![]() |
| Can you trust what you read online? |
"Weather. Can you take it? Winters are really bad in the UK and Canada. In Australia or US you can live in a temperate or tropical area – but you need the money."
Verdict: False. Even Canadians do not lie in the snow naked when it is -20 outside, no they know exactly how to keep warm and comfortable during the cold winter months. After all, loads of people live in countries that experience cold winters and they know exactly how to cope with the winter weather by dressing appropriately in such wintry conditions. No, you're not going to freeze to death in Canada during winter. You can heat your home and office to the appropriate temperature and when it is that cold, you're going to either rely on public transport or drive - you're not going to walk an hour in the cold to get home. In short, nobody actually just sits around and shivers when they are cold - no they take the appropriate action to make sure they are warm enough. I actually love winter and I suppose it is the novelty of seeing something I never got as a child in Singapore. Last year, I went up to the Arctic Circle in Finland where it was -40 degrees and was perfectly fine in that weather because I knew how to cope with that weather and I even regularly share my tips on how to dress appropriately in such conditions. As for the winters being "really bad" in the UK - are you kidding me? Our winters are relatively mild compared to cities like Helsinki, Moscow, Toronto and Chicago. I've been living in London since 1997 and there are some winters where we don't even get a single speck of snow. Hence I shall dismiss this as bullshit by suaku idiots who have never ever seen snow and thus make crazy assumptions about winter weather.
Verdict: False. It depends on your industry and your employer - it also depends on whether or not you are highly qualified/skilled or not. Singapore is a pretty good place for further education, skill training and gaining useful work experience. If you do meet a dumb white person who has no idea where the hell Singapore is, then do you really want to work for someone that stupid? Hell no. If your work experience in Singapore is very specific to the local market - say you were marketing local food products like sambal belachan and ang ku kueh, then there could be still some transferable skills associated with sales and marketing that you could use in the West even if we give you a different product. At the end of the day, if you are indeed an impressive candidate and have accomplished great things in your career, then sure you can easily find a job in the West. But if you're a lazy bum who has done little, then don't blame employers in the West for not recognizing your work experience, it is then because you've not achieved much in Singapore and you're useless.
Verdict: Mostly false. Malaysia doesn't allow Singaporeans to live or retire in Malaysia just like that. You need to get a legitimate visa to live in Malaysia - this may come in the form of a work permit or you can have a look at the MM2H scheme which allows you to get a 10-year social visit visa with no limit on how long you can stay in Malaysia but you must meet their criteria. For example, they want to be able to see 500,000 RM (equivalent of about S$165,000) in liquid assets and a HDB flat doesn't count because that's not considered liquid assets. So that totally destroys your plan of renting out your HDB flat and living off the rent in Johor Bahru, the rules don't allow you to do that - not unless you can find a spare S$165,000 through other means to fulfill that criteria. Oh and that's just the start - basically they don't want poor people, they will only give you the visa if you're rich enough. If you do have that kind of money sitting around, then you probably can afford a rather comfortable life in Singapore. In short, Malaysia is more than happy to welcome rich Singaporeans there but not the poor ones. Malaysia is selective when it comes to their visa policy and of course they have their own criteria about what kind of migrants they want. And they don't want poor people from Singapore - it is that simple. By that token, that's exactly the same as any other country - if you're rich, highly skilled and talented, they'll gladly roll out the red carpet for you. But if you're poor, you can fuck off. This is what pisses me off - yes this idiot knows that real estate is cheap in Johor Bahru, that much is true, but did he even for a moment consider whether or not Singaporeans are allowed to reside in Malaysia and what the laws in Malaysia have to say about that? No, he didn't even bother to research it, he just assumed it was possible and posted some bullshit without fact checking. We call it doing a Google search - the information about the rules are clearly stated on the MM2H website in English for crying out aloud!
Verdict: Mostly false. This is scaremongering. It sucks to be poor and old, you have got to feel sorry for the poor people in their 70s and 80s who can't retire and are forced to keep on working because they have no money. But that's the same problem in any country - in the UK for example, we have free healthcare in the form of the NHS and old people do get a pension; it is not going to allow you to live well but at least you won't starve to death even if you have no other sources of income. The moral of the story is simply: if you can't make it in Singapore where you were born and bred, where you speak the local language and know the local culture, where you have a whole network of friends and family - how the heck are you going to succeed in a foreign country where you are struggling with the local language, you don't understand the local culture and you don't have a network of friends and family to support you? In any case, I refer you to the point above: even Malaysia doesn't want the losers from Singapore, they only want the rich Singaporeans who have money and good jobs. So what makes you think countries like Canada or Australia will want stupid, poor Singaporean losers? Of course not, they will never meet the stringent criteria for immigration. You need to verify what the rules and laws are! If you're a poor loser in Singapore, then even if you somehow get a visa to live in the West, you're still going to be very poor because the problem lies with you - not the country you live in or the government that governs that country.
"Crime & drugs. Most countries are not safe, especially in the poorer areas. Expect a big dose of reality."
Verdict: Totally False. This is fear mongering again. I have written so much about racism on my blog and I've lived in Europe (mostly in the UK but also in France) since 1997 and I've encountered very, very little racism. Sure I've encountered ignorance and stupidity - like people who ask me if my sister would speak English because she's from Singapore, or people who think that I am from China despite the fact that I told them I am from Singapore and not China. But there's a huge difference between ignorance/stupidity and racism. Oh there are stupid people in the West, make no mistake about that, that's a problem you will have in every country in the world. But are they racist? Hell no, a small percentage may be, but do allow me to say something very blunt and politically incorrect - I am not at the receiving end of the racism because I am neither black nor Muslim! Racism exists but it is directed mostly towards people who are black or anyone else who has a darker skin tone (like some southern Indians or indigenous Australians) or Muslims, particularly those who adopt some form of traditional dress like the hijab. As a fair-skinned Chinese person, I am not a target of racism and the worst that happens is that I am often mistaken as Japanese or Korean. Or like that evening in Bariloche in Argentina when some random drunk stranger ran up to me and shouted, "Gangnam style!" Yeah, that's really the worst of it. I'm the only Asian person in my company and I'm judged by the amount of business I can bring to the company, how much money I can make for the company rather than my skin colour. As for the police shooting first and asking question later, that's complete bullshit again, I refer you to my posts talking about the issue when I was in Florida.
But let's look at that a bit closer: a poor Asian person in the West (or in Singapore, or China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, or anywhere else) will suffer because it sucks to be poor. You want to live a good life - you need to have a lot of money to live in a beautiful house, have servants, afford anything you want when you go shopping, dress in beautiful clothes, be able to provide for your family, take care of your friends and treat yourself to amazing dream holidays in 5-star resorts. If you've struggled for years in the West and you're still poor, then people can turn around and say, "why are you such a loser? Why have some of your peers gone on to make so much money whilst you're still struggling to make ends meet at your age? What is wrong with you - are you stupid or lazy?" It is hard for people to be honest and admit, "yeah, it is all my fault, I am a failure." It is a matter of pride, so instead they play the victim's card and claim that they have been discriminated against in the West, it is all because of racism that they cannot get ahead in their careers - that is is not their fault, but it is the racist white people who have been the villains. Oh yeah, talk about deflecting blame. But there are poor Chinese people in Chinese-majority cities in the world, just have a look at the short documentary in the Youtube below about the poorest of the poor in Hong Kong - they are poor Chinese people in Hong Kong, so they can't play the racism card when trying to explain their poverty. There are other factors that have led to their poverty, but it just goes to show that even in the absence of the threat of "racists", there will still be poor Chinese elderly people really struggling.
6. "What about Malaysia or Taiwan? Very few countries Singaporeans can go to. Canada and America too angmoh. Asian or Asia Pacific countries like Australia or NZ."
Verdict: Okay this is a question, so I am not going to judge the person. I have already talked about Malaysia above - they only want rich Singaporeans, if you're a poor loser, then fuck off, Malaysia doesn't want you. Likewise, if you want to live in Taiwan, you need to get a work permit in the first instance which is the first step - you work in Taiwan as an expatriate for at least 5 years, then you can apply to naturalize as a citizen of Taiwan (that really is no different from the UK and many other countries). But the same strict rules apply to Taiwan, if you're a highly educated, rich professional, then you should be able to get a job in Taiwan easily - but if you're a poor loser, then fuck off, Taiwan doesn't want you. As someone who deals with the Taiwanese market all the time, I must warn you that I daresay the vast majority of Singaporeans don't speak Chinese well enough to operate in Taiwan - everything is in Chinese and they use the traditional Chinese script. Your Chinese has to be of an exceptionally high standard if you want to work there and most Singaporeans won't be able to handle it as the standard of Chinese in Singapore is painfully low. And if you think that Canada and America are too 'angmoh' for you, then what the hell are you doing considering Australia and New Zealand which are just as 'angmoh' as any other country in the West? You should be thinking about other truly Asian countries like China, Vietnam, Laos, Hong Kong and Thailand if you think you will be a lot more comfortable in an Asian environment.
Verdict: Very misleading. One person's experience should never be generalized. Was there racism in Australia in the 1980? Undoubtedly so, but I think every person experiences Australia differently and to claim that all cities are openly racist and the work places even more so is hugely misleading because this person is claiming because he suffered racism, then all of Australia is racist. Well I beg to differ. Now note that I am only offered an extremely short paragraph to analyze here, but I can tell that this person had a really hard time in Australia - was this purely down to racism or was he unable to adapt to a new environment? Did he have the necessary education and skills in order to obtain a good job with a reputable company? Did he have the vital social skills in order to assimilate when starting a new job? Why did he move cities and change jobs so many times? You see, what I detect is that this person seems to blame everything on racism and he is so keen to state all the different cities he has worked in as proof that he knows what he is talking about - yet he doesn't once divulge what industry he has worked in. Was he an engineer? A doctor? Or perhaps something a lot more lowly skilled? How did he obtain his PR? Did he qualify as a highly skilled migrant or did he simply marry an Australian citizen (thus bypassing the need to meet their stringent criteria)? Hence I get very skeptical when I come across people who are very defensive like that because I think they have something to hide - so he had a tough time in Australia but was it entirely down to racism or perhaps there are some other issues which he should take personal responsibility for?
Verdict: Only half true. Is the UK an expensive place to live? That depends on your income, are you rich or are you poor? So if you're paid peanuts because you're cleaning toilets for a living, then hell yeah the UK (or any other country for that matter) will be an expensive place to live not because of the price of goods but because you're earning so little money! But if you're a hot shot lawyer earning millions, then you can go to any city in the world and live like a king. And I was waiting for someone to mention Brexit and here we go. Brexit does change a lot of the rules of engagement when it comes to immigration - currently (until we actually leave the EU) we have a huge influx of migrants from the EU from poorer countries like Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Lithuania etc. That freedom of movement of labour will end at the end of the transition period after we leave the EU and the UK will still have gaps in our labour market to fill - that's when those gaps which were traditionally filled by the Eastern European migrant workers would be open up to the international market. That means Singaporeans would be able to compete for those jobs on equal footing as someone from Romania or Poland, since the UK would no longer have to give preferential treatment to EU migrant workers post-Brexit. As for the pound depreciating, I don't think that's a major factor - look, there was a time when the pound was very strong and you have your Polish worker who would come and work in a factory in England, save up most of his earnings to send home to his family in Poland because of the favourable exchange rate. But if you're a doctor, lawyer, engineer, investment banker or any other highly skilled professional who can command a huge salary, then you're not dependent on a favourable exchange rate to live comfortably - you will be paid a lot of money regardless. Such highly skilled professionals will be able to earn good money regardless of what the exchange rate is, their situation is very different from the poor Polish migrant worker trying to make his meager earnings go further by profiting from the exchange rate.
The VAT in the UK is 20% - that is higher than say Australia, the US, Canada and Singapore but like I said before, if you're a rich professional earning a lot of money, the rate of VAT isn't going to determine whether or not you can afford that nice new suit when you go shopping. For poor people, yeah it is going to make a difference, but not for the rich people who have so much money they don't even think about the VAT when they go shopping. Currently, you will only get a work permit for the UK if indeed you are one of those highly skilled professionals who can earn a lot of money, so the issue of VAT isn't going to worry you at all if you are that rich. There is the possibility of a poor Singaporean marrying a poor British man, such as in the case of Irene Clennell - then yeah, she moved here, lived in poverty and found that her life totally sucked because it sucks to be poor in the UK. And if you're worried about the UK government spending too much money on subsidizing the poor through housing and healthcare, well - that's all going to change after Brexit because the government coffers are not going to have that much spare cash lying around after crashing out of the EU without a deal and cuts will have to be made. Personally, I don't think having a free healthcare system is a bad thing - if you get a cancer diagnosis tomorrow, you shouldn't have to ask yourself, "how am I going to pay for the cancer treatment? If I can't afford the expensive treatment, have I just been given a death sentence?" This is a system that benefits the poor as it is redistributing wealth and benefits from the rich to the poor - is that really such an evil concept?
Why? It is because the Chinese migrants:
* tend to be very academically inclined;
* tend to be very industrious & hard-working; &
* very effective in capital accumulation & in wealth achievements.
In the West, nearly all the top percentile of academic achievers are Asians especially of Chinese ethnicity."
* tend to be very academically inclined;
* tend to be very industrious & hard-working; &
* very effective in capital accumulation & in wealth achievements.
In the West, nearly all the top percentile of academic achievers are Asians especially of Chinese ethnicity."
Verdict: Half true, half bullshit, beware! This is very warped logic based on some facts which are true, but the conclusions is total bullshit. Firstly, let's start with the truth: yes Chinese people are the model minority, we work hard, our kids outscore everyone else in school by country mile - like seriously. Only the Indians come close to that, but the Chinese students blow everyone else out of the water when it comes to school and university - so it is hardly any surprise that they end up earning a lot more money than the local white population. That much is totally true and I have covered this in a recent post. However, the bit which is bullshit is the conclusion that the Chinese are therefore seen as a threat because we're more capable than the locals and we'll steal their jobs, thus that will turn the locals against the Chinese. That hasn't happened at all - to understand the situation, you need to look at the big picture. The Chinese are generally very much welcomed and appreciated wherever they go because they work hard and serve their communities - you turn up at your local hospital with your sick mother and she is being taken care by the Chinese doctor. Whereas we have loads of other migrant groups (mostly Muslim) who turn up, they don't speak English, they don't assimilate, their kids suck at school, they get married at 20 and go on to have like 7 children - the parents then claim they have too many kids so they cannot work and become totally reliant on the state for everything. Yeah, people like that are seen as the enemy and the real threat because they are a burden on the state, they are reliant on the local tax-payers to support them through government hand outs. They take, take, take and take some more but give nothing in return. So migrants like that who turn up as refugees as seen as the enemy, so when the white people compare them to the Chinese migrants, they would shake their heads and say, "at least those Chinese people work so very hard, pay their taxes and contribute to society."
Verdict: Completely wrong. A basic rule about immigration is that you can bring your spouse and children along to your new country, but no you cannot bring the rest of your family. So even though I am a British citizen now, my siblings and parents have absolutely ZERO rights to come and 'join me' here in the UK. The reason is pretty simple: these countries in the West want bright, young, hardworking, highly talented, highly skilled productive migrants to come and work there, to contribute to their economies. But the parents? No, they can fuck off. They are old, they are retired, they are unproductive, they cannot contribute, they will fall sick and be a drain on the resources when they need to go to a hospital etc; so the rules are such that parents of migrants have no way to join their children in their new country. They can certainly get a tourist visa for a short holiday there, just to visit - but any long term residency visa is out of the question. No no no, the policy is simple when it comes to the parents of migrants: you're too fucking old, fuck off, we don't want you here. Your daughter/son is cool because they are working, but you're old and fucking useless to us so please fuck off. So if you do want to migrate to the West, then hurry up and do it or else you will eventually see your kids move to the West and you'll end up talking to your children and grandchildren every weekend for 30 minutes on Skype.
Okay, so there you go, there's so much misinformation out there on such forums that I would plead with you please never use such forums if you are genuinely serious about looking at something as serious and life-changing as immigration. Always seek your information from a reputable source, from experts who know what they are talking about rather than anonymous people posting fake news on internet forums. So if you have any questions about moving to the West, or if you have any thoughts further to the issues discussed then please leave a comment below and many thanks for reading.

A lot of these people would never be rich or talented enough to migrate to any other country. So in order to reduce their cognitive dissonance they would try to convince themselves and brainwash others into thinking that Singapore is the best place for them, the other countries are too racists and/or too difficult to get a job in.
ReplyDeleteThe truth of the matter is that there are opportunities in every country for those who are willing to seek them. 不是猛龙不过江. I have heard of uneducated, poor PRCs going to Africa to seek opportunities and ending up very wealthy, whether measured in terms of an African nation or China.
But then again those opportunities are for people willing to take the risk to seek them out. Or as Alec Baldwin puts it, "Coffee is for closers." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elrnAl6ygeM
Hi Choaniki, thanks for your comment.
Delete1. I still don't know how the heck anyone can go to such forums for information or advice since there's no way you can sift out the truly useful advice from the bullshit and fake news there. Who do you listen to? who can your believe? Who should you be wary of if everyone there is totally anonymous?
2. A lot of the people who think that other countries are racist have never set foot in those countries - good grief. I was at an event last night hosted by a law firm and the room was truly international: people were from UK, Australia, Canada, Germany, South Korea, China, India, Kenya, USA, Estonia, Germany, Russia, Austria, Hong Kong, Greece - it wasn't our skin colour that mattered but we were invited to the event because we were important people to that law firm. In the business world, it isn't your skin colour that matters but your ability to make money. So it is crazy that some Singaporeans are still so hung up on the idea of racism and skin colour.
3. Ooooh that clip, yeah - it's a classic.
For Malaysia My Second Home, the requirement for liquid assets is lower at RM350,000, or about S$120,000, if you're above 50 years old. On top of that, they need offshore income of RM10,000 (S$3300) per month regardless of age.
ReplyDeleteMight be good for elderly Singaporeans who paid off their HDB and have access to their CPF. For Singaporean retirees, living in Malaysia will stretch their retirement dollars. They can rent out or sell their HDB and rent a cheaper place in Malaysia.
But like you said, Malaysia does not welcome poor and low skilled Singaporeans to stay or work in Malaysia.
Hello Zelda, thanks for the info. I think the problem for some Singaporeans would still be raising the requirement for liquid assets without selling off their HDB flat and still having that offshore income - the CPF + the HDB rental could cover that requirement, but if they did have that much liquid assets, then like you said, it would make it a very nice option for some older Singaporeans.
DeleteHowever.
If you looked at the kind of crap posted on that forum, it was exactly poor and low skilled Singaporeans who are looking to escape to Malaysia as some kind of panacea to all their woes which stemmed from the fact that they are poor, have no skills to get a well-paid job and are convinced somehow that life would be better in Malaysia as things are cheaper there.
But of course, Malaysia doesn't such Singaporeans there. Why would they accept Singapore's trash?
Good day, on SG persons migrating to MY for lower cost of living, my recollection is that since the early 1990s, the MY gov has effectively forestalled any migration arbitrage.
ReplyDeleteIf the MY route is so easy, really large numbers of SG older folks will have continuously relocated to MY long ago. In reality, there aren't really lots of home-grown SG origin persons living regularly in MY for the past 30 years.
There has never been mention of "little SGs" in MY for this time period. Furthermore, any significant surge in SGs in MY will have been a topic (for the wrong reasons) from BN-UMNO politicians but this has not occurred.
Hi there and thanks for your comment. I am not aware of the inner workings of the Malaysian government on this issue but I can see how any significant movement of Singaporeans to Malaysia could be a problem for the government given how Malaysians feel about Singaporeans. I do wonder if there's more to the situation than simply politics though - here's my theory.
DeleteA lot of lower-income Singaporean folks are poor because they have done little to contribute to their own success - so they sucked at school, failed to get into a university, ended up doing a lowly paid job and became your typical working class Singaporean who may live in a HDB flat but really has very little to their name after decades of struggling. In short, they sucked at everything and they are failures, losers or whatever you wanna call them. So people like that will turn to their country as a source of pride - instead of being proud of their success in their careers, they would say things like, "I love Singapore, I am proud of being Singaporean, Singapore is the best country in the world etc." Thus when they attach so much of their self-esteem and pride to Singapore's success (in the absence of any personal success), then relocating to Malaysia would tantamount to them admitting that their very source of pride has not even managed to give them a way to live with dignity and that the only way they can do it is by moving to Malaysia.
So no matter how miserable they are in Singapore, they still convince themselves that they are in the best country in the world.
What do you think of this theory?
And here's another brief thought I had - a lot of smaller towns and villages are losing their young people because of the limited opportunities for employment. The young, well educated people don't want to stay in the countryside and will move to the cities for work and thus you have a situation where the countryside are losing people constantly. This is not just the case in Malaysia but any country from the UK to Brazil to China to America. An injection of old Singaporeans into the countryside (ie. put in some clause that only allows them to settle in the countryside and not a big city like JB or KL) will be good for these kampongs because they will create jobs: they will need nursing homes, restaurants, they will go shopping, they will need transport, they will buy food, they will want entertainment etc and when their families visit from Singapore, they'll need hotels and other usual things that tourists wanna do. Placing some retired Singaporeans in a sleepy kampong in Malaysia could actually do their rural economy a lot of good and it's an easy way to put some life into these sleepy kampongs - otherwise it will take a helluva lot of investment into these rural backwaters to revitalize them. Allowing some older Singaporean retirees to settle there is a far easier solution that will cost the government of Malaysia virtually nothing, but the rural communities get to reap a lot of benefits.
DeleteI agree. The same effect as British retirees in Spain. They're not going to integrate well and speak the local language but they bring in money.
DeleteUnfortunately, there is some historical baggage between Singapore and Malaysia from separation. That's not the case for Britain and Spain.
On top of that, UK and Spain being part of the EU makes it even easier for retirees, no need to apply for a retirement visa, no restrictions on pension from UK (you lose pension increase if you move to Australia) and access to free healthcare.
Hi Zelda. I've just returned from my mother in law's funeral in Ireland and there's the same thing happening in Ireland - the Irish diaspora would work all their lives in somewhere like England where they can make good money, then retire to the Irish countryside where they can buy a huge house and live well for the last years of their lives. My mother in law managed to get 25 years in Ireland like that, which was good going.
DeleteLong time reader, first time commenter :)
ReplyDeleteIn the US, it is possible for chain migration (as Trump calls it). A US citizen is allowed to sponsor their immediate relatives, ie. Parents and children under 21 (no quota). For siblings, they're subject to quotas and the wait for siblings under the 4th preference is about 13 years as of right now.
Sorry for the late reply, I had been in Ireland.
DeleteOK that's not possible in the UK (and many other countries) I had never ever contemplated the US, so I am not aware of that. Indeed, many countries don't like older migrants as we're about to retire, we're going to fall sick and we're not going to contribute much to the economy before we become a burden on the health service as we become old and frail.
But by that token, what you have described sounds soooo liberal compared to Europe - which is surprising for Trump's America.
Go figure.
Oh update: the current average waiting time for chain migration for the US 15 to 20 years. So if you're counting on using this method to bring your parents over to the US once you've gained residency rights, your parents may be in for a very long wait and may probably be dead by the time they get the green light. So whilst in principle the route exists, in practice a 15 - 20 year wait is just ridiculous and would render that option not a viable one to consider.
DeleteI just check on that forum. It is where 30% of Singaporean who visited this type of forum where majority of them are anti PAP.
ReplyDeleteMost of them who comment inside are anti PAP.
Just because they're anti-PAP doesn't mean they make any sense. Heck, I'm anti-PAP as well but you ought to read what I write carefully instead of just agreeing with everything I say. There is sooooo much bullshit in there - I only dealt with 10 points in this post which were totally misleading. And I don't even think these people who posted these had the aim to mislead or trick people into believing fake news - they are ignorant, they are not well informed, they don't have the facts, yet they still want to participate and have their say despite having the wrong information, so they end up spreading fake news without even realizing what they have done.
DeleteGeez.
Stay the hell away from those forums.