Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Why SMRT's discrimination against PRC drivers is wrong

There are so many blog posts about the SMRT PRC drivers' strike at the moment, so I shall concentrate on one aspect of the issue rather than do a long post trying to cover all issues as the strike goes on for another day. Today, I am going to talk about the issue of languages - one that is very close to my heart as a linguist. I have to thank my reader XxToweringxX, allow me to quote from his/her comment on my last post:

"When I replied on Facebook regarding the wage disparity between China and Msia workers, another angrily replied to me that Msia knows Malay, English, Chinese and Hokkien while PRC knows only chinese which is why msia have higher pay." 
I just wanted to point out to you that as someone with a father from Johor and a lot of Malaysian friends & relatives, you cannot assume that *all* Malaysians are able to speak Malay, Mandarin/other dialects & English. Some do of course, but not all. For example, Malay-Malaysians would not speak any Chinese - just doesn't happen. It's often the Malaysian-Chinese who do speak both Malay & Chinese, but those who do speak English well tends to be those who are very well educated.

I remember visiting my relatives in Johor during Chinese New Year when I was a child - my dad is Malaysian-Chinese-Hakka and the language spoken amongst all my Johor-relatives was Hakka. Now I am ashamed to say this, I speak 10 languages competently: English, French, Mandarin, Spanish, Welsh, German, Italian, Hokkien, Malay and Russian - but I can't speak any Hakka. My dad never taught me Hakka - he chose to teach my Mandarin instead so when we go visit those relatives in Malaysia, I have to use either Mandarin, Malay or English to communicate with them and they were like, "oooh you don't speak Hakka? Why don't you ask your father to teach you, it is your language!" 
I have plenty of Malaysian cousins who are around age and it was our family tradition during Chinese new year for the adults to get together and catch up whilst the children (and maids) were left in the courtyard to mingle before the big meal. I used to dread that so much, my dad would bring my sisters and I to the courtyard and after some cursory introductions, like "This is your uncle's daughter, this is your auntie's son, they live in Johor Bahru - now make friends." Duh. My cousins spoke very little English and Mandarin - they spoke Hakka, Malay and Cantonese. I would struggle on in a mish-mash of Malay and Cantonese with them whilst my two sisters would not even try - they would just sit in the corner and speak to each other in English. My dad would get upset when he saw my sisters not even making any effort to get to know the extended family - but it's really hard when you don't have a language in common! 

Now compare that to my mother's extended family in Singapore, I have absolutely no problems when it comes to communicating with them - my mother's family is Hokkien and I would speak Hokkien and/or Mandarin to the older adults and English to anyone around my age or younger. Given that many of my dad's extended family lives in Johor Bahru, the physical distance between Woodlands and Johor Bahru is just 1056 metres - that's the length of the Johor-Singapore causeway. Yet there is such a difference between the languages that we spoke - if not for the fact that I actually do speak some Malay and Cantonese, gosh I would've had to resort to sign language with my relatives in Johor. Did my Malaysian cousins learn English at school? Sure they did - but obviously not to a high enough standard to even have a basic conversation with me in English.
I had a hard time communicating with my Malaysian relatives.

Now I know what you're going to say, "I have loads of Malaysian friends who speak English absolutely fluently!" Yes, that's completely true (read about my Malaysian friend May Ling here) - but there is a sliding scale in Malaysia. Well educated Malaysians tend to speak English flawlessly but let's face it, you're not going to get Malaysian graduates coming to Singapore to drive buses. Those lower down the food chain (like my cousins in Johor) are unlikely to be as competent in English like those high-flying Malaysian graduates and scholars. So if my cousins came to work in Singapore as bus drivers, they could offer Malay (spoken by 17% of Singaporeans), Cantonese (spoken by about 10% of Singaporeans) and Hakka (spoken by less than 5% of Singaporeans). So, I wouldn't assume that all Malaysians were trilingual - you would need to check the language skills of each Malaysian job applicant and treat each person as an individual. By the same token, you can't assume that all Singaporeans speak English. There are plenty of older Singaporeans who do not speak English.

Even amongst the Malaysian-Chinese, there tends to be tendency for them favour Cantonese over Mandarin. Since we don't really speak Cantonese in Singapore (about 10% of Singaporeans have some knowledge of Cantonese), it is hardly a useful language for Singapore. I've got friends from Penang as well and Penang Hokkien is not that easy to understand, like I can struggle on with them with some guess work and figure out what they're saying, but otherwise I'd often resort to Mandarin, Malay or English. Likewise, even if the Malay speaking drivers came from somewhere like Kelantan, they may speak the local Kelantanese dialect Baso-Kelate. It's not just an accent but a dialect of Malay which very hard for Singaporean-Malays to understand. Likewise, Kedahan Malay (from the state of Kedah in the North) is also quite different from standard Malay as well. As for Malaysians from East Malaysia - the linguistic divide is even bigger. Ethnic minorities like the Iban, Kadazan and Bajau have their own languages and the Sabah dialect of Malay (known as 'Baku') is very different from standard Malay spoken in West Malaysia.
So the bottom line is, YES there are Malaysians who are very multi-lingual indeed, but you cannot simply assume that ALL Malaysians are multi-lingual. I am all for rewarding drivers who can speak 3 or 4 languages with a bonus, but each driver should be tested for their linguistic skills individually, rather than for SMRT to make any assumptions like that on the basis of their nationality. Besides, some PRCs in Singapore have made some effort to learn some English. Indeed, if there is a system that will reward them for learning English, then yes they will make an effort, isn't that what we all want? Right now, the system is like, "oh you're PRC you won't speak English, you never will and we will assume that" rather than, "come on, if you learn English, we will reward you for it! 加油!"

I would also like to raise another point in defence of the PRC bus drivers who don't speak English - not all Singaporean bus drivers speak English either. I was born in 1976 in Singapore and grew up in Singapore - from a young age, I had to get the bus to school and often the bus drivers did not speak English. We're talking about older Chinese Singaporean 'uncle' type bus drivers who spoke Mandarin, Hokkien and maybe a smattering of Malay. I remember how I had to translate for an Indian friend of mine when he was challenged by a bus driver in a mish-mash of Mandarin and Malay that his bus concession pass was no longer valid. Oh yes, those were the days before we had EZ Link cards... My dear Indian friend was saying, "Look, uncle, can you not see that I am Indian? Speak English or Tamil! I don't speak Malay, I don't speak Chinese!" And just to make his point, he repeated himself in Tamil.
"Uncle, can you not see that I am Indian?"

Okay, that incident was in 1991 but you get the idea - older Chinese Singaporeans have never been universally fluent in English. Rather, you have a sliding scale from "first language native standard fluent" to "no English at all" and there's everything in between. Those who were fluent in English tended to be highly educated professionals whilst those who spoke little or no English tended to work in professions lower down the food chain... like bus drivers.

Unlike taxi drivers, bus drivers don't even need to engage in any kind of conversation with the passengers. I get on the bus, I swipe my EZ Link card, I sit down. When I get to my destination, I swipe my EZ Link card as I get off the bus and at no point do I need to speak to the bus driver. It is not a profession where it is critical for the employee to speak English - heck, I'm not even that fussed whether I can indulge in small talk with taxi drivers as long as they take the most direct route. They just need to understand where I want to go and that's more than enough really. This is why there are older Singaporean-Chinese bus and taxi drivers who barely know any English - and guess what? That's perfectly fine. And as for the bodoh goondu who insists on asking the old bus driver for directions, tolong lah, what the hell are you thinking? You're holding up the entire bus - all the passengers are waiting whilst you're trying to get directions to Orchard Point from the bus driver? Go ask someone else and stop disturbing the bus driver you idiot, the bus driver has a bus to drive!

So if we leave the issue of languages aside, the bus drivers are all doing the same job, putting in the same hours ... can the wage differential (as seen in the chart above) be justified? Yes the PRCs receive a subsidy for lodging and utilities but their hostel at the bus depot is so basic. In an interview, a PRC driver told Yahoo News, "They may say that we are given accommodation, but have you seen the accommodation they give us? It isn't fit for humans. Eight of us share a room, and there isn't any walking space between our beds. I've also been bitten by rats and insects on multiple occasions before. This really is unfair to us. We do the exact same work, work for the same number of hours and yet we don't receive the same compensation. Our living conditions back home are far, far better than they are here." Can you imagine living like these PRC drivers? Is SMRT being fair to them? Where do your sympathies lie?

So my readers, what do you think about the whole situation? You know the drill, don't be shy now - leave a comment below, let me know how you feel. Thank you!

8 comments:

  1. Hi Limpeh,
    This does not belong here but did not know how to Email you direct.

    The 22nd of November was the last pre-trial date for Kong Hee and consorts with regards to the CHC misappropriation of money.
    No, not one article, coverage in the Singapore local press whatsoever.
    Netizens are wondering speculating what is happening.
    Any news from your side?

    PS - FYI, I am very anti Kong for personal and well founded reasons

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, I don't know anything. I am just as curious - obviously, you know I did many articles on the whole story of CHC /Sun Ho as Sun Ho somehow got my attention, call it morbid curiosity more than anything. I will keep my eyes open on cyberspace for more info and will post when I do know.

      Delete
  2. It is not so much about fluency in languages but more a matter of service attitude. In general, Malaysians do provide a better service experience to passengers. It is normal to ask the bus driver if the bus stops somewhere and it doesn't hold the bus up that long. More often than not PRC drivers just ignore you by outright refusing to communicate or waiving you away. Surely you have observed this if you have taken enough buses. If you talk about adding value to the company they definitely score lower than Malaysians in this particular aspect.

    The wage structure is certainly unfair to PRC drivers that are an exception to this norm. I sympathize with those drivers since there seems no way they can demonstrate they are better.

    As for general fairness to the whole PRC group. Well, the PRC is a high growth country. Certainly there must be loads of bus/truck driving jobs. As long as they have not be hoodwinked into coming here I don't see it as unfair. They are not desperate people being exploited here and have freedom in the job market.

    The main issue that I find unfair is the attempt to reduce their wages by giving them an increment but requiring them to work more hours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there. I agree with the principle that good service is important and if a member of staff provides good customer service, then s/he should be rewarded. Like, recently, I was paying for my sushi when I dropped some money from my wallet ... I must've held it upside down and somehow the notes fell out. A member of staff noticed it, rushed over, picked up the money and returned it to me. I wrote to her manager, praising her for her honesty as such acts must not be ignored and should always be rewarded. Kinda disappointed that the sushi shop's manager never got back to me, least s/he could've done was said, "thank you for your email, I am very pleased our staff was able to make your day blah blah blah etc".

      So by all means, create a system to REWARD good bus drivers who give a better service experience to passengers - Yes, I am all for that. But to assume, Malaysians = good, PRC = bad ... that's wrong on two levels. Firstly, the M'sians will think, hahaha I don't even need to make any effort at all, the Singaporeans will always assume that I will be this wonderful driver. Secondly, the PRCs will think, shit they're going to assume I'm going to be rude and nasty, so why even bother to try to be nice and polite? Who loses out in the end? The passengers - because neither PRC nor M'sian drivers have any incentive to try harder.

      It's like how the last US elections were so divisive - blacks and gays will almost certainly always vote Obama and never Romney; so as a result the Democrats think, "we have the black and gay vote, we don't need to focus on them and try to please them on their issues." The Republicans think, "we will never win the black and gay vote, so we don't need to bother trying to woo them." Who loses out in the end? The blacks and gays - because neither of the main parties are interested in their issues.

      So yes, part of the reason why PRC drivers do not give good service is because of the way the system is structured - the management is assuming the worst of them and are not interested in giving them any encouragement or incentive to give better service and improve their English. It's not the drivers' fault - it is the management who have messed up their wage policy badly and they need to rethink this ... They need to REWARD those who are performing well, thus encouraging all drivers to try harder, improve their service, rather than make assumptions based on their nationality.

      Delete
    2. PS. If a passenger asks a driver, "do you stop at Suntec City?" or "do you go down Bras Basah Road?" - simple question with YES/NO answers, then fair enough lah. I am talking about the bodoh sotong people who try to get long winded directions from the bus driver whilst holding up an entire crowded bus - and I'm like, eh hello, auntie, can you not see you're holding up the entire busful of people here alamak? So many people at the bus stop, couldn't you have asked one of them? Why did you HAVE to ask the bus driver of all people? Thus in cases like that, I think it's 100% correct that the PRC bus driver refuses to engage them at any level to minimize disruption to the bus service.

      Besides, how salah do you have to be to approach a foreign bus driver for directions in S'pore? Aren't you much better off asking a local for directions?

      Delete
  3. True, its clear that PRC drivers are taken as a source of cheap labour and has rightfully seek for fairplay. SMRT has a history of labour issues starting from 1988 when train drivers did not turn up for work.Their employee/employer communication channel is clearly not functioning or management chose not to listen.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Following are some thoughts.

    Yes Malaysian drivers may not be able to converse well in English and Malay. But I believe most have no problem recognizing Singapore road names in English. On the other hand, it is difficult for PRC drivers to remember names such as Bukit Merah, etc. Sometimes, you do ask bus driver questions such as whether the bus is near Tanah Merah, etc.

    According to PRC drivers, living condition is bad and some were bitten by rats and insects. If they were bitten by rats, I suggest they sue SMRT since this is a very serious allegation. Why were there rats and insects? Is it because of the upkeep, food lying around, etc. Is it due to people eating in the room, on their bed or sub-standard cleaning service. Are they expected to keep the place clean or are there cleaners to do the dirty job? Many questions but so far no answer.

    Personally, I don't like SMRT. I feel they did not handle the situation well. Where is their CEO, shouldn't he say something? They thought they can get away with under paying the drivers, just like how they got away with underpaying Singaporean drivers for so many years. Having said that, without more information, I don't support the PRC drivers either. A contract is a contract. Asking for higher pay is ok, demanding one is fine too. But I don't like to be threatened.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there and thanks for your comments. I would make any assumptions about Malaysians - I think it is necessary to treat everyone as an individual. Let me share a story with you which a lawyer friend of mine shared with me. Her client 'Cheng' was brought up in Sarawak - he was sent to a Chinese school and he spoke Cantonese, Mandarin and English and virtually no Malay. He didn't learn it at all in school nor did he have any Malay friends. Cheng's father got a job in London so Cheng came with his father to London.

      A few years later, Cheng's Malaysian passport was due for renewal and he went to the Malaysian embassy in London and they challenged him. They didn't believe he was Malaysian as there have been PRCs turning up at the embassy, claiming to be Malaysian but with no proof. Cheng's passport photo was rather old and it didn't look like him - so the embassy official said, "You claim you're from Malaysia, proof it. Can you speak Malay?" Cheng couldn't and the embassy official refused to believe him - he demanded for Cheng's birth certificate. Now Cheng's father didn't pack that with them and they phoned their relatives in Sarawak immediately to look for it but they couldn't find it - leaving Cheng in limbo, stuck in the UK with an expired Malaysian passport. Cheng even called Malaysian embassies around Europe and they all said, "if you're resident in the UK, then we cannot help you - you must go to the M'sian embassy in London."

      As for their living quarters - 8 to a room?!?! That sounds like my army days ...

      Delete