Friday, 25 June 2021

Do you work on evenings and weekends?

Hello again everyone, I would like to share something that happened recently - as you know, I regularly give my nephew tutorials to help him prepare for his exam and my two sisters in Singapore would join in so my nephew can have a conducive, supportive learning environment. As Singapore is 7 hours ahead of London in the summer, the lessons typically take place in the early afternoon for me, so if it is 2 pm for me in London, it is 9 pm in Singapore. So on a Saturday night, both my sisters as various points had to say, "excuse me, my boss is trying to get me to do something urgently. I will be back soon." And of course, I told them to just attend to their work matters whilst I conducted the lesson for my nephew but I am shocked that they are expected to respond urgently on a Saturday night when it comes to work. This is highly unusual in the context of London but actually pretty normal for them in Singapore. In a recent post, we talked about dealing with a boring job and let's continue on this theme: how do you avoid being in my sisters' position whereby you are expected to put in an insane number of hours at work? How do you achieve a great work life balance? 

Study the organization carefully before starting your new job.

When you get to the stage where you are invited in for a job interview, there will be the opportunity to ask them some questions about the new job and of course, that's when you should raise the issue of work life balance, particularly when it comes to working from home. Given that the pandemic is here to stay for quite a while yet, working from home is always going to be a feature for many of us but just because we're working from home doesn't mean we have to work at 10 pm on a Saturday evening. That really depends on the expectations placed upon you by your boss about having to get work done: so if something arises during the weekend, can it wait till Monday morning before it gets resolved? Well, that depends on two things: for example, if I have a leak in my kitchen sink, then that's the kind of problem that needs to be resolved as soon as possible before my kitchen is flooded of course. But let me give you an example of when something can wait: my Taiwanese client once raised a question with me on a Saturday and I said I would need to clarify the transaction with the platform she used to place the trade. By Sunday evening, she was extremely irate that the matter had not been dealt with yet and I had to explain to her that British people don't work during the weekends, so the earliest the matter can be dealt with would be Monday morning UK time. So even if I was prepared to respond to my Taiwanese client during the weekend, the other companies that I work with in the UK certainly will not and therein lies the difference. 

So is working long hours a Chinese thing?

Is this an Asian vs the West dichotomy? I don't think so - even within China, I see a range of attitudes. On one hand, you have the employees who are not paid to work a minute overtime, these are typically civil servants so the moment the clock hits 5 pm, they refuse to answer phone calls and emails because they're probably already out of the front door by then. This is a legacy of Mao's communist era when he was trying to establish equality in Chinese society by making sure everyone got paid the same, regardless of work performance. Few were afraid to stand out in Mao's era by either working too hard or working too little - much emphasis was placed on being a part of the team, in blending in with everyone else that all the workers excelled at being mediocre. It was only after Mao passed away and Deng Xiaoping took over that all that began to change, but Deng had a massive challenge. He was trying to undo something that had already become part of the Chinese worker's mentality under Mao's rule. Fast forward to today, things have changed so much - you now have the famous Chinese work ethos of 9-9-6: that means working from 9 am to 9 pm 6 days a week. When I was in Shenzhen in 2018, my hotel was right next to the corporate headquarters of Tencent and I saw staff leaving the office around midnight or even later - that's how hard some Chinese people work today if they are given the opportunity to make a lot of money in such a company. The fact that you can have both extremes co-existing in China today tells is that it isn't a Chinese or cultural issue per se but rather the environment that we have created for ourselves. 

It's not that I mind working longer hours, I just want my pay to reflect that! 

Oh yeah there are some jobs where you do get overtime pay and some jobs where you're given a monthly salary which covers all possibilities of overtime. Allow me to give you an example from my acting days: there are several components to our pay - there's the buy out (ie. when you sell the rights for your image to be used in media for an agreed period, within a geographical region) and then there's your daily rate. The latter is calculated based on a 'standard day' which is either a 10 or 12 hour day (depending on the contract you have negotiated) and the clock starts ticking from the moment you arrive on set. So there was this time when I was on set for the filming on an ad in London and the crew had encountered some technical difficulties in setting up the camera for a particularly tricky shot - we were meant to have finished at 8 pm that evening but because of those technical difficulties, we were still there at 11:30 pm but instead of grumbling about how long we had worked that day, everyone was in very high spirits because we knew that the moment we went one minute after 8 pm, we were all paid overtime and it was quite generous: it was calculated at x 1.5 our hourly rate for every hour or part thereof, so even if we finished at 8:05 pm, I was getting a whole hour's overtime. And beyond those first few hours of overtime, that could then go up to x 2 our hourly rate if that went beyond midnight. So basically, even though we have all had a very long and exhausting day, nobody was complaining because we were paid rather well for working overtime. It is simple, you want your staff to be happy to work overtime? Just pay them for it: problem solved. 

Is it the fault of the employees? 

The pandemic has forced a lot of people to work from home - this has only resulted in much longer working hours for my two sisters in Singapore. Before the pandemic, there was the mindset at least that some functions could only be performed in the office, for example, meetings were regularly held for the teams to work together and you were expected to attend such meetings in person - that was simply the norm back then. Well, times have changed so the concept of turning off your computer and leaving the office is now a thing of the past: now people like my two sisters are expected to respond to their management's demands 24-7. Is this inevitable for people working from home? I don't think so - I believe there is another issue at stake here which is the root cause of the problem. Allow me to use a recent experience to illustrate my point: I had to take my pre-departure Covid-test in order to visit Portugal back in May. The tests that I had ordered were meant to be sent to me but there was a delay in the delivery which led me to try to contact them to find out what the hell was going on: holy shit, that was a total nightmare. I had to wait over an hour before I could get through their call center and emails to their office were ignored or answered only after a few days - it was evident that this company was woefully understaffed and that even if the staff there did absolutely nothing wrong, there just weren't enough staff to cope with the amount of work that had to be done. One of the emails sent to me arrived at 1:25 am in the morning and it was clear that this person was working all night to clear the backlog of emails. In this case, I blamed the company for not hiring enough staff to deal with the workload, but I felt sorry for the people trying their best to serve me. 

Or is it the fault of the boss?

This is the root cause of why some companies are forcing their staff to work hideously long hours - such employers are trying to minimize their cost by hiring as few staff as possible. It is a shortsighted view when it comes to business development: imagine a restaurant that adopts this strategy. They try to boost their earnings by hiring less cooks and waiters so they get to maximize their profits by keeping their costs low. Would this strategy work? Before you answer, allow me to point out that it depends on the situation! If it is a rainy Monday evening and you're not expecting a lot of customers, then reducing your costs by having less staff that night would make a lot of sense since it'll make little sense to have too many staff on a relatively quiet night like that. But if it is a public holiday and the weather is nice, then you have good reason to expect a lot more customers; thus trying to reduce the number of staff on such a day would simply be foolish because having a situation where you're understaffed would lead to many unhappy customers who would have to wait a very long time for their food and if that leads to many poor reviews online, then any marginal savings you might have made by using less staff that day would be canceled out by the long term damage done to your reputation when others avoid your restaurant after having read all those terrible reviews. Thus an intelligent businessman will know how to exactly manage this situation properly to both maximize profits and customer satisfaction by getting the balance just right - so having the right kind of boss who knows how to get the balance right on this vital issue can make a huge difference. 

Or perhaps this is just peer pressure? 

My sisters simply accept that working during the evenings and weekend is totally normal for them for a simple reason: all their colleagues and the majority of their friends in Singapore do it. There might even be an element of guilt on their part - if everyone is willing to make this sacrifice for work, would simply refusing to do it make them come across as lazy in contrast? By that token, unless my sisters are willing to make a rather radical decision like change careers or even move abroad, they are pretty much constrained by the cultural norms in Singapore. So if an employer in Singapore finds a particular member of staff unwilling or unable to work during evenings and weekends, then s/he can find a replacement with ease. However, this is hardly a situation unique to Singapore - the exact same thing happens in Japan as well whereby workers feel guilty about leaving the office even if they have nothing left to do, simply because being the first one to leave will make them appear lazy compared to their other colleagues who have stayed longer than them in the office. Thus working longer hours does not lead to more productivity, indeed many Japanese workers simply spend hours in the office on social media whilst maintaining the facade of 'oh I am staying late tonight and working hard like my colleagues'. Officially, Japan's productivity lags way behind other G7 countries yet few Japanese people are willing to even speak up to challenge this aspect of their culture - most of them simply conform without asking any questions. So is it even possible to find a company in Singapore or Japan where this kind of behaviour isn't the norm? Of course that's possible - but the onus is then on the individual to be aware of what kind of companies to avoid when seeking a new job. 

What can someone in Singapore or Japan do in this situation then?

Well the obvious solution is to avoid a job where you can work from home - allow me to use my friend Lee in Singapore as an example. He is a dentist and thus obviously, that's not a job he can do from home. If you want him to fix your teeth, you have to make an appointment to see him at the dental clinic where he works. So at least his ability to work from home is hindered by the fact that he can't perform any kind of dental surgery without all the medical equipment in the clinic. So in Lee's case, he truly can switch off the moment he leaves his place of work. I also have another friend in Singapore who works in a sushi restaurant - she doesn't prepare the rice or the fish at home, no all that is done at the restaurant and whilst her shifts may be long, at least the moment she leaves the restaurant, just like Lee, she is off the clock and is not going to work again until the start of her next shift. The other alternative to that is to set up your own business and be your own boss, that way you call all the shots and you simply don't have a boss at all - problem solved. But of course, it isn't a perfect solution either. I have an old friend in Singapore, let's call him Teo, he is the CEO of his own company because he wanted to have that level of control over his own time. However, he is working harder than most people I know - when I visited him in Singapore, we met up for dinner around 9 pm and then he went right back to work after that. Then when Teo came to visit me in London, he was constantly answering phone calls and emails. I told him that he was the boss, he can just turn his phone off but he replied, "I wish I could - I'm afraid I have already delegated and outsourced all I can, but some important matters I've to do myself even, when I am on holiday in London!" 

But wait, does it really matter? Is this a problem? 

Teo runs his own business, his company is like his baby (especially since he doesn't have any children) and he is very passionate about the work he does. So actually, he really enjoys what he does for a living, he can be so proud of his accomplishments and he doesn't mind working such long hours. But of course, allow me to point out that Teo is also an extremely rich and successful businessman - he earns a lot and so with money being the incentive for him, it isn't hard to see why he is happy to work such long hours. I daresay my two sisters (and a lot of people in Singapore I know) simply don't have Teo's level of job satisfaction. They look at the way I work in London, where I have great work-life balance and they are insanely jealous of this aspect of the culture here. Thus I can see that my friend Teo chooses to work very hard as he is the boss, but my two sisters really don't have a choice in the matter and thus they have to comply begrudgingly. Thus I think it is necessary to look at the detail in each case, as Teo's circumstances are quite different compared to my two sisters. Of course, I think that we need to be reasonable: after all, one can never expect a job to be perfect - recently, I had talked about having to deal with certain boring aspects of one's job. Whilst my sisters certainly don't have the perfect job (and to be fair, neither do I), I think the quality of their work life balance could be greatly enhanced if their bosses were to simply back off on the issue of expecting them to get things done during the evenings and weekends: oh that would make such a difference. Is it therefore simply a question of respect: would you expect your boss to respect the fact that your evenings and weekend are reserved for your family and that it would be rather unfair to expect you to drop everything just to respond to an email when you're spending Sunday evening having some quality time with your family? 

So that's it from me on this topic - what do you think? Do you respond to work emails and calls during evenings and weekends? Am I being too harsh with my two sisters; are my expectations having a perfect work life balance somewhat unrealistic? Do you know of people like my friend Teo? Do you feel peer pressure to work long hours or does your boss expect you to do that? Are you paid for overtime or is that something that's just 'part of the deal' for you at work? Are there concrete steps we can take to address this issue of having a decent work life balance? What are the consequences of overworking when work cuts into your evenings and weekends? Do leave a comment below, many thanks for reading. 

24 comments:

  1. I think the ability to set your own hours can be a double-edged sword, because it means you have to be good at time management or get screwed. In a 9-5 job like working at McDonalds or Amazon's warehouses someone else does the time management for you, but they pay a pittance. Although the civil servant jobs end at 5pm, they probably had to swim through rivers of shit to get that position in the first place.

    Anyway, I got this story to share that I heard from my coworkers. In academia we can come into the office almost whenever, and mostly work on our own(even from home, but during the pandemic it was 75% of the time). But last year there was this deadline to submit a project around September, and my coworkers didn't start construction of a prototype till around early August. Our boss was very pissed because for the past year he didn't micromanage or set deadlines/goals, but the project didn't look close to completion at all 1 month before the deadline. The parts for the prototype weren't even ordered yet! So during August my coworkers were working 12 hour days, 7 days a week, overall being miserable, and then our boss had the audacity to say "I see you're in the office every day, so we're finally making regular progress every week. Can you also do this for the rest of your PhD?"

    I get that my boss was pissed my coworkers didn't have good time management and they should've put in more effort the past 11 months of the year and not in the final month, but from my coworker's face I could tell that was not the right thing to say. But my boss would say "They are adults! I don't have to tell them how to manage their time", but if he got them to manage their time better they will be happier and more loyal, even if they are adults who should manage their time well. Well tough shit on my boss' part, he finds it hard enough to find ideal employees to work for him since the self-motivated ones are lured away by hedge funds or tech companies for 4-6x the salary. He has to work with the people he can get instead of assuming everyone who comes to work for him will be great in spite of market forces.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Amanda, thanks for your comment and if I may respond to the following points:

      1. I don't think all civil servants have that enviable a job. It's a double edged sword; a lot of people have civil service type jobs but few actually make it to the top of the relevant government departments where can rake it millions of dollars whilst working a 9 - 5 pattern with zero overtime. We often make fun of people who work in places like the DMV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz3bDON9bNo and sure these people don't have to work overtime but most of them actually end up working their life times in pathetic jobs where they earn so little, have zero fun and probably hate the job so much but have no choice but to keep working there as they have a family to feed. So no, I wouldn't imagine that civil servants are happy either - some are I am sure, but the majority are in just as much crap as the rest of us but at least if you're in the private sector, you get rewarded with cash if working that bloody hard earns you a ton of money (like my friend Teo).

      2. Good grief. Complete your PhD and get the hell out of there already. This sounds like such a toxic environment - you should be working for hedge funds and tech companies and cashing in on your knowledge & expertise. Sure the work there may suck but at least you'll be paid enough to become financially comfortable.

      Delete
    2. Omfg I hate going to the DMV or whatever government office for any service(including immigration, which is even worse than the DMV). It's not like Singapore where the government is at least fast in it's response after you submit all your documents, though you can be waiting a few hours at the immigration and checkpoints authority.

      Well I don't have problems with time management so my boss gives me extra vacation weeks in exchange, but he doesn't handle other people misbehaving super well. However in my case(btw coding is fun not boring!), the problem is I don't have a bachelor's degree that is recognized in America since I did my undergrad overseas, so I can't just go off to a hedge fund or tech company until I get my PhD from this American uni. In fact I was rejected by Facebook just yesterday without an interview even after my cousin referred me for a job. In contrast my cousin referred my brother for a job a few years ago and he had way less scientific achievements than me but still made it to the 3rd interview only because he went to undergrad in America.

      Anyway, knowing that, see my boss assumes everyone that applies to him, including the Americans, is some great candidate who is somehow choosing to work for him instead of a tech company or hedge fund just because. For the Americans, the brightest ones can get a job at Facebook or UBS right after undergrad without a PhD because these companies can easily call a coworker/friend who knows someone who went to their school to vouch. My brother had 2 scientific publications in undergrad but chose to work a high paying job as a software engineer instead of getting a PhD because it pays double, and after 1 year of working recruiters from Google/Amazon contacted him. He would make an ideal PhD student but has much better options. As a result most PhD students in America are foreign because foreigners are bright but cannot just join a tech company/hedge fund right away. So they take a PhD in the US because there are no better jobs back home(definitely the case for me). But my boss grew up in and did his undergrad in Eastern Europe, another poor country with horrible jobs, so he doesn't get it. Also, the coworkers who had the bad time management, they all have American passports lol.

      Delete
    3. Btw from what I just mentioned about local PhD students usually being the people who the hedge funds and tech companies don't want, it really shows how stupid Boris Johnson is to give extra immigration points to people who have a PhD. I think work experience and prior salaries should be given more points than a PhD.

      Delete
    4. The DMV is a bit of an extreme example but the fact is a lot of civil servants can't hack it in the private sector given how hard it is to adapt to a different mindset. My eldest sister is a civil servant in fact (she works for an entity that is ultimately controlled entirely by the Singaporean government) and I can't help but get the feeling that her work is very much quantity not quality - they pay her to do tonnes of work, like she works 18 hours a day rather than because she is so freaking inventive or creative. She joined in my nephew's economics tutorial and she gave a very silly answer to the point where I had to shake my head. I don't think she's stupid per se, it's just that in her kind of job, she is not paid to think too hard, she simply follows procedure, just like at the DMV.

      And now I understand your work situation - damn that sucks, when do you finish your PhD then? As for Boris Johnson being a total idiot, oh we know that. His health minister has finally resigned today, not because of the Covid mess but because he was caught on camera cheating on his wife with another married woman. Like duh. Where do I even begin when it comes to this country?

      Delete
    5. I think in France there is also the situation of cushy civil servant jobs but it varies immensely in salary from railway workers to the top government officials. But being France they have great work hours and benefits. Has your sister been in the government her whole life? I can't imagine working for the DMV that long, but if she hasn't practiced critical thinking in a while then it won't be the first thing she uses when participating in an economics discussion.

      I finish my PhD when I finish 3 projects that are accepted into peer reviewed journals and form a "set." That is going on track, but is not my main priority to worry about. Since I have time I'm trying to pick up the connections and skills that industry needs in order to hire me. Yesterday I found out a former student of a professor who wants to collaborate with me works at Google in the same field. I think if I trade him a good project he could give me an introduction to that student and hopefully I'll find out what my CV needs to look like to not be rejected.

      Lol UK politics is insane. I think a lot of laws are actually dumb but appeal to the layman who won't probe any deeper. Recently I was playing games with some total strangers and when I mentioned I'm a PhD student one guy who works at a cafe because of the covid recession said "ooh that's a flex..." And I said "nah, a PhD doesn't make you a smarter person." But he said "but it does make it look like that to most people."

      Delete
    6. OK in the UK for instance, you have everything from super highly paid civil service jobs high up in the ministries right down to the equivalent of DMV jobs at very local levels, where you're responsible for issuing parking permits in the local neighbourhood or something as mundane as that. So if you are working at a very low level job issuing parking permits, even if the hours are regular, the pay is still painfully low. It is a simple function of economics: you don't have to offer £500,000 a year to employ someone to handle parking permits. And thus it's not like your parking permit manager isn't hardworking, s/he is just doing mind-numbingly boring work that is monotonous, boring and tedious. As for my sister, she has been in various such government departments all her life so again, she has a boss further up the food chain who tells her exactly what to do, when to do it, how it has to be done and the workload is heavy; but the other side of that same coin is that she merely follows orders & instructions instead of being left on her own to figure out a whole new strategy (which is the kind of situation I am often in). That's why I think she struggles when I gave her a critical thinking puzzle - though having said that, she still performs much better than my nephew and of course it is a moot point: my nephew is the only one who has to prove himself in the exams at the end of this year whilst my sister finished her exams decades ago.

      I don't believe you can make a person smarter via a PhD. I am quite fatalistic, in that you're either born smart or stupid - that's it, we call it the genetic lottery. Some people are lucky, others are not. Those who are born smart can go on to do a PhD whilst others like me can go on to do other things to use our brains to make money - but imagine if you enrolled a stupid person like my father in a PhD programme, that PhD programme cannot change the fact that he is fundamentally stupid. In short, universities are not there to cure stupidity. Nothing in this world can cure the curse of stupidity. Rather, top universities are merely a way for super smart people to prove their worth, to have that badge of honour to show the world, "I'm smart enough to get into this university - I'm one of the smart people, not one of the stupid ones."

      Delete
    7. To be fair we do need people to do mundane jobs in life. And I couldnt care less if they were well paid for it. In fact it's the non-mundane jobs that have the hugest disparity in wages, e.g Hollywood, or some other artsy career, because you don't need to pay people when they love what they do too much.

      I wouldn't say it's just a badge of honor because you mentioned some people who went to Oxford can't even get a job due to poor social skills. I think it's also learning how to deal with people, since you will be packed with lots of other students that you have to interact in class and outside of class. And also making connections. I didn't know our department had someone in Google till I was chatting shit with my coworkers after work. That's something I can't do on LinkedIn alone by myself. Especially considering you mentioned some rich people you knew who went to universities low on the league tables but managed to get good jobs using family connections anyway. To me universities are not just proof of competence, but also one of the best places to network. But of course if one dumps a person with bad social skills in a university they are gonna leave a bad impression on everyone they meet and won't make any good connections at all.

      Delete
    8. Aaah Amanda, allow me to explain something please: in your previous comments, you had made it sound as if these civil service jobs in Europe are well paid, have fixed 9 - 5 hours and have generally good conditions. I had to then point out to you that even if some of that is true, especially when it came to the 9 - 5 working hours, some of them are very poorly paid if you're stuck in some local government office dealing with something as mundane as parking permits. As for whether these jobs are well-paid or not, neither your opinion or my opinion matters - how much people get paid are simply determined by market forces. So if you are a highly skilled professional with skills that are highly valued by society, then you will command a high salary for your services. And if you have little to offer apart from the ability to turn up at the office at 9 am on weekdays to process parking permits till 5 pm, then you will be paid very little - this has nothing to do with moral or ethics, but it is all basic economics. Supply & demand of labour in the job market; I'm still in economics teacher mode. Leave your morals and feelings at the door and look at how market forces determine the outcome of this issue.

      So this is why I am pointing out the fact that some civil servants are very, very poorly paid because of the type of work they do. I've actually written a lot on my blog about why some people are so rich and others are always desperately poor - maybe it is because I've come from a poor family that I am acutely focused on how one can get rich whilst the fact that you've come from a rich family, you've never tasted poverty, so you take quite a different view on the matter but the fact is it is important to understand WHY & HOW market forces operate in this aspect rather than have a personal opinion on it - akan datang, I am currently writing a piece on how I ma struggling my nephew during his economics lesson on a very similar theme.

      Delete
    9. Yeah, I guess how much people are paid is hardly ever determined by the kindness of society or their employers. It is just a fact of life. It's just in my workplace what one will be doing can vary a lot. There are super mundane tasks to do (e.g measure the density of all the elements in the periodic table), and then there are very exciting tasks to do (colonize Mars). But even though we're usually paid the same some groups think they're better than each other based on what they do. But this is science we're talking about, where the supply of scientists is low for both tasks so both will be paid at least middle class, and both groups can't fight too much since they depend on each other anyway. There is less job security in other mundane jobs with lower skilled requirements like the DMV.

      Delete
    10. Well then, it is up to the individual to find a job in the right environment where one can find the right motivation: whether it is to find purpose in your work or getting paid loads for the work you do. I have that freedom and I exercise it - I was once in the army in Singapore where I had no say over what I did or how much I got paid for it. Having my liberty taken away from me like that has made me appreciate just how precious my freedom is.

      Delete
    11. Oh man the Sg army must be run very inefficiently with so many workers held there against their will. When I talked to guys in Sg they said "most of the time we're really just waiting around doing nothing..." But when I talked to my friend in America who works in the military delivering vaccines, his response was the same, but at least he's there willingly. Btw how is the UK lately? Are you able to go out and do things you like as if it was pre-pandemic? Here in the US life has pretty much gone back to normal (no masks except on planes), restaurants are crowded, etc. Domestic planes are also 99% full.

      Delete
    12. The inefficiency was unreal, it was shambolic, it was a a catastrophe every single day but what did you expect? Nobody wanted to be there, hence the poor moral there. Even those who did make the army their career were doing it out of desperation, out of poverty - they needed a monthly salary to support their families and the army would take anyone, they weren't fussy at all.

      As for life in the UK, we are due to lift all restrictions on the 19 July despite there being a surge in cases (ie. the fourth wave) but today, only 3 people died despite there having been a massive surge in cases. We're hoping that we have broken the link between getting Covid and loads of people dying - the kind of people who die of Covid are the elderly and the vulnerable with underlying medical conditions. Well these people are now either a) vaccinated + protected or b) dead so the people testing positive these days are kids in schools mostly + other young people and they rarely ever get that sick from Covid. So life is pretty much back to normal, ie. I am doing all the things I used to do pre-pandemic; I do wear a mask but I note today for example on the train, less than half the people wore a mask and I was like, geez what's the point of me wearing a mask if few of the others are doing it? We're looking at a second half of 2021 whereby we accept that we will live with the virus - thousands of people will get it everyday but life will still go on and it'll be treated like the common cold, something that is part of our lives and that we no longer fear as it doesn't lead to serious illness and death anymore, thanks to the vaccinations.

      Delete
    13. Yeah I hear a lot of sad stories about people forced to sign on as army regulars due to personal circumstance. Otherwise, many people would rather try their luck in the private sector. Even the most disgruntled Singaporeans who have been retrenched would not try the army as a last resort.

      Three people is not bad, it was only a few months ago that more than 500 a day were dying. Yeah I only wear a mask if I'm taking an Uber because they require it, but when I get into the car and the driver isn't wearing one then I take mine off. It's good you get to live a normal life again, I take it you've been going to the office around Mayfair? I'm glad I can try out sports again and have some semblance of a social life. Science really did win in the end, who knew the vaccines would be this effective so soon?

      Delete
    14. Oh I know of this former classmate, his family was very poor and he didn't want to put the burden on his parents to pay for his university education, so he signed on as an army regular to get the army to pay for his university (which worked out fine). I knew he wasn't happy in the army but he did the minimum in order the army to get his degree before moving onto something better.

      I am a bit of a geek when it comes to statistics - but daily cases jumped from 16k to 22k yesterday but deaths fell from 19 to 3, so there is no correlation between case numbers and deaths, given that we have seen an upward trend in cases in the last 6 weeks due to the Delta variant which has taken hold in the north of England and Scotland. I am not due to start till next Monday, but I expect I would be in the office about 2 days a week whilst still working from home a lot. But let's see, on one hand it is crazy to relax the rules during a surge in cases, but on the other hand, the death rate is so low compared to previously (when we had up to 2000 deaths a day) - so we're in uncharted waters here.

      Delete
    15. Yeah I do know some people who do use military scholarships to get through their bachelor's degree. It's not a bad deal if the army treats you as a scholar and lets you work as an engineer following graduation.

      It seems the UK has almost reached herd immunity so it's not unreasonable to relax restrictions. Those case are probably people in their early 20s who are very unlikely to die. I guess the Astrazeneca vaccine turned out to a be a real workhorse which is a shame other countries don't use it. Oh it's nice your office lets you work from home and only come in sometimes when you have to/feel like it, makes for a happier workplace.

      Delete
    16. I think we're also less concerned about the deaths for two reasons: firstly, we're totally desensitized to the idea of hundreds, even thousands of people dying everyday. There was a time if there was a major accident that killed 50 people, we would all be in shock, lighting candles and asking for a national day of mourning. But now we're like meh, whatever, we're used to it. But also, there is also the sense that the people who die of Covid now either a) refused to get the vaccine and b) are fat and/or smoking heavily (thus rendering them vulnerable). Gosh yesterday I saw a fat older woman smoking outside a supermarket and I thought, you're the kind of person that dies from Covid, you're not wearing a mask, you're smoking and you've just bought so much junk food - you have a death wish, go ahead and die, see if I care if you ask for it like that. Also, we have a testing programme that includes all school kids and so this latest surge of cases is caused mostly by kids under the age of 15. The Delta variant is spreading rapidly amongst the kids at the moment, it's not the young adults.

      Delete
    17. Just read this article: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-57640397 it is the under-18 kids in primary & secondary school who are getting infected rather than adults. In fact, all adults over 18 can now get vaccinated in the UK but children under 18 still have to wait their turn.

      Delete
    18. Yeah it shocks me how people were freaking out over bodies piling up in April-June 2020, but by now its just an everyday occurrence if 1000+ people die per day in your own country.

      I kinda wanted to ask you how you regularly find the time to take care of your fitness? I only got into some sports and good eating after I went to uni, so I get why some people don't take care of themselves like the lady you saw in the supermarket. I wanted to go cycling this afternoon after I got my new bike, but somehow I ended up opening my laptop and working unpaid overtime instead(lol and this blogpost is about that). I probably should've went cycling, but it's just a bad habit to be a nerd all day and all night...

      Delete
    19. Well I have a simple answer to your question - because the adult gymnastics training sessions are run as a class, there is a designated time slot like "Wednesday 8 pm to 10 pm", so I can't turn up at Thursday 6 pm and say, "can I train now?" No, I must abide by the schedule and show up during the designated time slot. So there's no way I can get distracted by something else on the internet and then miss my training slot if an alarm goes off on my phone that says, "time to go to gymnastics training". Perhaps that's what you need - a designated time slot, commit to attending a class regularly. Rather than this "oh I can go cycling anytime since I have my new bike". The flexibility means you don't go cycling that often, but you can make it a regular thing if you put it in your diary, like 6 pm every Friday you will go cycling as you have allocated that time slot for it.

      Delete
    20. That's not a bad idea. When I was in Sg pre-pandemic I used to have fencing lessons every week that I would even do cardio on my own for just to survive 2 minute duels. Now the sports clubs are just starting to open. I should email them to ask when new members can join.

      Delete
    21. Yes do that, then it cane be a regular part of your schedule!

      Delete
  2. Even in sales job, although their working hour is fix, they still have to answer customers' call at night and weekend.

    I am working in the car rental industry. I have saw that my colleague on rest day still need to respond to customer enquiry.

    Those working in the insurance and real estate industry also had to work at night or on weekend. I can said that most of the insurance sales closed are mostly in the evening and at weekends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Kelvin, thanks for your comment. Allow me to make the following observations:

      1. I don't have a problem with working from home during the evenings/weekends as long as there's some way to be paid for it, be it claiming overtime pay or if I could be rewarded with commission if I can make a sale from home. So if someone who works in sales answers a sales inquiry during the evening/weekend, I am sure s/he will be doing it with a smile on his/her face, knowing that it could lead to a sale and there is some money to be made. I would gladly spend my weekend working on a deal if I know I stand to make money from it.

      2. Par contre, it is the concept of 'unpaid overtime' that I have a problem with. Many Singaporeans are expected to put in so many hours of overtime and there are no provisions in their contract for them to be paid for that overtime work they do from home during the evenings/weekends. A simple solution would be for such employees to claim for the extra hours they have put in during the evenings and weekends, then their employers can more accurately reward them for their efforts.

      3. Having all that unlimited, unpaid overtime leads to poor productivity. Working longer hours means lowering productivity, as in the case of Japan which has the lowest productivity rates amongst the G7. Ideally, you want to get the most amount of work done in the least amount of time possible. Workers must be given an incentive to work faster, get more done in less time, be more efficient and increase productivity.

      4. If you work in sales, your work patterns are determined by when your clients are able to buy. So if you work in real estate for example, your clients cannot view the property during office when they have to be at work; so you will have to arrange viewings during the evenings and weekends - that's completely normal as long as you're given time off in lieu for working evenings and weekends, so your number of hours worked per week is kept to a sensible number.

      Delete