Alex: Hello Joyce, can we begin by telling me a little about Paul please? How did you meet him?
Alex: Sounds like D&G could have done with his help in China, but I digress. Do tell me more about his background.
Joyce: Not only is Paul extremely good looking, he is also very rich but you could tell immediately that he's extremely posh, his parents are nobility and had all kinds of fancy titles. Paul probably could have used a bunch of titles as well but he has refrained from doing so. I felt like Rachel Chu in Crazy Rich Asians except that I was even more of a fish out of water - I grew up in Ipoh for crying out aloud. Whilst Paul spent his summers sailing around the Mediterranean on one of his father's many yachts, a post-exam treat for me would be going to watch a movie followed by some Japanese food. My family were not totally poor, like we weren't starving but we were very working class and I had never set foot on a yacht until I met Paul. I am well educated and I have a good job, but I always felt really out of place with Paul because I was just afraid that all his friends and family were going to look down on me for being this poor working class girl - I thought everyone was going to think that I'm a gold digger, that I was only with him because he was so crazy rich but that's not the case at all. I'm not as rich as him of course, but I am gainfully employed in the banking world and I am doing pretty well at my firm. But Paul was always very kind in that aspect, he never ever made me feel bad about my humble, working class background and I always felt very comfortable when it was just the two of us together, it was just his friends and family that I was always somewhat wary of - that's mostly because of my own insecurities. Paul was handsome, rich and had everything going for him, I thought he was out of my league but hey, we were a couple, I was in love. I was so totally in love with Paul and thought I could see my whole life ahead with him. Oh my life was so perfect.
Alex: Would you like to tell me how things unraveled and fell apart in that relationship then please?
Joyce: I felt that things were becoming serious and once, we were talking about our past relationships - like you know, whom we had dated before in the past and I told him about Michael. I had this thing with Michael for a while and I really liked Michael but he was a married man with two kids. It was a completely loveless marriage - like the wheels had fallen off that bus a long time ago but because there were two children involved, the decision was taken for them to maintain the status quo until the kids were old enough, like at least until the younger child turned 18 before they would get a divorce. Michael and his wife wanted to bring up their children together in a family unit as they always put the interest of their children first, but both him and his wife were effectively 'single' when it came to dating and sleeping around. It's actually not that unusual, many older couples end up in that kind of situation when there are children involved. I think Michael's a great guy, he just made a mistake by marrying someone who wasn't right for him but that's life for you. I'm sure his wife isn't a bad person either, they're simply not compatible as a couple for marriage. So I was sort of seeing Michael, it was mostly for sex as Michael is very good looking - there's a certain George Clooney meetings Anderson Cooper quality about him. He was refined, rich and very posh just like Paul - if I had met Michael when he was single, things would have been very different indeed but sometimes life just fucks with you like that. When I met Paul, I stopped sleeping with Michael as I wanted things to work with Paul but we still remained good friends. It wasn't acrimonious at all.
So once Paul asked me point blank if I would have sex with Michael if the opportunity presented itself, I tried to be diplomatic about it - I said I would not sleep with anyone else whilst I was in a relationship. So then Paul asked me if I still found Michael physically attractive and I answered honestly: yes I still do and that's the whole reason why I was sleeping with him in the first place, I do find him attractive. You don't get into a sexual relationship with someone you're not attracted to. He accused me of being a Wendi Deng - you know, the Chinese third wife of Rupert Murdoch. She married him even though he's so freaking old, had two kids with him then divorced him for a lot of money? Well in fact, her first husband was another rich American old man who was married when they first met, but she seduced him and got him to divorce his wife to marry her. She was not stupid, she graduated from Yale but twice she got ahead in life by seducing and marrying much, much older rich white men. There was even a juicy rumour about Wendi Deng and Tony Blair, but I think she's now so well-known for her tactics that any rich, old white man will be wary of her. I'm not like that at all, I am not a gold digger, I had that relationship with Michael because we were attracted to each other and I truly loved Paul. But Paul couldn't handle the fact that I still found Michael attractive and even though I did not sleep with Michael whilst I was with Paul, Paul was completely consumed by jealousy. He became really obsessive, he would text me and call me a mediocre gold-digger, going for the lowest hanging fruit. Please, like Michael had perhaps bought me dinner on a few occasions but that doesn't make me a Wendi Deng at all. More to the point, that's not how you treat someone you love.
Joyce: Partly. It turns out that Paul had an older brother Matthew whom he was always compared to. When they were boys, his parents would be like, "Matthew is doing so well in French, why can't you work harder so you can be as bright as your brother?" You get the idea, from a young age, instead of getting encouragement or help from his parents or his older brother, he had been made to feel inferior to Matthew and in their warped way of thinking, they somehow thought that would motivate him to become better at school, at sports, to make more friends but it was just bad parenting and they just crushed his self-esteem by making him feel he wasn't as good as Matthew. Furthermore, Matthew wasn't kind to Paul and had gone out of his way to make Paul feel as if he would never be good enough and it was really only his aunt Caroline who took some interest in Paul as he was growing up. But the damage had been done, it is quite unbelievable that this family can be so incredibly rich, yet somehow bring up a young man who has a huge chip on his shoulder and an inferiority complex despite the fact that he had developed into a handsome, accomplished adult who has everything to be proud of. Even rich people can fuck up when it comes to bad parenting. To be fair, money has nothing to do with it. My parents are working class and we were poor compared to them, but my parents made just as many mistakes as them and fucked up just as much. So you can't make money as the scapegoat here, we need to hold the bad parents accountable for all their mistakes whether they are rich or poor. The money is a moot point when it comes to parenting.
Alex: Yes I can see that - it is so wrong to put parents on a pedestal as if they are incapable of doing any wrong when clearly, parents are only human and even if they have good intentions, they are still capable of fucking up really badly and doing some serious damage to their children. Gosh, the amount of awful parenting I had been subjected to personally. My parents never set out to fuck me up, no they had the best of intentions I'm sure, but they still fucked up as parents not because they were malicious, but simply because they were both autistic and incredibly stupid - like you wouldn't believe just how clueless they were as parents and now they're repeating that same stupid shit with my nephew. But going back to Paul, so you think Michael is somehow taking the place of Matthew because of all this unresolved sibling rivalry crap from his childhood? Like he can't or won't confront Matthew, so he vents his anger on Michael instead.
Alex: Yes, but you eventually ended up bearing the brunt of it. And that's not fair to you, is it?
Joyce: I made a judgement call that was wrong. I wasn't prepared to be the kind of woman who would simply sit back and say, oh that's the issue that would upset my man so I cannot talk about it. I saw a problem that I could fix, rather than a problem that I had to stay the hell away from. I could have easily just told him what he wanted to hear, I could have easily just put down Michael and begged for forgiveness for my folly. I could have pleaded ignorance and claimed that I was confused, that I didn't know what I was doing but somehow that just wasn't the kind of thing I would do. In hindsight, I bit off more than I could chew, perhaps I was very naive in thinking that as a loving partner I could fix that part of Paul's life by forcing him to confront his feelings about his brother Matthew. So many people simply don't deal with their feelings, they don't talk about it, it festers in their heart like a toxic poison and when the pain gets too much, they turn to alcohol, drugs or other ways to let out or forget the pain. Paul drank heavily and smoked a lot. I've been through my share of challenges in my life - I didn't have an easy childhood and as an Asian woman working in the male, white dominated world of banking, I have to control my feelings all the time otherwise I'll just be totally consumed by negativity and self-doubt. Well, hindsight is 2020 of course, perhaps I pushed Paul too hard to face his demons but I was pretty sure that he saw Michael as some kind of convenient scapegoat for him to vent all his feelings about his brother Matthew, thus he projected all these accusations onto Michael because he was never going to confront his own brother.
Joyce: No. He didn't. Like, they were both older than Paul and roughly the same age, well Michael is still a few years older than Matthew but what was Paul going to do, project his insecurities and angst onto any white man roughly the age of his brother? I wasn't prepared to back down I suppose out of pride. Things got quite confrontational and Paul was screaming things like, why don't you just run back to Michael since you're obviously still so in love with him? Common sense should have told me that when the man you're supposed to be in love with you speaks to you like that, it's time to walk away but I was so wrapped up in the idea of me "fixing" him that I had detached myself from the abuse and was playing shrink with him in spite of the fact that he clearly wanted to end our relationship. I have learnt my lesson, it is unfortunate that I had to learn it the hard way but hindsight is 2020. There was one night that he sent me a whole lot of abusive texts, then I thought I'm not going to respond to that, I just couldn't deal with it right at that moment, I didn't know what to say to him. Then the next morning I woke up, re-read the texts and thought, whom am I kidding? All this time I had been putting up with all this abuse because I kept telling myself that this was not his fault, so I shouldn't blame him for acting this way - but that's bullshit of course. I should have never allowed him to treat me like that in the first place. I realized that this relationship is so over and that was when I decided it was time to draw a line, stop fooling myself and walk away from Paul. I can only look back at my actions and shake my head in utter disbelief - I can't believe what I did.
Alex: Can we talk about the issue of insecurities and how that can really wreck havoc in a relationship? You have mentioned that you had learned your lesson, can you be a bit more specific about what those lessons were, please?
Joyce: You can never look at a person and make any assumptions about their self-esteem. On the surface, Paul is super rich, very good looking and has a successful career. On the other hand, he is hugely insecure and has so many demons from his past that he has failed to deal with - society is very unforgiving to people like that I'm afraid and at the risk of sounding as if I am still defending Paul, I think he is a victim. If someone like Paul were to say that there as something from his childhood bothering him, most people would be unsympathetic - they would brand him a spoilt brat, they would tell him to get over it and berate him for still bearing a grudge against people who wronged him years ago. I don't think many people would take the trouble to actually even begin to understand why he may feel this way, but they're often very simplistic in their approach - you can't change the past, so why continue to be upset about something that happened so many years ago? That's why Paul never felt comfortable talking about his childhood - he probably felt that people would never offer him any sympathy, especially since he was so rich and they would never get their heads around the fact that rich people have their share of problems too but of course, these problems are nothing to do with money and often money can't solve these problems. Paul hid his self-esteem issues really well but once I scratched beneath that veneer of fine manners and decorum, I opened up a whole can of worms from his past and I wasn't prepared to deal with it all.
Joyce: I can never tell for sure. I had my share of problems growing up but somehow I managed to figure a lot of things out on my own as an adult - I think we call that growing up, but we just make the assumption that somehow, as we get older, we just manage to make sense of a lot of complex issues in life without anyone actually explaining to us how it all works. There's an element of truth to that but some people have better social skills than others and they are the ones who are much better at working things like that out for themselves. Look at me, I came from a humble working class family in Malaysia, I have little in my younger days to feel proud about but somehow I emerged as an adult with healthy self-esteem, able to function with enough self-confidence. Feeling confident doesn't depend on having achieved great things, having a lot of money or many friends - you need to give yourself the permission to feel confident and that comes from learning to love yourself, to give yourself credit for the things you have done. I hate it when I see people looking for approval from others - be it from their parents, their friends, on social media; like, why can't they just give themselves the approval if that's what they're looking for? Why can't they trust themselves and their own judgement? That really messed Paul up, he never got the approval he wanted from his parents and brother and so he became rather insecure whenever he thought that someone didn't respect or like him enough, or didn't give him enough credit for what he has achieved.
Alex: You were motivated by love. You saw that he was in pain and thought that you had a way to help free him from that pain - that is not a bad thing, you were not malicious. Things didn't work out because he wasn't prepared to accept your help but you can't blame yourself for having tried to help the man you loved. You only did what you thought was right.
Joyce: You know, I have friends say to me that Paul's irrational reaction shows that he can be volatile, jealous and difficult to deal with when he feels his ego being undermined or when he doesn't get his way; they say that I am better off without him. There's a part of me that agrees with that sentiment given how caustic the relationship turned in the end, but I was very much in love with him. And that's the third lesson I have learnt: you can't go into a relationship and say, "okay I like these things about you, but I don't like those other things," then try to fix those things you don't like. No, if you love someone, you have to accept them for all their imperfections and faults, warts and all. Sure people do evolve, grow and mature during a long term relationship but you allow them to do that on their own free will, rather than try to shape them into the perfect partner you want. You can be there for them, support them, give them all the love and encouragement they need if they wish to improve themselves, but they have got to want to do it - you can't make them do it for you, to please you. I suppose I did see a part of Paul I didn't like and I decided to fix it the same way I would fix a problem at work. I can't help it, that's just the kind of person I am: when there is clearly a problem, I feel I need to do something about it but resolving a problem in a business is not the same as dealing with another human being you're in a relationship with. There were many other great things about Paul that made me fall in love with him in the first place and once I had opened this can of worms, I suppose in hindsight I should have not try to fix it despite my instincts to want to.
Joyce: Well, I used to think that Paul was out of my league but now I don't think that way anymore. This whole concept about society having this standardized way of judging what kind of spouse or partner you deserve based on your looks, wealth and brains that's all bullshit designed to make you feel inferior. It's easy to find someone you fancy, it's so rare for two people to like each other that way and if you happen to find someone you have that special chemistry with to create the magic of love, then all the rules get thrown out of the window instantly. Let's just say I've seen enough unusual relationships that break the mould to demonstrate that the rules that our parents had lived by no longer apply in this day and age. I got a taste of what it was like to live that kind of crazy rich lifestyle and boy, that was sweet but I'm not poor. I have simply gone back to being ordinary middle class - I'll now fly economy class when I travel, I'll miss flying around in first class. I'll go back to using AirBNB when I want to book somewhere to stay, I won't be able to afford the suites at that Mandarin Oriental anymore. That initial shock made me want to be wealthy, but not to depend on a man to buy me nice things and take me to nice places: I want to make my own money, I want to become so successful at what I do that I can be that rich. That gave me renewed focus on my career and I am now ever so determined to be successful at what I do.
Alex: I have to ask this question, did Paul have a big problem with the fact that you were seeing a married man? Perhaps Paul's father or mother had an affair and that just made him hate anyone who would be involved in anything like that?
Joyce: A lot of people could say that, like I am some kind of Wendi Deng type who was a home wrecker, the younger Chinese woman who goes out of her way to seduce the rich white man. But I must stress, Michael's marriage was over a long time before I had even met him and there's a huge difference between a husband having an affair behind his wife's back, without her knowledge and what Michael was doing. It was not like Michael was lying to his wife, "honey I'll be working late again tonight" when he was with me; she knows exactly when Michael is with me and she didn't care or mind as long as Michael adhered to their childcare schedule, so she could see her boyfriends on the days when she didn't have to take care of the children. You could argue that this whole charade is not necessarily the best thing for their children, but for some reason they agreed that they didn't want to subject their children to any kind of traumatic change like that so I respect that. A lot of people would say, "oh your marriage has clearly fallen apart, it's better to make a clean break and get a divorce, loads of children live through that and come out okay." But one thing that is clear to me is that even though Michael and his wife no longer love each other the same way, they are both still completely devoted to their children and are not willing to compromise on the quality of their childhood; so they have arrived at this uneasy status quo. I have even met her a few times, it was all very civilized and polite. I don't think she and I would ever become best friends who will hang out or go shopping together, but there's no acrimony whatsoever. She doesn't hate me and I don't resent her. I can understand why some people may find that whole situation unusual, well, because it is rather unusual.
Alex: So are you actively looking for love now? What will the future hold for you?
Joyce: It's complicated. I'm currently married to my career, I'm determined to succeed and things are going well at work despite everything that happened with Paul. But that means working so freaking hard that I don't really have the time to start dating someone properly and that's where Michael comes in - he's familiar, he's there, he's all I need and he feels the same way about me. It's convenient: he has his kids to take care of, he has his career and he only has a little bit of time for me - but that's enough for me as that's all I want and need right now. But look, I didn't go on a dating app to try to find love: I just kinda ran into both Michael and Paul by accident, purely by chance simply by having an active social life and that's exactly what I intend to go on doing. I hate it when people think that oh you're a woman in your 30s, you're going to have to hurry up if you want to marry and have children before you get too old. If it happens, it happens: I look at Michael and his wife and I think, hell no, do I want to end up in a situation like that by rushing into a marriage and then regretting it after there are children involved? It all gets so complicated and messy - I'm not against the idea of getting married and settling down, having a family but I'm terrified as hell of ending up in a loveless marriage like Michael. I have friends who are stuck in loveless marriages, they just end up focusing all their energies on their children and careers, but they are effectively married to someone they are no longer physically intimate with nor do they really love and that is pretty darn scary to me. I'll rather be single and dating, than to end up like that. My parents keep nagging at me to settle down soon but fuck that, they can think whatever they want - oh it's not like they had a particularly happy marriage either.
Joyce: I think one final lesson that I have learnt is that you can never get into a relationship looking for someone to complete you or to fix you.When I was with Paul, I thought my life was complete - like I was going to marry into this fabulously rich, upper class family and that I could finally be proud of myself and hold my head up high; I thought I was like a caterpillar who had finally become a butterfly. But what was that based on - the fact that Paul found me attractive enough to want to get into a relationship with me? It was all based on pleasing one person and that's dangerous. I don't want to base my entire self-esteem and success in life down to that one person granting it to me because the man who gave it to me can take it away anytime as well. When I realized just how emotionally unstable and irrational he could be, it dawned on me that this was not the kind of man I should depend on to feel like I have achieved something. Whereas if I achieved success in my career, I can say, even if I don't work for this company, there are plenty of other companies out there who will gladly hire me because I am very good at what I do. I have the confidence to believe in my abilities and that's why I am focusing on my career right now, because even if say my employer decides to make me redundant tomorrow then I would be like, so what, I'll just take a holiday and find another job - it won't be the end of the world for me. But I realized that as I left Paul, I walked away from all his money and the kind of privileged associated with being with someone like that and no, you don't want to depend on anyone else but yourself. That's quite an important lesson.
Alex: Thanks so much for sharing your story with us.
Alex: Thanks! Happy holidays.
Correct me if I understand wrongly, this "Joyce" is married to her job and not ready to get attached or married to anyone. But then this super rich guy like Paul or Michael comes into her life and suddenly she is thinking of marriage? What happened to being married to your job? Can't you at least be consistent women?
ReplyDeleteI'm not calling her a gold digger but if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
OK I can't speak on her behalf but from what I have gathered through the long conversations I've had with her (not all of which has made it into the article which is already too long admittedly), here's the way she is thinking. She is attractive, she is well educated, she has a good job, so she feels she has the right to set her expectations very high in terms of what kind of man she wishes to marry. If she settled for someone average - then she feels she is shortchanging herself. It's very much an Asian way of thinking I'm afraid, we are afraid of being shortchanged.
DeleteI had that same thinking back in the day after I got my A level results and I refused to go to NUS (my parents didn't want me to study abroad) as I thought, arts & social science at NUS is a dumping ground for people with lousy grades, I wanted to do an arts degree but I had excellent results - I would have been 'forced' to contemplate doing something like law (which wasn't really for me) or go abroad in order to avoid being shortchanged. Likewise, I remember some years back being offered another job but the money wasn't what I had expected - I quite literally felt shortchanged, even though I liked the company and the role, I had to say no because of this strong feeling about being 'shortchanged' for what I am worth.
Is that fear of being shortchanged so hard to understand? Heck, when I am lining up to pay for my groceries at the shop, I actually work out exactly what I am handing over and what my change should be before even saying hi to the cashier, so I can avoid being shortchanged. It's just a force of habit. I do the sums mentally as a reflex.
Likewise, in terms of Joyce, I don't think she's a gold digger per se (you may disagree of course) but she is definitely afraid of being shortchanged - by that token, she really isn't that unique.
Oh don't get me wrong I'm not against golddiggers they are in the market because there is a demand for them. Just like Melania Trump and countless other social escorts out there, they provide a crucial service to old and/or ugly men.
DeleteBut when Joyce tries to defend herself it just doesn't gel with me. How about you just call your self a whore or a gold digger and stop with the intellectual dishonesty Joyce? You don't want to be known as one then don't accept Paul's money. Simple as that. Pay for your own meals and flight ticket, after all you work in banking and earn a respectable salary.
I know some Western women who always go Dutch even during the dating phase because they don't want to own the guy anything, and I respect them for it. But what grinds my gears are Asian women who expect the guy to pay for everything and them say they are "just friends" and there is nothing to it. They are whores, and I call em as I see em.
Hmmmm. I can't speak on her behalf but allow me to make a few points:
Delete1. People like Paul have access to a bottomless pot of money - they regularly spend money on their friends and it makes them happy to be able to do so. Joyce would have blown a whole month's salary on a first class air ticket or a suite at a 5-star hotel; there was just no way she could have kept up with the kind of spending habits of Paul even if she was earning $20,000 a month because Paul was spending $20,000 a night. So what you suggested wouldn't have worked out as Joyce couldn't keep up with Paul. Joyce may be rich, but you fail to realize that Paul is off the scale crazy rich (as portrayed in the film CRA). People like Paul simply don't live like us ordinary folks, so he would simply say, "don't be silly, let me pay for it." Mind the gap, there's a huge difference between folks like me who are 'comfortable' and those who are crazy rich. People like Joyce and I are not crazy rich, not yet anyway.
2. Joyce and Paul were properly boyfriend/girlfriend - they were together for approx 18 months.
3. By Joyce's own admission, she did say many times that she thought Paul was out of her league.
1. Its Paul's perogative to spend money on his friends or fwbs. But Joyce has personal agency, she could refuse anything to accept his gifts.
Delete2. So? During courtship phase with my wife we split costs I paid for travel and hotel expenses and she paid for food and drinks. She might not have liked it being from the very patriarchal society called China. But I set the tone early on in the relationship that there was no free lunch (even though I could afford it and frequently paid entertainment expenses in ktvs).
3. Then stop being with him, its not really that difficult correct?
4. One of my best friends Chris is very similar to Paul / Michael - good grief. Long story about mochi, I love mochi / muachee (yes I am so Asian) and he said, "it has been ages since I've had it" and I suggested buying some from the Asian supermarket and he made this face like, "is it safe? Would I get food poisoning?" Turns out that people like that don't even buy anything from an ordinary supermarket. He only shops at like the finest stores and they deliver to his house. Eeeeks.
DeleteChoaniki - you're going down the line of argument that is, "Joyce didn't do what I did with my wife, so she MUST be wrong." You seem to use your own experiences as the only benchmark - I find that disturbing because there's really no other basis for your argument.
DeleteOf course, you make the rules you wanna make for your relationship, that's your prerogative. But there's so much reference to "I did this, I did that, with my wife it was like this, with my wife I did that etc" I can't help but feel that you're only judging Joyce because she a) didn't do what you did and b) didn't do what your wife did rather than for any other basis. You seem to have a huge problem with Joyce accepting Paul's gifts and money - it's not like she demanded the money from Paul, he offered it unconditionally and she accepted it. I don't actually think I have a problem with that. It's a private arrangement between two individuals and they're both consenting adults.
And forgive me for being blunt, I can't help but feel that perhaps you have a problem with relationships like that because you are a straight man who isn't in a position to treat a lady like that. Perhaps I'm wrong. But I think you're cynical of relationships where the rich man pays for the lady to enjoy luxuries that she cannot otherwise afford. Personally, I don't have a problem with that as they are two consenting adults and what they do is nobody's business but their own, so I don't even think we should judge them.
DeleteLet me iterate again I have no problems with Joyce accepting money. My problem is with her dishonesty, that's all.
DeleteShe had been totally honest with me. I think you have a problem with women who have very high standards. It's a Chinese thing. I think Chinese men are always very intimidated by highly educated women who earn more than them.
DeleteIn any case, one's earnings is not fixed for the rest of your life. When I met my partner, he earned more than me as I was still at university and hence had virtually no income. Now I earn several times what he earns because I have struck success in corporate finance whilst he's an engineer, so my earnings can skyrocket exponentially whilst that can't happen with an engineer. We have a joint account at the bank - but quite frankly, our financial affairs are nobody's business but our own.
Joyce would only consider marriage if she meets a man that meets her high standards. She would never consider marrying someone like you because you do not meet her criteria. I think that upsets you, perhaps that thought emasculates you and you're upset with her on that basis; so you are calling her a gold digger when really, all she has done is set the bar very high and refused to compromise on standards. It is her life, her body, her right to choose whom she wishes to marry and what kind of criteria she sets and if you fail to meet her high standards, then tough - find someone with lower standards. Sounds like you've met someone like Joyce before and she really got under your skin.
I think it is up to each individual to decide whether or not they wish to pay for the other person in the relationship and if one person offers and the other accepts, well that's a private transaction between two consenting adults and it is not for anyone to label the party that accepted the money as a gold digger. But more to the point, Choaniki is upset that a woman like Joyce would only date rich man and not someone who isn't rich (oh, like him, for example) and thus he is mortally offended by her and labels her a gold digger. But I don't think that Joyce is specifically out to marry a rich man per se (please note that she earns a lot of money herself, she just isn't crazy rich). Rather, I think it's a matter of being afraid of being 'shortchanged' in a relationship. We all want a good deal, whether it's us shopping for for clothes, looking at a menu in a restaurant or looking for someone to date. Joyce happens to be beautiful, well educated and successful in her career so she has set the bar very, very high for anyone who wants to date her - so if I may be blunt, she would dismiss people like a janitor, a male nurse or Choaniki for that matter as 'not worthy'; of course, to be labeled 'not worthy' is probably very hurtful, to be put in that category, so he is lashing out at her, calling her a gold digger because one could argue that true love shouldn't be based on how rich you are or how much you earn. But come on, in this day and age, a lot of people will consider how much their partners earn before even considering if they are boyfriend/girlfriend material.
Delete@Sandra consider me cautious but I haven't heard many good stories about marriages so I remain pessimistic about women who say they aren't gold diggers but refuse to pay their own share.
DeleteSingapore's very first techopreneur, Sim Wong Hoo is still single because he calls equates marriage to the singing of 2 blank cheques. On the other hand we have people like Jamie Chua whose ex-husband probably regretted marrying. She is costing him 300k in alimony (should have been called all the money) every month. She fought and got her husband's assets frozen at one point since he refused to continue paying alimony.
Now I'm sure she was very pretty back in the day as an ex-stewardess. But no pussy is worth that much money, to put it bluntly.
On the other hand we have my good friend who used to be very rich. He lived in a bungelow growingup. He married a Japanese wife. Their marriage didn't last and she divorced him shortly and ran off with an older married man who was also very rich. In this case she paid him back her half of the costs for the marriage. Of course I would still consider her a gold digger since she literally threw herself at the other man's foot (she went to stay with him at his house in the middle of one night). But at least she had some integrity.
Of course it is any ones perogative who they want to be with and marry but at the end of the day women who say they aren't gold diggers yet throw themselves at rich married men are just intellectually dishonest.
Choaniki - in case you have forgotten the details of Joyce's story, once she found out that Paul was upset about Michael, she could have just said, "you're right, I'm wrong, I'm sorry" and that would have been the end of the matter. Instead, she saw a man who was torn apart by unresolved crap from his bad relationship with his family which led to him projecting his insecurity and jealousy onto other people and she tried to get him to face his demons. Of course, he didn't want to and resented her for it - so the relationship fell apart as a result.
DeleteDid it occur to you for a moment that if Joyce was only interested in Paul for his money, she would have done whatever she could to keep him happy until they got married (then she would be financially secure, even if it ended in divorce, she could still get alimony)? No, instead she did what she thought was the right thing without considering if it would result in her losing Paul and his money. Clearly she was not motivated by money, she was motivated by love as she could have chosen a different path that would allow her to stay with Paul - but that would have meant putting up with his irrational behaviour and jealousy (and she's not prepared to do that, not even for money).
The bottom line is, she walked away from his millions. That's not the kind of behaviour that a genuine gold digger would do. Look at Melania Trump for example - now a lot of people who are insiders actually say that she's a lot smarter than she comes across, it's just that she speaks English with a thick accent and makes some errors now and then (it is a foreign language for her), so people perceive her as not very bright but make no mistake, she's extremely intelligent.
But would she start criticizing Trump and all the crap he does? No, cos he would replace her with a younger, more beautiful bimbo who would keep her mouth shut and not criticize him. She wants his millions, so she keeps her mouth shut, smiles and looks pretty next to him.
Now that's a real gold digger.
@LIFT so are you saying that gold diggers are on a spectrum? All jokes aside, I'm not sure about your understanding about females in general. They tend to say one thing and mean the other.
DeleteIf we were to take Joyce at the face value of her words then she wouldn't be considered a gold digger. But do you know what she really thinks? So best way to judge her is based on her actions.
I don't pretend to know that I understand my spouse completely. I have alot of female colleagues and even they don't mean what they say. I recently got a complaint that I didn't work harder than my female counterpart on the same shift. Apparently there was some sort of difficult case and when I offered to go handle it my colleague said it was ok that she would handle it. But she didn't mean it of course and I was supposed to reject that offer.
During an informal "interrogation" after that complaint, my female manager straight up told me males were traditionally supposed to lift heavier loads and handle all the difficult cases without question.
So gender roles were still a thing in SG. I'm not surprised that the general sentiment in SG is that females expect a male to pay everything during courtship otherwise they would break it off.
Hi Choaniki - I've not lived in Singapore for 21 years now so I can only take at face value what you have told me about the attitudes towards gender roles there. Which is fine, but please do bear in mind that Joyce's story took place here in London and not Singapore.
DeleteFurthermore, the fact is Joyce walked away from Paul's millions by choosing to try to deal with those problems, rather than shutting her mouth and smiling (which is what Melania Trump does). What Joyce did is the complete opposite of what a gold digger would do - if you wish to judge her by her actions. As for what you claim about women saying one thing and meaning the other - that is a very sexist and even misogynistic statement that even I find quite offensive as a man.
My opinion is that there are people out there who say one thing and mean another - but that's down to the way two individuals trust each other and communicate, if there's trust, then they will be honest but if there isn't, then they will either withhold the truth or even go out of their way to mislead/deceive the other party. I'm a big fan of the reality TV programme called "The Mole" - too long to describe here, it's a fantastic programme based entirely on trust and it explores the group dynamics whilst dangling a huge cash prize to see the lengths the players would go to in order to win that prize. If you go to far and alienate everyone by stabbing everyone in the back early in the game, then you'll be eliminated and can't win - in order to progress in the game, you need friends, you need alliances, you need to have a bond with some other players and agree to help each other. It's a brilliant format which has been done various countries: US, UK, Australia, France, Netherlands, Spain and Belgium. It is interesting to see within even a small group of 10 people, how the dynamics of trust works when they know they have to form some alliances and trust some people when there can only be one winner who walks away with the huge cash prize. Yeah, in a game like that, you don't know whom to trust but you have to trust someone but even within such a context, you can see how the good players know how to build genuine trust within such a difficult environment and they are the ones who usually go on to win (or survive till nearly the end).
If you are having problems building trust with females, then I say there are two possibilities:
1. The females you're encountering are the problem - but not all women are like that.
2. The problem actually lies with you - you are not good at establishing this trust in the relationship but you turn around and blame all women instead of looking in the mirror.
Either way, watching the programme makes it very clear how some people are good at building relationships whilst others are not. It is the former who go on to win the game, not the latter. And whose fault is that?
Oh, the programme is also known as 'Who is the mole' in some countries (such as in Holland: Wie is de mol?) whilst in other places it is just 'the mole' (as in Belgium: De Mol). I note that Survivor - another reality TV programme - works on the same basis of trust and building relationships when only one person can win.
DeleteYou really could have gone down the route of claiming that true love shouldn't be bound by arbitrary rules like, "I won't date a man who earns less than me (or whatever benchmark a lady wishes to set)" - that the kind of romantic chemistry involving two people when they fall in love shouldn't be bound by rules like that. After all, in the movie Crazy Rich Asians, almost everyone in Nick Young's family thought that Rachel wasn't good enough for him and assumed she was a gold digger when she never even knew that Nick was rich when they first fell in love. But such is life - sometimes you just meet someone randomly and fall in love, then you start finding out things about them like whether they are rich or poor, or even married/single/divorced/it's complicated etc. You have just gone out of your way to attack Joyce for choosing to set her standards quite high and labeling her a gold digger which is simply inaccurate. Look she has been hurt, she has learnt her lesson and the way she thinks she can prevent herself from getting hurt in the future is to be more careful and that means raising the bar even higher - that is not what a genuine gold digger would do. I just see a woman who is scared of getting hurt again. You seem to have dealt with some women in Singapore who have been difficult with you in the past - but your reaction seems to be putting every bit of blame on 'females' in general rather than looking in the mirror and analyzing where you could have gone wrong. So are you Mr Perfect who has never made a mistake? I don't think so, no you're not. You're already making a huge mistake by refusing to acknowledge any wrongdoing on your part.
@LIFT, i think this comment thread has gone on long enough so we have to agree to disagree. As for whether my comments are sexist we shall let history and the readers decide.
DeleteThe recent #metoo scandal is probably the result of women sending mixed signals. And i won't generalise that all women are like that or that all the women in the #metoo movement are necessarily fighting for the same thing. But i think 2 guys arguing over the internet will do nothing to solve the problem. Or if we can even get down to identify the entire root cause in the first place.