Tuesday, 27 November 2012

SMRT drivers go on strike!

Singaporeans reacted strongly to the news of the PRC bus drivers going on strike today, as it was the first strike in Singapore in living memory (there haven't been strikes in Singapore since the 1950s). In Singapore, if you intend to go on strike, it is a criminal offence if you don't inform your employer 14 days in advance. Technically speaking, these striking drivers have broken the law - but to deploy the riot police on them seemed incredibly heavy handed and it sounds like the government went into a total panic. These drivers were simply standing around in the car park, they were not exactly rampaging through the streets causing harm to innocent people and property. They were well organized, they made their demands clear and if anything, they convinced Singaporeans that the government's heavy handed stance on striking is unnecessary to say the least.
The PAP would use footage of violent riots from countries like France, Spain and Greece to show scare Singaporeans, "see? You see these so-called liberal countries in Europe? They allow strikes and look what happens, chaos in the streets. You want Singapore to become like that? No, you don't. So shut up and let us deal with this." There is a huge difference between a riot and industrial action - such a well coordinated strike allowed the drivers to make their demands, exert some influence with their employers without actually involving the general public. 

Of course, the general reaction by the Singaporean public so far on social media has been very negative towards the PRCs who went on strike, it was all along the lines of, "if you're not happy with what you're offered, then go back to China!" PRC bus drivers were never popular in Singapore. However, it was clear why they were so unhappy: their Malaysian colleagues received a $275 increment and a month's bonus, while Chinese nationals were paid $75 extra without any bonus. It is arbitrary to give out pay rises based on one's nationality rather than work performance - I do think that the matter was badly handled by SMRT and they owe the PRCs an explanation. It made no sense whatsoever and such decisions not only ignore good work performances but clearly sends out a message that PRC employees are less valued than Malaysian employees. That's just plain wrong - an employee's worth to the company should be measured by his work performance and not his nationality!
By that token, I do have a lot of sympathy for the PRC drivers and I support their cause. They have clearly been discriminated against and I salute them for having the balls to stand up for their rights. Singaporeans, on the other hand, would never have the balls to do the same thing. Oh pullease lah, the PAP has walked all over them over issues like ministers' pay, national service and foreign talents and Singaporeans are unwilling to even protest about it. This is why there is such a strong reaction to this strike - particularly since it was staged by a group of expatriates rather than locals. I am not sure if Singaporeans are that against strikes - rather, they are resistant to change, especially if this is a change that is instigated by a group of expatriates. 

What will this lead to? It depends on how they will be dealt with. If these bus drivers are severely dealt with - say if the government adopted a  approach and decided to make an example of these bus drivers by deporting them, it may seem a bit heavy handed but it may achieve the desired effect of preventing further strikes. Even if that brings this episode to a swift conclusion, there will still be unanswered questions like, who hired these bus drivers in the first place? What kind of contracts were they offered when they accepted their job? Did they understand the nature of their contracts? What kind of protections are they receiving as foreign workers when it comes to conflicts with their employers? Will they inspire other workers to strike like them? So many questions.
How can SMRT justify this kind of discrimination on the basis of nationality?

On the other hand, if the government caves in to their demand or at least try to reach a compromise (come on, you've gotta feel sorry for those striking PRC drivers), then it does mark the start of a brand new chapter in industrial relations in Singapore - where strikes become part of the landscape again. This would change the nature of the relationship between Singaporeans and their government, employees and their employers, the worker and the system. The government's decision would depend a lot on public opinion (readers, let me know how you feel about the situation) and they will probably do what would make them look best in a situation like this.

Either way it is a game changer - for the better, one hopes. I live in the UK where strikes do happen - train drivers, bus drivers, teachers, hospital workers, tax office staff, even border control staff can go on strike and have done so. However, just because they are able to strike doesn't mean that they do strike all the time - strikes tend to be fairly uncommon. Public transport works, schools are open, hospitals are operational and when you land at Heathrow airport, it's business as usual at passport control. Giving people the possibility to strike may empower them when it comes to demanding better working conditions and pay, but it doesn't mean that they will abuse that right to strike. When strike happen, they are more an exercise to flex one's muscles as part of the negotiation, make their opinions heard and usually the strikes don't often last more than a day or two.
The fact that Singapore has gone over 60 years without any strikes is nothing short of a miracle - it is the greatest achievement of social engineering by the PAP to tame a population to the point where they become so docile they are totally obedient and wouldn't dare to contemplate striking. However, this has come to an end this week by a group of PRCs bus drivers who weren't brought up in Singapore and tamed like the local Singaporeans. How ironic. The PAP have undermined their own grip on power by letting in so many foreign workers who don't fear them the same way locals do. This episode answers the question about whether new citizens would always the PAP. Perhaps they didn't think this one through carefully enough?

So there you go my friends. What do you think about this strike? Do you think that some good will come out of it? How do you think the government and SMRT will react to these strikers? Do you sympathize with the strikers? What are your feelings on the issue? Don't be shy - please leave a comment below! Thanks.

10 comments:

  1. Hi LIFT,

    The last strike in Singapore is 1986, when Ong Teng Cheong as the NTUC head sanctioned a strike in the shipping industry. You can read more about it in wikipedia.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ong_Teng_Cheong#Implicit_pact_with_unions

    > That's just plain wrong - an employee's worth to the company should be measured by his work performance and not his nationality!

    Please lah, this nationality discrimination has been happening in Singapore for so many years now, it is not something new. It is just that finally there is a group with enough balls to grab the public attention so vividly. Just take a look at pay of nurses (in both the restructured and private hospitals), IT folks, construction workers, maids, etc. That foreign workers don't strike does not mean all's well at work. Such nationalistic discrimination re-inforces nationalistic cliques and nationalistic bullying at workplace. [Speaking from my experience working as a nurse in Singapore.]

    Personally I am glad that the PRC drivers strike. Best case scenario: SBS bow to public pressure and re-negotiate their terms, which set the socio-political climate towards the direction of workers' empowerment. Worst case scenario: PRC drivers get fired, thrown out of Singapore, SBS decides to hire more toe-the-line Singaporean drivers instead, and Singapore becomes infamous around the world as the [IMHO] repressive labour-exploiting country that it truly is. Singapore citizens win either way, thanks to the foreign "talents".

    Cheers, WD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi WD, thanks for your comment. Yes I agree with you, that's why I support the strike :)

      Delete
  2. Hi LIFT,

    When I replied on Facebook regarding the wage disparity between China and Msia workers, another angrily replied to me that Msia knows Malay, English, Chinese and Hokkien while PRC knows only chinese which is why msia have higher pay. He even called me a communist for advocating equal pay. I wanted to rebut but I don't debate with people that throw insults at me.

    However, he does have a point. many S'poreans don't like PRC drivers because they can speak chinese only. Do you think just based on language ability alone, that PRC drivers deserve lower pay?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there, thanks for your comment.

      I just wanted to point out to you that as someone with a Malaysian dad and a lot of Malaysian friends & relatives, you cannot assume that *all* Malaysians are able to speak Malay, Mandarin/other dialects & English. Some do of course, but not all. For example, Malay-Malaysians would not speak any Chinese - just doesn't happen. It's often the Malaysian-Chinese who do speak both Malay & Chinese, but those who do speak English well tends to be those who are very well educated and let's face it, you're not going to get Malaysian graduates coming to Singapore to drive buses. Likewise, there tends to be tendency for those around the KL area to favour Cantonese over Mandarin - and we don't really speak Cantonese in Singapore, how's that going to help anyone apart from Cantonese-Singaporeans? I've got friends from Penang as well and Penang Hokkien is not that easy to understand, like I can struggle on with them with some guess work and figure out what they're saying, but otherwise I'd often resort to Mandarin, Malay or English.

      Likewise, even if the Malay speaking ones came from somewhere like Kelantan - the local dialect is called Baso-Kelate ... it's not just an accent but very hard for Singaporean-Malays to understand. So the bottom line is, YES there are Malaysians who are very multi-lingual indeed, but you cannot assume that ALL Malaysians are multi-lingual, so I am all for rewarding drivers who can speak 3 or 4 languages with a bonus, but each driver should be tested for their linguistic skills individually, rather than for SMRT to make any assumptions like that on the basis of their nationality, right? Some PRCs have made some effort to learn some English - not all have (only a small number, I have met such English-speaking PRCs before in Singapore), and indeed, if there is a system that will reward them for learning English, then yes they will make an effort, isn't that what we all want? Right now, the system is like, "oh you're PRC you won't speak English, you never will and we will assume that" rather than, "come on, if you learn English, we will reward you for it! Jia you!"

      As for the internet trolls on FB, why bother? That's why I write a blog rather than just get into those arguments on FB.

      Delete
    2. The PAP only sees the dollar sign when they open the floodgates to foreigners.
      I saw it coming a long long time ago. The reason why no one near to the govt has ever spoken up (if they have even a little bit of gray matter) may be pined down to a couple of reasons:

      1. Groupthink -no body nmoves unless the big boss say so. They probably have to leave their brains at home whenever they take part in any PAP events or activities. In fact, all they ever need to wear is an obsequious and silly grin. Smiling like a jack ass. We see a lot of them in photos in the crowd around any PAP VIP which the national service press would not dare not to report.

      2. Almost all of them are mercenaries. They are with the PAP for the connection and benfits to be derived to be in the company of the party.

      Delete
    3. http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/why-smrts-discrimination-against-prc.html Latest reply to XxtoweringxX

      Delete
  3. Hi Limpeh,
    I agree, I was brought up in S'pore thinking all strikes are disruptive and violent. In the 1990's, I participated for the first time in a strike (not in S'pore), but as a graduate student in the state of Wisconsin, USA - it was the most liberating experience in my life!
    Graduate students had to pay tuition fee, which only left me $400 a month afterward (not enough for food and rent). The strike went on for 2 weeks, involving picketing in front of the chancellor's office, informing students and faculty about our cause...never violent. The AFL-CIO (national trade union) even brought in their farm workers and teachers to join our picket. Eventually we got a tuition waiver, and I have become a lifetime supporter of worker's unions (the western kind, not S'pore's NTUC) and it's one reason I choose not to live in S'pore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi and thanks for your comment. I've not gone on strike before ... but have gone as far as to threaten to and it worked. I was working on an on-going contract and I said, if you don't pay me by this date, then I am not going to go on to do the next part of the project. As the date got closer and closer, I said, that's it, I'm on strike if I don't see the money - I mean it, I will strike. Sure enough, I got paid the same day.

      I've done loads of political protests for various causes - it's a very liberating experience.

      Unions are a double edged sword ... but I am too sleepy to open that Pandora's box right now. Another topic for another day.

      Delete
  4. Hi LIFT, the case just got closed today, but the outcome is unsatisfactory and rather sad. This episode boils down to lack of empathy by SMRT & those who criticised the strike. It was appalling to hear a PRC bus driver’s starting salary was $1K. Omg 1970s wages, are we assuming the drivers will send it back to China where its worth more, & how are they expected to survive while theyre here?

    After you said Sporeans have no balls unlike the PRCs, I did some reflection &… by gosh, I think you’re right! Just one minor case in point -as a jogger at the Alexandra park connector near my place, people running opposite often get in the way & Im the one who has to move aside. Theres a “keep to your left” convention for road users but some foreigners are unaware of this, esp those from countries that drive on the right.
    This brings to mind your Ah Beng response to the cyclist shouting “Get outta my way”. Once, an angmo cyclist headed straight for me & I expected him to swerve to his left but he didn’t, so I went to the right where a female jogger also headed towards me & she was nearer. I zig-zagged a bit, waiting for either one to give way. The guy shouted “Make up your mind, will you?” as he passed & I even automatically replied “sorry”.
    Since then, I’ll signal my intention to stick to the left if someone wants to bump into me. What I’d really like to do is yell “Keep to your LEFT lah!” & wish I’d said it to the cyclist. Every time Im confronted with this situation I imagine myself saying it, but know I never will. There are lots of regulars here; I don’t want to be treated as the Resident Park Villain. It’s a combination of not wanting to be rude, and simply no guts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment Lam Toh. I hope we have all learned a little something from this episode.

      Delete