about 2.5 km and to try to do this swim at night with no guidance, well that's a suicide mission. The kid could've easily swam in the wrong direction, got disorientated by the currents and it was extremely lucky that he got picked up by the police coast guard. Now this kid was an RJC student - so it's not like he's that stupid and wouldn't have been able to estimate the distance to the mainland or at least realize how dangerous or difficult the swim would be. What was he thinking? My thoughts turn to his parents who must have been distraught at the possibility of their son possibly drowning that night - then again, does this surprise me? No. I've been there myself and have spent time on Tekong during BMT.
Oh those were the days...

I served national service - all 2 years 4 months of it from 1995 to 1997. Yes I am of the generation where you had to serve 2 years 6 months if you were of the A-level batch but if you have done well for you physical fitness test before enlistment, you are entitled to a 2 month discount, hence I served 2 years 4 months. My parents foolishly thought that it would be good for me, "it'll make you a man" they told me. I beg to differ.
Many people in the SAF misunderstand a fundamental concept of patriotism: they seem to think that serving NS would make you patriotic, but that's putting the horse before the cart. I left NS feeling much less patriotic than when I enlisted, in fact, I felt so unpatriotic that I emigrated. In an ideal world, serving one's country like this should be a voluntary act inspired by patriotism. Did you know that in WW1, the British army was in fact made up almost entirely volunteers (as opposed to conscripts) at the beginning of the conflict? Add to the fact that an estimated one million British people died as a result of the war - one would wonder, how many Singaporean men would voluntarily enlist to protect their country if a war broke out tomorrow?

If one was patriotic, one would gladly die for one's country. However, compelling young men to serve national service when they really don't want to will not somehow inspire patriotism - instead, it will drain what little patriotism there is left.
How patriotic are you?

If you were to look at a country like Israel where the Israeli-Jews are willing to die to defend their nation-state, they gladly serve national service and turn up on the first day of NS, willing to follow orders. In Taiwan, there is a sense of threat as well from China, so this threat makes young Taiwanese men willing to stand up and rise to the challenge and accept the responsibility of national defense. I could go on listing countries with conscription who also have some sense of imminent threat: Cyprus, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, North and South Korea - there's nothing quite like the threat of war to inspire a sense of patriotism. Now the problem with Singapore is that there is no imminent threat, it's by and large a very peaceful part of the world and the Singaporean government is very good at maintaining excellent diplomatic ties with our ASEAN neighbours.

Now to answer Alvin's question: what has NS done for me? Well I am trying hard to look at he positive aspects - to be quite blunt, I'm struggling with this. In fact, I struggled with this so much that I left this, wrote my previous piece on maids getting a day off before coming back to this. Okay, I will start with the more positive aspects before I stick the knife in.
I learnt how to get along with others in the army. 

The biggest lesson I take from NS is to learn how to get along with people - NS was a big difference from my school days. Now as a student, you know you're not obliged to get along with everyone in school. You have your good friends, you form little cliques in school and few people aspire to be popular with everyone. Heck, I had my group of good friends and those I didn't like, I simply ignored. It was a luxury I didn't have in NS.

In the army, you do not get to choose whom you have to work with - that is decided for you by those of senior rank and you have to get along with those people whether you like it or not. It was the first time I was put in that position in my life and it certainly wasn't the last - later on in my working life, I have had to work with people I disliked and get along with them no matter how much I hated their guts. But of course, I didn't have to like these people - no, I merely had to be diplomatic and put on a front. So yes, those were skills I learnt from experience, adapting to my environment in the army.

In order to get along with these people, I learnt how to become the person they wanted me to be - I humbled myself and put them first. For instance, if I knew that this sergeant doesn't like people who speak English, then I would never speak English in front of him and act as if I can't speak English and don't like to speak English in order for him to feel comfortable with me. It was all new to me you know, contrast this to my student days when I was this idealistic young teenager trying so hard to express myself and tell the world who I am. In the army, it's the total opposite. In being whom they wanted me to be in order to get along with people, that process taught me far more about whom I was.
You know the saying, in order to find out what you want to do, you have to find out what you don't want to do? Well the same principle applies when you're a young person seeking to establish your identity. In order to find out who you really are, you have to find out what you are not. And the better I became at fitting in, the more I realized that this was so not the environment for me. I guess I was a really good actor as I managed to fool so many people that I was this total Hokkien-speaking Ah Beng when all I was thinking of was, "I can't wait to get the hell out of here to start university in England."
The thought of studying in England was the light at the end of the tunnel for me.

What was interesting was the way my brain internalized so many functions - let me explain: in JC, as a student, I talked so much. I talked to everyone from my siblings to my friends to my teachers, I never shut up. I talked non-stop. When I had ideas, I had to share it with them. When I had questions, I would ask them and we would talk about it. In the army however, I learnt the golden rule: shut the fuck up. Don't open your mouth. Don't even talk. Shush. Conversation is bad. Keep your head down and mouth shut and hope that no one notices you, keep an extremely low profile, don't provoke anyone, don't offend anyone and if you don't even talk then you're probably going to be alright.

I went from a chatterbox to someone who was quite quiet - and when I did speak, it was never what I wanted to say. Hell no, I said what I wanted others to hear, ranging from senseless banter in Hokkien in order to fit in with the Hokkien pengs to paying compliments to the officers of senior rank in order to massage their egos. I remember at this event, one of the officers I worked for made this terrible speech in broken English and I went up to him after the speech and told him how good his speech was. He knew his English wasn't good and was worried about people laughing at his mistakes. I reassured him that practically everyone in camp spoke English like him and in speaking the people's language - he was able to communicate with them at their wavelength, rather than sound like an English textbook if he spoke perfect English; and by that token, it was good public speaking even if it wasn't great English. You should've seen the smile on his face. Did I mean what I said? Not a chance. I just wanted this officer to like me.

Any conversations I had were not meaningful, but were merely carried out to help me fit in with the people around me. None of them wanted intellectual conversations anyway, not that brain dead army lot. I still had all these ideas in my head and no one to talk to - so I started writing a lot, not just in English but in French as well as I had no one to share these ideas with and putting them to paper felt less crazy than talking to myself. I wrote everything from essays on political and social issues to plays to short stories and I even won a prize in the 1997 in an international play writing competition when I entered some of my plays.
I had entered something like four plays, I can't remember exactly what they were all about but there were some pretty dark ones - such as the one set in a mental institution and two patients who hated each other started talking to each other through a hole in the wall because they were so lonely and despite their obvious hatred for each other, they still talked and argued. The other dark one was about a few passengers on a flight to KL that was going to crash and what they talked about to calm each other down as they knew that they may or may not die but could do nothing about it and one of them started talking about Shakespeare to the others and they started having an argument about Shakespeare, but they couldn't settle it as none of them had a copy of Romeo & Juliet on the plane (which crashed anyway). Then there were two funny ones - one about a woman who was trying to get to job interview and everything going very wrong, a classic comedy of errors. And then the one that one was prize was about a woman whose job was to teach women how to succeed in love and she gives a series of talks to teach other women the secrets of a successful relationship. But we get to see her just before she goes on stage and after and we realize how fake the facade she presents is - that's the one that won the prize - which is quite befitting really, because the protagonist being so fake and insincere was so like me in NS. I got along with everyone but hated most of them.

A friend did ask me then why I didn't just write a play about NS - and I thought, no it's way too close to home. It wasn't creative enough - I wanted to take one aspect of my life in NS (eg. my hypocrisy), put it in a totally different context, create a protagonist who was nothing like me, (ie. an older woman in a difficult relationship) but still doing a lot of the same things I was doing as a soldier. It wasn't meant to be autobiographical - such is art. Many found it hard to believe that the play was written by a man and not a woman - but there you go.

I remember just after my ORD, I ran into one of the guys from my camp at Boat Quay (outside the McDonald's). And he was so happy to see me and he was like, "so when are you going to England? When does term start? etc" He was so keen to keep in touch with me but I thought, I never liked you at all, I only was nice to you because we had to work together. As I stared at him, I thought of all the times I wanted to say something nasty to him but bit my lip and said nothing and guess what? I did the same thing again - instead I told him I was in a hurry and gave him a fake email address and phone number before rushing down Boat Quay to get away from him. I never saw him again and let's keep it that way.
Boat Quay, Singapore

I remembering being oh so naive when I enlisted and when I ORDed, I was wiser to the bullshit of this world. Let me give you an example, okay? I was very religious then and used to go to church faithfully every Sunday. When I witnessed some pretty awful bullying in the army, I went to church and asked a senior church member who was of very senior rank in the army. "Why is there so much bullying going on? Why does God let this happen? Why does the army let this happen?"

The senior officer put his arm around my shoulder and said, "Listen son, the army is not like in school, we could go to a war tomorrow and I may have to give a command to send some men to the front line where they have to face enemy fire and possible death. They may be blown up by enemy fire and they may feel afraid, nobody wants to die. So what some officers do is resort to this kind of method to teach the younger soldiers that they must obey orders no matter what the situation is, sometimes they don't use very nice language but it is all part of the process to instill in them a sense of obedience - to ensure that they know they will always have to follow orders. These young soldiers come from civilian life - maybe they're from rich families with many servants and they don't know what it is like to have to take orders. So our job is to break down their egos, teach them how to function as a unit, within a team, so sometimes, yes this kind of technique which you call 'bullying' is necessary - but it's not bullying really, it's for their own good you know?"
Taming a dog and reasoning with a soldier are very different tasks.

Bullshit I thought, but I guess I wasn't confident enough to challenge that answer. I merely nodded and accepted that someone had given me an explanation. Now 18 years later, I shall refute his explanation. Firstly, soldiers should obey orders because they respect the institution the army represents and they should be there because they have a sense of duty, a sense of patriotism to their country. And if they don't already have that sense of duty and patriotism, then surely some degree of reasoning can be applied to demonstrate to them why they have good reason to feel pride in serving their nation in this capacity. I believe in the power of reason - instead, this senior officer was treating these soldiers the same way one tames a wild beast, through brute force rather than reason. What does he take these young soldiers for? Cannon fodder incapable of thinking or reasoning? In condoning this 'bullying', this officer is allowing the bullies to behave in any way they want in a consequence-free environment.

This led me to learn how to question authority. I was brought up to be a very obedient Singaporean who didn't ask many questions - I suppose many Singaporeans are like that because asking difficult questions means not getting any simple answers. It is admittedly so much easier not to ask questions by that token. As a child in Singapore, one is taught to trust authority - obey the law, listen to the teacher at school, trust the government etc. Some of us break out of that pattern, others don't.

The other major wake-up call I had whilst serving NS was the reality of working under idiots. Oh boy, did I work under a few really stupid idiots in my time and I'm sure anyone who has served in the military can tell you the same thing. In the army, rank trumps intelligence - need I say more? When you work under someone more intelligent than yourself, you learn from them. When you work under someone who's clearly an idiot, then you learn other things as well - such as how to hide your feelings, how to subvert them covertly and how to manipulate them. The learning opportunities are abound in NS, you just have to approach these challenges with the right attitude.
I did a large amount of self-study via distance learning whilst in NS. Nobody asked me to study, I chose to do so myself and indeed, the vast majority of NS men do not bother to study - after all, they all have their jobs to do full time, trying to get any kind of studying done after that is pretty tiring. However, it was a great experience studying on my own like that. You see, the Singaporean system is such that one is often spoon-fed and constantly pushed by demanding teachers who check our progress every step of the way. This self-study experience was great preparation for my transition to university, where one is expected to be far more autonomous in one's studying habits and the teachers at college have a far more hands-off approach.

Another important lesson I learnt in NS was to mind my own business. There's this word in Hokkien: kaypoh, which means "busybody". One learnt to look the other way and not get involved in the affairs of others even if it meant acting in a selfish manner. Let me give you an example.

Now all combat fit soldiers in the army have to learn how to use a rifle. Some of us had to use it all the time, others once in a while depending on our vocation. When we go to the rifle range to practice shooting with live ammunition, the ammo was deposited into the rifle's magazine. Now the magazine is detachable from the rifle so as to enable the loading of ammunition - it is the one part of the rifle that you're going to drop or lose.

One day when we were at the rifle range, a soldier in my unit announced that he had lost his magazine. That was a very serious offence - the army wasn't going to allow soldiers to get away with an offence like that. He faced a major punishment for that. We were ordered to scour the area to look for the magazine. Whilst a magazine on its own could not be used to kill someone, losing any part of the rifle was often treated as if you had lost the whole thing.

As we were digging around in the bushes, around the rifle range, a friend - let's call him 朋友 Peng You (Mandarin for 'friend') pulled me aside and confided in me. "I know where his magazine is. I took it. I stole it from him. I think I dropped mine or someone took mine. Shit, is that guy going to get into a lot of trouble now because of me?"

I looked at Peng You and then instantly checked that I still had my magazine. I then paused for a moment and said to Peng You, "You and I never had this conversation, is that clear? I don't know anything, I don't want to know and if I were you, I wouldn't say a word to anyone, okay?" I got up and walked away.

Months later, I found out through another friend, let's call him Nanbar (Tamil for 'friend'). It's too long to retell how I got to know the whole story, but here it is: Nanbar had realized that he had dropped his magazine during a lunch break, so he took advantage of the fact that some of the men left their rifles on the ground as they were trying to get some lunch. Nanbar spotted a rifle on the ground with the magazine still attached and without knowing whose it was, he swiped the magazine.

Moments later, Nanbar was approached by his friend Kawan (Malay for 'friend') who said to him in a panic, "I have lost my magazine, what should I do?" Unaware that he was speaking to the very person who took his magazine, Kawan didn't suspect a Nanbar at all. So Nanbar said to Kawan, "See Peng You over there? He's leaning against a tree and is fast asleep. If you took his magazine quietly, he probably wouldn't even notice."

So Kawan took Peng You's magazine and Peng You then in turn took someone else's magazine. The tale ended there because the guy Peng You stole the magazine from was simply too honest to steal one from another soldier. We know how the story ended but I have no idea how it began. But you get the idea, back when I was a student, if I knew of any story like this, I would be very tempted to run to the teacher and divulge the whole story but in the army, I simply minded my own business and looked the other way.
The rifle magazine

There you go, this is what NS does to people like Nanbar, Kawan, Peng You and myself. Those of you who have done NS, perhaps you have similar stories to share? What did you learn in NS? Leave a comment, thanks.

Update! Part 2 continues here: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/how-to-rationalize-ns-in-singapore.html

19 comments:

  1. Hi LIFT

    I share similar experiences. My own NS was done in late 80s to early 90s and as the army song goes, "Here we go again, same old sh*t again, up and down this avenue, 2 more years are we'll be through..."

    Conscription is really modern day slavery imposed by the State on its male citizens in a fairly discriminatory manner. Smart people game the system by getting medical downgrades or excuses. The rest of us go through the grind especially in combat roles in operational units.

    It did teach me basic self-defence skills through unarmed combat and some physical fitness. It also taught me to shoot with M16 and later during reservist SAR 21 rifle.

    The downside was experiencing how a top-down bureaucratic organisation conducted itself. Being pushed around and given sh*t jobs by regulars to pass time e.g. area cleaning, scrubbing staircases, clearing drains, plucking weeds, even cleaning a manhole without safety equipment.

    The episode of the lost magazine that you narrated captured well how NS teaches one to shirk responsibility and to mind your own business or cover your own backside.

    During my time, I also saw a regular killed when his SM-1 tank overturned during training for skill-at-arms competition and during reservist, one of the battalion reservist collapsed (and later died) during his ICT IPPT 2.4km run.

    In a nut shell, 2.5 years + 10 years annual ICT cycle = wasted time, lost opportunities in education or employment (during full-time NS) and basically terrible misuse of human resources by the State. The upside is not turning into a fat slob due to annual IPPT requirement as a reservist and knowing how to operate infantry weapons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment! Right now, I am having a really shitty day at work with my boss being really unreasonable and I am drawing on all the diplomatic skills I have picked up in NS. This is the world of investment management and sometimes, I feel the urge to revert to my eager student self, the boy who would put up his hand in class and say, "teacher teacher I know the answer!" and today I have completely switched gears and slipped into NS mode if my boss wants to be so unreasonable. In NS I was like, "just keep your head down, mouth shut and count the days no matter what happens" - on days like this, I do the same and just remind myself that I am being quite well paid to take shit like that rather than in NS, when we were paid peanuts to take even more shit. Sorry, gotta get back to work.

      Delete
    2. Oh gosh, talk about applying what I've learnt. There was a major fuck up with a client's account this morning, like HUGE fuck up and I'm the piggy caught in the middle squealing because I am the one at the end of the day who is dealing with the client in Singapore.

      Without going into the details of how we fucked up so badly, let me tell you how I dealt with it. It was 50-50 my fault and my boss D's fault - he sent me some instructions via a blackberry message which was very short, not in complete sentences and I showed it to S our head of back office and said to her, "Please tell me what the hell D means here, it is far from clear." So S and I interpreted D's email in a way which we thought made sense, then the other director L said, "we can't do that, if D wants to do that then you get him to sign this off, I won't sign this off."

      So we went to D and he said, "you two completely misunderstood what I wrote!" And S and I were like, here we go again, D and his bloody blackberry cryptic messages. So we're like, okay so what do you want us to do now? A lot of nasty bullshit went back and forth, I blamed S and S blamed me but I think to be fair it's really D's fault for not being clear in the first place.

      Anyway, so I had to go back to the client in Singapore and explained the situation - and in so doing, I told him that my colleague S completely fucked up and I am so so sorry that S fucked up and I apologize for her mistake and she would be harshly punished by the boss for her mistake and I convey our apologies (but don't blame me). So the client was angry but with the company (rather than me personally).

      Then I went back to D and told him the client in Singapore was the one making unreasonable requests and misread my emails, making unreasonable requests when it came to us processing his trade etc - and I told him that I am just the piggy squeezed in the middle, don't shoot the messenger for the message, I am just doing my job as the middle man and my boss responded by saying that the client in Singapore is a ####ing ####.

      There you go, apart from S and I blaming each other internally (as we cannot blame the big boss realistically), I think it's the equivalent of falling into a sewage plant and walking away smelling of roses. I thank the SAF for teaching me the Chinese art of Taichi.

      Delete
    3. Hi LIFT

      Yes, that is what we call CYA, shi**y part of working in organisations and with human beings. Your remark that you are compensated to take the sh** is so true. As conscripts, we risk life and limb and yet have to take the shi** from some bullying, Warrants/Sgts/PCs/OCs throwing their weight around when their PMS strikes and we only draw NS allowance that then was lower than what foreign construction workers earned.

      Majulah Singapura.

      Delete
    4. True - whenever I face shit at work (who doesn't once in a while), I just think about getting paid and once I can contrast that to my NS days when there was plenty of shit and no money, I feel better already.

      Delete
  2. Firstly and most importantly, LIFT, thank you for finally sharing what I requested you to privately respond to some time back, after taking the time and the courage to do so.



    I was 'condemned' in the army.
    That kind of guy who is considered so hopeless as a soldier, that "what the heck is he doing here? Oh yes, he's one of those useless conscripts… so why doesn't he go jump into a hole and vanish? No, wait, then we'll have to write reports and answer for that… so let's put up with him, but treat him like crap…"

    I feared the army.
    In naive, pacifistic teenage days, I felt that the military was all wrong, and imagined one day there would be no more organised armed conflict, ever.
    I feared it so much I sacrificed English club in secondary school to join the army cadet corps.
    I washed out before completing the 3rd year, and by then there was too little for me to go back to English club.
    'Preparing' for army did me nothing really good.

    Notice I use the term 'army'.
    I do not feel I did the 'nation' any true 'service' that way.
    I think my real National Service all these years, has to be teaching my students how to do their English better.
    And of course, painstakingly raising our family.



    I graduated 2 and a half years from all that, feeling useless as someone who was going to be a university undergraduate.
    Feeling washed out from military service is really good for destroying self-esteem.
    Even now in my 40s, the trauma continues to wear off.
    Maybe my continued vicarious preoccupation with war games and conflict history is a sign of lifelong disturbance.

    Loyalty and patriotism?
    It's puzzling for an ugly duckling, misunderstood, teased and generally kicked around by many strange aliens whom one is supposed to give one's life for.
    Loyalty and patriotism come naturally and most powerfully, when you're among those whom you can trust and feel comfortable with, who support you and make you support them in turn.
    In Singapore, we call it Psychological Defence, one of the 5 arms of Total Defence.

    But just like Singapore has failed to engineer babies, how much has it succeeded in programming reluctant soldiers?
    Why do some of us have to get our sense of self-worth destroyed, for the convenient excuse of the common good?

    Even worse, it has been like trying to make ostriches fly like eagles, and eagles run like ostriches!
    Such a waste of national resources!



    But what about those skills picked up during NS (national service)?
    Those life skills belong to me, they are my property.
    Some of them were triggered by necessity, as a survival response to bewildering harshness.
    Most of them I acquired earlier and later than that Dark Age of my life, many self-taught, the rest preciously nurtured by those who cared for me as a person.



    With that in mind, finally I must thank the few in the army, without whom I would not have found back myself by today.
    I still don't think it's appropriate to name you here, but you silently diverted some of that excessive harshness away from me, the kind of treatment given to 'slackers' who do not seem to pull their weight.

    No, you could not seem kind as you joined in the scolding and meting of punishment, but I look back at those years now, and I realised how you provided those more humane moments of relief, when I feared getting the worst but somehow it got just a little better, for a while more.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Alan - sorry, a bit busy here, work situation bubbling over like ... aaargh. Just wanted to say that I don't always read all comments before approving them if I am having a v busy day and recently I found a 'spam' folder and noticed that one of your messages got flagged up as spam and I'm like, oh that's Alan H, I'll just approve it. So yeah, it's not like I sat on that message for a reason.

      Delete
    2. No worries, LIFT, I appreciate every comment that you allow through, and reading what you've been going through recently, I can feel the tremendous workload on your side.

      In fact, I suspect that -asingaporeanson- might be similarly swamped, with work and family and all, that he cannot respond directly as much as he might wish to.

      On my part, I must admit that I'm beginning to experience comment fatigue, after pouring out much of myself while struggling for the same balance as both of you.
      So if I do really drop off for a while, I might be recharging to share again in future.
      Currently, my emails are backlogged into mid-February, when I used to clear them current to 4 days back!

      So let's all of us continue as much or as little as we want, an enjoy whatever interaction which naturally follows! :-)

      Delete
    3. Oh yeah. I've been having a shit day at work - but that's the thing you see, sometimes I can get along really well with my boss, like he knows I like ice cream and we'll often go for ice cream together. He loves the fact that I'm not one of those guys who just like getting drunk and would gladly eat ice cream instead instead of having beer after work. So sometimes, I almost see him as a friend - but when he gets moody, demanding and unreasonable, then I slip into NS-mode and just go into auto-pilot. I just wish I know in advance when i should be in relaxed mode and when I should be in NS-mode, y'know?

      Delete
    4. I believe I can understand the tricky nature of working for a boss who is/was a friend, or has become like one.

      Recently, I was honestly shocked that someone I worked for, with whom I was once rather friendly colleagues, reacted in a high-handed manner, and basically blew up at suggestions I made to increase my job scope and adjust payment rates, so that I may approach adequate income for our family.
      And unlike an acquaintance or friend naturally would, there has been no direct effort at making up, so I get the impression he is maintaining the stance that he is in no wrong, since he's in charge.

      I understood later that this family business had met some recent setbacks which were very personally disappointing to them, and my long email came at that moment.
      But friend to friend, this is no way to treat someone else, even if s/he's working for you.

      Anyway, I leave it to his conscience.
      The trickier bit, LIFT, is how much as a friend we can make them aware of their very human behaviour, and even support or help them do better in future.

      I've got no illusions about that, especially more so now.
      It's really tough to get people to admit to their flaws and consciously amend them, especially when they're in a position of authority/power.
      Even children already exhibit such strong tendencies!
      One has to be humble and honest within oneself to even start doing so.

      Whatever the case, all the continuing best with your work family!

      It's strangely heartwarming to me to learn of going for casual drinks/snacks with bosses; 'strange', because it does not seem to happen here wherever I have worked.

      With time and experience I guess, one might even feel, see and smell their mood swings starting, and switch into whatever reaction modes are most effective!

      Delete
    5. Mind you, on the subject of snacking with my boss, it only happens with one boss. I have two bosses, one thin one fat (Ah Pui and Ah San) and it's the fat one who snacks and he would be generous enough to say "let's go for an ice cream" etc together. The other one drinks diet coke and black coffee, eats virtually nothing and is thinner than me, crikey. Mind you, the thinner one never gets angry - but it's the fatter one who can range from being extremely nice to extremely rude ... Perhaps it's a cultural thing or a personality thing. Some people show emotions, others never display them.

      Delete
    6. I guess if you can control your appetite and urge to snack, you can control your emotions?

      Mind you, I'm not think but I'm not fat either. I'm just average but I never say no to an ice cream :)

      Delete
    7. Now you've got me thinking again, LIFT!

      You might or might not have caught my mentioning elsewhere that I am obese most of my life?
      So do I lack self control throughout, any more or less than those skinnies who are hardcore addicts at drinking/smoking/sex/gambling/spending? ;-)

      I wouldn't want to delve further into convenient (but often grossly inaccurate) stereotyping.
      Instead I want to suggest that from the little I have read from you, Ah Pui Boss is naturally prone to swing extremes in mood.
      Positively, he could be generous on snacking.
      Negatively, he could be over-indulgent in certain aspects of life, including biting and chewing at others when moody, to frequent detrimental results.

      I'm not speaking theoretically at armchair length.
      I have Type 2 diabetes (adult onset), and one significant symptom of it might be depression.
      I also have hypertension, and I don't think it's just because I'm so fat and aggravated by my constantly deep anxiety, but the OTHER way round.

      We have tendencies, genetic and cultural, from young.
      They push us towards medical disorders earlier and more seriously, from younger too.

      But before anyone starts snickering, feeling like passing snide remarks about Tubby, consider this: as human beings we quite equally share time-bombs, of dying at the end of our lives from the major causes of heart attack, cancer or pneumonia.
      Let's not therefore, as the Chinese saying goes, be those fleeing 36 steps laughing at those fled 72 steps (even simpler in English: pot; kettle; black).

      So I say, and I believe LIFT agrees, regard your bosses with imperfections and all.
      In the end, most are in totality not much better or worse than you are, and people universally want to be well regarded by others, no?

      Delete
    8. Oh hi Alan, I totally forgot that you have mentioned that you're overweight. I was just rambling on with my two bosses in mind and the way they behave with me. Yeah Ah Pui boss has mood swings - from generous to v demanding and rude and loses his temper with me. Whilst Ah San boss has never bought me an ice cream and is a caffeine addict (black coffee + diet coke non-stop all day) and always seems tense, like he bottles up his tension and stress and I think all that caffeine only makes him even more high strung, whilst Ah Pui boss just lets it out, even if it means shouting at people. Aiyoh. He nearly got arrested at Bangkok airport for an outburst once with airport staff if I haven't intervened and apologized profusely on his behalf he would've been locked up and I would've been faced with the choice of "do i get on the plane to Singapore or do I stay and try to see what I can do ..." Mind you, he eats his feelings - I remember when we did get back from Bangkok that evening, we went for dinner at a food court and I suggested he had either Char Kway Teow or Fried Hokkien Mee (since he asked for something local). Guess what? He had both and I was like, erm ... okay! Guess that's why he is fat. And then we went for ice cream after that. Go figure.

      Delete
  3. Hi LIFT,

    I didn't go through NS but observed during my university days the effects NS has on the young Singapore-citizen male undergraduates of my cohort. There is a lost of idealism, passion, increase in self-presevation, etc.

    I have similar rite of passage through my nursing training and work. My full comment exceeded the 4,096 characters limit of Blogger, so I posted it on my blog instead.
    http://winkingdoll.blogspot.ca/2012/04/nursing-in-singapore-what-did-you-learn.html

    Nursing in Singapore opened my eyes to the ugly side of human nature of some people in the "caring" profession. Army is supposedly a "fight for your life" profession (conscripted or sign-on), so I don't expect people inside to be any different/better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Limpeh,so do you think our ranks and vocation played any part in how your perceived your 2.5 years in NS?

    I don't have the statistics to back me up, but I am wondering if those people who complain about NS and how it wasted their 2.5 years of their lives were most likely specs and enlisted personnel (especially the "men") who are often perceived as lazy and slack and looking out for every opportunity to “siam” every single arrow, otherwise too lacking in leadership qualities or fitness to go into Officer Cadet School.

    "Chao keng during BMT lah! See, cannot go OCS and become Occifer!"

    Please not that I don't have anything against these two groups above- I was also an enlisted personnel in a combat unit and I also trained side by side with the "Hokkien Peng".

    I mean officers are of a different class. They had their ranks, privileges and various opportunities to exercise their leadership skills and I guess in general were appreciated more than the other two classes of soldiers. I would guess that
    they had some emotional maturity during that time that motivated them to make full use of the 2.5 years of their national service, and that allowed them to better rationalize their experience.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a meeting in 50 mins and have to dash as I have to get ready, but I would just want to reply you in a nutshell. Please resist the urge to imagine that just because one has passed OCS they are somehow a better breed of man. Good grief, I remember a good friend D.O. back in the way. D.O. wanted so so so badly to go to OCS and become and officer just to prove to himself that he is a man -he had other serious issues in his life and he lacked self-confidence and he somehow became fixated with becoming an officer and when he failed to do so, he was so upset. I was like, look man, listen to me, there's more than one way to prove that you're a worthy man with great qualities, use your own benchmarks and standards, don't allow others to 'grade' you like that and decide if you're worthy.

      I have met some officers who were good officers and some who made me seriously question the OCS' admission criteria - let's just say there were some who were excellent and some who were really fucking awful.

      There's this story which I will find the time to tell you at some point ... but not now as I have to run. But fucking hell, this must've been like the WORST officer I have come across in my unit.

      I rationalized my experience alright even though I was not an officer and I think it is entirely up to one to make the most of one's experience in NS. It's not up to the SAF to make it worth your while - the onus lies on the individual soldier, not the SAF. I took the initiative - in Hokkien we call that 'ay hiao tzi-dong' ("knows how to automatic").

      After all, we all had min. 18 years of life experiences before we stepped into the SAF. I believe the first 18+ years has done far more in shaping one characters and personalities than the few months of BMT+whatever training the SAF can give us. The bottom line is this: we're already the people we are when we get there, we're not new born babies and they only have that little time to shape us - they cannot change much, if you're of high calibre, then it's thanks to the first 18 years of your life. And if you're shit, well, then they cannot polish a turd.

      Delete
    2. As mentioned just earlier, stereotyping is convenient but too often grossly misleading.
      And human diversity within any conceivable category is astonishing.

      Simple clichés that repeat the above: there's often a black sheep; the exception proves the rule.

      I remember a Hainanese-speaking Chinese other-rank who was already running a family business, and drove fellow campmates of his kind to and from camp in an older-model Mercedes.
      Officers with brand new cars could not even begin to compete with his real-world status outside!

      And of course I do not have first-hand experiences into the world of army officers.
      My resentment of not being treated as an equal will therefore not be cancelled, by their very real sufferings actually serving the nation more effectively.
      Unless, of course, they are more of my personal friends.

      A few years later, I met an acquaintance from my former secondary school, on university campus.
      He was studying the far more prestigious Law, I was stuck with ubiquitous Arts.
      Yet he was so upset, as a reservist officer, about talk of reducing future national service liability down by half a year, to only 2 years.
      In a tone of grievance with which he expected comradely agreement from me, he said to the effect, "We suffered 2 and a half years! It's not fair that future generations should have it shorter and easier than us!"

      And I thought to myself even then, look who's talking.
      He was still an officer then, I was condemned permanently to useless NCO other-rank.
      He got served meals at cook house, had everyone yelling "Yes, Sir!" in compliance, wore nice, comfortable dress uniforms, strutted around during parades, attended and headed far more meetings etc. etc. etc.
      Suffered? Try being kicked around in the gutters like me.

      We were both some more victims of yet another artificial caste system in hierarchy-crazed Singapore, still so today.

      You know, it started with branded/neighbourhood schools as students, Monolingual/Extended streams in primary school, Express / Normal in secondary, N/O/A level post-secondary, ITE (technical college) / polytechnic /university at tertiary, and onwards into non-/graduate into working life, public/private sector, local/overseas university graduate etc. etc. etc.

      Delete
    3. The complete reply: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/how-to-rationalize-ns-in-singapore.html

      Delete