Hello guys, I'm going to share with you a random incident that happened to examine the theme of social skills. I go to a gymnastics club in East London about an hour away from me every Sunday, it's quite a long journey but it is worth it because the equipment there is fantastic and the Sunday afternoon session is ideal for my schedule. So last Sunday when I was on the DLR train as usual heading to the gym when I was approached by a little old Chinese lady clutching a bible and a pamphlet about her church, she asked me if I spoke Mandarin. Sensing that she wanted to preach to me in Mandarin, I said I only spoke a few words but I'm very sorry I don't understand enough to have any kind of conversation with you. So she persisted in English but her English was very limited, it was at that point which I felt sorry for her - is this how she has chosen to spend her Sunday? Approaching random strangers on the train and finding someone willing to talk to her about her religion? I sensed that I might have been the first person who didn't chase her away so I decided to be friendly. I'm an atheist who is vehemently anti-religion, but I didn't feel the need to get into an argument with her - I could have either spend the next 15 minutes looking at social media on my phone or I could chat to her, so I chose the latter. Let's call this woman Fei (not her real name), she was in her 60s and was originally from China. Our entire conversation took place in English - I did not want to tell her that I had earlier lied to her that I didn't speak any Mandarin.
I realize of course I had forced Fei to struggle on in her second language and perhaps that was a bit unfair of me to have done that, but if she was trying to persuade me to listen to her and visit her church, well she failed. She didn't ask me what I did for a living - I work in sales and I do know how to deliver a good sales pitch. Fei's pitch was terrible, she started lecturing me about why her god is the one and only true god without checking with me if I am a Christian, if I had a religion or how I felt about religion. So here's the first lesson: always check if your content is suited to the social context. I can imagine if Fei stood up in her church and started praising god with such enthusiasm, then those around her would gladly give her their approval and applaud her. But would it have the same effect on me? Definitely not, yet it didn't even occur to her to try to change her approach and it was only because I was too polite that I didn't simply walk away at that point. Now what she should have done of course was to engage me and try to make me feel as if I was having a real conversation with her rather than being lectured at: so she could have asked some questions about whether I believed in god, whether I had been to a church before, whether I was open to the idea of visiting her church. But no, she had somehow made the assumption that I wasn't even a Christian and she needed to tell me all about Jesus - now I found that rather condescending as I did used to go to church every Sunday when I was much younger and even regularly attended bible study classes, so I had to tell her that she didn't need to tell me about Jesus but she didn't seem to listen. I felt like she had simply gone into auto-pilot mode as I couldn't break her out of her routine once she started praising god.
I thought, we're going nowhere so let me try to ask her some personal questions, so she could talk about herself instead. So I asked her three questions: how long have you lived in England? What kind of job do you do? Do you live in East London? She told me that she had moved to England from China over 40 years ago, I didn't ask her how someone who didn't speak much English managed to come over but I didn't want to risk coming across as xenophobic. She works in a supermarket in Chinatown where she had to learn how to speak Cantonese over the years as many of her colleagues were from Hong Kong. She then went on to tell me about the various parts of East London she has lived in over the years and clearly, she was dependent on the social housing network for a roof over her head. Now for those of you not familiar with social housing in the UK, allow me to explain how it works: there are a lot of poorer, working class people in the UK who simply can't afford to own their own homes and have to rent, but without some help from the government, these people would end up either homeless or in horrific conditions like you see in the third world where a family of five lives in one room. So the British government has a social housing scheme where they build affordable housing for the poorest people in society and then let them rent it at below market rate prices; in some situations, like a severely disabled person or a single mother with many children, they end up paying no rent at all and they can effectively get the accommodation rent-free from the government. But if you think this sounds like a good deal, well no - it isn't. Even if you were offered social housing, most people who can afford to would usually prefer to move out and find better alternatives.
Social housing like that however are of very low quality and the supply simply cannot keep up with demand over the years. A lot of the housing stock is very old and the waiting list is painfully long. Such social housing is often allocated to those who need it most - so if I applied for it, they would tell me, "you've a good job, you're earning a lot of money, you've got plenty of savings and thus that would automatically bump you so far down the waiting list that you'll be dead for a few decades long before your name ever comes up in the system, so there's absolutely no point in you applying for it." This does mean that people who end up in social housing are the poorest and most desperate. Fei described her neighbours as drug addicts, drug dealers, alcoholics, ex-criminals who can't get a job, teenage single mothers with too many children and refugees who didn't speak a word of English. Needless to say, Fei's living conditions were horrific. She told me a story about how some of the neighbours who were just kids would bully her, they would wait for her to come back from home and then throw random items from the dustbins at her. She would have to run down the alley to try to dodge the missiles but by the time she makes it into her front door, she would usually be covered with food waste and other foul, disgusting rubbish and even then, the kids would continue throwing crap her her front door. She lived in fear of them and was totally traumatized by all of this. Was this racism? Of course, those kids who picked on her sound like monsters but such is the nature of racism in the UK: poor people like Fei are a lot more vulnerable to such attacks whilst rich Asian people like me can afford to live in much safer neighbourhoods, very far away from these undesirable characters who get up to no good. Need I state the obvious? It truly sucks to be poor in this country and by that token I felt very sorry for Fei.
So one day, a colleague at the supermarket invited Fei to go to her church and this was one of the few Chinese churches in London where all the services are conducted in Mandarin rather than English. Fei met a helpful friend (let's call this person Luo, not his real name) at the church who spoke English rather well. Once he realized the horrific abuse that Fei was suffering, Luo helped Fei contact the relevant local authorities to report the racist harassment she received - Fei had previously been reluctant to make a police report due to her very limited English, she was worried that she couldn't make herself understood by the police but with Luo at her side acting as her translator, she was then able to get a resolution quite quickly. The local council responsible for her housing quickly relocated Fei to another location where she was left in peace - she was so happy, she could now walk home in peace and nobody would harass her. She even found out later that the police did investigate the kids who harassed her and the families were dealt with by the authorities. This was the series of events that made her believe in god and she credits Jesus for saving her from that awful situation. This was when I rolled my eyes and thought, Jesus didn't save you - Luo was the kind person who had stepped in and helped you out, what about thanking him instead? Besides, once the relevant authorities were made aware of what was going on, they swiftly stepped in and moved you to a different council flat, so you were no longer harassed by those horrible kids. I thought Fei made the mistake that believing that god would care enough about her to intervene when it was Luo who was the one who went out of his way to help her out of that situation - the fact that he was from her church is just incidental. But I wasn't prepared to get into an argument with Fei over this so I just sat there quietly, listening to her story.
So even though I politely gave Fei my attention, I thought that her logic was riddled with flaws - yet nonetheless, she thought that if she could share with me how Jesus had helped her when her life was so difficult, then she could convince me to turn to Jesus for help if I am experiencing any problems in my life as well. She didn't stop to once ask me what kind of problems I may be experiencing with my work or family life - she was simply so convinced that if I listened to her story, I would arrive at the same conclusion as she did. At this point I realized that she must probably be completely autistic as well as she did something that autistic adults often do - she totally failed to take into account of the fact that I may come to a totally different conclusion after hearing a story, that her perspective may not be one that I share. If you don't even acknowledge that the other person has a different perspective on the matter, how the hell are you going to start convincing them of the validity of your perspective? To be honest, she reminded me of my own severely autistic parents and that's why I felt sorry for her, because at least I know what it is like to deal with severely autistic adults with no social skills. The only part of her story which I would give her credit for was the way she said that Jesus had taught her how to forgive the horrible kids who used to harass her - that was why she has bears no grudge against them and she is able to move on with her life. Fei certainly has every reason to feel angry, resentful and bitter about what she suffered in the past but it was her religion that has given her the tools to deal with all those feelings. Thus I could see how religion could be useful for poorly educated people like her, to make sense of the world and deal with bad experiences.
However, I felt that Fei was a poorly educated woman who was clueless, she thinks that she is doing her duty as a Christian to spread the word of god and preach to random strangers on the train, but we have here a classic case of the Dunning-Kruger effect: Fei was so incompetent at her job that she didn't realize just how hopelessly incompetent she was. I got the feeling that she simply loved the sound of her own voice but didn't really care to find out if she had been successful in convincing me to believe in her god. So to test her, I gave her this challenge: I told her that I used to go to church up till the age of 21, but I became disillusioned when I saw what my mother was doing. My mother would to go church every Sunday (and several times a week in fact, before the pandemic) - not only would my mother not understand what the pastor was preaching, but she would go on to do many wicked, cruel things that completely goes against any kind of Christian teaching. She once had gone out of her way to be incredibly cruel to her own husband out of spite and after witnessing how someone like that can claim to be a pious Christian, it left me completely disillusioned with Christianity. Now what should have done was to realize how difficult this question was and bought herself time by asking me for more details like, you said your mother did something very wicked to your father, what exactly did she do to your father? Why do you think she was wrong to do that? How did your father react to your mother doing this to him? What do you think that Jesus would have done in this situation? What does the bible teach us about dealing with family conflicts?
But unfortunately, Fei did none of that. She simply sidestepped the issue, I wondered if she understood what I had explained about my mother in full as Fei's English was rather limited. Instead, she reacted by exclaiming, "Aiyah, you young people are always so impatient, you want the answers immediately - you don't understand the situation because you don't study the bible! If you really study the bible and believe in god, then all will make sense to you! You must have faith in god's plans for you." She then went back to her default mode of praising god and telling me how wonderful Jesus is, whilst conveniently ignoring the story I had just told her about my mother. I didn't want to pressure her into talking about my mother, after all, I was expecting Fei to give me any useful advice about the situation - I was merely testing Fei so see if she would have the social skills to react appropriate (and unsurprisingly she totally failed). As the train reached the final destination at Beckton, she once again extended her invitation for me to visit her church with her and I politely declined. I didn't give her a reason but she didn't ask, she merely said, "I'll pray for you Alex. It has been nice chatting with you, thank you." Frankly I don't think it really bothered her whether or not she had convinced me to believe in her god, I think she was just grateful that someone was willing to listen to her respectfully and engage her without prejudice. I could have easily given her some advice about how to speak to strangers and engage them if she was determined to spend her free time preaching to random people on the train but I don't think she would have been interested. As I took one last glance at her before I left the station I noticed that she already started talking to another person on the platform.
Such is London for you, you can run into someone like Fei whilst taking the train and I hope she finds fulfillment in her own weird way. She reminds me of this other guy I run into quite often on my way to and from the office, I usually pass through Oxford Circus junction (depending on the route I take, but it is only about 720 meters from my office according to Google maps). Oxford Circus is one of the major junctions in central London where two famous shopping streets intersect: Oxford Street and Regent Street. This is also one of the busiest tube stations on the London Underground network as three lines intersect there and it is an important interchange station. So this guy would stand at the entrance of the tube station with a loud speaker and lecture random strangers about why we're all going to hell because of our deadly sins and we need to embrace Jesus before it is too late. However, this guy never ever has an audience, in fact most pedestrian actually start walking faster just to get away from him one they realize what he is preaching. Does it bother this preacher guy that he doesn't really have an audience? No, not at all - so if you were to actually spend more than a minute listening to him, you would realize that his 'sermon' is a stream of incoherent ramblings, he is extremely inarticulate and none of what he said makes any sense at all. It is certainly not a convincing, cogent argument, just the nonsensical ramblings of a delusional guy who is probably uneducated and highly autistic. Even Fei did much better than this preacher man at Oxford Circus as she at least managed to get me to listen to her for a good 15 minutes on the train.
So allow me to conclude by comparing Fei's performance to what I am expected to do at work: my role is sales, my company is paying a lot of money to make those sales happen. Am I able to sell to every single person I speak to? No, but I need to generate a decent amount of sales each quarter in order to prove my worth to my employers. Yes, we are very much results orientated and that is why we pay successful salesmen a lot of commission because we want to reward the results rather than the effort. If I were to do what Fei did by pitching a lot of people only for none of them to invest with us, then I think I would be sacked pretty quickly! I feel very sorry for Fei - I see a lot of effort but none of that is going to yield any results given how atrocious her social skills are. I do wonder what might happen if Fei's church would reward her with big wads of cash or some kind of special status in the church for new each person she actually brings with her to church each Sunday- would that motivate her to focus on results rather than just endlessly praising god. There is after all no punishment, no penalty at all for Fei failing so miserably and I'm sure if the people at her church knew just how hard she was trying, they would certainly praise her. But isn't she simply wasting her own time if she persists, given how terrible her social skills are? Shouldn't someone at her church say to her, "Fei, you work so hard six days a week at the Chinese supermarket, why don't you make the most of the one day you have to yourself and get some rest Fei? Why spend your one day off preaching to strangers on the train like that, you really don't need to do this."
There you go, that's it from me on this episode. What do you think? Have you ever encountered someone like Fei before? Why do people like her suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect? Why do people who preach religion tend to like to hear the sound of their own voices so much? Is this because they think they are performing to their god rather than preaching to me - do they actually believe that their audience is divine rather than earthly and mortal? Would you have spent time talking to someone like Fei if she had approached you on the train or would you have simply walked away? Do you feel sorry for Fei? Or would you judge her more harshly? Leave a comment below and many thanks for reading.
So one trick I use if Christian people try to preach to me is to pretend I'm already Christian(I'm an atheist). But if they ask me about which church I go to or to recite a prayer then I'm fucked. It surprises me how persistent some people are though. I once was invited to a Halloween party with really amazing food by some batchmates which turned out to be a church recruiting event. But like you said I don't think they are trying to be successful like a salesperson who really wants to close a deal and make a commission. Not like God is gonna strike off points for trying but failing, unlike a salesperson not being able to eat if they fail to get customers.
ReplyDeleteHiya Amanda, allow me to explain how that may not work - I remember in Singapore, when I used that excuse/reason (since it was true back then), those who preached to me wanted me to go to their church instead as turning up at church with a bunch of new friends in tow would make you look like such a good evangelist who has gone round preaching to so many people. So at least with those Singaporeans I encountered, they were at least results-orientated, ie. they had to convince me to go to their church with them, quite unlike Fei and that guy at Oxford Circus who don't really care about whether or not they convince me to go to their church.
DeleteLol so churches fight over churchgoers. It surprises me how seriously people take evangelizing. Not like Atheists stand on the train trying to convince people not to believe in God.
DeleteWell I assume that those who bring more 'new friends' with them to church each Sunday must enjoy some kind of higher status within the churches as a result of this 'accomplishment' - that's their reward.
DeleteThis is totally another kind of being a pickup artist haha. Church-luring artist. Btw, I remember you talking to Putty about picking up guys on the street in a past post. Does that even work? Sometimes I go cycling/jogging and sometimes guys will try to say something, but I usually ignore them.
DeleteInteresting question. I think I am more passive in this approach - ie. if a guy smiles at me or gives me eye contact, I might just say hi and see where it goes if I like what I see. But I wouldn't just chat someone up just because I think he's hot and I like him because he may not like me!
DeleteOh I have to tell you about what happened yesterday - you saw the pic on my stories yesterday, it's my usual Friday selfie with 'Dave' and of course, he's looking amazing. We were at the pub with a client and his wife (let's call her Mrs Client) got drunk. Yup, we call that hospitality - we buy our best clients loads of alcohol and before I knew it, she was lying on my shoulder saying, "Dave needs an experienced woman, I bet those young girls would have no idea how to please a man like that, let me tell you what I would do to a man like that." And then proceeded to tell me in great detail every single sexual act she would perform on him and I'm there thinking, I don't know you well enough to have this conversation, your husband is sitting next to you and I'm really only super nice and polite to you because your husband does a lot of business with our company and this for me is work!
Yeah I have no idea how chatting up works in the gay world. In the straight world the woman just dresses up pretty and waits, but that's changing.
DeleteI saw that story on Insta haha. Day drinking in suits? Dave was looking good that day, I can see why that client was so enamored with him. Lol that sounded like a Carrie move on your client's part. Suppose she was a younger woman who wanted to charm Dave, I hope she starts out asking about his background before dirty talk.
Oh in the gay world, chatting up rarely happens anymore. We use apps instead - gay men cut to the chase, it'll be like, "hi, wanna meet for sex right now?" No more making polite conversation with someone who is friendly but not interested in you. I remember how I barked up the wrong tree with this guy years ago when I was at university. We had a mutual friend and were supposed to go out together when this mutual friend canceled on us, thus turning it effectively into a blind date for me and gosh he was very handsome. I liked him. So we went out and I had a lovely time on the blind date but it wasn't long before I realized, oh he just wants to be friends, he isn't into me like that, he was just being a nice guy who is friendly but no he doesn't fancy me at all. That was in the late 1990s but there's just no way something like that could happen in 2021 because gay men would be like, "wanna have sex NOW?" And it's easy to ask that on an app and get a yes/no answer, quite unlike the 1990s when I totally misread the signals on that blind date.
DeleteOh that wasn't even the client, it was Mrs Client, ie. the client's wife. He earns enough money for her to be a housewife. Even if I do see a hot guy and have dirty thoughts, I keep them to myself: I wouldn't get drunk and then a random person exactly what I was thinking. I think that might be a good reason why my boss trusts me so much because I am always stone cold sober and sensible like that.
Wow gay men don't waste any time. In the straight world you still have to be polite to each other and beat around the bush until you can gauge interest from enough conversation. Yeah I get what you mean by meeting a handsome dude and not knowing whether he's interested or not, and not wanting to get your hopes up. I brought this topic up because there's this cute guy in my math class who I have no idea is interested in me or if he's already taken or just not interested.
DeleteWow Mrs Client said that to you about young Dave? I hope her husband didn't overhear! Yeah holding your tongue while drunk is an invaluable tool in business. I heard in China business partners go out for a drink before signing a deal so both sides can try to sniff out whether the other is hiding secrets. But wow the people you have to deal with on a weekly basis, just wow...
Well I like the directness of it all because I am a salesman. When I speak to a customer, I want a quick no if they are never going to buy from me and if they are going to buy, then let's sign the contract and get the formalities over and done with quick so I can get my commission and move onto the next sale. Remember the example I gave you above from my university days about the accidental 'blind date' that I stumbled into? That was a waste of time - that guy never fancied me and he was polite & friendly enough to say, "hey our mutual friend canceled on us last minute but let's go out and have a good time in town anyway" If I had asked him out for a date like a romantic date, he would've probably said no sorry I am not interested in you that way. As for the cute guy in your class, simple: imagine if I was your friend in class, I would go up to him and gauge his interest and find out on your behalf if he is interested in you or not. Ask a friend to help you find out, it's not the most sophisticated method but it works.
DeleteYup Mr Client heard everything his very drunk wife said, I didn't ask him what he thought of his wife's behaviour - it wasn't really any of my business. I just happened to be sitting there and I don't wanna get involved. Thankfully, I have steered well clear of all the drinking and what I like is that nobody has ever forced me to drink alcohol at work. As long as I don't stop them from drinking, they don't ask me to drink and we respect each individual's wishes.
Oh yeah, I usually tell telemarketers outright that I'm not interested, so we don't waste each other's time. Get a friend to find out? Even that is really bold. Me and my friend who is in the class don't even know this guy's name because everyone is so quiet. But whatever, my very optimistic friend who doesn't go to my school says "the time you spent waiting, you could've been together." I'm not nearly as optimistic, but whatever I'll put on my best clothes and makeup on Tuesday and go ask the cute guy's name, what he does for fun, and if we could do something together.
DeleteLol this seems like a daily occurrence for you, listening to drunk people spilling all their secrets. But yeah its good they tolerate it when others don't drink. Though your workplace seems very professional, everyone has to have good manners.
I think gay men have become increasingly bold online in a way that is identical to how you treat telemarketers: ie. interested or not? Yes/No? Don't waste each other's time if not interested. Just try it, what's the worst case scenario? Rejection - but at least you know where you stand and you can move on, NEXT!
DeleteI know when things can get messy when it comes to alcohol, it's when they take clients out for flashy dinners and they spend an insane amount of money on alcohol, that's when they make dirty jokes, speak about women in quite a disrespectful way but this happens in places like Japan and Korea as well - the alcohol makes them honest and I'm like, I'm interested to know your uncensored honest opinions. I don't partake in that because I don't drink but I'm just grateful I face no pressure whatsoever to drink. I'm hired because I'm unique and special, there's a certain sense of "Alex must be doing something right to have worked in this industry a long time, we must let Alex be Alex and do his thing."
Lol is dating like telemarketing then? I recently had to call a pest control specialist, but I did it through a kind of "dating app" where contractors bid for my project. And the contractor who called me first offered to do the job the very next day, so I said yes. But right after the job was done, another contractor called me out of the blue and I had to tell them someone else was faster. Technology has made the world really fast nowadays...it doesn't just apply to dating haha. Makes you think, rejection is more common than being accepted in the modern world I suppose. We talked about this in your post about 99% failure rate jobs.
DeleteMy dad once told me about some hotel bar in Singapore that sold glasses of some special booze for $40k usd each. Jeezus, that's a new car! But yeah you don't have to be a cookie-cutter type of person to succeed in jobs, in fact most of the time people appreciate when someone is different, at least in the west. I have a similar situation at work where nobody has the same skillset as me, we have very little overlap and I struggle to do their projects. But for the things that others find super difficult to do, they call me since that's my specialty. I think of an office as more like a soccer team than an individual sport. You can't have a team of only goalkeepers or only goalscorers, you need both.
We did have a discussion about working class jobs vs white collar jobs - jobs where you shut up and do as you're told vs jobs where you have to use your brain to figure out new solutions where none existed before. If I was working in McDonald's for example, I would have to wear a uniform, do exactly as I'm told by my manager and make the burgers exactly according to a recipe. That's why in such an environment, workers are expected to conform a lot more and be just like everyone else working there whereas in my kind of environment, it's the opposite: it's not so much you're encouraged to be different but that difference doesn't matter at all, rather it is how you can contribute to your company in terms of your creativity, your innovation and your ideas. And if you can do that whilst being completely different in more superficial way like not drinking alcohol, then the latter doesn't matter at all.
DeleteSo in addition to your working class jobs series have you ever considered writing a post about what ridiculously high paying jobs are like? And I'm not talking about being a doctor/lawyer making < 1 million/year.
DeleteHi Amanda, I have just completed my latest post and again it is about working class jobs and why the poor stay poor. The next post will be a cruel one about growing tomatoes in London and what that teaches us about trying to succeed. Akan datang.
DeleteBusy period at work, new post will be out soon!
DeleteHi LIFT, not sure if you have been following Singapore Covid situation update. Many people are dying from covid and ICU beds are near capacity.
ReplyDeleteHow do you think Singapore government had fared? If you have the power, what kind of policy will you implement in Singapore? Will you bit the bullet and try to ride the wave so that Singapore can open up eventually like what UK did?
Thank you.
Hi Jon, I think the situation in Singapore is quite different from the UK's in that your government has handled the situation with a zero-Covid approach whilst our government are like, "oh we're going to get 100,000+ cases a day and over 1000 deaths a day but so what? We don't care and neither do you."
DeleteThe UK government hasn't solved the Covid problem, it merely realized that the people were sick of lockdowns and if given a choice of a) another lockdown and b) potentially 10,000 deaths a week, if put to a vote, the public would overwhelmingly choose b). So the government here is getting away with it because it is merely giving the people what they want.
The key difference here is the culture - Singaporeans are willing to endure much stricter controls on their everyday lives because they are Singaporeans whereas we don't even have a track and trace system like you guys, it's ridiculous. And if we have another lockdown, there would be anarchy like the Queen and Boris Johnson would be beheaded by the angry mobs and their headless bodies dragged through the streets. Hence we would gladly accept 10,000 to 20,000 deaths a week as "completely normal" and hence I look at Singapore and think, "you guys are freaking out over a few deaths? Wait till you see what's going on in the UK where we don't even know where to store the corpses and nobody gives a shit."
I do wonder how long Singaporeans are willing and able to endure an indefinite lockdown situation - oh at some stage would they just end up like the British and demand that we let people die, we let the bodies pile up by the thousands in the streets just so normal life can resume. Don't get me wrong, normal life has resumed here in the UK - I don't even wear a mask, there's zero social distancing, all normal activities have resumed. But the dead bodies are piling up by the thousands, that's the price we paying as a society and the consensus is that "oh those people who die are old and sick anyway, if they didn't die of Covid, they'd have died of something else anyway, so I don't care."
To answer your question: my personal take on the situation is "I don't care, normal life has resumed, let the bodies pile up." But that's me as a normal citizen. If I was a government figure in power, I would try to understand what the public mood is at the moment and give them what they want. You have to understand that the public mood in Singapore and the UK are at the polar opposite ends of the spectrum. The Singaporeans freak out over a small cluster of cases even if no one gets hospitalized and the British don't bet an eyelid when a hospital says, "we have so many corpses this week we needed to ask the army for help to take away some of these dead bodies." And we're like yeah whatever, we don't give a shit. A government has to do whatever the people want in order to stay in power, it's a basic function of government - to serve the people, so it is the will of the people that dictates the policy in this case. So if I was in government in Singapore, if I gave people a policy that would prove to be unpopular - then I would risk losing my job very quickly. Likewise, if a government minister in the UK tried to impose another lockdown, I think s/he would fear for his/her life, so there's just no way that could happen. Call me cynical, but that's politics for you.
DeleteIndulge me in my cynicism: a government doesn't care about the people - they care about doing whatever it takes to stay in power. So the agenda is never about "how do we control the pandemic" it is about "what do we need to do to stay in power under such circumstances?" In the UK, if the government lit a big bonfire and burned the thousands dead bodies of the people who died of Covid in Trafalgar square, it would probably boost their popularity and there will be street parties to celebrate a government that will not let something as silly as 20,000 deaths a week stop us from enjoying the activities we like. Whereas in Singapore, if locking down society indefinitely is what will win the PAP votes, then that's what they will do. At this stage, it is not about controlling Covid, it is about staying in power for the governments. And in the UK, even if we had 30,000 or 40,000 or even something ridiculous like 250,000 deaths a week, we will never go into another lock down. That's why I refuse to criticize the Singaporean government on this issue, they are doing what the UK government is doing by the same token, it's just that public opinion is totally different there in SG.
Delete"they care about doing whatever it takes to stay in power" - thank you, I agree with you on this, except when PAP government was more popular during LKY era that he dared to implement a policy which he knows will lose him votes- He could afford to lose a few more votes. It was the Graduate Mother Scheme (1984), which proved to be so unpopular that it was discontinued eventually.
DeleteSingapore had to open up eventually, as COVID is here to stay and if more people start to lose jobs and Singapore reserve getting depleted from all the assistance schemes, the people will start to question the government.
I think the reality is the government had to choose between the economy and people's lives, and which options is more popular, and since most SG are already vaccinated, SG government know death can be controlled to the minimum.
In other words, I believe that progressively opening up SG will lose PAP less popularity than continuing to lockdown SG, provided SG healthcare does not collapse from the surge.
Personally, I'm pro-opening up and anti-lockdown. We have got to learn to live with Covid - it is never going away. So we should all get vaccinated, take necessary precautions if we're elderly/vulnerable but then allow life to get back to normal. There's this guy I work with who is an alcoholic, like holy shit he drinks too much and it's terrible for his health. But do I try to stop him from drinking? No, he's a colleague not a friend per se, like as long as it doesn't adversely affect the work we do then his drinking issue is his own business, I'm not going to stick my nose in there. I'm not going to demand that the government bans the sale of all alcohol in the country just to save my colleague from drinking himself to an early death - the way I see it, if he refuses to take the necessary steps to protect his own health, then why should the rest of us pay a high price if he is hell bent on drinking himself to an early grave? It's the same thing with Covid - if some fat, older person refuses to wear a mask or get vaccinated then that fat older person dies of Covid, how's that different from my colleague who drinks too much then? It is pretty much the same thing, why should it be treated any differently?
DeleteBut as for the PAP, they're politicians, they care about what's going to keep them in power and thus their policies will be dictated by what's gonna make them more popular with the Singaporean voters.
DeleteHi LIFT, I wish to share with you my experience with my friend whom is very unhappy with recent SG government decision to open up. I tried to reason with her, telling her SG need to open up eventually due to various reasons. She started to abuse the government, which I am not happy as I felt its important to be fair to SG government,so I started to send her even more information to support my views. I even sent your earlier reply to her and she was angered by your answer. Eventually, she got so angry and refused to talk to me. Only in her last messages to me, she revealed she is scared of covid and only then I fully understand because of her fear, she will not listen to reasons. I felt so foolish, I should had realize that earlier and should just shut up. I am more angry with myself, why do I need to prove myself right to others? I already know earlier she will not change her mind regardless what I said. How can I avoid this mistake next time?
ReplyDeleteWell Jon, from what you've told me, it seems that your friend has very poor social skills. She doesn't have the intellectual capacity to hold a debate with you to discuss your point of view, she isn't articulate enough to form a cogent argument to defend her point of view (and try to persuade you to see her side of the story) - no, she reacts with anger because she is a) unwilling to change her mind but b) realizes she is gonna appear bloody stupid if she cannot come up with a reasonable rebuttal to your argument. In short, not only does she have very poor social skills, she's probably quite stupid as well. People like that can't win an argument so they react with anger. It's like you're playing chess with her, she can't win the game as you're just too good so what does she do? She flips the table and everything from the chess board to the individual pieces fly all over the room - you don't get to finish the game (which would have definitely ended with you winning) and she escapes defeat on that technicality of the game not being completed (but that's only because she smashed up the chess board). No, with people like that, she only wants you to agree with her 100% because she's totally unable to deal with anything else. People like that are toxic, very toxic. With friends like that, who needs enemies? My parents are like that and I can't cut them off because they're my parents (though I try my best to minimize contact with them) but with someone like that, why are you even friend with her in the first place if you knew just how toxic she was?!
DeleteIt is because she is a kind of person. When my family was suspected to be down with covid, she send bubble tea to me to cheer me up. However she is blinded with fear of covid that she became irrational, and I stupidly still tried to reason with her. This is what I am angry with myself, that I should had just shut up, not to be try to prove to her that I am right.
ReplyDeleteOh yeah I fell out with another friend over this too. I am a rational person you see, I know how statistics work. Let's look at the odds of a fully vaccinated adult aged 45 like me who has already had Covid before becoming a) hospitalized from Covid or b) dying of Covid, it is so incredibly low. However, I cycle to work and the chances of me becoming injured or killed in a traffic accident is actually higher than that of Covid but do I freak out over either? No, there's something we do called mitigating risks. I know I can vastly improve my safety whilst cycling if I am a cautious cyclists who doesn't take risks like run red lights. Likewise, with Covid, we can also mitigate the risks by altering our behaviour (masks, social distancing, washing our hands, working from home, whom we meet in person etc).
DeleteThe fact is she has become irrational rather than sensible in this case: she is not reacting logically and having a civilized conversation with you about the issue. That's just really poor social skills - even if I didn't agree with you, I would have an honest and open discussion with you. I'll let you know my point of view, I'll acknowledge yours, we'll share our ideas and even if we agree to disagree, hey at least we've spoken to each other and I want you to feel free to come to me to talk to me about anything, including stuff you know might be controversial or that I would clearly take an opposing view. But for her to get angry and shut down the conversation, nah that's just poor social skills on her part. Even her person with poor social skills is still capable of kindness at times of course, but nonetheless let this be a lesson about how to deal with people like that. You can't change her, so I would just keep my distance from her.
I actually have a theory about people like your friend - I call this theory 'blame it on the boogie'. Let me know if you think I am right on this one. People like her have problems in her life: maybe it is family crap, maybe she is unhappy at work, maybe her health is suffering, maybe it could be one of so many other things that has gone wrong in her life. So she needs a scapegoat, some entity to blame to divert all this anger and pain - so that scapegoat happens to be Covid. Imagine if that person causing her pain, stress and anxiety is her mother - well she can't bring herself to blame or hate her own mother. So Covid is a simple, non-human entity for her to blame for everything (instead of, say, her mother) - it is her way of dealing with stress and I've done that before in my past when I was a teenager. I couldn't bring myself to hate my father so I hated what he represented: Chinese culture and Chinese language. So I kept struggling with my Chinese exams and claimed that I hated Chinese language - but today, I realize, hey actually I'm doing business with people from China and Taiwan, my Chinese language skills are fucking awesome. I hated my father for being a terrible father, but that's no reflection on how fucking awesome I am when it comes to the Chinese language. Maybe your friend will figure out her own demons in her own time, but in the meantime, just give her loads of space to do what the hell she wants.
DeleteIf you think this theory is accurate, then this friend isn't a bad person - she is just someone who has far more than she can handle, she doesn't have the social skills to handle all the crap that life has thrown at her and this is her coping mechanism. It is all too easy for me to mock her for her lack of social skills of course but I think it is worth exploring the other side of the story to see what she is currently going through, what is causing her to be like this.
DeleteI think your theory is pretty accurate. I know her for many years so I know she is not a bad person. Hence when it comes to covid, I was so surprised she's so irrational. She must have so much shit coming in her life that she needs to blame on something. I feel sorry for her.
ReplyDeleteOf course she isn't a 'bad' person per se, I've been in her position before. Sometimes people who are overwhelmed need a boogieman to blame for all the things that have gone wrong and Covid can be the perfect scapegoat. If she didn't blame Covid, she would have found another entity to blame for everything that has gone wrong in her life. I hope I've given you some clarity about her mindset.
DeleteYes, thank you.
Delete