Friday, 19 October 2012

Q&A: Bursary vs Scholarship

I am having a busy afternoon but I really want to address a question that some Singaporeans have been asking on social media regarding the Alvivi case. It goes like this, "why was Alvin Tan awarded a scholarship even though his family is relatively rich?" There are so many issues I'd like to deal with but one at a time.

My family is also relatively rich - yet I was given three scholarships. My parents were teachers and my dad's family is fairly rich. My were grandparents owned so many acres of rubber estate in Johor and were one of the richest families in their town in rural Johor. My late uncle is a Datuk who was good friends with the sultan of Johor. I grew up in a terraced house in Ang Mo Kio - upstairs, downstairs, 4 huge bedrooms, garden, patio, driveway, garage/parking area, big backyard. My parents had no problem putting my two older siblings through NUS, they paid full whack. In short, I was not poor - my parents had plenty of money.  In fact, my dad has bought another condominium in Khatib on top of the terrace house he already owns. Yet I was given three scholarships back to back. Why?
Who do you think should get the scholarships?

Let me explain the difference between a scholarship and a bursary. Here are some definitions to help us out:

Scholarship - A scholarship is an award of financial aid for a student to further their education. Scholarships are awarded on various criteria, which usually reflect the values and purposes of the donor or founder of the award. Scholarship money is not required to be repaid
Bursary -  the term has become synonymous with monetary awards made by some institutions to individuals or groups of people who cannot afford to pay full fees

I must point out that the definitions are in fact a lot clearer in Chinese (apologies to those of you who don't speak Chinese, but trust me and follow this through with me). In Chinese the translation for scholarship is 奖学金 - individually the characters mean 'award', 'study/student' and 'gold' - but together it means 'scholarship. A bursary on the other hand 助学金 - 助 means 'help'.
A scholarship is very different from a bursary.

Note that for a scholarship, the selection criteria does not usually include the relative wealth of the scholar's family. Instead, it is a big investment for the awarding organisation. In Alvin Tan's case, the scholarship came directly from the university rather than a private or governmental organisation which would've expected the scholar to have worked for the organisation for 6 or 8 years to work off the bond. This is actually fairly common practice - many universities do give out scholarships like that without any kind of bond. Why do they do so?

Don't forget, there is fierce competition amongst universities at the top of the food chain. In the UK, a student with straight As would be wooed by the top 5 universities and certainly, each of these universities would want to attract such great students. If you get someone who is already brilliant, who has already proven himself - then you don't need to polish that diamond for it is already sparkling. This is why top universities like Oxford and Cambridge produce such great results - but is it any wonder if they are already receiving the very best students from every cohort?  A way to make sure that brilliant students chooses your university over your rivals is by offering scholarships. In fact, the top universities all do that so if you are in a privileged position to be wooed by them, then you can actually pick and choose which scholarship is the most generous and has the best conditions.
The best universities are competing for the best students too.

By that token, these scholarships are going to the best students, the most brilliant ones - rather than the most 'deserving' ones. Some of these universities do also give out bursaries to help students who have made the grade to earn themselves a place at the university but are struggling to pay the fees, but bursaries are usually less generous than the scholarships. Let me give you an example:

A student has earned herself a place at a university. It costs her a total of £13,000 a year at the university - but her parents are not working because they both have cancer. They have managed to find half the money - £6500 so the university says, "Okay because of your very difficult family situation, we want to help you. We will offer you the other £6500 to enable you to study here." Yes there is an element of charity here - the more tragic the circumstances, the more generous the bursary. Universities often do have an element of bursary/charity as part of their admissions procedure because it is good PR to help out poor students with difficult family circumstances. Students are evaluated in the basis of need, rather than merit.

That's very different from a scholarship - which is like a bribe to get the best talent to study at your university instead of your rivals' universities. These universities believe that some of these scholars will go on to do great things and bring glory to their alumni - given that I have not yet become famous or won the Nobel prize, my university is probably rather disappointed in how I turned out. But they take that all in their stride, they are not expecting every scholar to go on to become a president or win the Nobel prize. The process is like a princess who kisses many frogs and if one in twenty or one in fifty turns into a prince, then that's a pretty good hit rate.
Yup, I was a waste of money as far as my university is concerned. 

The fact that I have chosen a rather senang diri lifestyle, valuing fun over ambition, that would probably indicate that the university probably should've given my scholarship to someone else who was willing to work a lot harder and driven by far more ambition. But hey, like Alvin, I am a good actor and knew how to tell the interview panel exactly what they wanted to hear in order to secure my scholarship. I may be lazy but I am also crafty and know how to get what I want.

You may say to me, "Hey Limpeh, given that your family isn't poor and could've paid for your university education, aren't you depriving a student from a poor family a chance to go to university by accepting a scholarship you didn't need?" Well, I went through the scholarship route, not the bursary route. I remember another Singaporean scholar who also received a scholarship from my university - him and I knew each other from NS as we were in the same unit for a few months. His family was far richer than mine. I remember how he used to give me a lift in his BMW and I was like, "wow, you have such a beautiful car!" And he would reply, "It's my dad's not mine. But he has a few cars so I get to use the ones he is not using." Yes he was ridiculously rich, but he was also a ridiculously intelligent student from RJC as well. Our university was interested in his potential as a human being, that was why they gave him a scholarship. Poor students who experience financial difficulties can always go through the bursary route and tap into a different pot of money but let's be clear: there are two different pots of money for two very different purposes.
And as for the relative morality of me accepting a scholarship - hey, I earned it fair & square. Anyone could've applied for that scholarship, I fought for it and won it. I suppose very few people actually are in a position to receive competing offers of scholarships from top universities or competing job offers from top companies - that's why they confuse a scholarship with a bursary. I suppose there are some people who may think, "hey it's not fair, rich people shouldn't be allowed to get scholarships. They have rich parents, they are smart - don't they have enough of an advantage already?!" I have news for you. Life just isn't fair - get used to it. Scholarships are an investment on the part of the university, it is not meant to level the playing field for poorer students.

I do think that NUS has some questions to answer but they are really barking up the wrong tree with this whole sex scandal. The fact is Alvin has said on camera during an interview that he has no interest in pursuing law and wants to pursue instead a career in showbiz. "Probably something in the entertainment industry - anything that allows me to be famous. Yeah I like being famous.... Law is definitely not for me, I struck that one out in year one at law school already. You gotta make your parents happy sometimes."
So ... how could you have given a law scholarship to someone who wasn't even sure he wanted to do law to begin with? I have a friend who is currently in NUS law and she is working so hard to make her dreams come true - she spent her holidays during her JC days doing unpaid internships at some of the law firms in Singapore and good grief, if you're going to give out law scholarships, give it to students who definitely 100% sure wanna go into law - not someone who (like Alvin) is just doing it to please his parents but has no intention to go through with it. For me, this is the real issue - his sex blog is just a red herring!
So there you go, I hope this article has cleared up any confusion between a scholarship and a bursary. You may argue that universities should give out more bursaries and less scholarships - but that's up to each university to decide for themselves what is right for them. I don't judge them, I am just explaining to you how the system works. Any questions, please leave a comment - thanks.

PS. I am off to Somerset to spend the weekend in the countryside, here are the photos.
For more on the Alvivi Saga:
http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/in-defence-of-vivian-lee.html
http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-double-standards-of-singaporeans.html
http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/doing-it-alvivi-style-alvin-tan-vivian.html


8 comments:

  1. Hi LIFT,

    Sorry to say this. By sharing what you just did about your wealthy family background, you have just devalued your past arguments using yourself as an example of social mobility, a.k.a. "work smart and you will move up in the world". You are not a typical Ang Mo Kio "ah beng" -- a typical Ang Mo Kio resident in the 80's and 90's lived in HDB apartments, not "terraced house in Ang Mo Kio - upstairs, downstairs, 4 huge bedrooms, garden, patio, driveway, garage/parking area, big backyard".

    In fact, you have just unwittingly supported the concept that social inequities lead to different outcome. E.g. Many years ago, I met an intelligent young man at a Mensa event. From what I understood, he had discipline issues and was rebellious as a child, but his parents were too poor to spare time (i.e. busy making ends meet) to address those issues. As a result his academic performance suffered and neither of his parents were educated nor spoke enough English/Mandarin to be of any help nor could they afford to pay for help. When he was streamed into Monolingual stream in Primary school, neither he nor his parent knew how to navigate the education system to get him a second chance. No need to explain what going down the monolingual stream in Singapore leads to, since you know the Singapore education system well and your knee-jerk reactions to frustrating people tend to be, "you probably didn't get much of an education did you? People like you never made it to university, no way. You're so on the wrong end of the IQ bell curve, how disappointed are your parents? I bet they wish you were just a little bit brighter, I feel sorry for them. I bet you weren't exactly the brightest kid in the class back when you were at school otherwise you won't end up doing a shitty job" I hope you realize the fallacy of your knee-jerk reaction by now.

    Back then, I felt sorry for that youth who seemed quiet and defeated -- i.e. seeking instead an internal balance by lowering his own dreams/expectations. Afterall, from what I gather, the monolingual or ITE or Normal students are often discouraged, looked down upon and discriminated against by their teachers; in addition, others in society "remind them of their place" in the totem pole especially when they start out on the low-end jobs -- it takes extraordinary self-belief, tenacity and perseverance to break out of that poverty cycle. Yeah, your often used illustration of the rich boy with parents in a car and poor boy pulling his parents in a rickshaw at the starting line of the race comes to mind.

    If it helps you to feel any better, some other successful people have also tried to lay claim to the "self-made man" image but got shot down by others. Notably, Mitt Romney is a recent example.
    http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/fox-news-megyn-kelly-spreads-propaganda
    http://www.politeonsociety.com/2012/08/29/the-self-made-man/
    http://www.salon.com/2012/09/18/mitt_romney_self_made_man/
    http://www.sheldensays.com/selfmaderomney.htm

    For sure there are others who excelled despite their relatively underprivileged background, but you cannot possibly count amongst them when using Singapore as a context. Credit must be given where due: you have clearly utilized the advantages of your birth and upbringing well to score your numerous scholarships to prestigious education and illustrious mulit-career and skills.

    That said, your other arguments and logic not based on yourself as an example still holds true.

    Hope you don't mind my honest 2 cents analysis/opinion.

    Cheers, WD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. Your honesty is perfectly ok with me WD. I don't think that the relative wealth of my family made that much of a difference, I probably had good genes with blessed me with certain talents and aptitude for sports, languages etc; that is something money cannot buy. I would also say I'm steetwise, crafty, even manipulative - again that's a useful trait that you can't buy with money. I look at my autistic nephew and its like we are throwing SO MUCH money at him, anything to help him but to no avail. What made more of a difference was my Tiger mum's slavedriver mentality when it came to our studies, again, what has that got to do with money? Sure money can buy you nice things in life, you can even give your child a fortune, but you can't buy them success if they don't make the most of what they're given.

      Delete
    2. Hi LIFT,

      I am currently busy. I will reply you with a longer comment or even a blog post on your statement, "I don't think that the relative wealth of my family made that much of a difference". For sure, you have your inborn strengths and character that you've listed above. That said, I am sorry that you do not seem to know how to count your blessings -- your numerous blessing from your privileged background.

      Meanwhile, here's something that maybe money can buy for your nephew. I saw it from a friend who has a son who is also autistic.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YRhaevfLDOY

      Best Regards, WD.

      Delete
    3. Well, WD, let's put it this way. Everything is relative, even though my family had the money to pay for my university school fees - I felt terribly disadvantaged coming from a Chinese speaking family and I had to change the way I talk, alter my accent and thank goodness I was born with incredible powers of mimicry and was able to learn so many things so quickly - such as social graces in polite company. My parents gave me none of the above given that they were a very ordinary Chinese speaking family in Singapore - they knew absolutely nothing about social graces when it came to polite British social norms. I was thrown in the deep end with British classmates who had been to places like Eton and the most exclusive private schools in Europe - believe you me, I did feel like a 3rd world refugee in their company. I learnt to adapt very, very quickly - that ability was something I was born with. I am crafty, manipulative, quite to adapt, observant ... if you have watched the film 'The Talented Mr Ripley', I'm not that different from Tom Ripley. And if you haven't watched that movie, you must so watch it. It's haunting, it's beautiful, it so got under my skin for it reminded me so much of what I had to do to adapt to a new life in Britain.

      And as for those who live in HDB flats in Ang Mo Kio, well you can compare them to their poorer counterparts in places like Cambodia, Laos, India or Nepal and say, see? They're so lucky to have the chance to grow up in Singapore - everything is relative.

      I think we all get a mixed bag of blessings and curses when we are born into a certain family. Money is great of course, but I also struggled with a terrible relationship with my parents. Like we argued every single day for years. We hated each other. The only way we could get along was by living in different continents. Now that's the kind of bullshit that no amount of money can solve.

      Delete
    4. Surely it is obvious that LIFT is not the typical ah beng from Ang Mo Kio? I mean, which ah beng from AMK needs to adapt himself to mix in with the other hokkien peng in NS?

      This is LIFT's blog, he writes whatever he fancies. I enjoy much of his articles and his global view point. But just like any blog, everything must not be taken at face value including the "typical ah beng from AMK" claim.

      Delete
    5. Oh yeah, I think you guys have to be more flexible about your definition of an Ah Beng. If you have a checklist of 10 characteristics that define an Ah Beng, do you need the man to have ticked all 10 boxes before you declare him an Ah Beng? What about someone who has ticked 8 or 9 out of 10 boxes?

      I am probably one of those who has ticked 7 or 8 out of 10 boxes - and I self-identify as an Ah Beng. For me, there is a certain Ah Beng mindset that makes him a more aggressive kind of guy who doesn't get pushed around, who will stand up for himself and wears his masculinity on his sleeve. The opposite is the Singaporean man who does get pushed around, doesn't stand up for himself and is a coward.

      Let me give you an example. I once read on Facebook this story about a Singaporean man who was walking in a park when an jogging Angmoh yelled at him, "get outta my way!" The coward with no balls stepped aside reluctantly and then went online to complain that there are too many foreigners in Singapore. What a typical ball-less Singaporean coward and there are too many such useless Singaporean men around. An Ah Beng would deliberately block the Angmoh and challenge him, "This is not your park, what's your problem motherfucker?"

      So for me, it's not so much a socio-economic definition of being Hokkien-speaking (I do speak Hokkien fluently mind you) or belonging to a certain socio-economic group (erm, I work in asset management, was just dealing with a difficult institutional investor before I wrote this comment) - but rather it is an Ah Beng mindset that I have in facing the challenges in my life. That is why I self-identify as an Ah Beng because of my attitude. For me, Ah Bengs represent a certain kind of Singaporean masculinity that I do identify with for I totally despise the Singaporean coward who lacks the courage to deal with a situation (such as the jogging Angmoh).

      I hope I've made myself clear.

      Delete
    6. Hi LIFT,

      I was hoping to have time to write on this over the weekend but have been. So here's my short answer for now.

      > I think we all get a mixed bag of blessings and curses when we are born into a certain family.

      Yes, I agree with you on that. However, I disagree with your statement that "I don't think that the relative wealth of my family made that much of a difference...". Every little advantage along the way adds up and snowball into a big advantage over the years. Read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers for examples supported by research.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outliers_(book)

      I think some who are born with a silver spoon have no idea how the poor and working class families survive. Talent is nothing if you don't have the money and opportunity to develop it. Classic example is my secondary schoolmate telling me that I can tap-dance too if I buy the shoes and attend classes. She was clueless that those shoes represented 1/2 (half) the cost that I paid for textbooks at the beginning of the secondary school year and it was way beyond what my family could afford. Even you language skills, would you have learned an additional language as a teen if your family cannot afford the extra textbooks and classes?
      http://winkingdoll.blogspot.ca/2011/11/friends-with-money.html

      A lack of talent can be mitigated if one has the financial resources to get a second chance, e.g. the lucky Singaporeans who did not make it to local universities but their families can afford to send them to overseas universities. Or the poor Singaporeans who can make it to university but their financial circumstances mean that they have to give up the opportunity.
      http://winkingdoll.blogspot.ca/2011/11/financially-poor-but-academically-above.html

      The problem with attitudes like "I don't think that the relative wealth of my family made that much of a difference...". is:

      1. when those born with a silver spoon mixes amongst themselves reinforcing ignorance of the challenges faced by the poor and working class. E.g. MP Michael Palmer who said, "Before I joined the grassroots organisation, I never knew there were poor people in developed countries." [Note: Ok the source is someone else's blog, but I remember clearly that he was quoted as saying that because it caused a furore in the online media at that time.]
      http://singaporedesk.blogspot.ca/2011/01/more-hard-truths-about-education-in.html

      2. and when such misconception of reality for the poorer classes; and the "self-ascribed factors of success", egocentric sense of self-superiority inbreeds in the upper/upper-middle classes a sense of entitlement for their own classes and contempt for those beneath them. The Wee father and daughter are classic examples. What was worst is that Mr Wee who had such views and made such statements was then an MP contributing to the legislative process -- one wonders what kind of laws he would support. E.g. If he saw social welfare as a money-waster rather than an investment to equalize social-obstacles that may otherwise hinder the development of skills for the underprivileged young Singapore citizens.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wee_Shu_Min_elitism_controversy

      The concept of analyzing the root cause (i.e. upstream thinking) of social determinants of health, education, employment, wealth, etc, matters. For sure there will be a rare few who will breakthrough despite the barriers, but studies have shown that having a capitalistic economy (meritocracy not withstanding) does not guarantee social mobility. Quote wikipedia: "At least five large studies in recent years have found that vertical inter-generational mobility is lower in America than in comparable nations, belief in America as a land of opportunity not withstanding."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_mobility#Country_comparison

      Your comment has inspired me to write a series to present the challenges faced by the working/poor in Singapore. I really hope I will have the time to get it done on my blog.

      Cheers, WD.

      Delete
  2. After my response to he Alvin story you penned, I also wanted to talk about scholarships and the Singaporean mindset to it.

    Your article here more or less again mirrors my views.

    Unlike you, I don't have a scholarship or degree, but that doesn't mean I am against those who get it and somehow or rather don't fulfil the 'expectations'.

    I actually know 1 or 2 scholars who gave up/broke the bond or like you simply said thank you very much and went their own way in life.

    Scholarships are like you said a lottery, unis (and colleges) offer them to boost their image besides perhaps also wanting to attract top talent who may not only go on to serve society but bring some glory back to the unis.

    But we are talking humans, and no 2 are alike. Some may go on and fulfil what the unis had in mind, but others may develop different pursuits in life and what the scholarship and unis offered may not be what the student wants to acquire out of life.

    Is it thus a waste? No. Even if the Govt offers it or in Alvin's case - ASEAN (be it a single govt or the whole ASEAN). When you offer something generally you don't ask back, even if it's a bond, and a student wants to break it - big deal. Why force that student to do something he doesn't want to? Deny a more deserving person? Nope, I don't think so.
    Scholarships are awarded based on a lot of that you mentioned and whoever offers them know full well that some may not honour them or those who do, may eventually leave or do something totally different.
    But there will also be others who will fulfil what was required or expected.

    However I think even those who leave or broke the bond, do not regret or condemn the scholarship, it was a positive thing in the first place and they are thankful for it.
    And some of these 'discards' (for want of a better word) do actually go on and become titans in industry and do give back to society in later life, in the same way that the scholarship had hoped to achieve all those years back.

    Do I regret Alvin getting this scholarship? Nope. He got it fair and square. Maybe after a few years, he finds it stifling or wants to take a break - as he has done now. Well that's ok too. As long as he's doing what he's happy with - I don't begrudge him that and I don't think his talent or abilities will diminish if he fails to honour the scholarship or if he chooses a different field.
    He may well go on and achieve great things in life with or without the scholarship, that choice is his, and his alone to make. If he gives back to ASEAN, well and good, if he doesn't, it's ok too, for there will be others who will.

    The important thing is not to deny people like him who have the ability and grade to make the scholarship, the opportunity of doing so.
    Like they say in football, if you keep creating chances, eventually you'll score a goal. If you don't create, you'll never score. Or simply put, if you don't buy or give someone a ticket, they'll never win the lottery. We gotta keep giving people a chance to win the lottery as far as scholarships go, and eventually we'll end up with winners.

    ReplyDelete