Friday 5 February 2016

What the Benjamin Lim case tells us about the mindset of Singaporeans

Hi there, I would just to do a quick follow up on the Benjamin Lim case, given the intense discussion that it has provoked in Singapore. Now you know I normally don't use social media like Facebook as I hate getting dragged into flame wars with unreasonable people who are just spoiling for a fight, but as I am using alternative media in Singapore to try to follow the developments in this case, I gave in to the temptation and left a comment on the TOC's Facebook page when they published a letter written by Mr Lim senior, the boy's father. The comment I had left has since garnered 164 likes (and counting), but there have been some people who also left quite angry messages for me.
Not everyone agreed with Limpeh

I think the one that irked me the most is the person who suggested that I don't have the right to comment because I am no longer a Singaporean. Now, in this day and age, anyone can leave a comment on social media - you don't get to decide who gets to leave a comment and who doesn't get to express an opinion. The process is quite democratic actually, those who leave thought-provoking good comments will get many likes and those who write something stupid will either be ignored or be lambasted by the others. Thus people are judged on the quality of what they have written, rather than whether they had the 'right' (however defined) to express that opinion - this isn't just democracy at work, but meritocracy too. It is a shame that Facebook hasn't brought in a 'dislike' option yet, otherwise this will give us a clearer picture of just how unpopular some opinions expressed are.

But why do some Singaporeans hate what I have to say? Well, firstly, it is because I can be very critical of the Singaporean system and in the case of Benjamin Lim, quite rightfully so. It is what it is - even I am cynical that anything will change at all after this tragic case, there will be an investigation that will take an awfully long time and the authorities are waiting for people to move on, for the next big story to help them forget about Benjamin Lim's suicide. So when you are faced with a problematic situation you cannot resolve, what do you do? Some people will try to do something to improve the situation (however futile their heroic efforts may be), others simply choose to ignore it - it is too easy to look the other way and think about something else. People who choose the latter get angry with people like, me, who try to remind them that they really need to be thinking about the issue even if I do not have a solution to offer. Oh dear. They really hate being reminded of the problem they would rather ignore. So they either try to dismiss me as someone who doesn't have the right to speak up, or discredit me as someone who hasn't made a valid point.
It is not the first time people have tried to silence me.

Have I encountered people like that in Singapore before? Oh yes, they remind me of the older generation, people like my parents who voted for the PAP election after election. I wonder what kind of lies they have to tell themselves about the PAP to help them sleep at night. but I daresay many of these people are delusional. They justify voting for the PAP by convincing themselves that they are making the right choice and once they have made up their minds, they dismiss anyone who comes up with evidence to the contrary. Listening to someone like me go on and on about the injustice only makes them feel extremely uncomfortable - after all, they know that a friend or a close relative could become the next Benjamin Lim. And the only way they know how to counter that thought is to go into denial mode, "won't lah, aiyoh this one is an unfortunate case but an isolated incident lah." But should we be focusing on the death of a boy, when we should be focusing on the system which caused his death in the first place? The boy is already dead, but the system that cause his death is still there. And that should scare the shit out of anyone resident in Singapore.

But what do Singaporeans do when they get such thoughts? Some accept that this is part of living in Singapore but then there are those who go into denial mode, they shoot the messenger who delivers the bad news (ie. yours truly, Limpeh). I have been accused of simplifying the situation - that it is not simply the fault of the PAP since none of the opposition MPs have said anything about the situation either. But wait - I do have a simple solution. Leave Singapore, do what I did, start a new life abroad in a country where human rights are respected, greener pastures await you abroad. If you do have children and you want them to have a brighter future in a better country, then start considering the options. I left Singapore because I knew that Singapore wasn't going to change much in my life time, I wasn't prepared to wait, so I left when the opportunity presented itself.  I have a reader who didn't have such an opportunity, so he is studying to retrain as an X-ray specialist in order to get a work permit in the west, just to get out of Singapore.
Why am I speaking up on this case then, since I am doing it from the safety of my living room in London, eight time zones away as a British citizen? Well, there are a few reasons. Firstly, my family is still in Singapore and I am concerned about their well-being. I have an autistic nephew who is social awkward (and that's putting it mildly), I do worry that someone like him may find himself in the same position as Benjamin Lim - what will happen then? I have no faith in the system treating an autistic boy with any kind of sympathy or dignity. They would probably just assumed that he was guilty because of his autism because autistic people face such prejudices and discrimination in Singapore. Secondly, many Singaporeans do not have the experience of living in another country where people are treated differently by the law enforcement authorities - I have had the experience of living in so many different countries and am in a position to compare and contrast. Some are better than Singapore, some are worse and boy do I have a few interesting stories to tell. Part of the reason why my blog is so popular is because I am able to offer that 'compare & contrast' perspective for readers who have not experienced living outside Singapore and these people value my insight. And lastly, I really feel for Mr and Mrs Lim as well as Benjamin's sister. I think the worst thing to do now is to ignore the whole incident and celebrate Chinese new year as if nothing has happened, as if what happened doesn't matter at all. In keeping the debate alive, it is my way of saying that Benjamin Lim's life did matter to us and we need answers, we need to keep talking about this so as to try to prevent it from happening again to others (and it is clear that this kind of interrogation happens all the time in Singapore).

Finally, I don't think that this is just a domestic issue that doesn't concern anyone outside Singapore. If you're talking about some really local issue, like whether or not to build a new bus stop in Hougang, then yeah, believe you me when I tell you that I am not interested at all in trivial matters like that. But Singapore's image in the world is so important to the government, Singapore welcomes everyone from foreign talents to foreign investors to foreign businesses to come and be a part of the Singapore success story. The opposite of Singapore would be North Korea, Kim Jong Un's regime doesn't give a rat's ass what the rest of the world thinks about their reclusive country. In fact, Singapore cares quite a lot about what the rest of the world thinks about Singapore! In the age of the internet when many people access information about Singapore via Google, there is a pretty high chance that they will stumble upon a popular blog like mine rather than the official Singaporean government's website if they are looking for information on a particular Singaporean issue that I have blogged about. Google searches drives more traffic to my blog than any other website.
Well read bloggers exert a lot of influence over public opinions, thanks to Google.

Thus whether you like it or not, I have more influence on affecting the outcome of events in Singapore because of the success of my blog, despite the fact that I am neither Singaporean nor a resident in Singapore. Is this fair? Certainly not, but since when has democracy and social media ever been about fairness? Social media has enabled anyone to voice an opinion if they wish to, but it doesn't mean that everyone's opinion will be heard. The moment I post something on my blog, it is read by thousands of people within hours - can the same be said about everyone who has an opinion to voice? Certainly not. Such is social media for you. It has never ever been a level playing field, the internet has created an environment where a lot of people can speak at the same time, but few people are actually heard and if you are under the impression that you will be heard just because you have something to say, then you're seriously kidding yourself. Come on, get real. Katy Perry has 81 million followers on Twitter, how many have you got? When Katy Perry has something to say, people listen - what makes you think that your opinion is going to be heard?
So what has this case told us about the mindset of Singaporean? It is not good news I'm afraid: we have learnt that many are suffering from a bad case of denial and some don't even understand how social media works. Damn. Well, I do hope I have better news for you next time. But until then, thanks so much for reading Limpeh's blog. Kumsiah.

26 comments:

  1. Hey Limpeh, exactly who do you blame? The police, principal, teachers, counsellor or PAP? I blame the overall lack of empathy by the school and police, created by PAP, treating him like a criminal, coerced to admit all guilt in an untransparent manner. But will anything change? Maybe someone directly involved will get a bad ranking for that year. Maybe some changes of protocol involving children. But nothing more.
    Some Singaporeans already defending the police, saying they keep us safe, and not to politicise the issue. This will be labelled as an unfortunate incident and life will go on. Sadly, Benjamin's death will be in vain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well John, you did summarize it pretty well - everyone you named are to be blamed to have created such a situation in the first place. My solution is simple: just leave Singapore.

      Delete
    2. Hypothetically, if Benjamin's death were to happen in the UK, how would authorities deal with this differently to Singapore?

      Delete
    3. http://www.civilrightsmovement.co.uk/rights-if-your-child-arrested.html There you go.

      Delete
  2. Anton Casey spoke his mind about the poor and the MRT. Amos Yee spoke his mind about the government and Christianity. They were both publicly lynched. Anton Casey was driven off the island. Both were unlikeable but not criminals. Here you have a 14-year-old who was mistreated by the police. Guilty or not, he should have had his parents and lawyers with him. Where is the same outrage for the atrocity he underwent? Singaporeans lack compassion and morality. They have no souls. Rich in material wealth. Poor in humanity. They disgust me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Alex, your article reminds me of some of my previous employers.
    When a coworker from my previous workplace and I pointed out design flaws in the specifications of projects shoved at us, our boss got defensive and accused us of personal attacks. The mindset that they possess is one of instead of acknowledging the problem(I am not even asking them to resolve it), they would deny the issue’s presence.
    This sort of mindset attributes to why software development never progressed in singapore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally Weiping, I couldn't agree more. You've hit the nail on the head.

      Delete
    2. On the other hand, in my current company, every minor issue gets blown out of of proportion, warrants in-depth investigations, discussions before anything gets implemented. The downside is that it takes too much time to get minor things implemented. But at least the burden of responsibility is shared throughout when things go wrong, there is no need to point fingers and we get to focus on the resolution.

      Delete
    3. That is where I believe the art of communication comes in. People who are "higher" in the social heirarchy gets insecure very easily if you try to prove that you are smarter than them by pulling them down. You did that by pointing out their flaws.

      I believe Singaporeans have a communication problem than the issue that WPT has pointed out. We don't know how to approach someone and not offend them.

      Delete
    4. First of all, I would like to clarify that we were pointing out flaws in the design, not flaws in the person. Everybody is better than everyone else in one way or another. The concept of one being “smarter” does not apply.
      Secondly, I was employed as an engineer. It was my duty to be critical in my assessment of specifications before I start designing the data flow and structures.
      In all, it was just the inflated ego of my employers who refused to accept the existence of problems in the specifications when they bid for the contract.

      Delete
    5. You are actually "attacking" the people behind the desgin by pointing out the flaws. I don't know how and when you said it, but for me I will do everything I can to avoid putting myself in such a bad position that I have to point out the flaws of anything related to my employed, especially if my employer have an inflated ego. It is expected for them to react this way because they want to be superior to you...or they will be thinking that you are arrogant and trying to act "smart".

      I understand that you were employed a engineer. But you still need to know how to deal with people and esp your employer effectively, and how not to appear "arrogant and condescensing".

      Btw, you will most probably get upset if you know my age. It is almost the same case everywhere... and human psychology are pretty the same. Perhaps I should have kept quiet.

      Delete
    6. I apologize if I sound offensive.

      Are you not mistaken about my work? My utmost priority is to create and deliver products/solutions to the clients, not foster personal relationships with my employerss or help inflate their pointless egos.

      Having worked with different Singapore employers, I have seen many employers refusing to objectively assess the situation as it is and simply, dismiss the presence of issues till the shit actually collapse on them. The worse part is that when these issues turn problems, their first priority is to find something to blame on, rather than asking for a solution.

      Even after criticizing them, I admit that some of them are still my friends but just that I would never want to work with them. At the same time, there are employers who can be a complete bastard in their private lives but still objectively fulfil the role of the leader that is required of them. These people understands that each one of us has a role to play, respects the assessment of issues raised by their employees. By simply acknowledging that the existence of the issue allows the employees to work on the solutions.

      You are right that this is not a situation unique to Singapore but it just happens that this mindset is shared among the majority in Singapore. And this mindset is what hampers the solutions and innovations that the Government has so much desired for.

      On a side note, you can have faith in me not judging people by their age. I do, however judge people based on their competencies for their responsibilities.

      Delete
  4. To be able to deal with the police in an effective manner requires a lot of social experience and emotional stability.

    He wasn't able to handle it and cracked under pressure. The problem is not with the 70%...rather, it is the police's personal behavior. Things can be changed and code of conduct can be introduced into the police force.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. And unfortunately in Singapore we've yet to have some sort of laws in how law enforcers should treat the minors with respect. In fact, treatment is the same across all board. There's still a long way for change to happen. Hope Benjamin's case can shed some light and things can change for good.

      Delete
  5. Alex, thank you for your blog in keeping this discussion alive on behalf of myself and families with young boys who are kept in the dark.

    My wife and I have pre-teen boys and as a result of this scandal we have just told them to never go with the police alone and to inform us first if they are in any trouble.

    Since the last election we are extremely disappointed with the SG population in increasing their support for the PAP. I feel is a lot of smoke and mirrors from mainstream media and the people fell for it. And it's not just the dumb people but some of our peers too. I hope one day our kids will do well abroad and have to option of leaving this country.

    Thank you again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words & support for my blog :)

      Delete
  6. Alex u know what? I realized most Singaporeans love to poke their noses on other ppl's biz. I hope I could be a little fairer to my fellow countrymen but unfortunately I really hate to say this - Singaporeans in general love to judge and assume! 很喜欢带着有色眼镜看人! Sometimes I really wish they can be a little kinder but after staying here for over 30 yrs, things haven't really change for better in fact with the current social media era, it just bring the most ugliest side out from us. Sometimes I do feel a little ashamed after reading some of their awful comments.

    As I was being judged since young by my family and parents, I grew up in an environment that being an Asian I've to behave in a way that's agreeable and in accordance to my 长辈's requirement. Even they're wrong, I'd have to give in just 'cos they've lived longer than me and I'm obliged to give them the respect. But respect is to be earned not demanded. Putting me aside, as I conversed with several aunties/uncles as well as some of my friends, I noticed this kind of "teaching" still exists. Even my friends who are educated judge their kids and labelled them in front of me. Perhaps the number of persons I've talked to is not sustantial enough to determine the ill-behaviour of whole Singapore but I feel strongly that why Singaporeans will react this way is greatly due to this kind of upbringing culture.

    When such "teachings" are ingrained into kids' mind, it's only natural when they grow up they ended up judging people. If others failed to behave according to their "requirements", they're deem wrong and start to judge and criticize. If u r open about it, it's inevitable people will judge u as being too westernized with no values. Then within their social context, people like me will be ostracized. I find it hard to please these people and I'm always surrounded by them unfortunately. Seriously can't wait to get out.

    I've read ur comments on TOC. Oh my God! Ok! Shan't say much about them. They're just too negative. Even I had left one encouraging comment after the GE2015 on TOC I was being criticized. I know we were all upset by the results but why kept harping on it and segregate the 70% and 30% so distinctively. I'm part of the 30% who wants change and being encouraging was to lighten up the sombre mood a little. I don't join in to curse and swear the 70% means I'm not supportive enough or I'm not facing the truth? Please lah, I don't think the PAP can dominate Singapore forever, and democracy is a process and probably will take a few decades for change to happen. The point here is are u Singaporeans willing to persist for change no matter what PAP is going to do to u in the future? By blaming the 70% and not perisent enough to pick ur stand to have change then its as good as giving in to the PAP. When I read those negative comments, that's it! I wonder how to have change like that?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi, thanks for posting your thoughts on this issue. I have always been a silent, avid reader of your blog, but I am compelled to reply this time round.

    I agree with you on how the majority who voted for the incumbent government has endorsed the current regime and indirectly led to the current outcome, although many deny that they expect such a outcome and they do not approve on how the police handles a minor. However, does giving the opposition more autonomy mean that the situation would be different, where the state will guarantee minor rights so on? We can never know till the opposition becomes more dominant.

    The way forward does not solely lie on the ballot box. Active citizenry is important. It is heartening that many people are expressing their displeasure through the Internet like the SPF FB page. However, complaining over the Internet is clearly insufficient in changing the current state of matter as we know. There is still lots to be done if those who are displeased do not want the issue to be closed soon by the state, which is likely to happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Marvin, you're right and you did raise a point said by many others on social media as well. If the opposition wants more votes, then they need to do more to prove themselves and such opportunities present themselves when things go horribly wrong. The opposition should be there to hold the government accountable - and so far, they've have said little, which is very disappointing to say the least. And yes, Active citizenry is the key to battle and defeat political apathy in Singapore.

      Delete
    2. Hi Marvin, Alex. I think that this has little to do with the oppos and PAP per se but more to do with how the typical Singaporean actually thinks. The lunar new year holiday just passed and from what I gather from my bunch of relatives, I can safely tell you that by and large, people don't actually give a damn when it does not involve a family member. I am afraid that my relatives represent the typical Singaporean core that strongly buys into the concept of family that the govt had been happily selling to them. I have always theorised that a strong family concept also suggests that social justice is perceived as so unreliable that one can only trust in his/her own clan. So goes the "not in my backyard" mindset. Having more oppos is not going to change anything unless the general populace has a mindset change that encompasses that they have a responsibility to society and fellow human beings as a whole.

      I am going to draw parallel for the Benjamin Lim case with that of the Catholic archdiocese sexual abuse scandal uncovered by the Boston Globe in early 2002. Wikipedia has a good summary of it for the TLDR folks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_scandal_in_the_Catholic_archdiocese_of_Boston). The sexual abuse by the priests had been ongoing for years and the church had used its considerable powers to stymie all attempts by individuals to hold them to task, preferring instead to settle individual cases behind close doors instead of being held accountable in public. It took several individuals in Boston Globe who cared enough for the surviving victims to uncover and report the whole systematic cover ups. Sure, everything was nice and legal, everyone followed procedure but it took a few good men and women who questioned if the procedure was the right thing to bring closure to those victims and their families who were not yet driven to suicide.

      At least the surviving victims and their families received closure courtesy of Boston Globe. Yet the statements from them suggested that they were under immense pressure from their fellow parishioners to keep quiet as lambasting the church at a time when US was reeling from 911 means pulling out the rug under the spiritual feet of ordinary folks. It was really the peer pressure that kept victims from pursuing the abuse. In a parallel vein, if fellow Singaporeans don't give a damn that a 14 year old had been driven to suicide, I don't think any meaningful change will occur. Too easy to cast your vote the other way but how do you deal with the folks you have to mingle with day in and out? How do you deal with the folks who behave like the typical parishioners who would rather you turn away than to question the rights of the church?

      Better to get out while you can.

      Delete
  8. Which one is your comment? Cant seem to find it....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Aiya, the dead boy is just another statistic in our nation. Nothing will change, things will get swept under the carpet and people have short term memory. I assure you by this time next month, no one will ever remember the boy existed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That may be the case, that nothing will change - so isn't that a good reason to get the hell out of Singapore and seek greener pastures abroad, before you or your future son follow in Benjamin's footsteps? A 14 year old boy took his life this time, what if it was you who was falsely accused of a crime next time? How would you feel if others reacted the same way?

      No I don't have a solution, apart from getting out of Singapore. But accepting the status quo as if everything is alright? Great. Good luck to you if you ever get wrongly accused by the police in Singapore. When your parents are at your funeral, maybe nobody will bother to turn up.

      Delete
    2. I am already out of Singapore, so I dont really care.

      Delete
    3. It is not about you. It is about the ethics, or lack thereof. You don't care that a 14 - year- old chose death over facing the Singapore authorities? So by the same token, you don't care about world hunger and genocides because they don't affect you?

      Delete
  10. Update on the case: Statements released by investigation officers suggests that the whole "molestation" might just be a case of misunderstanding. http://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore-news/benjamin-lims-death-police-officer-testifies

    ReplyDelete