Wednesday, 28 November 2012

It's SMRT's fault, not the PRC drivers

Now for today's post, I have to thank my reader 'Devil' for the following comment on my last post:

Devil28 November 2012 03:49
It is not so much about fluency in languages but more a matter of service attitude. In general, Malaysians do provide a better service experience to passengers. It is normal to ask the bus driver if the bus stops somewhere and it doesn't hold the bus up that long. More often than not PRC drivers just ignore you by outright refusing to communicate or waiving you away. Surely you have observed this if you have taken enough buses. If you talk about adding value to the company they definitely score lower than Malaysians in this particular aspect. The wage structure is certainly unfair to PRC drivers that are an exception to this norm. I sympathize with those drivers since there seems no way they can demonstrate they are better.
Yes, I totally agree with the principle that good service is important and if a member of staff provides good customer service, then s/he should be rewarded. Recently, I was paying for my sushi at Japan Centre when I dropped some money from my wallet. I must've held my wallet upside down and somehow the notes fell out. A female member of staff noticed it, rushed over, picked up the money and returned it to me. I thanked her profusely! I wrote to her manager, praising her for her honesty as such acts must not be ignored and should always be rewarded. I was kinda disappointed that the sushi shop's manager never got back to me, least s/he could've done was reply to my email with, "Dear sir, thank you for your email, I am very pleased our staff was able to make your day blah blah blah etc".

So by all means, create a system to REWARD good bus drivers who give a better service experience to passengers. Yes, I am all for that. But to assume, Malaysians = good, PRC = bad ... that's wrong on two levels. Firstly, the Malaysians will think, hahaha I don't even need to make any effort at all, the Singaporeans will always assume that I will be this wonderful driver on the basis of my nationality. Secondly, the PRCs will think, shit they're going to assume I'm going to be rude and nasty, so why even bother to try to be nice and polite? Who loses out in the end? The passengers - because neither PRC nor Malaysian drivers have any incentive to try harder. This is why it is SMRT's fault - they have removed any incentive to try harder, so no one will bother trying harder. I have actually encountered some very good service on the public transport system whilst travelling around China - so it's not like PRCs are somehow all incapable of delivering good service. Rather, the onus is on the management to get the best out of their employees and find effective ways to make them perform well by rewarding good performance.
It's like how the last US elections were so divisive - blacks and gays will almost certainly always vote Obama and never Romney; so as a result the Democrats think, "we already have the black and gay vote, we don't need to focus on them and try to please them on their issues." The Republicans think, "we will never win the black and gay vote, so we don't need to bother trying to woo them." Who loses out in the end? The blacks and gays - because neither of the main parties are interested in their issues. Hence the outcome depended heavily on the Latino vote because they were the ones who were more undecided and they had their issues addressed.

Part of the reason why PRC drivers do not give good service is because of the way the system is structured - can you see the chicken & the egg catch-22 situation happening here? If you do not give the driver any incentive to be polite or learn English, why would they bother? It is almost as if they want to make sure PRC drivers keep on delivering a second-rate service, so they can justify paying them less, thus depressing overall wages at the expense of customer service. What are their priorities? Do they care about the commuters who depend on public transport? Do the management of SMRT use their own buses, or do they drive beautiful, expensive cars? Do they care if the customer service experience is poor, when they are in their BMWs, Audis and Volvos? Would they ever be on the bus in the clip below? (That is just such an incredible story - 2 hours?!?! WTF?! Freaking unreal!) 
On the issue of giving directions to passengers, if a passenger asks a driver, "do you stop at Suntec City?" or "do you go down Bras Basah Road?" - simple question with YES/NO answers, then fair enough . I am talking about the bodoh sotong people who try to get long winded directions from the bus driver whilst holding up an entire crowded bus - and I'm like, eh hello auntie, can you not see you're holding up the entire busful of people here alamak? There are so many people at the bus stop, couldn't you have asked one of them? Why did you have to ask the bus driver of all people? Thus in cases like that, I think it's 100% correct that the PRC bus driver refuses to engage them at any level to minimize disruption to the bus service. Besides, how totally salah do you have to be to approach a foreign bus driver for directions in Singapore? Aren't you much better off asking a local for directions?

Hence in conclusion, yes there are obvious problems with PRC drivers operating in Singapore pertaining to the quality of their service, but the issue that we need to deal with is the fact that the drivers are given no incentive to improve their performance. This wage differential is all stick and no carrot, it is not a good deal for the drivers nor does it do anything to improve the service experience for the passengers. By that token, it is wrong to place the blame on the striking drivers and SMRT should be forced to re-examine their wage policy and deliver a better system - not just for the SMRT employees but also for the passengers, for it is only by rewarding good drivers that you can improve overall customer satisfaction. Heck, SMRT has hardly had a good record so far, it is high time they took a long hard look at themselves (and their poor performance) and make some changes for the better. 
Remember this from December 2011?

So, my readers, over to you. What do you think? What have been your experiences on the SMRT network?   Have you had positive or negative experiences with PRC bus drivers? What should be done? How should the strike be resolved? Please, leave a comment below, thank you.

PS. Whilst there have been so many blog posts on the PRC strike saga, my favourite is here and I do encourage you to read it too.



14 comments:

  1. Indeed it's a lack of focus on good service. Then again, with the dearth of competition in the industry, I doubt the company would really care.

    Erm, the part about asking about the bus route. I don't think it's so much to do with local or foreign? Certainly a bus driver, being a pro, should have a better grasp of the complete bus route than a random local? I would think it more efficient to ask the bus driver directly than to ask random people. In fact, some bus drivers used to be able to tell you the correct bus number to take if you board the wrong bus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yah lah, in principle, in the olden days (Limpeh is old enough to remember the good old days) ... sure - but nowadays, surely there's a smart phone app for that kinda thing? I'd rather trust a smart phone app than a PRC bus driver, sorry, just being practical here.

      Delete
    2. Halo.. you forgot unties or uncles who may not be as apps friendly as you, or can afford a smartphone.

      Also irrespective, a strike is illegal in Singapore. Follow the rule of the country you want to work in. If you can't or don't want to follow, get the f.. out

      Delete
    3. I can't remember about S'pore ... (remind me please, as I am sitting here in London), but in all London bus stops, all the bus route information is clearly displayed in the bus stop shelter - so if I ever need to check where the bus is going, I can always obtain that info from the signs in the bus stop.

      These workers are reacting to a wage increment announcement AFTER they have started their contract in Singapore, which is clearly unfair. So you expect them to sit back and do nothing? They have the right to react - that's why I support them 100%.

      Delete
    4. Darn... just lost a really long reply thanks to this dynamic blogspot template.

      Most SG bus stops do have route information. Young people will check it if the bus stop is not swamped or they will check their phone. The rest like those without smart phones, or tourists will still ask the driver.

      Seems like SMRT is now saying that the PRC drivers are on 2-year contracts.
      Do contract staff get the same kind of increments as perm staff in UK? My impression in SG is that contract staff seldom get the same benefits or increments as the perm staff. I could be mistaken though.

      Delete
    5. I have lost an entire article once because of a blogger screw up ...

      Anyway, yes that's what I thought - it is possible to get all the info you need anyway from a bus stop notice board. It's not difficult really and I do that even when I am on holiday and even if I am not sure, I *ALWAYS* ask a local just to confirm, however, I would *NEVER* ask a bus/train/tram driver as I don't wanna hold them up, I would always just approach someone (usually a younger person who looks like s/he would speak English) at the bus/train/tram stop and ask them. What's wrong with asking another person at the bus stop?

      Recently, I saw a tourist ask a woman for directions at the bus stop and the woman said, "I'm sorry I am not sure...", I automatically stepped in and ask the tourist, "where do you want to go?" and I helped them out. People are usually quite helpful to tourists or just anyone who may need directions.

      My point is simple: I've not asked a bus/train/tram driver for directions in over ten years despite having lived and travelled all over the world. It's not like I have a smart phone app to depend on - but simply I choose NOT to ask drivers for directions, I always approach others. Why? Two reasons: 1. I don't want to hold up the bus/train/tram!!! 2. If in a foreign country, I don't expect them to speak English anyway. I have always managed to get the information I need for *OTHER* people anyway, so as long as the bus drivers do their job and get the bus from A to B on the right route on schedule, I don't have any trouble with them refusing to communicate with the passengers.

      As for perm staff in the UK, I have no idea sorry, I don't know anything about those who work in public transport. I just use it.

      Delete
    6. *TYPO: the information I need FROM *OTHER* people anyway

      Delete
    7. Okay, our methods differ in our travels. I always ask the bus driver when I travel if I board from the front. I try my best to pronounce the stop name in their language. And I get myself acquainted with 'yes' or 'no' in that language. Sometimes I know it should stop but I ask anyway because I am not up to date with route changes due to roadworks, etc. I guess the transport companies in the countries I have visited are smart enough to have buses that are scheduled such that these little delays can be easily overcome.

      Having said all that, locals do come to my rescue as well. Many a time I don't even have to ask, just look blur with a map and someone that speaks English will help. That usually happens when I board the bus/tram from the middle/rear.

      As for the contract vs. perm staff, I was referring to in general, not specifically public transport companies.

      Delete
    8. Hi there. I think there's a part of me that's "pai seh" - I would automatically think, whoops people are going to glare at me and hate me for holding up the bus, so I automatically ask anyone but the bus driver. I would usually pick some smartly dressed young professional in his/her 20s/30s who look like they will speak fluent English for directions... to be honest, until you mention the word 'roadworks', that didn't cross my mind at all. But yes, it's not a question of the schedule per se, delaying the bus by how many minutes ... but more the 'pai seh' instinct in me that kicks in, ie. "I don't wanna make a fuss and hold up the bus driver, I can always ask someone else, don't be the awkward tourist who draws attention to himself lah."

      And yes, helpful English speaking locals always come to my help esp in Europe cos I look so obviously foreign. For more on languages when on holiday, read my piece on it here: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/tourist-season-part-6-holiday-languages.html

      As for contract/perm staff - gosh, that's a BIG issue man. Can I put that aside for now and maybe do a proper post to address it for you at some point? Thanks.

      Delete
    9. Sure, whenever you feel inclined to.

      Delete
  2. Hi Limpeh,

    A-men to the title of this article.

    The moment I read about the strike, my immediate reaction was "oh god.. not another stupid SMRT management issue again" !!! So thank you for this article, keeping my mind sane while I struggle with the rest of the Singapore blaming all on the PRCs (again!) (What's new...!!?!?!??!)

    The issues of PRCs, foreign talents, language fluency and all that attitude problems so said created by PRCs drivers are invalid in my point of argument here really.

    A management that creates such unfavourable wage differences and yet expects it not to get leaked or fussed over is without basic foresight and absolutely incompetent in my opinion.

    If SMRT has intentions to pay the PRCs lower amongst the M'sians, it should have at least try to protect itself with some disclaimer clause in the contract stating their every intention and it's up to the PRCs driver to accept the conditions if they want to work for SMRT. (as an example)

    Low cost, high profit. Basic economics. Everyone tries to use it to their best advantage. Some more ruthlessly than the others.... but hey survival of the fittest right ?

    Now, ethical issues asides. I can understand a small shop trying to exploit it's foreign workers via sneaky means but SMRT is a huge organisation with supposedly smart people overseeing the running of things. If there are going to be an exploitation done, at least make some effort to cover up their arse professionally !!!!!!

    One can argue the PRCs could not dispute the fact that they have to be paid lower than Singaporeans due to nationality rights, i.e. putting Singaporean first. But what astonishes me was did SMRT really expect the PRCs to eat humble pie when it comes to comparing themselves with the Malaysians? Afterall, Malaysians are foreigners too.

    So to sum it up. Not only does SMRT fucks the running of things up... they couldn't even handle the most basic form of "exploitation" well enough ! Maybe they should just stick to hiring Singaporeans at a higher rate at the end of the day to keep it simple. One nationality, one rate. A simple equation for their simple minds.

    Low labour cost, high profitability models are best left to smarter management. It seems to me like a task too mammoth for SMRT to deal with at the moment ! *SNARK*


    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I forgot to add... What I'll REALLY REALLY like to see is the SMRT group being questioned by the government !!!!

    Who were the ones in charge of recruiting the PRCs driver? Why was it not being communicated clearly from the start the reason of their lower wage? What were their contractual terms? Who drew up those terms? What was missing in the terms? Did SMRT tried to engage the PRC drivers before the strike went ahead.

    And finally.... did SMRT really thought it was NOT going to happen ?

    Also.... what did they learn from this and how should it be dealt with in the future setting a role model for other businesses engaging in a mix local and foreign workers !

    Shifting blames around and blaming the PRCs is totally futile !!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Limpeh - please do delete my second post timed at 15:35 ! It was a double post due to hanging of the machine ! :) Thanks !

    ReplyDelete