Sunday, 1 August 2021

Covid-19, masks, summer 2021 and freedom day

Hi guys, it's been quite a while since I've done a Covid-related piece so I thought I would update you on the latest developments in the UK. I do chat with my family in Singapore every weekend so it is quite interesting to compare and contrast the two very different approaches to the pandemic in these two countries - my family in Singapore are actually quite shocked by the approach the UK government has taken, but I hope to shed some light on this complex issue here. 

Q: So what's happening in the UK now with the pandemic? 

A: Well we have had the vast majority of restrictions lifted on the 19 July and earlier this month, we were getting more than 50,000 new cases a day and nearly 100 deaths a day - it was quite a gamble for the British government to lift virtually all restrictions despite there being a fourth wave but it was more a political move for them at this stage rather than one based on the science. The people are sick and tired of the restrictions already - mask compliance has been shockingly low even when it was compulsory. So when masks were compulsory on public transport, typically you would see about 50% to 60% of the passengers wear masks and the rest wouldn't bother. Even though the mayor of London has still mandated that masks must be worn on London public transport, compliance has fallen to around 30%. Sometimes I get on a train and I look around, like literally nobody is wearing a mask and I think, what's the point if I bother wearing a mask if no one else is doing it? Given this form of mass civil disobedience when it comes to the British public ignoring rules on mask wearing and social distancing, the government literally just shrugged their shoulders and thought, what's the point of having rules if so few people are actually obeying them? We may as well lift all restrictions under such circumstances. It's quite a relief actually, like I would used to get really annoyed when I see people without masks but now I'm like, they are no longer breaking the law, they can go without a mask if they want. Ironically, this has been less stressful for me since I was one of those that did dutifully wear a mask all the time, because I follow the rules.  

Q: Has this got to do with the successful vaccination programme in the UK?

A: Yes and no - with these many people getting infected everyday, it ought to have brought our health service to breaking point but no, we have successfully broken the link between getting infected and being hospitalized as well as dying from Covid. Hospitalizations are about a third of what they were in the third wave and deaths are even lower, about a tenth of what they used to be so clearly, the vaccinations have had a massive impact on making Covid far less deadly. However, not everyone is vaccinated - some people cannot get vaccinated for health reasons and then there are the anti-vaccination idiots. I was on the train on the way back from gymnastics when this older black guy who was quite fat started yelling at people wearing masks, "you lot are fucking idiots - you are falling for a hoax, there is no virus! This is fake news! Don't get the vaccine, they will put a microchip in you - you can take the vaccine and shove it up your ass, nobody will ever vaccinate me!" I took one look at him and thought,you're old, black, fat and working class - you're the exactly kind of person who will still get the virus and die from it because you're not vaccinated. That's why we still have anything from 20 to 100 people a day dying of Covid-19 and the rest of us have no sympathy for those who die of Covid now because all adults in the UK have already been given the chance to get vaccinated - there is simply no excuse now unlike in countries where the vaccine has been in very short supply. If this crazy man on the train dies of Covid, then it's like an unrepentant chain smoker who has lung cancer - you must make such people take responsibility for their actions. 

Q: Yes but aren't you using a rather crazy anti-vaxxer as a rather extreme example in this case? 

A: We need to think two or three steps ahead rather than focus on the immediate here and now. The vaccine is available to any adult in the UK who wants to get vaccinated and it is free - it is remarkably easy to book an appointment and get the jab. But the fact is we're never going to get everyone vaccinated even if there are enough doses of the vaccine for everyone here in the UK, so what are you going to do? Continue keeping the country in lockdown and be held ransom by people like that crazy anti-vaxxer I encountered on the train? Or do we let people like him take his chances with the virus whilst the rest of us just get back to normality? Of course, there was that case in America where this anti-vaxxer who was also black (I'm being very un-PC by flagging up his skin colour but there's definitely a pattern here) died of Covid-19 after refusing the vaccine, claiming that his Christian faith would save him. Guess what? It didn't and now he's dead, he died of Covid. Now there's another case of another anti-vaxxer this time in England dying of Covid after having refused the vaccine: you can't force these people to get vaccinated the same way smoking and drinking alcohol isn't illegal, even though those two activities are very detrimental to your health. The aim of an effective vaccine programme would be to achieve herd immunity against the virus in an ideal world, but if someone chooses to go down the route of refusing the vaccine and then dying of Covid like that black guy in America, then it's their choice; so go ahead, let them die whilst the rest of us get on with our lives, we're not even going to bat an eyelid if people keep on dying of Covid-19 in big numbers. 

Q: So do you have to wear a mask in public now? 

A: No is the answer, though there are some places where they have the right to make their own rules. Let's take public transport for example: Transport For London and the mayor of London Sadiq Khan have insisted that people must wear masks when using public transport. What will happen if I try to board a train in London without wearing a mask? Absolutely nothing - there just isn't enough staff or police to deal with those who do not comply and when the vast majority of the people are simply refusing to wear a mask, then those rules are meaningless. Then there's my local supermarket Sainsbury and their official stance on the matter is to 'encourage' all customers to continue wearing masks when shopping in their supermarkets; however, even the staff themselves are not wearing masks anymore and only a minority of shoppers are bothering. No one is going to say or do anything if I remove my mask whilst I am in the store, even the security guards there are no longer wearing masks. So essentially yeah, in London we can afford to ditch the masks now and ignore the rules on social distancing. Nightclubs, bars, sport venues are all open now with no restrictions, it's like life before Covid. But it's not like we're Covid-free right now, we are still recording a scarily high number of cases and deaths everyday - it's just that the public are totally fed up and have had enough; so I doubt the government here can get away with imposing another lockdown even if the death toll rises dramatically - nobody cares about people dying of Covid anymore - our society has really changed in the last 18 months ,because of this pandemic. 

: Are British people really that heartless and selfish? 

A: Yes, indeed. Let's put it this way, in places like Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan, people don't really care if a bomb goes off and kills a hundred people. Yeah like it's just a fact of life, it's just yet another bomb, people died, so what? Yet in countries where this kind of thing doesn't happen on a regular basis, people are still generally quite appalled and shocked by a small number of deaths. Just last week, in Zhenghou, China, a heavy storm caused a flood which killed 12 people who drowned when their train was flooded - the dramatic pictures of passengers struggling in water up to their necks, trapped in the railway carriage shocked many around the world. But look, that's 12 people who died in that train vs 131 who died from Covid in the UK today - in Zhengzhou the public gathered at the train station where those 12 people drowned to lay flowers. But did anyone give a shit about the 131 people in the UK who died of Covid today? Nope, nobody gives a shit; most of the news was about team GB winning medals at the Tokyo Olympics. We're far more interested in the Olympics than the 131 people who died of Covid. Why? Because this has happened every single day for the last 18 months, we're just so used to people dying everyday that we're completely desensitized to the concept of people dying. Deaths like that no longer bothers or upset us as a society. I'm not condoning this attitude, but it's a sad reflection of the terrible situation here and it is quite shocking that a country like the UK can develop this kind of mindset.

Q: This is quite a contrast from the situation in Singapore, isn't it? So is the Singaporean approach better then?

A: Some countries like Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan have a zero-tolerance approach to Covid and to their credit, it is an approach that has saved many lives. My sister was telling me how people in Singapore started panicking after there was a small cluster of cases and I was like, well did anyone die? No? Well then what are you worried about? But it is this zero-tolerance approach that has made Singapore's death rate from Covid one of the lowest in the world - allow me to compare this to the UK. The population in the UK is 68.2 million compare to Singapore's 5.9 million - so the population here is 11.56 times that of Singapore. The number of deaths in the UK so far at the time I am writing this is 153,070 and if Singapore had the same death rate as that of the UK, the number of deaths in Singapore from Covid should be about 13,241 but actually, only 37 people in Singapore died from Covid. So according to these figures, Covid is 357.87 times more deadly for the British public than it has been for those in Singapore. I can imagine if someone actually died of Covid in Singapore this week, it would probably make headline news and there would be a massive public outcry. But so many people in the UK die of Covid every single day now to the point where we're just utterly totally immune to it, we're emotionally numb from it all, unable to feel anything like anger, outrage or sadness from each death. To put things in perspective: 131 people died from Covid today (27 July, as I am writing this) and if we divide that figure by 11.56, that would be 11.33 - goodness me, can you imagine the kind of public outrage if 11 people in Singapore died from Covid in a 24-hour period? But in the UK, we just don't care anymore when people die from Covid. 

Q: What is it about the Singaporean mentality that helps Singapore cope with this situation?

A: The key difference of course is that if there are anti-vaxxers in Singapore who refuse to get vaccinated, then the chances of them getting infected and dying of Covid in Singapore is still extremely low because of the tiny number of cases in Singapore and the highly efficient way the government there deals with each cluster of infection. Whereas in the UK, infection rates are so ridiculously high that it is impossible to avoid the virus. My sister did tell me that there was some vaccine hesitancy in Singapore as well, mostly due to the spread of misinformation amongst less-educated Singaporeans who are believing all kinds of ridiculous bullshit they read online. But the fact is even if some uneducated idiot  in Singapore refuses to get vaccinated after reading some fake news about vaccines online, then they're probably going to be alright in a place like Singapore but in somewhere like the UK where the Delta variant is circulating very widely in the community, there are far more serious consequences for refusing to get vaccinated. Such is the problematic situation we have to contend with. The one good thing about the Singaporean mentality is that '乖乖听话' nature of a lot of PAP voting Singaporeans who will simply do as they are told - so if the government tells them to get vaccinated, they will simply do as they are told regardless of their feelings about vaccines. Thus ironically in the context of Singapore, this is actually a good thing if you do want to achieve the aim of herd immunity through a successful vaccination programme. 

Q: Have you ever met an anti-vaxxer in the UK? What are they like? 

A: Okay let's call this friend Charles (not his real name), he is such an anti-vaxxer and floods social media with anti-vaxx contents. I've known him since the late 1990s when we used to train gymnastics together and he's also in his 40s now. He was a brilliant gymnast but chose to switch to trampolining instead as he thought that would be his best chance to make it onto the national team by focusing on just one apparatus rather than artistic gymnastics which requires gymnasts to perform on all six apparatuses. He then switched to diving for a while just to see if he was talented at it and he was, so for a period in the late 1990s and early 2000s, he was concurrently training and competing in both diving and trampolining. He was young, good-looking and super talented then, so a mutual friend suggested to him, "there's this casting for male models to star in this ad, it's a lot of money, why don't you audition?" So he did and he scored a part in a huge international ad campaign (which I shall not name, lest I accidentally identify him) and it made him a ridiculous amount of money. I even appeared in a British film with him in 2006 - life was good for Charles during that period, he was happy doing what he loved most, everyone thought he was going to go to the Olympics and win a medal and he was making plenty of money on the side from modeling as well. But unfortunately, things didn't quite go to plan - Charles got badly injured during training and that was the end of his diving career, he recovered from the spinal injury but that caused him to miss the selections for the 2008 Beijing Olympics. He kept training for a while and could have staged a comeback for 2012, but frustratingly that never happened as he just kept getting injured. Unfortunately, Charles just ran out of luck. 

After Charles' diving career officially ended, he got into a relationship with a woman and she became pregnant - this wasn't planned but Charles did the honorable thing and married her. But such was the situation then for him: he didn't have a degree, he had not much work experience outside sports and modeling. His modeling career depended on his good looks and unfortunately since leaving the sport, he put on a lot of weight and started losing his hair as well. The last time I saw him, he had become completely bald (hey just like me, but I am not trying to use my looks to make a living) - it suffices to say that his modeling days had come to an end as well since he was now an old, fat and bald man. On top of that, Charles now has a wife and child to support - he did the sensible thing and moved out of London to the West Midlands where the cost of living was a lot lower than in the capital. I did suggest that he get into coaching for diving or gymnastics but he chose not to do that, after all, being in the environment where he would be reminded what might have been, all the missed opportunities would have undoubtedly been too painful for him unfortunately. So instead, he got a job at a post office which was boring but stable - it paid the bills, enabled him to bring up his son and I thought he had settled into a quiet life in the West Midlands. Then when the pandemic happened, he started calling it a hoax on social media, even claiming that the vaccine was dangerous - that is was create to control the population and even euthanize the poor. Some of his theories are so ridiculous but no I couldn't bring myself to debate with him: where do I even begin?

So when I posted a photo on Facebook that I have had my second dose of the vaccine and expressed how happy I am to be fully vaccinated, he launched a stinging personal attack on me. I didn't respond but one of my friends Phil leapt to my defence and they got into massive argument on my Facebook page. I messaged Phil to say that back in the day, Charles was a good friend whom I was very close to but we have lost touch since he has moved to the West Midlands - I honestly was not expecting him to attack me this way but I thanked Phil for defending me. I wasn't going to take the bait, I refused to get into an argument with Charles over this matter but it has put a massive strain on our friendship. Not that I care or mind, since he lives in another town about 200 km from London, it was not as if I was going to see him on a regular basis anyway. But in the case of Charles, I have seen how he went from hero to zero in a space of 14 years - actually I feel sorry for him, but he's an adult and this is the life he has chosen. I can imagine that Charles has a lot of hidden anger that has no outlet - he has no one to blame but himself for the way things have turned out and that's why I think he has used this anti-vaxx stance as an outlet to vent all the anger, bitterness and pain that has been poisoning him all these years. Is this a healthy way for Charles to deal with his feelings? Of course not, but he seems to have taken this whole Covid-19 thing very personally when really, everyone on this planet has been affected as well - it is not about him but he is acting as if it is when you listen to the way he rants about vaccines. All I can do is steer clear of him and avoid any conflicts but as a good friend, I just feel so sorry for him. The Charles I have known all this years is not a bad person.

Q: But surely, there would be the equivalent of anti-vaxxers like "Charles" in Singapore as well, right? 

A: I think so but the circumstances would be different - if Charles was in Singapore and he tried to be vocal with his anti-vaxx messages in Singapore, he might face more opposition from his friends for daring to defy the government and take a stance that could be detrimental to society. After all, even if Charles doesn't care about his own health, he could potentially be infecting others in his family and community with the virus - he would thus be part of the problem, not the solution. In the UK, Charles will find it easy enough to find others (like that crazy man I encountered on the train) who will agree with him and thus I think it's easier for someone like Charles to get away with a stance like that in the UK than in a place like Singapore, where there simply hasn't been much tolerance for any kind of dissent over the decades. This is of course a double-edged sword - one of the main reasons I really like living in London is because this is a far more progressive and liberal society, it was quite a change for me having grown up in Singapore which was the complete opposite. But with this comes a tolerance for a wider diversity of opinions even on issues like the handling of the pandemic and that's why people like Charles are able to get away with his brand of anti-vaxx bullshit. Yes he risks alienating and losing friends like me but he has clearly found enough new friends who share his point of view on the issue. Like I said, I stand by the fact that I've known Charles for a long time and I do cherish our friendship, but I can't help but feel very disappointed in the way he has turned out - his life has turned out to be such a mess through bad luck. 

Q: Is the fourth wave in the UK over? Will there be a fifth wave? 

A: Right now, we are coming to the end of the fourth wave in the UK - daily cases have been falling for about a week now, from an average of about 50,000 a day in mid-July to 30,000 a day now at the end of July. There is a time lag between the case numbers and hospital admissions as well as deaths - so we expect to see an improvement in the hospital situation and the death rates only about 3 or 4 weeks later, but things are definitely getting better now. What is significant is the lack of panic about the fourth wave, like literally, nobody gives a shit if more people died - so it's not like things have improved to the point where we can relax but this relaxed attitude amongst the British is more a sign of nobody giving a shit about people dying of Covid anymore given that we're still having about 100 a day die of Covid - but the attitude is, meh, so what? These people are either very old and frail and thus were going to die anyway, or they were idiots who didn't want to get the vaccine, so they deserve to die and certainly don't deserve our sympathy. But interestingly enough, we actually got through the fourth wave in spite of the lifting of restrictions so this shows that future waves will come and go - lockdowns can only flatten the curve (to make sure health services are not pushed to breaking point) rather than avoid a subsequent wave. So yes, without doubt, there will be more waves to come depending on the new variants that emerge in the future and that's why we need to focus on getting everyone including all children vaccinated, so we can be prepared as a country to face the fifth, sixth wave and whatever else that might come our way. 

Q: Is life finally going to get back to normal at long last?

A: The answer to the question will vary depending on whom you ask. For me, obviously one thing I would love to do is to visit my family in Singapore but no, that's not possible - the borders are closed. Even if I manage to get permission to visit (no idea how that would be possible, but hypothetically let's imagine if I do manage to do that), I will be given a 30-day tourist visa as a British visitor of which, I have to spend 14 days in quarantine in a hotel. Hardly normal, is it? Rules for international travel are slowly being eased between some countries but there's a long way before things get back to the way things were - I have been able to visit countries like Portugal this year which have the situation under control, but visiting other places like India, Africa or Brazil would not be possible for the next few years at least. But that's international travel - I have mentioned a friend 'Vera' in my blog several times already. She's currently finishing her degree and working part time, so she cannot afford foreign holidays - even before the pandemic, she rarely left the country given her financial situation. However, Vera can now pretty much do whatever she wants in London - she can see her friends, she can go to cafes, restaurants, bars, cinemas even visit nightclubs and party the night away. She can access all manners of cultural, sporting and leisure activities in the UK as everything has reopened, so for her, life is pretty much back to normal for her since she can now do everything she wants. But for me, until the international travel situation is resolved in the future, life is not normal for me at all, as 'normality' for me involves a lot of international travel. 

Q: But surely things in London are much better than before, right? 

A: Sure, things are better for me, but really depends on whom you ask. I've just started a new job, we hosted a party this week at a club and when my husband turned up, he was amazed at what he saw as it was like pre-Covid times. We had some great food whilst watching a live band perform on stage - we mingled with the other guests at the party, there were no masks, no social distancing, people were shaking hands and hugging each other. Was I worried about Covid at all at the party? No, because I am fully vaccinated so even if I do get infected, I know I wouldn't get as sick as I did the first time I got it in January this year. So yes, I am having a pretty good time right now and I'm able to focus on my new job rather than worry about what the future may bring. But for some people, they have lost their jobs - they might be on furlough or even on unemployment benefits, uncertain if they can find a job soon. I have this friend at the gym whom I shall refer to as Ian (not his real name) where he works as a gymnastics coach - he has a baby and his wife is unwell, he gets paid for the number of hours he works at the gym and he has gone through many months where he really struggled to even put food on the table for his family. Even before the pandemic, his financial situation was already quite insecure given how poorly paid sports coaches are, but the pandemic has well and truly made him realize how precarious his situation is. So for people like Ian, life isn't any better just because he no longer has to wear a mask now, that's actually the least of his worries and Ian would gladly wear a mask all day if he had a better job that paid him a half-decent salary. 

Okay, so that's it from me on this topic. What do you think? How is life for you where you are and has some semblance of normality returned? Are you still wearing a mask in public or have you ditched your masks already? Do you still hesitate to shake someone's hand when you meet them now, do you opt for an alternative like a fist pump, an elbow-bump or even just a wave? Do you think the UK government has been way too reckless in lifting the restrictions with the Delta variant still circulating in our midst or is it a logical step to take following a very successful vaccination programme? Have you been fully vaccinated yet and have you met people like Charles who refuse to get vaccinated? Have you ever met anyone like Charles, who is angry and bitter about everything? Do leave a comment below and many thanks for reading. 

23 comments:

  1. Hi Alex. Life is fully normal for me in the US, don't see a single mask in sight except for people in service jobs like the cashiers at grocery stores, since they come into contact with many people and the vaccine isn't 100% foolproof. However, I do encounter people who have refused the vaccine. One person told me they weren't sure if it would interfere with heart disease. And this is quite common since 50% of my state has not even received a single dose. As a result, we are bracing for the delta variant here in the US. I don't really mind since my friends, family, and myself are all vaccinated. Sometimes people just make bad choices, even if they are deadly choices.

    Y'know, it's not bad for people to question whether the vaccine is good/bad for their health. In Asia people take it for granted that authority figures have their best interests in mind. But what is bad is to question but not find answers from credible data, and instead resort to conspiracy theories on facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me share with you what happened earlier - I left my gym where I am not required to wear a mask and walked into the supermarket next door, forgetting to put on a mask. Then I realized, hey even the staff at the supermarket at not wearing masks - if they're not wearing masks, why am I bothering then? So my mask stayed in my pocket and that's actually the first time since spring 2020 that I did my grocery shopping with no mask on from beginning to end. But the rules are not consistent - cos in the gym, we're not required to wear masks as we're doing sports so it was considered uncomfortable to force us to wear masks but surely that increases the risk of transmission if we're panting from exertion and breathing heavily. Go figure. At least people are vaccinated here so we're not that worried about the consequences of going maskless. But in the train on the way home, an elderly lady asked me for directions and so I chatted with her on the journey - to protect her, I wore my mask out of respect for her. As for people who refuse the vaccine, well you realize that most people who are getting hospitalized and dying of Covid now are the unvaccinated, so I would compare that to smokers to die of lung cancer. It's their choice to make an unhealthy decision and die an early death, let them die, they deserve no sympathy and I wouldn't even feel sad when they die.

      Delete
    2. Wow thats very inconsistent rules in the UK. In America most places which required masks stopped doing so after Fauci said the vaccinated didn't need one.

      As for the smokers, lung cancer, and the unvaccinated, I somehow have more sympathy for the smokers than the unvaccinated because the elderly today dying of lung cancer picked up the habit when the health effects of smoking were unknown. Cancer kills in decades while covid kills in weeks, the unvaccinated don't have much of an excuse. Furthermore, its one thing to refuse the vaccine but wear masks and not go out often during a pandemic. It's another thing to refuse the vaccine and walk around like there isn't a pandemic and expect not to die.

      Btw, did you hear about the anti-vaccine protest in France attended by thousands recently? It would be ironic if that was a superspreader event and many people got hospitalized with covid as a result.

      Delete
    3. Oh yes, I know about what happened in France. The thing is the same thing would probably happen in the UK if they would try to impose a lockdown again - there would just be so much mass civil disobedience that it would be pointless. That's why all restrictions have been pretty much lifted and life is more or less back to normal now here. I won't miss having to wear a mask.

      What do you think of my friend Charles, the former diver whose life turned out to be a bit of a mess and has used the anti-vaxx movement as a vehicle to channel all his anger and frustration? Have you met anyone like that before? How would you handle a friend like that if you knew Charles and he was your friend?

      Delete
    4. Ahh okay thats why the UK gov doesn't even bother with restrictions, then we'll see a lot of anti-vax protests in the streets. We already had those in the US but its not really news haha. We even had healthcare workers protesting having to get the vaccine.

      Wow Charles' life looks like a complete 180. He was at the top, and now he's at the bottom. I have met people who fell from grace, I do have a friend who attended both Oxford and Cambridge but had a failed science career. But I have not met anyone who used the anti-vaxx movement to channel their anger. I did have that one preachy vegan friend but that phase only lasted 6 months until he snapped out of it. I think as long as Charles doesn't personally attack you for getting a vaccine(maybe too late), or brings up his views in personal conversation, it's okay. But if he's this frustrated it might not just be about vaccines, he could be in general negative about everything which puts a damper on any conversation.

      Question, what happens to athletes after the Olympics? I get that for more lucrative sports like football or basketball the athletes have a full-time highly paid career to return to. But what about the less televised sports? When you said Charles had no education, was he really that dependent on his athletic career that he didn't attend uni?

      I recently read this article about how many Olympic athletes live in poverty whilst training for the Olympics since they aren't given large sums of money by their governments to train. US rowing only pays $1000 usd/month per athlete. Only really famous athletes like Michael Phelps or Simone Biles can live off lucrative sponsorships. It makes being a regular person who attended uni seem much more well off by comparison haha.

      Delete
    5. Well yes, poor Charles. In 2007, he was super good looking, all straight women and gay men fell in love with him, he was a super talented sportsman and he was making easy money doing modeling. Then he got injured, all that came to an end: he got fat and bald, that's the end of the modeling and he couldn't make a comeback because of those injuries. So he went from the top of the world to the bottom of the scrap heap in a matter of like 10 years - the reason why I went into so much detail in his case is because I know he is not a crazy anti-vaxxer but just someone who has so much pent up anger and frustration with no outlet, so the anti-vaxx thing seemed like a natural fit for him, but it is really no more than an outlet for him to rant, scream and shout. After all, the one major event that made everything go wrong was the spinal injury that put an end to his diving career - when you do competitive sports like that, people get hurt. It's no one's fault, when you're doing skills difficult enough to win an Olympic gold medal, a lot can go wrong and people do get injured. It's not like Charles is blaming his former coach, he has no one to blame but himself and so I think he just needed an outlet to scream, rant and shout after being this angry for so long. And I do actually know of a former colleague who did go to Oxford but failed to build a career after that because he couldn't adapt to the working world - having an Oxford degree gets you your foot in the door but you still have to deliver good results. Part 2 coming up.

      Delete
    6. As for your other question - what happens to athletes after the Olympics? I think it depends on whether or not they have managed to get an education or not. Take Mykayla Skinner - she won a silver in the vault finals at Tokyo but she also is a graduate from the university of Utah in broadcast journalism. Now with her credentials as an Olympic silver medalist, she can look forward to working with the sports networks on covering future sports events. Note that Skinner only won her silver at Tokyo after she completed her degree, not before. There are very few examples of gymnasts who made it big in a completely different field but they do exist: 1984 Olympic gold medalist Li Ning from China is now one of the richest men in China after having started a sports apparel brand. Another 1984 gold medalist gymnast from China Ma Yanhong now owns a chain of restaurants in China (hey, nothing to do with sports). And Nastia Liukin of America (gold medalist from 2008 Beijing Olympics) now works in finance and is very successful having established herself in a field that has nothing do with sports. Her father Valeri Liukin was a gold medalist from 1988 Seoul Olympics but as he was from the Soviet Union, all he could do was coach gymnastics but he isn't doing too badly for himself since his daughter became Olympic champion.

      But the fact is most gymnasts do end up as coaches if they have not had much of an education. A good example is one of the gymnastics coaches in Singapore I met years ago Qiao Ya, she used to represent China internationally in the mid-1990s and even went to the 1996 Olympics (4th place was her best result there). She has been coaching in Singapore for many years now - it's a quiet life, she is a good coach but then it's a question of whether she cashes in on her fame as an Olympian or if she does something totally different like Ma Yanhong and opens a restaurant?

      If I may correct you, lucrative sponsorship deals will only be offered to current athletes who are still competing and still winning - once they are retired, the sponsors will quickly move onto someone else who is current. You need to establish celebrity status before you get invited to take part in reality TV programmes like Dancing With the Stars and Celebrity Big Brother - but few sports people achieve that level of fame so many fall into obscurity; many take a quiet life in coaching (note coaches are not paid much, thus many remain poor unless they can produce the next Olympic gold medalist) or as in the case of Charles, they end up doing a very low-paid job because they haven't got the skills, education or training to do something else like what you and I do for a living. As for Biles' future - who knows, what has happened in Tokyo with her withdrawing from most of the competition will make it hard for her to bounce back and get more sponsorships in the future unless she keeps on competing till Paris 2024 and hopefully win all the medals she didn't win in Tokyo - it's a difficult situation.

      Delete
    7. Oh so that's what happened to your friend Charles. Had he not gotten injured he would have stretched out his career a little longer, but eventually he would have had to think about life after retirement. Unfortunately he got a woman pregnant so soon so he didn't have time to get a degree or establish a second career. Pretty unfortunate when you think of it. I remember there was a TV show about an investment banker who helps athletes invest, starring The Rock, called "ballers." But not every athlete is good with their money knowing the gravy train lasts a short time.

      Lol in undergrad I had a friend who complained her boyfriend intended to be a gymnastics coach after graduation(and he was an engineering major), and she complained that wasn't enough money to buy a HDB let alone have children. I didn't get it at the time but if you say the money isn't a lot then I believe you. I hope Simone Biles squirrelled away a nest egg to start a second career after her eventual retirement. Last I heard she was accepted into UCLA but transferred to an online university so she could focus more on training for the Olympics.

      Delete
    8. Well it is a tough career choice to go into sports - if you win a gold medal at the Olympics then you can milk your fame for a while, but if you go to the 1996 Olympics and finish 4th like Qiao Ya did, then the best she can get is a coaching job in Singapore. Charles was crazy talented but he got injured - I also have to point out that he was emotionally crushed by his injury, that his dreams came to an end, he couldn't compete anymore and he had to move on with his life. Under such circumstances, his girlfriend offered emotional support but you're right, the baby meant that he couldn't go back to school to learn a trade to get a more highly skilled job - he had to work full time to support his family and thus the timing of it was was terrible. But coaches are paid very little - allow me to compare it to acting. Some famous A-list celebrity actors can rake in the millions and become super rich, but the vast majority of actors struggle to make ends meet as they're not famous. Thus a tiny top 1% of actors are rich whilst the other 99% are desperately poor. The same applies to coaching: I mentioned Valeri Liukin earlier. He won gold at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and he coached his daughter to win gold at the 2008 Beijing Olympics - so there's a very, very long list of people asking him to coach and he will go to the highest bidder, thus earning a lot of money in the process. How many gymnastics coaches have that luxury? Even someone like Qiao Ya in Singapore has a modest contract - she hasn't produced a gymnastics world champion or Olympic champion yet, so she is not in the same league as Liukin as a coach. So your friend is right that most gymnastics coaches earn peanuts. Harsh but true. Ironically, LOL, I still have my gymnastics coaching qualification, I am a fully certified level 2 gymnastics coach here in the UK but I have no desire to use that qualification to make a living.

      Delete
    9. Ahh okay so it's really tough to be a really good gymnast but not be in the top 3 spots in the world. I see why parents could be hesitant to allow their child to get into sport, unless it paid for an education (e.g sports scholarships).

      Delete
    10. Well yes, in America you have the sports scholarship model where the NCAA is a really strong movement and many top gymnasts do effectively get a free degree - not a bad deal given how much they have invested in their training over the years and how expensive degrees can be in the US. However, there's no such thing as a sports scholarship here in the UK - only academic scholarships are given out.

      Delete
    11. Oh there are pros and cons to the sports scholarship model. In the US the Olympic athletes aren't professionals who are supported by the government to train, unlike the UK where the athletes are supported by the national lottery. The college scholarship helps but it only lasts for the length of a degree, and many athletes would then have the choice to struggle on as a lowly paid athlete, or retire and pursue a career using their degree.

      Btw, continuing on from our conversation about your Welsh friend who you are trying to help get into finance. This morning I was supervising movers to help me change apartments. And they were around about my age so we talked a lot about videogames and TV, and they also asked me about my education and so on. Anyway, I was hesitant to tell them about my education because one of them mentioned something about how the minimum price for a good car is "expensive", even though the number they gave was something I thought was very low. And when I did tell them about what I do, they said I seem like a cool person who's done quite well. The first thing I thought of was a comment you wrote in a previous post about the rich girl who had an internship at a bank because her mom knew someone. For people who grew up at least middle class, obtaining a degree is not really an achievement because they have already had so much help and investment from their parents. But for someone who is working class it is a huge achievement because of the lack of support. Its encounters like this that make me feel less bad about the government taxing my income if it goes into helping people like that.

      Delete
    12. Well Amanda, allow me to share with you what I did yesterday evening - I hung out with one of the coaches from my gymnastics club and we played ping pong. He was telling me all about how he is frustrated with the job there, yes even amongst gymnastics coaches there's the equivalent of 'office politics' though in this context, I should call it 'gym politics'. Normally I do what do you - I steer the conversation away from money and we talk about innocent things like "which is your favourite ice cream flavour?" But with this guy yesterday, I know him well enough to say, "why don't you leave coaching then? You're young enough to establish a new career in a completely different field if you're not happy with the people at the gym." Then he pointed out that he doesn't hate coaching, he just hates the people (or the 'gym politics') - actually he does enjoy coaching and I can tell you Amanda that he is a really good coach. It would be a big loss to the gymnastics community he if listens to me, leaves coaching and becomes something like an estate agent simply to earn more money. I took a balanced approach: I listened to him, I asked him questions about his options, his worries, his aspirations, I then slipped in some of my perspectives and a little bit of advice but I mostly just listened and asked question - that's all I could do. He is an adult and I can try to guide him to the right conclusion by making him reflect on what is most important.

      Delete
    13. Yeah like as someone who used to be a gymnast who had a coaching license but prefers to use their degree to make more money in finance, it's such a different career choice than this gym coach that you can't do much more than listen to their problems and empathize. Everyone has to make a decision whether to choose money or to do something they love. I think I'm more on the pragmatic side like you, but there's no right/wrong answer.

      I was hesitant to ask these movers yesterday whether they were considering college or to pursue engineering like myself, because I don't know if they like engineering, or if it is financially accessible(especially in America). All I knew was that they didn't really like their current job even if it pays above minimum wage. They mentioned some customers can be very rude, not offer them anything to drink (during extreme weather too), or even flat out refuse to pay. I've never had to deal with rude customers before so the most I could do was empathize then go back to videogames and TV.

      Delete
    14. Well I was pretty much in the same situation talking to my coach friend as you were with the movers - my coach friend is a really sweet and sincere friend, all the gymnasts love him and he's great at his job, I'm just so frustrated to see him unhappy where he works and in an ideal world, I would love for him to be able to sort out the problems so he can keep on coaching. But in reality, I thought it was just easier for him to find a new job. Hard choices Amanda, we're in the real world with no easy answers here. Akan datang my latest post coming up soon.

      Delete
    15. Y'know I work in engineering, and there are some jobs that are flat out boring and don't require much talent (think using excel and some data entry, no seriously!), but they pay decently. So it baffles me to see a job like Olympic gymnast/gymnastics coach that requires a lot of talent and skills but pays very little. But then again you work in finance, where some people click here click there, and then suddenly make millions of dollars. Life isn't fair I suppose. Talent + skill + hard work =\= high income. Looking forward to your next post.

      Btw, just curious, how does your friend Vera afford to do a second degree given her meagre amount of savings? Considering she won't be making an income and would still have to pay tuition and living costs. In America that isn't possible without a huge amount of debt, but the interest rate can be very high.

      Delete
    16. The next post is ready! As for Vera's second degree, she got herself a loan. It is possible to get student loans to fund a second degree, even if she is simply saddling herself with debt for decades to come, making it even harder for her to achieve financial independence. It makes no sense.

      Delete
  2. Hi LIFT, is it true that the more languages you know, the possibility of attaining native-level proficiency in your first language would become zero, as compared to a monolingual? I know that I should stop thinking of my brain as a refrigerator, and I know I will have to maintain a decent level of proficiency in my English and Chinese when I embark on learning another language, otherwise there would be a decrease/decay in my first and second languages respectively. Actually, for French, I have attained a decent amount of vocabulary for a beginner, just that I have problems stringing the words and sentences together, and I tend to memorise "key sentences" and stick to them.
    ie. Quel est votre numero de telephone, Je suis boulangère etc. Je suis etudiante, Je parle un peu de francais, et anglaise et chinoise.
    I am thinking that I should at least become more fluent in French before attempting to learn Japanese. May I know what are your thoughts on this issue?
    https://www.reddit.com/r/languagelearning/comments/afk5t4/how_many_languages_can_one_learn_and_maintain_at/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Bella, I think what you postulated is completely wrong and inaccurate because it is based on an assumption that ALL human brains are the same. It is wrong to take this one size fits all approach to learning languages for a simple reason: some people are super intelligent and have a natural gift when it comes to picking up many languages with such ease; whilst others are not necessarily stupid, but have a handicap when it comes to even expressing themselves in their mother tongue/first language, never mind learn a second or foreign language! I hate to be blunt, but some people win the genetic lottery and others lose at that same game: that's why some of us are absolutely brilliant geniuses whilst others are stupid idiots. Am I stating the obvious? I think so, I'm really not telling you anything new - I'm sure you've met both extremely intelligent people and really retarded idiots before; how can we treat people from both of these categories as if they're the same?

      So your ability to attain native-level proficiency in your first language doesn't depend on how many languages you speak, but rather on your IQ, on your intelligence. To be blunt, if you're born clever, then you have nothing to worry about. If you're born stupid, then there's nothing you can do to cure that stupidity - sorry to be harsh but that's just the way it is. So any kind of postulation about how learning one more language would impede your ability to speak your mother tongue is quite frankly, bullshit. The fact is some people struggle to learn a second or third language because they're either a) too stupid or b) good at other stuff so not typically totally useless but otherwise just totally suck at learning languages.

      You're right that your brain is not a fridge, I have a freezer that's really well-stocked, cos whenever I see something on sale/discount I would buy it and if I can't eat it before the used by date, I would just stick it in the freezer. So if I wanna buy a big tub of ice cream for example, I need to take something out of the freezer to make space for that tub of ice cream because the space in my freezer is finite.

      However, if we were to compare our brains to the freezer in my kitchen, then goodness me, some super intelligent people would have a 'freezer' the size of a multi-story carpark and they have a lot of storage space for anything else you wish to store in that brain. However, some really stupid idiots have a tiny brain with no capacity, so they cannot process any more information or learn anything new cos they're really that stupid and useless.

      And of course, I go back to the point that some people are born with incredible brains and are super geniuses, whilst others are useless stupid retards. No two brains are the same. So how can one possibility make such an arbitrary rule like that about the learning of languages? It completely depends on the individual's brain and intelligence - so what you have postulated is total bullshit.

      Delete
    2. Over the years in fact, I've met super intelligent people who are have achieved native-standard fluency in several languages and I've also met really stupid idiots who are inarticulate in their own mother tongue/first language. They key difference is their IQ, their intelligence - that's what makes the difference; these super intelligent people who are blessed with a much more powerful brain than the rest of us can go on to do incredible things that most of us would find impossible. We need to be humble enough to accept that if someone is born with that kind of natural gift, natural talent or even if it's just a freakishly high IQ, then that's their pure luck to have won the genetic lottery whilst the rest of us can never attain that kind of intelligence no matter what we do as we're stuck with the brain we are given at birth. Sucks but that's the truth. So it's absolutely ludicrous to try to have a one-size fits all approach to this issue when you're dealing with the human population which includes everyone from super geniuses to retarded idiots.

      I hope you're enjoying some of the action from the Tokyo 2021 Olympics. If you look at the sprinters winning gold medals at the athletics event, can I make you train like them and then expect you to run 100 meters under 10 seconds? Of course not, you weren't born with that kind of body that would allow you to sprint at that speed - you weren't born with the body of an Olympic sprinter and thus you can't ever deliver that kind of speed when you run. So it is once again, the game we call the genetic lottery: some of us are born with gifts at birth with our brain and body, whilst others are cursed with bad luck at this game.

      Delete
  3. A very good article.

    From some of the Telegram group chat that I read in Singapore, there is a article where the government and the mass media is trying to cover up.

    In the article, it said that more and more vaccinated people are spreading the Covid19 virus as compared to the unvaccinated people. The government and mass media is trying to cover up the news that vaccinated people are the super spreader now.

    Even in the US, they had listed Isreal as a res zone. Isreal have the most vaccinated people in the world but the vaccinated people are now the super spreader.

    The government now are also pushing away their responsibility on the death of people who take up the vaccine. They are saying that their death is due to their weak heart. Vaccine is not the cause of their death.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well we simply have to live with the virus - a zero-tolerance approach is not sustainable in the long run. What has happened in the UK is that we've accepted that the fat, the elderly and the vulnerable are at risk - if you're in the high risk category, then it is your responsibility to protect yourself by social distancing, not going out and wearing a mask. But those of us who are not in the high risk category are ready to get back to normal - so if someone who is old, fat and unvaccinated then gets Covid and die, then what are you gonna do? Put the whole country back in lockdown because of them? Or let them die because, well it's their fault they're fat, it's their fault they didn't get the vaccine when offered, so just let them die and treat it like the chain smoker who dies of lung cancer. In the UK, that's our mindset: let them die because it's THEIR choice. Once we accept that, then we'll just get on with life. We've had enough of this pandemic already. We had 94 deaths just today and once again, the reaction was, "these people died because of their poor choices, they have no one to blame but themselves, so let them die. There will be neither sadness nor sympathy."

      Delete
    2. So do you think that Singapore would ever evolve to the point where the people can adopt that same mindset when it comes to Covid deaths? Or would people still expect the government to enforce strict lockdowns to minimize deaths? Or can Singapore show us an alternative model to deal with it - because I'm not saying that the UK has the perfect solution, our answer to the pandemic is, "let the bodies pile up, these are stupid FAT people who didn't get vaccinated, so they deserve to die, let them have their death wish and good riddance to them." It's hardly the perfect solution to a pandemic - I'm not condoning the UK model, but I live here, that's what I have before me and actually I'm just grateful to be able to do things like socializing with neither masks nor social distancing today, just like pre-pandemic times and like the rest of the country, I couldn't care anymore about those who died. We've just run out of compassion as a country.

      Delete