Wednesday, 25 July 2012

The pointlessness of tuition in Singapore

I was shocked by the article on Yahoo about how more than half the parents who engage tuition teachers spend over $500 a month. I had recently started my latest education series, dedicated to those starting university this autumn and I had just covered the issue of how some students struggle to shift gears when they try to adapt to life at university. There is a culture of over dependency on tuition teachers and this is ultimately detrimental to the future of your child.

Now this isn't a new topic on my blog as it is an issue I feel very strongly about - the Singaporean education system has gone very wrong. My parents are retired teachers who have taught in Singapore for their entirely lives - so I was able to observe over the years why the system is so inadequate and how the mindset of the parents and educators are wrong. Tuition is pointless. It is unnecessary and it serves very little purpose in the long run. If I am going to stick the dagger into tuition, then I have to tell you why it is so bad and I wish nothing more for this evil industry to disappear overnight so the children of Singapore can be spared the misery of tuition.
Do you know why tuition is ultimately pointless?
I wouldn't be so opposed to tuition if it did actually help the students - but the bottom line is that it doesn't, not in the long run! I am now going to give you 8 reasons why any short term benefits from tuition does not lead to any long term pay off.

1. University, adulthood and beyond

This was a topic I recently covered in my university season series - in part 2 of this series, I talked about Singaporean students who struggled to make the transition from JC mode to university mode because of the amount of spoon-feeding JC students receive in order to maximize their A-level results. Of course, everyone involved wants the best possible results from the teachers to the students to the parents - but there is a very myopic problem going on here.
Universities treat their students like adults, not children. 
At university, the student is expected to function as an adult rather than a child - no spoon feeding, no hand holding, the student has to think independently, solve his/her own problems rather than running to the teacher for instructions every step of the way. In the west, there simply isn't the culture of tuition - it is very much an East Asian thing. The vast majority of students in the UK get through their entire education without actually having had a single tuition lesson ever. I know what my parents would say, "wah these Angmor parents are so bad, don't care about their children's studies, so heartless, don't help their children, so bochup one". Well I actually believe it is far better for the child in the long run to have a more hands-off approach to their studies. Yes you should make sure that they are indeed spending enough hours doing their homework and revising for their exams, but to inflict hours of tuition on them is taking it too far. This is why Singaporean students tend to find university a real shock to the system whilst most British students who have done their A levels in the UK find the transition less stressful.

The analogy I would use is that of cycling - eventually when the students gets to university or into the workplace, the students have to function as an autonomous adult, able to seek the solutions to any problems that come their way without always running to the teacher or the manager for help. Singaporean students have the training wheels on their bicycles all the way up till A levels and when they try to cycle without them at university, some crash and fall pretty badly, never to get up again. Whilst some other luckier ones learn quickly and can adapt to cycling without the learning wheels. Why leave this to chance? Get rid of those training wheels early, the earlier the better. 
Those training wheels have got to come off at some stage. 
I know of this sad story from my mother's church. We knew this guy a few years older than me, let's call him Ben. He came from a very nice family with caring parents who made sure he had everything he needed to become a scholar - including tuition for all his subjects all the way till A levels. He aced his A levels and won himself a place at a top British university on a prestigious scholarship. Well, he crashed really badly in his first year as he was not the kind of student who could function autonomously. He had gone from JC where he enjoyed spoon feeding all the way to NS where all he had to do was follow orders without questioning them to a British university which had expected him to think and function autonomously. He was like a fish out of water - he spent so much time and effort on his essays only to have them thrown back at him by his tutors.

It turned out that Ben did work very hard, spent hours in the library doing a lot of research, was able to quote and cite very sources very well but the tutors accused him of doing no more than "cutting & pasting" (ie. control-C & control-V) rather than applying any critical thinking into his essays. He was too proud to accept reality - he had been the top boy in his JC and was celebrated as the brilliant scholar from Singapore and it was the first time in his life he had failed anything - and now he was failing everything. When he spoke to his parents, he lied and said that he was enjoying life at university rather than confess that he was bottom of his class. By the end of his first year, he knew that he was going to fail all his exams and lose his scholarship, get kicked out of the university and return to Singapore with his tail behind his legs. Rather than accept reality, he killed himself by taking an overdose.

It is a terribly tragic story - there are many people to blame, not the least the scholar himself for refusing to ask for more help when he needed it. The problem was that he was in an environment where students were expected to help themselves rather than buy the help they need via the tuition industry. I also question if his parents knew if they were setting their son up for failure by making him over-dependent on tuition in Singapore? Or has the entire Singapore education system set him up for failure?
Who was responsible for Ben's suicide?
2. The Culture of Kiasuism

This culture of tuition perpetuates itself in Singapore because of the kiasu mindset of parents. They do not stop for a moment to think, "does my child really need tuition?" No, instead, their rationale for getting tuition is, "If the other parents of my son's classmates are getting them tuition, then I must do so too or I may lose out." It is this fear of losing out which makes them follow the rest of the flock without thinking if they are just a bunch of lemmings heading for the nearest cliff.

Mind you, the parents often have the best of intentions for their children and they worry that if they dare to go against the trend and reject tuition, then they may not only be letting down their children but may be perceived as bad parents. Add to that pressure from peers, teachers and other family members and a sense of self-doubt, these parents are sucked into a circle they find hard to break out of without incurring the wrath of those around them.
 
Surely parents should have enough confidence to deal with this trend - if some other kiasu parent claims, "I am sending my daughter to Kumon and now she is great at maths!" The correct response should be, "Do you (or your husband) have a really, really small penis? Is that why you are taking your insecurities out on your child? Or did you regret having been a failure at school when you were a student? Why don't you fix the disappointments in your own life instead of taking it out on your kid?"

3. Very short term improvements do not lead to any long term benefits

My parents worked as tuition teachers as well as full time teachers - so I grew up always seeing various students in our dining room having tuition at our dining table. I am going to tell you the story of Priya, an Indian student who was a tuition student on my mother.

Priya had a problem with maths - she couldn't get her head around numbers. She had already flunked her PSLE twice and my mother was trying to get Priya to pass PSLE mathematics. I remember sitting quietly in the corner of the room, having my dinner whilst watching my mother go through problem sums with Priya over and over again, year after year. Eventually, Priya did scrape through PSLE mathematics on the third attempt - even my mother was surprised and we received a big food hamper from Priya's parents to thank my mother for her help. As far as my mother was concerned, Priya was a success story and she would boast about helping Priya understanding mathematics. But do you know what happened next? 
Priya simply couldn't deal with numbers.

Did Priya go on to ace mathematics in secondary school? Hardly. Years later. I ran into Priya at a local shop, she was working there and I'd recognized her. We had a brief chat and I found out that she struggled in secondary school, failing to pass any exams in mathematics despite her parents getting her plenty of maths tuition. In the end, she just reached a point when she gave up - she would refuse to get out of bed rather than go to school. Her parents didn't know what else to do and she dropped out of school. As she was already 16 then, she found temporary work in a shop and had been working there ever since. She told me that she was very happy working in a shop, "as long as they don't make me work on the till and get me to handle anything to do with prices! I am good with customers, I am good with people, I just can't do maths."

There was a lot of wishful thinking on Priya's parents' part - they thought that she could make her way through the Singaporean education system like the other students if she simply got enough help. Well it doesn't work like that. It was painful to see Priya's frustrating struggle week after week at my parents' dining table and I am so glad she had the resolve to drop out of school eventually and get a job. After all, she saved herself - she didn't end up killing herself like Ben. What would you do if you were Priya's parents? This brings me neatly to my next point.

4. Would you love your child even if your child is stupid?

Fact: not all children will become scholars. I refer you to the IQ distribution bell curve. You are born with a certain IQ, some of us are smarter, others have lower IQ. It is a fact of life. If your child is not blessed with a high IQ, no amount of  brain training or tution is going to change that fact. So I put it to you bluntly parents: can you love your child if you find out that s/he has a very low IQ, or for want of a better, just plain stupid?
You are where you are on this curve, tuition cannot change that. 

This is something that my family has had to deal with. I have an autistic nephew who is struggling with the Singaporean education system and it is a battle he is losing - badly. It pains me to see the way he is subjected to so much tuition - but hey, I am just the uncle. I have voiced my opinion and I have been shot down. My opinion is that he should be allowed a childhood - life is tough enough as it is as an autistic child, spare him the torture of tuition please. You know what my family have accused me of? "You're heartless, you are a monster, you've condemned him because of his autism, you've given up all hope on him."

Am I such a monster? I don't think so - but you be the judge. My opinion is that most of my family is still in denial, like Priya's parents. They all love my nephew and care about him but they are very misguided as to what is best for him. There will come a point some day when my nephew will react like Priya and say, "no, enough is enough, I won't do this any more. I don't care what you say, I am saying no and that is final." 
When will my nephew speak up and say no to my family?
Some Singaporeans have argued that there is something seriously wrong with the Singaporean education system - that is why so many parents are turning to getting extra help via the tuition system. Well did it occur to you that the system may be perfectly adequate and this entire industry is simply feeding off the false hopes of desperate parents? Is it so hard for them to accept that their child is not special, not clever, not smart, not talented, not ever going to be good at anything and no amount of tuition is ever going to change that? I blame these terrible parents, not the MOE.

5. Couldn't the money be better spent developing other aspects of the child?

I am shocked that parents spend over $500 a month on tuition for each child. Good grief. That means $6000 a year is spent on the child's tuition teachers a year with little evidence of any long term benefits. Are you parents mad or blind? Think of what you could do for your child with $6000 a year. It could lead to some amazing experiences. I am 36 today and as I look back at my childhood memories, I remember the highlights - go to camp with my friends, catching crabs on a beach in Malaysia, taking part in gymnastics competitions. I think about all the money my parents wasted on needless tuition and piano lessons and think about all the things that I would've done with that money - I would've loved to have travelled a lot more and see the world. I could've had far more interesting experiences that would've built my confidence and nurtured me as a young person.
How much are you spending on tuition?! 
I have to find it in my heart to forgive my parents' very misguided ways - it is terrible being the child of a teacher, never mind two teachers. Teachers have a double whammy - they are cut off from the real world, the business world and spend their time interacting with children rather than other adults. Their students look to them for direction, permission and instruction - thus fuelling the impression that what they are doing is actually important. What that meant was that my parents took my education way too seriously, forgetting that the whole purpose of education is to prepare the young person for the working world - they forgot the destination and focused instead on the journey.

Honestly, no employer in the right mind is going to go through an applicant's academic record with a fine comb and pick out some random result from secondary school and find fault with that. In short, nobody gives a shit flying fuck what you do at school - it's not important at all. So the next time your teacher gives you grief about not doing your homework, tell the teacher that none of that really matters in the big scheme of things. The only people who give a shit flying fuck about shit like homework and tests are the teachers and fucking hell, imagine having teachers as your parents who believed that it was a matter of life or death whether or not I scored an A in Chinese in some mid-term test. Really, my parents were oh so deluded it was unreal. No disrespect to my parents, but fucking hell, as teachers, they really didn't understand the whole purpose of education.
Most teachers don't understand the purpose of education.
The only thing that matters is whether or not you get into a really good university and if you are not of that kind of calibre - then you should be focusing on training yourself to learn a trade that will lead to gainful employment, such as becoming a chef, plumber or electrician. And if you do want to help your child do well enough to get into a good university, then inspiration is the key. Once your child is inspired to do well, half the job is done. Give the child a sense of aspiration - and no, this cannot be found at the fucking tuition centre.

6. Inspiration vs slave driver

I am going to say something that is going to get me hate mail but fuck it, I'm going to say it anyway. I hated studying Chinese so much as a kid. Yeah I had nothing but straight As for Chinese and have a better command of the Chinese language than most Singaporeans (Limpeh has worked in China in places where nobody spoke a word of English okay?) - but I hated the way I was taught the language. My dad was one of those fathers who was a slave-driver when it came to teaching Chinese - he was a Chinese language teacher himself so he felt that it would be a personal insult if his own children were scoring anything less than top marks in Chinese language.

There was no inspiration - there was no other motivation apart from "if you don't get an A I will cane you very hard". Talk about motivation, he made me hate Chinese so much. In fact, I would sometimes deliberately pretend I can't speak Chinese any more and speak to him in a mishmash of English and Mandarin just to wind him up. I know saying things like, "My French and Spanish is so much better than my Chinese today" and "I have forgotten how to speak Chinese" (NB: both statements are not true) would make him angry but fuck it, he asked for it. Message to you parents out there: don't fuck with your children's minds or they may decide to fuck with yours in the future just for the hell of it.
My dad made me totally hate the Chinese language despite the fact that I was very good at it.
Given how badly I was taught the Chinese language, I am surprised I didn't reject it totally and end up like many of my peers who can't speak any Mandarin today. Parents, you cannot bully your child into studying anything - they will only reject it in the end if you push them too far. You need to make them interested in the language and give them the inspiration to want to learn - once they are inspired, you just step back and allow them to find their way. And if they need help, they will come to you for help but you need to inspire them, not be a slave driver.

7. Finally, fuck tuition - it doesn't work.

It is 2012 today and I am 36 years old - I started primary school in 1983 and completed my A levels in 1994. How many adults in 2012 had tuition in the 1980s and still ended up in dead end jobs? Thanks to Facebook, I am able to track down many of my former classmates from Singapore. Some of them have gone on to do amazing things and are multi-millionaires today with amazing achievements and some are either unemployed or in dead end jobs earning peanuts. But what do all these people have in common? They all had tuition. It made no freaking difference whatsoever in the long run - which is what really matters: it is not what you score in your primary 5 exams, it is how your career develops as you approach your 40s. Are you a millionaire, home-owner and financially comfortable? Or are you struggling to make ends meet in mid-life? And yes, some of my former classmates are struggling a lot today despite having had tuition back then - it didn't ultimately make any difference at all in the long run. 
Did you know this cleaner had years and years of tuition?
I ask my regular readers to forgive me for repeating this story but I so have to tell it again. I worked as a Chinese translator & Chinese culture consultant on a BBC documentary last year called "Meet The Tiger Mums" - the documentary followed three Chinese mothers in London who subjected their children to endless tuition and extra lessons to ensure their children had a good start in life. Part of the justification for their choices was, "Well, my Chinese parents made me do all this when I was a child, so now I am a Chinese mother, I am doing the same thing as well for my child."

Being me, I asked the production team an awkward question. "None of these mothers are particularly successful. Two are in dead end jobs earning peanuts and one is an unemployed housewife. Of the two working, one is a receptionist and the other is a building facility manager (ie. if the lights or the toilets are not working, you go and tell her and she is responsible for sorting it out). None of them are doing jobs for graduates - they are barely paid above minimum wage. Only the housewife speaks intelligently and the other two mothers are clearly not particularly intelligent! Surely these mothers demonstrate the fact that you can't polish a turd, all this tuition isn't going to turn a low-IQ below average human being into a scholar."
What if I told you she had years of tuition and still flunked all her exams?
The director and producer looked at each other and after a long pause, they just said, "Ah... Oh. Erm, the programme is focussing on the children really, not the mothers... I think." They didn't know what to say. It was clearly something they had never thought about yet. It wasn't a great programme for the title was "Meet The Tiger Mums" - rather than "You can't polish a turd, but the Chinese insist on trying!" I challenge you, look at the adults doing the dead end jobs around you in Singapore - are they there because they didn't have enough tuition when they were students? Or are they there despite having tuition as students and it still made no difference whatsoever? The bottom line is this: no amount of tuition can increase a student's IQ. You are born with what you are born with - get used to it. Life isn't fair, some people are born smart and talented, others are not and tuition isn't going to change any of that. Tough shit. Told you life was unfair, didn't I?

8. But what is new? Such is marketing.

Well, what's new? I do wonder what tuition teachers tell the parents. Are they honest and tell the parents, "Well I'll try my best but to be honest, your kid is really stupid and I don't just mean kinda stupid, like your kid has seriously low IQ okay? I can't fix that, nobody can. I can't deliver a miracle. I am a tuition teacher, not a magician you know. You're better off taking all this tuition fees and betting on the roulette wheel at the MBS casino, who knows? You may win big and then your very stupid child will never ever have to worry about trying to get a job in the future."

Take a look at the ads for some products out there - look at this ad for example. It gives the impression that if you use this shower gel, you will automatically attract women and get more sex. We all know that is not going to happen - but it doesn't stop advertisers from making such claims.
 
Let's look at some of the marketing used by tuition centres. I found this tuition centre Mind Stretcher in Singapore and this is what they proudly claim on their website, "27 Mind Stretcher students topped their schools in the 2011 PSLE." They go on to make more claims with similar statistics from past years but let's just focus on this one claim. Now I am sure that this claim is 100% true otherwise they wouldn't dare to make such a bold claim, but can you see the similarity between this claim and the Lynx shower gel ad above? It would give the impression to some parents that if they sent their child to Mind Stretcher, they could expect similar results. Or could they? After all, this is all hinted, or at best implied - but it takes a parent to make that implication. Mind Stretcher are just stating their past achievements, it takes an element of wishful thinking on the parents' part to believe that their child has the potential to top his/her school. So you can't blame Mind Stretcher for misleading the parents - the parents have in fact misled themselves because the option was always there to accept the truth that is staring at them in the face.

I would be very interested to find out what a tuition teacher today (over to you Alan Heah!) would promise parents of below average students - do they promise miracles? Do they even promise results? Or do they promise nothing and all these false hopes are supplied entirely by the parents' wishful thinking? Certainly, I can see a lot of wishful thinking on my family's part when it comes to subjecting my nephew to all that tuition. Quite frankly, I don't believe it would make the slightest bit of difference but that's just my lone voice against the rest of my extended family. What is the missing piece of the puzzle? Why am I the only one who can see that tuition won't help my nephew in the slightest - the same way Lynx shower gel isn't going to get me more sex? Why is my family subjected to this blind spot?

Answers on the postcard please - or just leave a comment below. Kum siah, thanks! I would like to leave you with a song I really like - it is the Grasshopper Song by Sunny Hill. I have found a version with subtitles so you can appreciate the meaning of the song even if you don't speak Korean - it is a profound statement about what the hell we're doing with our fucked up education system and work ethic in East Asia.



43 comments:

  1. Your nephew needs specialised help for his autism, not additional tuition to fit into a 'normal' schooling system. Autism has to be dealt with in a separate specalised educational stream.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please lah, I appreciate your concern but do you know how many times I've been told to shut up in no uncertain terms? "You're just the bloody uncle, did you ever once change his nappies when he was a baby? Did you ever once take him to the doctor when he was unwell? Did you ever once wake up in the morning to take him to school? No, you haven't - so shut up and get lost."

      I am just the freaking uncle. I am not the parent. The uncle has no freaking say whatsoever. I am told to fuck off and shut up by the parents - okay? Uncle only okay? Uncle Limpeh is concerned but has no say whatsoever.

      Delete
  2. You mentioned Ben as an example of a scholar who could not cope with university, is this mostly (or rarely) true for the other Singaporean scholars whom you have met? I have always wondered whether the so-called scholars are there because of tuition or that they are indeed talented. The same goes for so-called Gifted Education students who I know have lots of tuition to cope with the GEP. It seems pointless to be in GEP if you need tuition to stay in the game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Brian, allow me to answer your questions. Now firstly, I have met a range of scholars throughout my time at university and some are genuinely talented & intelligent whilst others were simply a product of very good spoon feeding. I would've thought that the whole process of the extensive interviews would have weeded out those who got there via "mugging" and those who are genuinely going to shine at university & beyond.

      After all, the return on investment on someone like Ben is going to be pretty poor if you are going to send him to university only for him to fail there. The interview panel has got to get beyond the straight As, beyond the good family background, beyond the possibly very good ECA/CCA records and try to get to know the subject to evaluate him - after all, there are so many good students applying for scholarships, you have to make sure you pick the right candidate for your scholarship, not someone like Ben who would've been better off say at NUS where he would've had the local support network of family and church.

      By that token, I'd like to think that most interview panels would've done their job correctly, but of course, there will always be a few cases that slip through the crack - Ben and people like Sun Xu - should've never been scholars in the first place.

      I hope that deals with the issue of scholars & talent.

      I'm pretty cynical about GEP anyway as well - my sec sch in S'pore was RI where I saw virtually no difference between the GEP and non-GEP students, just an inflated sense of entitlement, a lotta ego and attitude from the GEP students. Meh.

      Delete
    2. I am not a GEP-er. GEP started in my sec school (RGSS) precisely 1 batch after me. One GEP-er whom I met (when she became an adult in the working world) commented that back in her student days, some GEP-ers (as LIFT says) have "an inflated sense of entitlement, a lotta ego and attitude", but there were also those who are your usual down-to-earth folks. GEP-ers, like scholars and other regular students, are not a monolithic entity. They are as varied as any other groups of students. Not all need/had tuition, some got there (and stayed there) by their own abilities.

      It is important to state clearly when one is generalizing. 不要一竹篙打沉一船人 ["Don't use a bamboo rod to overturn an entire boat of people", i.e. do not prejudge with generalizations.]

      Delete
    3. More on this topic just for Brian Tsai: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/university-season-part-3-what-makes.html

      Delete
  3. Here are a few circumstances where tuition just might help, but limpeh i hope you can rebut them, so i'll have good reasons for my wife not to get our son a tutor.

    -kid cant do his homework + parents uneducated, cant help him with it (usually happens with Maths)!

    -kid obviously not fulfilling potential: high IQ but low exam marks, we know our kid isnt paying attention in class, easily distracted so he needs tutors to help him focus/ recap/ brush up/ elaborate on whats taught in school

    -kid wants to enter a better Stream, Normal to Express. My son is a late bloomer he didnt do well in PSLE but hopes he can be in a good class. His class in school is rather rowdy, teachers cant cover a lot of ground, spend more time scolding the kids. So tuition gives my son an edge. Some more, he wants to get Science, he sucks in Humanities, but currently his results not good enough to get Science Stream.

    We're also wondering if we should send him for lessons that go beyond schoolwork, such as logic, decision-making & how to plan your future. In your article above, do you lump Enrichment together with tuition, or is it something different that you approve of?

    Overall theres something to be said for tuition when its NEEDED, like PRC kids should really get English tuition when they join mainstream schools. Anybody should have tuition, in the subject they are weak, which is pulling down their average.

    As OVERALL results improve, they can enter prestigious tertiary shools (which does affect their future). Limpeh please help, how to get out of the vicious circle? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lam Toh,

      Thanks for your comment and allow me to respond.

      1. If the kid is struggling with his homework & the parents are uneducated, surely the first port of call is the school itself. The kid has a maths teacher at school, right? What is this maths teacher doing, happily going to the cinema or the beach to senang-diri after school when the student still can't get his head around numbers? The parents have got a right to go to the school and demand help the maths teacher - and if the maths teacher is unhelpful, go to the principal and complain, "My son is failing maths and your maths teacher is letting him drown, if you don't help him, I will go to MOE and complain, now do something about it."

      Maybe the kid is like Priya, just no good with maths, who knows? But the first port of call should always always be the SCHOOL, not the tuition centre.

      2. "Kid obviously not fulfilling potential" - okay, I have 2 responses to that. Firstly, I sense wishful thinking on your part. Every parent is subject to that mindset even if the child is doing perfectly well - this is a function of a parent's hopes for the child rather than a reflection on the child's true potential. Secondly, as a 36 year old who has climbed 2 very different & challenging career ladders in media & finance - I can say this to you, I would've accomplished all this even if I had flunked a few exams on the way in primary school. It would've made no difference whatsoever. If a person has talent, has natural business acumen, it is in his genes, his DNA - this basic intellect, this je ne sais quoi - well you're born with it, it's not found in a primary 4 mathematics textbook.

      3. "high IQ but low exam marks" - time to read the writing on the wall. Either ignore the low exam marks and say, "whatever, exams are not important" or realize that you're placing him on the wrong end of the IQ bell curve.

      4. " our kid isnt paying attention in class, easily distracted" - then the problem lies with inspiration and you have got to inspire your child to want to study, to want to achieve, to want to better himself. You're clearly not communicating that to the child and approaching this totally wrongly by bludgeoning him through the system without reasoning with him why he has to do so. Very salah Lam Toh, time to talk to your child.

      5. I don't believe in "late bloomers" - that's a termed coined by parents who are hoping for a miracle.

      Delete
    2. 6. Again, if the school is the root of the problem, then have you talked to the teachers? Have you talked to the principal? That's where you should start - the school, rather than default to tuition.

      7. Help you son accept the limits of his ability - rather than tell him that he can achieve anything with tuition. A tuition teacher is not a magician and even if you get one who bludgeons him through the system, remember the story of Priya - what next? After all, short term improvements do not lead to any long term benefits: you have to think about the whole purpose of education, look at the big picture rather than focus on the next 2 or 3 years.

      8. I totally disapprove of any kind of "enrichment" bullshit. No no no no. Sorry but your son is born with his IQ as it is - no amount of "enrichment" can possibly increase his IQ. Spare the kid this bullshit and let him go do some sports instead, he will learn far more from sports than this enrichment crap. You wanna help him with decision making and planning one's future - do your job as a parent. That's your department, you cannot outsource it.

      9. No, I disagree with you on the point that anyone should have tuition on subjects they are weak in. Rather, if you are weak in a subject, you should spend more time on it, work harder on it, do more revision on that subject and try to come to terms with it rather than ask for more spoon feeding. The teacher at school should be the first port of call - but the STUDENT himself has to do most of the work, rather than expect to be helped all the way to an A grade. It doesn't work like that. And no, not everyone can score an A in every subject - parents have got to accept that truth if they have a child who is not straight-A materials.

      10. How do we get out of this vicious circle? Simple. Take a few steps back. Heck, run many steps back and look at the BIG picture. Think about your child at the age of 30 and think - does this matter? What really matters? What is going to help my child perform well in his career in his 30s?

      I trust that neither you nor your wife are teachers, so you know a thing or two about functioning in the real world outside the primary school. Think about poor me, my parents knew very little of the world beyond the primary school gates as they were primary school teachers and had no practical advice in terms of "the big picture". Come on, do what is best for your child in the LONG RUN.

      Delete
    3. Dear Learned Blogger Lim Peh

      Haven't you heard the idiom "You read what you sow"?

      While I professionally agree with your statement 50% of the time, I however felt that the remaining 50% of the time being gifted and such as "questionable".

      If a child is performing not well in school, the next course of action is like what you said:

      1. Look for the teachers in School

      However, do note that teachers in Singapore's School are merely "High Classy Clerks"

      They convey their knowledge from whatever guidebook and mark the answers according to the answer sheets. Do you think that they are personally attached and have a "Fiduciary Duty" to teach and give it all the way at this present times?

      The answer is an obvious no.

      2. The term "Some Help is Better than NO Help"

      Not everyone is as blessed and gifted as yourself. I have read your blog, and realise that you are indeed a lucky chap. You do not need to work hard to achieve your straight As and could fulfill your ideals in extra-curricular activities which made you a more fruitful person.

      But like what you said, 60% of the people are in the normal range of IQ. Nothing is going to change that.

      Let me pose you another POV : are we able to change the curriculum to suit the 60% of the people?

      There are many who couldn't make it, or even pass the major exams despite working hard, etc.

      We have also seen young primary school students breaking down in class with seizures because they couldn't pass too! Such students have to spend SGD70K in hospital and be absent from school for a while. What do they achieve in the end?

      Best of all, such figures, statistics and stories are never broadcasted, to give everyone in this Local Talented with influx of Foreign Talents have the mindset to say that hey we have High Flyers like your learned self eventually.

      Don't you think that it is only fair to articulate according to one's ability?

      What can Priya do now? She does not even have any N or O levels? Will she be like Bread Talk guy or Hyflux girl? No

      Times are already tough. Nobody wants to have the curse of failing.

      Naturally, the instinctive nature is to try to work hard.

      Who is to be blamed? Doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude isn't it?

      Delete
    4. Dear Timothy, thanks for your comment.

      1. I am disappointed that you have so little faith in Singaporean teachers - I don't deny that there are bad teachers in Singapore (I've been the victim of a few along the way) but if your child is subject to such a bad teacher, then that is even more reason to take this up with the school, the principal and the MOE rather than just turn to the private tuition route.

      2. There will be students who will never be able to achieve much because of their low IQs - Priya for example. No she will never ever become a successful business person, she will never become a millionaire, but at least now she has a job she can do and she is quite happy doing. She is doing okay and has taken control of her life - she doesn't need my pity nor yours. Needless to say, all the tuition in the world couldn't help her get through the Singaporean education system but guess what? She doesn't need it, she is doing okay without any formal qualifications in retail.

      3. I know there are too many PRCs in Singapore. I have said so enough on my blog already. Kindly vote for the opposition, do not vote for the PAP, thank you.

      Delete
    5. Dear Learned Blogger Limpeh

      Oh well, perhaps you have been away for too long.

      For point one.

      1. MOE are just like a seating duck there. In fact there is an unofficial rule that states that working parents MUST teach their children when they are back home. Or else they outsource.

      Firstly, time is a rare commodity and luxury here. In fact, even with duo income, one can just only merely survive and operate. Given the economic climate uncertainty, which your learned self will be experiencing first hand there, one cannot assume to flick the switch and go "Auto Pilot". Remember what happened to AF 447? Well, flicking the switch and let the children to fend for themselves against all the current "high flying education culture" peril aka learning to forage for knowledge instead of spoon feeding is way too dangerous.

      Plus do note that they do not even have time to fulfill their obligations on their homework, let alone do research for knowledge to apply to their homework. So what is the logical step when one is fighting for time? Outsource lor...

      Teachers just simply love to place elements of surprise and ambush to get High Flyers and throw the 60% away... Do note that the difference between an A and F is just a thin line at times.

      This society is unforgiving.

      2. Priya might be "Happy". But will she be happy in continuous poverty? A salary of lower than SGD 1.5k? Will she ever be able to rent a place and support anyone? The answer is no.

      It is instinctive for her mother to do so. It was a desperate act. But something is better than nothing.

      Although she eventually conceded defeat to the system, we must understand the true intention of her mother. It was a good one.

      It was painful to see her daughter being thrown out of the system and most probably will live a life of a low flyer. Perhaps being a so called "voucher handout recipient"...

      As the saying goes - No Pain, No Gain.

      Yes, nothing is going to change the IQ. One has to think holistically.

      Assumption that anyone with a happy extracurricular will make himself more capable? Oh Yes... but when it comes to getting the dough... Best of luck!

      There are by no means an easy way out.

      Likewise, the entire tuition thing is like the "Stimulus Bailout Package Bubble"

      The Bubble bursts when one comes to society and such.

      As such, concerted effort is still required to guide: the analogy is this to the kid:

      "Try the best to pass lah... If best not good enough, too bad...

      At least you have tried...

      Please don't end up having seizures and put an entire full stop to life...

      Move on..."

      Anyway, take care of yourself there. UK is under greater recession than ever, at least Singapore will still experience GROWTH...

      Austerity is the new vocab there I suppose..

      So quickly go to sleep and seize the day when you work in a couple of hours' time...

      Delete
    6. Dear Timothy,

      1. I'm sorry to hear about your displeasure with the MOE and perhaps there's some unpleasant personal experience which has resulted in your poor opinion of them - however, I don't believe that your cynical attitude is shared by all. Such a system clearly favours the elites and I can see how some people are better served than others by the MOE. This elitism is very Singaporean and hasn't changed in decades.

      2. I also sympathize with how low-income parents have to work hard to make ends meet, but such is the nature of work on that end of the food chain. Do you honestly believe that everyone can become rich, do comfortable jobs in air-con offices, live in beautiful big houses and have a troupe of servants if only they had the right education? That's never going to happen, life simply isn't fair - some people are born with brains that enable them to do great things, others, like Priya, can't even add numbers. Instead of blaming the government or the system etc, why not recognize that those Singaporeans who are born with high IQ and are blessed with the right talents are doing well and those who are not, well - it's what you're born with, it's your straw in life.

      3. No amount of tuition would change Priya's academic track record - so I don't see the point in 'punishing' her for not being able to do maths by forcing her to have endless hours of tuition whilst her friends are playing in the playground. Guess what? She still ended up in a dead-end job on low-income anyway. All that money her mother spent on tuition made zero difference in the long run - that's my point.

      4. Modesty aside, I'm a triple scholar (ie. I had not 1, not 2 but 3 scholarships) who became a millionaire at the age of about 28 who works in finance. I own 2 properties in central London and erm, how do I put this simply Timothy - I'm actually very rich. 我很有钱。I'm not like Priya - I'm not working in some dead end job struggling to make ends meet. So don't give me the bullshit about austerity and recession - the fact that the UK is in the middle of the recession doesn't change the fact that I have made my fortune when times were good in the period 2001-2007 before the property bubble burst. That's why I can senang-diri these days and not worry too much about work as I am a consultant these days - I have taken the next few weeks off just to enjoy the Olympics at my doorstep and have spent about S$7000 in tickets. Sorry mate, life is not fair - some of us elite scholars are not affected by the recession as much you know.

      Delete
    7. Well, Morning to you

      I am so very glad that you are very well to do - not the average Joe like others.

      Then again, your point of view is not in sync with the general consensus back in the island the other side of the world.

      You might still think that you are the Ang Mo Kio guy at heart, but mankind does evolve - and you might not have the actual point of view of a typical Singaporean there.

      Your misrepresentation of your own experience to apply to the rest will take place for the sake of blogging?

      Imagine if many other readers were to apply your theories to your children? Bao Fail liao.... no high IQ... no need to study liao, no need to learn things I don't know or depend that teacher in school... who treat the teaching job as any other job in any service industry...

      Well, without doubt you are right 50%, the other 50% is questionable.

      Everything should be done in moderation. If one catches the flu, he can choose to take the antibiotics to quickly cure the symptoms or let nature takes its course so that one is not reliant on antibiotics.

      However, if one does not seek a cure in time for a very bad dose of bacterium infection, it will escalate to pneumonia and even death.

      In life, one can take one way or the other of doing things.

      Similarly, I am also a FT outside of Singapore. However, I do not wish to divulge which passport I am carrying now.

      Unfortunately, I am not a high achiever academically, but prefers to seek a holistic view in life. Although I have a summer mansion in East Hampton from where I am replying your learned comment.

      I do not wish to flaunt one's wealth, it is crude.

      Life is unfair, spare a thought for many others, especially if your point of view differs from the general consensus.

      I am not saying you are wrong, but you are not entirely correct.

      Without doubt, all of us are just human beings with at most 35,000 days of vacation here. Be it whether our children are autistic, have down syndrome or a really just plain stupid, there are a lot more in life than just plain materialism.

      When was the last time when you truly emotionally shed tears?

      You will grow up one day.

      Everyone has their rights to articulate to suit to their objectives. One do not have to take drastic measures like yours unless they are, yes as academically gifted as your learned self.

      Without doubt, the system back there is a challenge. I am speaking for my other relatives and friends back there at the other side of the world. They gotta evolve in such adversity, and I truly empathize their position. Like what I give them my 5 cents worth, do things in moderation, don't overkill it.

      Only a small number can be so "Hor Sei" like your learned self.

      In life, one gotta try your best to hit it first. It's never easy at times, but we must try to under take the challenges instead of throwing the towel!

      Human beings are prone to evolution, which I believe in. Nothing is constant, but change.

      Whether one changes for the better? That will be left to his personality for the better.

      I wish you a pleasant day there and hope you enjoy your Olympics.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. Dude, honestly, I've already written a post of this: http://limpehft.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/why-averages-dont-matter.html

      It doesn't matter what the average income or GDP or economic performance is in your country, it's how much money you have in the bank that matters. There are some very rich people in places like Vietnam, Philippines, Bangladesh and Indonesia - whilst there are some terribly poor people in places like Switzerland, Japan and Singapore. Wealth isn't shared equally amongst all the citizens of a country - so you were really talking bullshit when you were talking about the recession. Regardless of what the economy of the UK is doing, dude - I am a millionaire. I am fucking rich. I am so fucking rich that I can afford to take it a lot easier, not work my butt off and enjoy the Olympics as it is a once it a life time opportunity happening at my doorstep. And even if Singapore is a very rich country - that fact doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is how much money you have. Anyway, hey I am glad you're doing okay financially too - perhaps you can inspire people like Priya to achieve great things, after all, you write like a bueh tak chek Ah Beng drop out from a chapalang neighbourhood school yet you can still enjoy your summer in the Hamptons (or wait, or was it Hougang?) But hey, good for you, you offer people like Priya hope.

      My point on the issue of tuition is simple - you can't turn someone like Priya into a scholar or a straight A student with tuition, stop punishing her for not being smart. Allow her to just get on with life and accept that she is not academically inclined. You're born with a certain IQ and that's it - if you are unlucky enough to have a stupid child with a low IQ then you shouldn't blame or punish the child, just accept it as fate. It's nobody's fault.

      Now you could brand me as an uncaring elitist, but I remind you that I do have a nephew who is in the same position as Priya (at least Priya is just hopeless with maths, my nephew is autistic on top of everything else) and this is something my family has to deal with. Priya can get a job, work hard and get on with life - I am not even sure that my nephew can achieve half as much as what Priya has managed so far. So it's not me sitting on my high horse passing judgement on ordinary people who weren't scholars or didn't make their first million before their 30th birthday, this shit is pretty darn real - it's something my family has got to cope with. What kind of future does my nephew have in a place like Singapore which celebrates scholars but condemns those with low IQ?

      Delete
  4. Hi LIFT,

    Here's my 2 cents, speaking as someone who has been a tutor (mostly voluntary) for around a decade. My answer is in 2 parts, since I am exceeding the 4,096 characters limit again.

    1. Unless and until Singapore become a more equal society, where holding a blue-collar job pays well enough to sustain a family (not a hand-to-mouth existence) and is socially accepted, parents will still push their children to do well academically (at least to obtain as high a paper qualification as possible) and to avoid the fate of becoming a "road sweeper".

    2. What parents need, and what tutors often deliver is that the child clears the academic hurdle that is CURRENTLY facing him/her. E.g. Passing the required subjects to cross the PSLE, GCE 'O' or GCE 'A' level threshold, so as to have the corresponding paper certificate. In the 1980's, those with just a PSLE can get jobs in factories. In Singapore now, even those with just GCE 'O' levels will have a tough time competing for jobs.

    3. Parents may not be in the best position to provide the necessary inspiration. Sometimes it is because of the parents' own lack of knowledge, sometimes it's because of the parents' temperament, sometimes it is because of role conflict (i.e. disciplinary master vs a nurturing tutor). School teachers are probably overworked to have the extra energy to guide/inspire every student. That is where the 1-to-1 tutor steps in.

    E.g. I once had a student, who at the start of Sec 3, complained to me about the subject combination that she was forced to take. She hated physics and was failing it in lower secondary, but was put into a subject combination with physics. I listened to her woes, went through with her on her options for an appeal, etc -- basically win her trust. Her appeal failed, but she was ready to work with me to survive the system. Within 1 year, she went from F to A. The following year, I was assigned to another student instead (as a volunteer tutor, I don't get to pick my students), and she complained loudly that she would surely fail without my help. I advised her to try her best and make me proud of her -- she scored a B in her Sec 4 final exams, did rather well overall. The last I heard, she completed her 'O' levels, joined the military and was happy with her career. Would she have overcome her dislike for physics and complete her 'O' levels without some "tutoring"? I don't know. But I am sure glad that I've, in a small way, helped her to overcome her challenges. She is not the only case I had whose performance improved with the right type of help.

    4. Exam-taking strategy. I know that some people get it instinctively, but I have met enough students who never thought about the matter. Simple things like time management (e.g. calculating how much time to allocate per question), MCQ strategy (how to guess intelligently), essay writing techniques (how to make one's essay stand-out given limited time such that improving one's English standard is unlikely), etc. For most parents, the last time they took an exam was probably more than a decade ago. They probably would have forgotten how little techniques like these help a student be more confident when sitting in the exam hall facing their exam paper.

    End of part 1. Please see below for part 2.

    ReplyDelete
  5. To answer your question about how a tutor sells his/her service. In my case, most of my students are non-paying clients (since I was mostly a volunteer tutor), thus I did not really need to sell my service. In fact, I don't always get to meet the parents. For the paying customers, my 1st tuition lesson is often a refundable interview and pre-assessment -- e.g. review the student's overall and subject-specific performance to-date, perhaps ask them some questions to test their problem-solving approach -- to understand my student's S.W.O.T. Then I will speak to the parents (if available) and/or the student of my expectations and check if they are agreeable. I do not promise parents that I will turn their children's performance around. However, from my experience, the interview and pre-assessment will usually reveal some weak spots, which as a tutor, I can address (strategy to use depends on the timeframe available). I have also ever told a student that he did not need my service beyond the initial agreed 2-3 lessons because he was a capable self-learner who was able to practise the exam guides on his own. And yes, I do take time to explain to the parents/student of the need for the student to become self-learners eventually.

    That said, I myself dislike the mass tuition format that many of the tuition centres are run on. Mainly because, IMHO, mass tuition is mainly more school hours and more homework, and perhaps some exam techniques. It does not address each student's S.W.O.T. individually. My mother forced me to attend one such mass tuition when I failed in Additional Maths in my first semester in Sec 4 (not because I didn't understand the lessons, but because I freaking did not do any classwork/homework). Well, I play truant to state my point that I was not wasting my time at the tuition centre and my mother admitted defeat -- no point wasting the money if I was resolutely not attending tuition class.

    Cheers, WD.

    ReplyDelete
  6. From a mom point of view about your nephew - I think there is fear driving them behind on. Not so much fear he doesn't do well, more the fear and the guilt that if they don't do it, they are giving up hope on him; that they have to accept his disabilities.

    It goes on so much more - feelings of failure as mum/dad. Failure is very hard to swallow for the average Singaporean. If we are not preening about our results, home, car, we preen about how well our children are doing. Pasturing out tuition to external providers means if your nephew don't do well, it is not their fault, it is the tutor's fault.

    Such acceptance is hard to come by and the issues are with the parents. Until they see it, there is nothing much you can do or tell, it would be like talking to a brick wall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Terima kasih melayudiLondon :)

      Well, I have long accepted his disabilities - for crying out aloud, the kid is autistic lah. Tolong lah and not just mildly autistic... Maybe it is because I am just the uncle, I am not close enough to my nephew, so I am able to be cold and objective when evaluating his situation. I am not the parent nor the grandparent - so my feelings and attitude would be quite different.

      As for blaming the tutor vs blaming the parent - tolong lah, alamak - the kid is autistic, we know that, we should accept that rather than play this blame game, IMHO it's totally ridiculous lah, tak masuk akal ...

      And yes, it's been like talking to a brick wall all these years. That's why I totally appreciate your empathy and understanding, TERIMA KASIH!! And that's why I always blow up when people start stating the bleeding obvious to me about "oh your autistic nephew needs blah blah blah" and I'm like, "I'm just the freaking uncle, I don't get a say, I don't get any say, nobody listens to me, they all think I am a freaking monster who has given up hope on my nephew!!!"

      Delete
  7. Hello,

    On tuition for mother tongue:
    Ironically, i know many chinese families who do not speak any mandarin at home. During my time, A-level students were required to achieve a certain grade in mother tongue in order to qualify for entrance to local universities, even for potential undergrads who had no intention of majoring in ther mother tongue. (I am told this requirement has since been removed.) If kids struggle with mother tongue (no motivation, no enviroment for practice at home/school), they could be unfairly penalised by being barred from entry to NUS/Ntu even if they were talented in other subjects. Going overseas was the next option but cost a lot more, and i am sure some people would have been priced out of the market.

    On learning disabilities:
    Have you heard of Marco Pierre White? Perhaps you do, as you are a keen cook, and in the UK.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Pierre_White
    Did you know he had dyslexia as a kid?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtEnemqewtc
    Great interview with him.
    He now has a rather posh accent.

    cheers~

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi JS, yes indeed the requirement for a pass in L2 was lifted quite a while ago - but what also happened in the meantime was the dumbing down of L2 at AO level (ie. what most of us did at JC) - it was freaking unreal how easy it got, with the amount of multiple choice questions involved. We used to say, even if you have no freaking clue what the hell the question is, anyhow hantam still have 1 in 4 chance of getting it right.

      I could write a piece on inspiration - it is a big topic and I feel that I should do it justice by writing a whole piece on it. Inspiration & Aspiration - these are two "rations" that go side by side and are so vital to a young person's development and crikey, so many parents just don't freaking get it. I'm not just talking about Singaporean parents, I'm talking about ALL parents all over the world.

      Yes I know about Marco Pierre White and I've dined in some of his restaurants here in London. V expensive and somewhat overrated but there you go.

      Coping with dyslexia is a challenge - but it means turning your talents to something which doesn't involve much language/writing/reading etc, such as cooking. Marco only has to read the labels on the packaging of his ingredients ... whereas coping with autism is much more of a challenge.

      But thanks for your comment, I will do a post about INSPIRATION :)

      Delete
  8. Hi Limpeh,

    I agree with you completely on most of the points in this article - I used to give tuition to students but I eventually stopped because I felt what I was doing wasn't helping any of the students at all. What they needed was motivation to work hard, not more pressure from any more teachers.

    However, I have to comment on two points
    1) On the teaching of Chinese, do you think there is any other way to teach it properly given that learning how to write the characters is mostly about memory work? I hated Chinese lessons as a kid, like most of my classmates, but without the work I put in then I certainly wouldn't be able to read and write it fluently now. (Honestly, I don't think our education system does the job of teaching pupils to speak mandarin very well so I won't comment on that)

    2) About your example of Ben - I believe that's not representative of scholars nowadays as most Singaporean scholars do extremely well overseas (in British universities, at least). I can only speculate as to why that is so but I believe that's either because scholarship boards learnt how to separate the self-motivated students from the others, or just because pre-university education in Singapore is so far ahead of pre-university education in the UK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there - as for the teaching of Chinese, I am not so much bothered about how it is taught per se as you can't run away from the fact that a lot of hard work has to go into the learning of any language. It is the lack of motivation that concerns me in the case of Singapore.

      As for point 2, of course Ben's story is not representative - what do you think interviews are for when it comes to scholarships? Scholars are interviewed and grilled by this panel to determine if they will do well - I will talk about this in more detail in my next post.

      Delete
  9. Hey Limpeh,

    I do have a question. Would you be opposed to the idea of tuition if the child him/herself wants the tuition classes?

    I admit that I have benefited from them and wouldn't quite regret it. I missed a year of JC and ended up having to cram two years of science into a year. My teachers willingly gave me remedial lessons but I just couldn't keep up with the standards set by my JC. I was being regarded somewhat as a hopeless case by then. The thing about tuition was that I was able to take it at my pace and I wasn't being thrown at the same hurdles I couldn't overcome. Long story short, I survived my A levels but couldn't cope with the same subject at university. (Yes, I know, might not be a great case here.) The only thing is: I did love those subjects, and I don't regret it. I don't know if you might consider this wishful thinking and a refusal to accept my limitations, but what the tuition did give me was the knowledge I wasn't a hopeless case, and if I paced myself right...

    Well, I was just as capable as any of the kids in the top classes. And that's fine by me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Kasimir,

      Yes I would oppose the idea of the tuition even if the child requests it. I would expect the child to first try to use his own resources to try to understand the curriculum rather than just go to an adult and say, "explain it to me, I don't get it". After all, I don't believe that the syllabus is so freaking complex that it would be impossible for any teenager in Singapore to make sense of what he is taught in the classroom.

      The only difference is the expectations - the child could probably do okay on his own, but the reason why he seeks tuition is because he wants to be amongst the best in the school or even the country. Now I applaud such aspiration and ambition of course, but is tuition the right way to do this? I much prefer to take a long term view on this - I don't think one should get so bogged down on short term goals that you end up losing your long term perspective. A child would gain so much more from learning if he receives little or not spoon feeding via tuition teachers. There must be more to education than passing exams - what about actually learning something useful, like the exercise of working autonomously and training the child to have the discipline to complete tasks like revising for an exam?

      I have noted your story but will not comment on it as I feel it's a very, very long story (as to why you missed a year of JC) and without knowing all the facts, I don't want to jump to any conclusions. Wouldn't be fair, right? But it does sound to me like you are very much focussing on your short term problems rather than looking at the long term perspectives. Tell me man, where do you see yourself 10, 15 years from now? How are you going to get there, to where you wanna be?

      Delete
    2. Dear Limpeh,

      Thank you for your perspective on this. I have specific goals and of course, my weakness in those subjects means I'm going to have to find another route to it. I haven't given up and am still working on them in my spare time. I think, sir, that then I might be approaching this from a slightly different angle than you are.

      For me, I don't even want to look at it in terms of learning something useful, picking up discipline, etc. As far as I am concerned, in those cases, while there could've been better ways than an examination to test for things, my stance is that these things we were learning are inherently valuable. I would struggle and go on to study them for their own sake because I love picking up these kinds of knowledge, even though one can't seem to fit them into the long-term perspective. Maybe I'm taking the whole 'knowledge is valuable' thing too far, but that's just me.

      And thank you for responding. However, do you think tuition is ever possible as a last resort? I understand what you mean by the child using his or her own resources. However, I would also say that yes, at least from my experience, mathematics for instance has been becoming increasingly arcane and bizzare. I recognise the obvious response is that you have to acknowledge you suck at that subject--but I do think that while I can't really come up with a good argument for it yet, other than the fact it isn't optimal, I do have sympathy for cases where students want to do something they're really bad at, perhaps because they do have some kind of interest or passion in it. And while it may be fair to tell them to stop pushing themselves and find something they're better at...I do think it is not necessarily a kindness to the student.

      Delete
    3. Hi there my friend, thanks for your latest reply.

      I believe it is pointless trying to be good at everything when really, we only need to be good at one or two things in order to gain fruitful employment. Some of us have a variety of skills we can count on, some of us have only one - but at the end of the day, as long as what you have is enough to allow you to have a career, then that's all that matters. I may work in finance and even scored 100% for statistics at university - but the only time when I use any mathematics at all is when I check that I am paid the right amount when I invoice my clients. Such is the reality of the situation - the vast majority of what you've learnt at school will be totally irrelevant to your working life, so really, please don't fret too much about certain subjects you can't get your head around. Simply focus on the stuff that you are good at as those are the things which you are going to build your future career around.

      That's what frustrates me about Singaporean education (and parents) - I believe in focussing on one's strengths, playing to one's strengths rather than one's weakness. You achieve so much more when you focus on your strengths rather than bang your head against the wall on something you just can't do (ref: Priya + maths).

      So there you go, rather than bludgeon a student through a subject with tuition, I say the student should give up on that subject altogether and focus on something else s/he is interested in and good at. Trust me, I have forgotten most of what I've learnt at school & university despite being a triple scholar and I've realized how pointless all this education is - it's just a rite of passage to nurture us on our way to adulthood. Never lose sight of your final destination Kasimir. Think about where you wanna be when you are 50 years old.

      Delete
  10. Hi Limpeh,

    This is a very interesting post that's going to the heart of the education problems in Singapore. I wish more Singapore parents would read your post.

    I sorry I have to agree with "Rights Timothy". I only agree with 50% of the post. This is because of my personal experience.

    In primary school, I had a Chinese language teacher who declared to all the young impressionable kids that she has a 100% accuracy who will be scholar and who would end up as a road sweeper later in life. Throughout the whole year she would go on and on about how her favorite pet would achieve all A* at PSLE. (Esp for chinese) While me and a few 'condemned' students would score at most a D. (This she declared as an afterthought)
    Did she spend much time actually teaching chinese? No. half the year was spent praising her pet. So in this case, I would say parents are justified (even required) to be sending their kids to tuition. (When PSLE results came in, I got an A for chinese. The look on her face was priceless. Last I heard, the pet made it to full-time gangster. Not a desirable career path in Singapore.)

    In cases like experienced and very long serving teachers, no point complaining to the principal or MOE. I know from experience. (have met many teachers + senior staff from MOE during my civil service career) There's also cases where the parents are not highly educated and simply do not know how/where to complain to get results.

    In Secondary school, like "Winking doll", I hated A Maths. The most I could achieve for A Maths was 20/100. The teacher in this case was non-existent. He broke his arm during the previous school holidays and took 9 months for the recovery. Relief teachers came and went. But without the responsibility for the subject/class, almost every one just copied the examples in the text book and asked the class to practice solving it on their own. When the "broken arm teacher" came back, his teaching method was to copy all the examples in the text book on the board. If you can't understand/didn't do well, it's because you never practiced enough. I've always wondered why he bothered to come back in the first place. (With his teaching method, we were better off without him)
    Even petitions from the whole class didn't get this joker removed from class. So in this other case, I would also say tuition is justified.

    What I'm trying to point out is that in neighborhood schools, there are vastly more crap teachers than good ones. When parents are cursed with such teachers, it's no wonder they send their kids to tuition.

    If I may be so bold to ask, you mentioned in your earlier post that your family know about your blog. With your constant posting about your parents/nephew wouldn't it strain the relationship with your family? (I know it's none of my business, but I'm very kaypoh.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi E. I'm very sorry to hear about your bad experiences with terrible teachers like that. Yes I've had a few terrible teachers along the way and was pretty much left to fend for myself and I guess I was lucky enough to figure things out from the textbooks. I suppose it was like in sec 1, so it wasn't that difficult I guess. The good schools also had their share of bad teachers then, but I digress.

      As for my family, sure they know how popular my blog is. My parents are not internet literate, my dad doesn't even speak English anyway, so they only know I have a blog which they regard as very controversial. They constantly tell me, 不要骂政府 - and I'm like, no I am far more sophisticated than that, I am a social commentator, not just someone out to criticize the government. In fact, I criticize my own parents far more than the PAP on my blog, but I guess I have a lot of pent up angst about my childhood that I need to let out to a other Singaporeans who will understand my childhood experiences.

      As for my sister (ie. the mother of my nephew) - she is so so so stressed trying to juggle her job and being a mother, she has no time to surf the net at all. My blog isn't thaaaat popular and I am not posting any personal details of my nephew anyway, so I do believe that it is important that we talk about autism to improve public understanding of the subject. I think older people would rather hide disabled people from the public view and pretend they don't exist - but I don't think we should hide autistic people away from the world as if they are some kind of shameful secret.

      I only have one other sister who does read my blog regularly (practically daily) and she loves my writing. She told me that her colleagues at work recommended that she read my blog and she was like, "hahahaha that's my brother's blog lah!" So yeah she's totally cool. And her sweet, generous and kind nature means that she doesn't talk about our childhood much - but I am sure she recognizes everything I have said in my blog posts about our childhood experiences and she is nodding silently in agreement (she's not objected to anything yet), but she's so so different in nature to me. She is the one who grew up in AMK and is still working in AMK and loves AMK whilst I am halfway around the world. I guess given that we're v different people, we reacted v differently to our upbringing. Mind you, she is just as intelligent and capable as I am and has a brilliant career and job in AMK, I guess that's why my parents kinda expected me to follow in her footsteps - ie. "you don't need to leave AMK to find success, look at how well your sister is doing right here in AMK."

      Delete
  11. Hi LIFT,

    I just came across this on Facebook. I think it reflects an issue that many teachers (even those in Singapore) face today. I had a good laugh!

    "Explain these bad grades"
    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151639540830639&set=a.365783180638.200966.79773090638&type=1

    Cheers, WD.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi LIFT, I think you are listing a few good points here though I think one can further expand the issues at hand. I am a foreigner from mainland Europe whose older kid just started the local primary school (I am married to a local Singaporean-Chinese) despite my reluctance as my impression of the local school system is that it resembles a North Korean military camp. Since my company doesn't pay the fees for an international school and since we have a 2nd kid in Kindergarten, the cost of SGD60k per year for such a school is somewhat prohibitory. From my nephew and niece I can see the tuition game in its brightest colours as they have to attend the tuition classes at least 3times a week, mostly on friday nights or on saturday. It doesn't seem to have a great effect from what I can tell but it makes the kids extremely tired and whenever I see them they prefer to play computer games or stare at their handphones in a zombiesh manner. As much as I can I will refuse that my kids take tuition classes or at most on a tactical level to address a certain weakness and strictly limited to a specific time frame.
    I think what is a problem here is that students are not educated to become individual personalities but are pushed through different tollgates which are entirely academic thus all learning focuses on these tollgate events and anything outside the norm is seen as an unwanted distraction. There is no sense that kids can also be successful by doing some different or nique that does not fall into the mainstream (like arts, sports etc.) and it is common perception that only top marks guarantee you a good life and lots of money - which again is crap as lots of money doesn't guarantee any happiness whatsoever and you might still be a huge asshole who isn't particularly happy either. Singapore is certainly expensive but society and school system must allow kids to develop their interests and in some cases turn them into their careers as well. It seems in the current system you cannot gain any achievements if you don't score top marks. The beauty of the European system for example is that even as a student with low academic marks you can still become a very successful business owner, artist, etc. You have lots of options available based on your real skills and then it's more a question of motivation and willingness to push through to get to your goals. This -I think- is lacking here in Singapore where no such opportunities exist (or are accepted by families and society in general). When I look back at my school days I had one classmate who had already repeated classes twice (thus was 2-3 years older than me) and he was still terrible but he had 2 passions - a. he could talk with confidence and b. he loved cars...he became a big shot at Volkswagen eventually (after selling cars initially and thus making his first million before the age of 25). Others with top grades didn't hit a homerun but still found happiness in what they are doing.
    So, I think in addition to your list the fact that Singapore only thinks that money is the decisive factor for the success of a human, causes even greater problems and pressure. There must be opportunities to actually develop and nurture your own personality even if they are outside the norm.
    Ok, getting a bit loh so here...thus will stop now...:P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Baby Bubs. Thanks for your comment. Hypothetical question: would you consider moving back to your home country to give your children a better education if you are really unhappy with the Singaporean education system?

      Delete
    2. Hi again, yes, generally I would...but as you know there are other factors that influence such decisions (my job, proximity of my wife's immediate family members, friends etc.) and...to be honest...in my home country the education has lots of flaws too and in a way favors the other extreme with many schools being way too soft and that way nothing much will be achieved either. Just on the whole I feel kids have more opportunities to express and develop their own personality and find ways to be successful (whichever way you want to define success (fame, money, fun, happiness etc.) - it will depend on their willingness to work hard and their determination anyway. I will probably have no choice but to monitor my kids for 2-3 years and see if they can have a fair balance of homework and play time or if their entire life is determined by tuition and homework and exams in which case I rather bite the bullet and send them to an international school or go back to good old Europe...
      I just feel that with the current system Singapore is missing out a lot on the potential creativity and unique contributions of its people which is almost certainly prevalent somewhere but gets completely suppressed by the craze over tuition and exams and competitiveness among parents and sometimes laziness of the parents to actually spend time and focus on the kids (though in all fairness working in Singapore often means your energy levels at home are pretty low)...Enjoy the Games!!

      Delete
    3. Hi Baby Bubs. Well the system is only half the equation - parenting is the other half so I am sure your children are in great hands whatever country they are in. I do know that UWC in S'pore has a great programme but they're not cheap, oh no.

      Delete
  13. Part 1 of 2

    Hi LIFT,

    I'm sorry I did not notice this post earlier, and your shoutout to me at the end.
    My thanks to Winking Doll for her reference back to her comment here, which thankfully led me to check out this page.

    If it helps, I'd be grateful if I'm reminded in future, in case I'm unaware that a response is reasonably expected from me.
    Thank you all.

    What do I do as a part-time tuition centre teacher about parents' expectations?
    (Un)Fortunately, my way of doing things may be considered atypical of too much that I see over here, so I'm afraid I hardly represent the majority here.

    I don't do exaggerated and outright fake promises.
    In fact, I don't do promises, because I do my best, but it's the student who scores, or flops.
    I honestly share with parents when I appraise their children, my students, but more of the time than not, I get the strong feeling that they're not listening to me, much less really understanding what I'm trying to convey.
    More of the time, their minds are filled with worry over how 'well' their kids can ever do in the system.

    My favourite tuition advertisement is like the very rare one that my old friend recently spotted stuck on a public wall.
    It simply listed the solid experience of the tutor, and what substantial resources s/he would bring to the lessons.
    No over-marketing crap, no enthusiastic salesperson promises.

    I've already commented in a recent Olympics post by LIFT, about how gym coaches quickly appraise a kid's potential for glory (or none).
    I mentioned there that similarly, after teaching English for so long, we can quickly determine whether a student is typically average, struggling to pass, has the potential to do well, and (not yet encountered) is that rare talent.
    Such an existing standard is a combination of (how much) gift there already is in the student, plus how well s/he has trained up till that point in time in secondary school, since (pre-)primary school days.

    We work from that established standard already in the student.
    It's unrealistic for borderline failures to score distinctions overnight, because the amount of hard and smart work required is atypically inhuman, even for the tuition expert.

    Worse, students of potential distinction calibre are too often not hard working enough to attain and sustain that level of excellence — there is the tendency to fritter away at petty cleverness, because language seems to come so easily for them.
    You've heard of the stereotype of 'pretty but no brains', because there's no need to struggle to attract what comes so easily; yes, it applies too to anyone already gifted in an area who feels the lack of personal push, to go beyond what so many others cannot even begin to attain.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Part 2 of 2

    How do I feel, earning from tuition?
    Nope, it's not easy money, and it's still not enough income for our small, young family.
    I don't have any game plan to con any unsuspecting families.
    It's just straightforward hard work, with far less prestige and respectability than a public school teacher.

    The nasty hurts attached to private tuition?
    Students who don't do their due diligence, and then parents blame us for their lacking results.
    Students and parents who suddenly pull out from our training, hitting our income and the gradual steady process of improving at the subject.
    Students who hijack the lesson process by being too playful, noisy, distracted (and almost never handing in work to be assessed).
    AND students who treat us like vending machines: put in the money, press our buttons, take what we deliver, and ignore and forget about the fellow human friends whom we are.

    The good side of private tuition?
    A few former students remain friendly lifelong acquaintances.
    Partnering the students' struggles, growth, learning and satisfaction of having gone through an essential part of their growing up.
    And last but not least, the satisfaction of having autonomy over shaping our lessons, delivering them and controlling our entire productive process.
    This comes together with also having time to live our lives and with our families, the way we really want to.

    I hope this answers more than what LIFT asked, and that most of it is relevant or at least food for thought.
    LIFT, if I've missed out on anything essential, do let me know.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Singapore well developed country and havin lots of options

    ReplyDelete
  16. IMHO, I didn't get any sorts of spoon-feeding, neither I was given any tuition as my dysfunctional family is always facing financial issues. But I managed to see and support myself all the way from Secondary to University, and obtained a Biomedical degree from UWA. Hey, it's not easy studying Science, plus my major consists a large aspect of medicine and biochemistry component. There's a lot of memorizing work to be done given the various scientific/medical terms are just complete alien to me. Not here to brag as my results are not fantastic, a price I paid to obtain a degree. I'd have to sacrifice my study time to earn the money to cover my daily expenses, textbooks and school/tuition fees, deprive my sleep to study whenever I could despite of my dysfunctional environment. I started working part-time once I hit the legal age of 14 and I was only earning $2.50/hr at a fast food restaurant. Imagine how many hours I'd have to clock in to earn a few hundred of dollars to buy my yearly textbooks. As my results falls within merit range, I managed to apply for bursary and able to offset large part of my education cost. Perhaps this is something the government has done me good. But it was never enough, especially when I'd need to pay the stupid few hundred dollars for my GCE 'O' level exams. It's even tougher when I wanted to see myself through Poly, in hope with a diploma it's the fastest track to get myself into the workforce earning a decent salary and get away from this kind of hellish life. My Poly life wasn't easy, struggling and juggling to earn a living plus studying was indeed the most torturing moment of my life. I sacrificed a lot and been through a hell lot of shit in hope life will be better once I graduated. In return, I wasn't able to obtain good grades to get any sorts of scholarship. And I only failed one subject, the rest I pass with good C grades. As I reached my 3rd year when I was about to graduate, I started to see myself unable to get a job. All thanks to the government, creating a smokescreen for me to believe that going into Science is good. I was stupid enough to buy in this shit. WTF moment! Well, still in hope since the government is developing this area. I ended up doing a degree, a part-time offshore programme with UWA in Singapore. Another hellish 3.5yrs. But this time round I'm able to get a lab job with Johns Hopkins Singapore. I love the American way and finally I started to see myself progressing. I had a good Australian boss who taught me everything under the sky in how to become a Scientist. She treated me with respect and I was the most respectful lab tech in her lab, overseeing post-docs, phDs and interns. I'm the lab tech who has a say, unlike those pathetic A*star lab where lab techs are hired to wash test tubes and do procurement. Then the government decided to shut down Hopkins. Another WTF moment! I wish for parents who can take care of the money and well-being aspect of me so that I can devote the time to study well and get good grades to become a scholar (in my dreams) which I believe I could. Unfortunately, I can't choose my parents. As such is life, it's never fair. Think I may have digress, but hell. It's a good rant! Thanks for listening.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I completely agree to this. I have a younger brother who only has Chinese tuition. But he topped his entire class when almost all of them have tuition and even the last class had students whose parents put them through tuition, and went to those "better classes" in primary school. Not to mention those who studies hard but still didn't do well.

    As for me, the moment I went on to secondary school it completely ended. I was left to my own devices, which on the way I realised a lot about myself and the strengths and weaknesses. And what was most definitely out when I am looking for work. As for the situation about having crappy teachers in normal secondary school, it depends. I don't know if I was lucky or what but some of the teachers I got were good that I could do decently well even without the need for tuition. Some were fantastic like the teacher who taught me A Maths, he did dedicate a lot of his time for most of his students. And even then, it was up to the student's choice to turn up. So, tution was never a necessity. I even had a friend who has both English and Chinese tuition, for his O levels, he sought help from his own teacher who did give him far better advice and help that he needed than his tution teacher ever did.

    ReplyDelete