Many blogs in Singapore (and indeed outside Singapore) have gone black for 24 hours in protest against the MDA's Broadcast Act and to promote the #Freemyinternet protest at Hong Lim Park this Saturday. I admit, I did feel very tempted to black out my blog as well as it got to 5 pm in London (we're 7 hours behind Singapore in summer time) but then I read this comment on Facebook which made me think twice.
![]() |
| Can the blog blackout actually achieve anything? |
The netizen commented that whilst the intent of the blackout is admirable, it is only really disruptive to those people who are looking for alternative news sources which are not blatantly pro-PAP. It is ironically beneficial to the PAP (and their cronies) who would rather bloggers like me who are anti-PAP just shut the hell up - even if it for one day. Woah. At that point I thought, this netizen has a point. At least for the next 24 hours, the PAP has free reign over the media because bloggers have silenced themselves in protest - giving the PAP exactly what they want.
I am divided here. Whilst I do see the irony in the bloggers silencing themselves in protest, they are drawing attention to the event happening in Hong Lim Park on the 8th June #FreeMyInternet which will hopefully attract a large number of Singaporeans who will stand united against the PAP. So if this blackout can raise the profile of the event, then great - I hope it is really well attended this Saturday. However, I am also watching the events happening in Turkey very closely and can't help but make a comparison between the situation in Singapore and that in Turkey.
I know the center of Istanbul really well - the old Town on Sultanahmet, the main shopping areas in Beyoğlu and of course, Taksim Square and Gezi Park. It was shocking for me to see these familiar areas transformed into a war zone as the anti-government riots clashed with the police. I remember seeing a photo of the riot police gathered in front a shop where I used to buy fresh pomegranate juice, I wondered if the little old Turkish lady who sold juice was hiding in her shop, her eyes stinging from the tear gas. I am following what my Turkish friends have been saying on Facebook and Twitter all day and it is harrowing to see what they are reporting.
![]() |
| Limpeh having a coffee in Istanbul |
The Turkish media have imposed a black out on reporting the riots - they are pretending everything in normal in Turkey. Instead of reporting on the massive anti-government riots which have spread across the country, they are showing nature documentaries about animals, cooking programmes and beauty pageants on TV. This is why Turks have turned to social media to report on what is happening in Turkey and it is truly inspiring to see how brave and well organized the Turks have been. They are an inspiration to many.
Let's look at the protest that started this entire episode - it was the plans to turn Gezi Park in central Istanbul into a mall. Environmentalists protested because Gezi Park is one of the few green spaces left in a very congested central Istanbul so they occupied the park in protest, #occupygezi to prevent the bulldozers from coming in to dig up their beloved park. Now let's compare that to the Singaporean situation, the MDA wants to move into our cyberspace and ensure that the citizens 'read the right thing' - so in protest, what do we do? A 24 hour self-imposed blackout by bloggers? Isn't that the equivalent of the environmentalists effectively boycotting Gezi Park for 24 hours in protest of the redevelopment of the park? Am I the only one who did a double take then?
![]() |
| I have fond memories of Istanbul. |
Think about this please people, #occupygezi had the right idea - the Turkish government wanted to take away a space from the people, they occupied the space and laid their claim to it. What I would like to see is a mass protest by Singaporean netizens occupying and claiming their cyberspace, #occupysgcyberspace or something like that. This would mean bloggers and netizens showing the government their displeasure by rightfully voicing their opinions online - such as going to the Facebook pages of the PAP and all the PAP MPs and ministers, writing to them there and telling them how wrong MDA's broadcast act is. Let's make our presence felt online!
I'm not suggesting anything illegal like hacking, but I would love to see more Singaporeans take the fight to the MDA and the PAP over this issue, the same way the Turkish have stood up to their government this week. Turkish protesters raised US$55,000 for a full page ad in the New York Times to bring their cause to a global audience, highlighting their plight and the situation in Turkey. I would love to see Singaporeans do the same thing to try a similar move to try to raise the profile of their campaign to an international audience, to reclaim our right to express ourselves in cyberspace and for journalists to criticize the PAP when they want to. There is just so much Singaporeans activists can learn from what is happening in Turkey right now.
There needs to be an active decision to reclaim and occupy this space that the MDA is trying to lay claim to - and I'm sorry, but blacking out your blog for 24 hours does not reclaim this contested cyberspace at all. You need to take the fight to the PAP and show them that you're not going to just quietly go away after you've made an eloquent but effectively useless gesture of protest. What is the point of such a gesture then? Let me give you an example of one such elegant yet useless gesture of protest in Turkey.
Many older women who are too afraid to go into the streets to protest (the police are using tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons - it is like a war zone) have taken to standing by their windows and banging pots and pans together, making a lot of noise. Some others have also taken to switching their lights on and off many times at night, creating quite a sight when many such women are doing exactly the same thing across the city at night. When I first saw the video below, I thought, okay at least they're doing something - eloquent, memorable if not useless.
I did ask another Singaporean blogger this evening what he felt about this blog blackout protest - he is not blacking out his blog either. "What is the point? We should be protesting about this ridiculous move by the MDA on our blogs, condemning the government for it. But silencing ourselves in protest over censorship? That's like a vegetarian protesting about the eating of meat by slaughtering a cow. Okay, it is a simple, eloquent and low-risk gesture on the part of these Singaporeans. If you were to go protest in front of the MDA, the way the Turks are in Taksim Square and Gezi Park, you will risk getting arrested and thrown in jail. But if you were to blackout your blog for 24 hours, few people would even notice. It is a small token of a gesture by some kiasi Singaporeans who are still inherently very afraid of the government they hate. They want to feel like they have done something and made a statement - and they are willing to ignore the fact that it is ultimately a futile gesture."
What will happen at the end of this week - after the blackout on Thursday and the Hong Lim Park event on Saturday? Would there be any real change in the government or would it be (as the cynics suspect) no more than a number of beautiful orchestrated eloquent yet ultimately useless gestures on the part of those who oppose the MDA's censorship? Will the government actually pay any heed to what will happen at Hong Lim Park?
I would like to see something bigger and more effective come out of this episode, such as a campaign to reach out to those on the dark side, yes I am talking about the 60.14% who voted for the PAP in 2011. It is something very constructive we could all do, even if we all just started engaging with one person who voted for the PAP and try to engage them in a discussion about what kind of society we want in Singapore. That could be one more vote for change, one less vote for the PAP - it is a small baby step, but one in the right direction. Such a campaign would achieve far more than this blog blackout protest.
![]() |
| You can do something constructive today - talk to someone who voted for the PAP. |
This is exactly what they are doing in Turkey right now - it is a very divided society. You have the well educated liberals who live in the big cities and then you have the poorer, more traditional and religious folk who live in the countryside and those in the countryside are far less demanding of their government than those in the big cities. This is why the unrest has started in Istanbul, the richest and most cosmopolitan city in Turkey. Younger, well-educated, English speaking Turks are far more aware of what is happening in other democratic countries in the West and are far less tolerant of their government's mistakes. Many Turkish activists are using this opportunity to engage with those in the rural interior of Turkey who have never really been involved in politics before to open their eyes to the faults of the government and make them think about the issues at stake.
In Singapore, there is a divide but it is along a different lines. My mother is a staunch PAP supporter and she is in her 70s - she doesn't use the internet and she is quite ignorant when it comes to how democracies function in other countries. She is pretty much a frog at the bottom of the well when it comes to her view of the world as she takes very little interest in what is happening outside Singapore - so she is blissfully unaware of the direction the PAP is taking Singapore. I see people like her as the key targets in this campaign to engage the 60.14% - we need to drag them out of their ignorance and make them confront the facts. Heck, even my father has proudly crossed over from the dark side and proudly supports the opposition now - but we still have to work on my mother as she just doesn't get it.
So there you go. I am not just a cynic who has nothing better to offer - I am offering a pragmatic and simple campaign: engage the 60.14%. Talk to them, reason with them, engage them, listen to them and start a conversation. You may or may not be able to change their minds but at least you are bringing them out of their shell. It is often apathy that makes many older voters default to the PAP - people like my mother don't understand many of the issues at stake, so they default to what they have known and trusted for years not because they actually like the PAP, but because they don't know what else to do. All you can do is to make such people think about the issues that matter to them in Singapore, make them consider the facts and what the PAP is doing and hopefully, they will come to the right conclusion.
What do you think? Did you black out your blog today? What did you think about this gesture of protest? What should we be doing in defiance? Where will all this lead to? Leave a comment, let me know. Thank you for reading.
| Limpeh in Istanbul |







I was initially wondering why we need to blackout our blogs to begin with. The more the PAP tries to stop people from owning their cyberspace, the more people should OWN it and show that they will not back off. Blacking out the blogs is almost like a conciliatory action. It in fact came as a surprise to me that people in Singapore would do that, because it sends a signal that goes, "Hey you pappies, you want us to shut down our sites because we did not pay. Sure, we will shut it down for one day and then get back again."
ReplyDeleteThank you! I am glad I am not the only one who felt that way!
DeleteNo, LIFT, you are not the only one. Think about it this way. In order to protest in Singapore, you have to apply for a licence to do so in Hong Lim Park. Is there a clause in the Singapore Constitution that says you cannot protest outside Hong Lim Park? NO. It is just a case of people feeling that they need to obey the rules even when it comes to protesting, other than a silly and corrupt government(what an odd conjunction of 'silly' and 'corrupt'...) trying to have its hand in everyone's lives. Now, how silly can it get? If you want to protest, then you do it without legal permission, because it is a reaction against injustice and corruption. Asking tyrants for permission to protest against them? Gimme a break!
DeleteLike my fellow blogger said in the article, it's a kiasi response lah. These people are sill afraid of the government they hate and resent.
DeleteHi Limpeh. First off, Neurotic Ramblings of a Singaporean Couple will not be shutting down either...
ReplyDeleteBefore I read your post, this were my thoughts:
The call to blackout didn't resonate at all. I didn't reject it, but neither did I give much thought to it. I wondered how to go about doing it IF we had wanted to, but as I am not too familiar with the mechanics (to be fair, I didn't even try to find out), we just left it at that. I also feared that the "blackout" for NRSC might become permanent if I cocked up, which happens very often...
I also had the exact same thoughts as you and Kevin, after I tried to read A Singaporean Son. Where the heck am I going to get my daily fix of blog posts from my favourite blogs??? I even considered the possibility that the blackout may have been instigated by the authorities, but I think we Singaporeans are stupid enough to come up with our own hare-brained actions.
After reading your post, my conclusion hasn't changed much: It must simply be a herd mentality thing.
Thanks for sharing your Turkey experiences and perspectives! That's the true meaning of foreign talent!
Btw, I have released my article on alternatives to PAID mainstream media. I figure this practical guide - if followed by everyone - can hasten the demise of our dear SPH. Though I guess that's not going to happen anytime soon given the rather mediocre readership stats we have been seeing over at NRSC
I agree with what you said about it being a herd mentality thing - I did worry, oh no if I don't blackout, would they all hate me?
DeleteI could talk a lot more about my time in Turkey, I truly loved the place.
Actually, concerning Neurotic Ramblings' point concerning the mechanics of blacking out the blog, I did not even know how to do it. My main concern was, if I stop access to it, and then try to go online again, would there not be the possibility--and not any remote one--that the blog(s) I have might end up becoming defunct? I think that blacking out your blog does not have the same effect as an organized mass protest, and ABOVE ALL, ousting and dislodging the PAP from their secure position of power by convincing and converting every one of the 60% of Singaporean voters to change their minds. Then again, call me a cynic or whatsoever, since with the incoming 1 to 2 million new citizens, who are likely to end up as unquestioning supporters of the PAP regime, and the constant maneouvring that the PAP are always doing with regards to electoral boundaries and mainstream media, I gave up on Singaporeans, and am more focused now on being out of this hell-hole permanently. The world is such a beautiful place outside of Singapore, and there are so many places and countries worth exploring and living in, not least of all, South Korea which is so near to where I work now.
DeleteBy the way, I liked your thoughts about Turkey. It is a country rich in history, dating back all the way to Byzantine days(ahhh....my days as a scholar who nearly ended up doing my PhD in medieval and Byzantine studies in a Catholic university in the USA...)....
Don't worry, you won't be singled out The Real Singapore, Newnation, Singapore Daily, MySingaporeNews and many others did not blackout either. We believe more drastic action would be needed, I really think the New York Times advertisement is such a brilliant idea. Thanks for the suggestion Limpeh FT. I have a question for you, would you consider it extreme to ask Singaporeans to stage a mass "sit-down" like what the turkish people did?
DeleteHey Neurotic, i was the one replying to all your emails on TRS :D
Alex Tan
TRS Editor
Hello guys, yeah drastic action is needed but there is always the threat of being arrested and I wouldn't want to put anyone in harm's way - it is easy for me to suggest more drastic action from the comfort of London knowing that I am a British citizen and the PAP can't touch me, but I see one useful way ahead on this issue is to embarrass the PAP on how out of touch they are with the way news is reported - so for example, would they be able to tell the New York Times what they can or cannot print about Singapore? How on earth are they going to enforce it?
DeleteThink about how many news organizations there are around the world - how is the PAP going to make every single one of them comply? You can wax lyrical till the cows come home about the law but unless you can practically enforce it, then it's meaningless, it is useless. This shows the PAP's total lack of understanding not only on how media works - but how laws work. It is bizarre to say the least as the PAP must have some good lawyers working for them. They should have gone to a legal expert to ask, "is this okay? Is this feasible? Can this work? Do I need to tweak it?" But no, they make these huge statements without realizing how the hell it is going to actually work in practice - it allows us to highlight these fallacies to the journalists around the world and challenge them on the Broadcast Act.
I suggest that the TRS can try to contact the Asian correspondent of a major American or British newspaper/agency (Reuters, BBC, CNN etc) and see if you can get one of them do a reverse inquiry with the Singapore government. "Hello, I am a journalist from the BBC/CNN/Fox News/Reuters etc, I want to know what you intend to do to me or my organisation should we fall foul of the Broadcast Act." Could the PAP punish an American newspaper who don't even have a presence in Singapore for running an anti-PAP story, exposing the corruption that goes on in Singapore?
If there is a genuine libel case like that involving an American newspaper, then they would have to go through the American justice system - nothing you legislate in Singapore can influence the outcome.
You need to find friends and allies abroad, in New York, in London, in Paris, in Sydney etc - there are plenty of people who are passionate about free speech and the freedom of the press around the world.
ok bro. thanks we will take note and try out your suggestion.
Deleteyou see,
another Singaporean girl resonating your thoughts.
http://therealsingapore.com/content/singaporeans-we-need-take-more-drastic-actions-towards-government
I don't think street protests would work in the context of Singapore - it is playing right into the hands of the PAP who capitalize on the fears of Singaporeans who have been convinced that putting up with a draconian government is a price worth paying if you want peace and stability - remember the recent bus driver strike episode and how the government used that episode to convince the people that such strikes are bad and needed to be dealt with severely in order to maintain order in society? Many kiasi Singaporeans actually believe that line of rhetoric and thus I am not sure any kind of protest would hurt.
DeleteYou wanna make an impact with the PAP? Hit them where it hurts - their international business reputation abroad matters greatly to them and they want to project a shiny, business-friendly, modern image to the rest of the world. This war is about claiming our right to express ourselves in cybersapce, so you need to find allies abroad and deal with others who will help you out. And here's the beauty of this solution - you'll be dealing directly with foreigners (mostly journalists) whom the PAP care so much about in the name of PR rather than kiasi Singaporeans who don't dare to speak up - hurrah!
Picked this up on my Facebook feed: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/keep-calm-carry-posting-064436432.html
ReplyDeleteProbably the first cogent piece of arguments in defence of the new regulations. Clear arguments that justify how the fuss over the new regulations might be much to do about nothing. I'm not necessarily in complete agreement with the article, but it makes very compelling and complete arguments. Wanted to ask your thoughts on the article.
There are plenty of comments on that page itself - let me just quote you the one I like the most: This Calvin Cheng is not even an elected MP. What right does he think he has to speak for us? What happen to all the MPs? Muted? Stunted? Or they never represent us in the first place?
DeleteI wonder whether yahoo.com.sg is not in a way conciliatory towards the PAP government to begin with. It is not only the featuring of this take by Calvin Cheng who is almost nonchalant about the measure and policy, but the very fact that prior to this, Yahoo Singapore was in fact posting articles which are even sympathetic of the kind of regime-supporters which the PAP would be so happy about, such as the article in which they collated the views of those Singaporeans who do not want to pay higher taxes or have universalized healthcare because they "do not want to pay for those who do not work"(quote-unquote). This got me so riled up, as much as I hardly even read yahoo Singapore anymore and have distanced myself from Singapore physically and in terms of my circle of friends over the years, because it just displays how yahoo.com.sg is nothing but a corporation making money off writing conciliatory articles.
DeleteThere you go - that is why alternative media needs to exist.
Delete